Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
China Privacy Technology

Frustration Grows In China As Face Masks Compromise Facial Recognition (qz.com) 81

schwit1 shares a report from Quartz: Face masks are mandatory in at least two provinces in China, including the city of Wuhan. In an effort to contain the coronavirus strain that has caused nearly 500 deaths, the government is insisting that millions of residents wear protective face covering when they go out in public. As millions don masks across the country, the Chinese are discovering an unexpected consequence to covering their faces. It turns out that face masks trip up facial recognition-based functions, a technology necessary for many routine transactions in China. Suddenly, certain mobile phones, condominium doors, and bank accounts won't unlock with a glance.

Complaints are plentiful in the popular Chinese blogging platform Weibo, reports Abacus, the Hong Kong-based technology news outlet. "[I've] been wearing a mask everyday recently and I just want to throw away this phone with face unlock," laments one user. "Fingerprint payment is still better," writes another. "All I want is to pay and quickly run." [...] Biometrics, including facial recognition, are essential to daily life in China, on a scale beyond other nations. It's used to do everything from ordering fast food meals to scheduling medical appointments to boarding a plane in more than 200 airports across the country. Facial recognition is even used in restrooms to prevent an occupant from taking too much toilet paper. And beyond quotidian transactions, the technology is a linchpin in the Chinese government's scheme to police its 1.4 billion citizens.
In other facial recognition news, the European parliament said it has no plans to introduce the tech following an outcry in response to a leaked security memo discussing its use.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Frustration Grows In China As Face Masks Compromise Facial Recognition

Comments Filter:
  • by ShanghaiBill ( 739463 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @09:35PM (#59700030)

    I don't know if anyone has already thought of this, but when facial recognition is needed for identification or to access a service, perhaps the facemask could be pulled off the nose and mouth for a few seconds until the face is recognized.

    I will refrain from patenting this idea and altruistically make it available for all to use as a gift to the world.

    • by Gay Boner Sex ( 5003585 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @09:38PM (#59700044)
      Great idea, but that doesn't jive with the Chinese form of mass surveillance. A camera in every face and a mike on every mouth!
    • by olsmeister ( 1488789 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @09:43PM (#59700060)
      I'd just go with clear facemasks made from cellophane.
      • I'd just go with clear facemasks made from cellophane.

        Will you also make this idea free to all, for the benefit of human civilization?

        I will make my contribution free to all. I suggest a plastic bubble encasing the head, like those on space suits and diving suits from TV shows, movies, and cartoons out of the 1960s.

        • by CaffeinatedBacon ( 5363221 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @04:30AM (#59700738)

          I'd just go with clear facemasks made from cellophane.

          Will you also make this idea free to all, for the benefit of human civilization?

          I will make my contribution free to all. I suggest a plastic bubble encasing the head, like those on space suits and diving suits from TV shows, movies, and cartoons out of the 1960s.

          I tried patenting tattooing ID numbers on the forehead so as to not be obscured by the mask. But was told there is already prior art...

    • by rtb61 ( 674572 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @10:56PM (#59700246) Homepage

      Something interesting is happening though. Lots of people do not realise it yet but everyone is slowly becoming more accustomed to face masks. There will be quite a few who are happy with this, the making of wearing face masks more publicly accessible. The pseudo celebrity set and politicians, they can put on a face mask and walk the streets free from facial recognition technology. A whole lot of privacy inclined people will start to look on this as an ideal opportunity to push normal social bounds and wear face mask when ever they want to be private out in public.

      All of you need to sit back and think, would you wear a face mask to protect you public privacy 'er' your health. Facial recognition is getting much cheaper thanks to a new method and you could have it on your phone, set to recognise public figures to keep a public eye on them 24/7 corruption will become very difficult sans face mask.

      How long before face masks as a fashion item?

    • by spire3661 ( 1038968 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @11:59PM (#59700378) Journal
      Congrats, you just made a massive infection vector. Do you think before you post? Having everyone removing their mask for the scanner is a recipe for disaster.
      • by NagrothAgain ( 4130865 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @02:17AM (#59700584)
        About the only thing those masks do is cut down on how much spittle flies around when you cough and sneeze. For an actual airborne disease they have little to no effect. If you're trying to reduce transmission, then making everyone wear gloves would be a lot more effective.
        • by hankwang ( 413283 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @04:20AM (#59700730) Homepage

          making everyone wear gloves would be a lot more effective.

          Coronavirus enters the body through mucous membranes in the nose and lungs.Not through the skin. A major path is due to fingers touching a contaminated surface, and then touching the face close to the nose or eyes. Gloves would not make any difference.

          Masks reduce contamination of surfaces by asymptomatic infected people, prevent the wearer from touching their face, and reduce the probability of breathing in airborne droplets by a factor three or so. For a disease with estimated R0=3, a factor three reduction in infection risk can make the difference between an epidemic dying out or growing exponentially.

          • by orlanz ( 882574 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @11:32AM (#59701486)

            Your first point is correct and is the biggest benefit. But your second is not. Facemasks like those worn by the general population & doctors in surgery do not stop the little contaminated droplets. So if someone in your area coughs, yeah you still get plenty to get infected, even if both are wearing the mask. If you aren't actually having to suck air through that mask, it isn't doing enough.

            But still, the first benefit is well worth it. Even if you consider that over the day, you are probably creating a nice humid home for various bacteria to reproduce in. And that you are constantly breathing them in giving your immune system a small but constant workout.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 07, 2020 @12:18AM (#59700434)

      I don't know if anyone has already thought of this, but when facial recognition is needed for identification or to access a service, perhaps the government and/or corporation wanting those biometrics are being too nosy and should be fought against tooth and nail.

    • by Joe Tie. ( 567096 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @12:59AM (#59700508)
      A face mask, as opposed to full respirator, is already pretty bad at blocking viral infections. Putting one's fingers on the mask without washing them beforehand is going to make it even worse. It's pretty easy for an infectious agent to go from sick person to environment. From environment to someone's finger. From finger to outer edge of mask. And from outer edge of mask directly into one's respiratory system. Someone taking the mask off every time they need to use their phone might as well not be wearing one in the first place.
      • A face mask, as opposed to full respirator, is already pretty bad at blocking viral infections. Putting one's fingers on the mask without washing them beforehand is going to make it even worse. It's pretty easy for an infectious agent to go from sick person to environment. From environment to someone's finger. From finger to outer edge of mask. And from outer edge of mask directly into one's respiratory system. Someone taking the mask off every time they need to use their phone might as well not be wearing one in the first place.

        A surgical mask isn't to protect the wearer from what's around them, it's the other way around. Surgical masks are positively lousy at filtering out stuff because they aren't fitted to your face.

        They are instead as you say, spittle catchers. Airborne infections aren't airborne as carried through air currents - they ride the fine mist you eject when you cough and sneeze. The finer the mist, the longer it stays before gravity takes hold. The average hang time can vary - from mere minutes to half and hour, to a couple of hours. The surgical mask you see sick people wear help keep most of your cough and sneeze and spittle out of the air. That's why sick people wear them - to avoid spreading it around, not to protect them from everyone else.

        It's why you cough into your elbows now - your elbows catch most of it, and you don't want to cough into your hands because then you're just going to touch everything else with your newly infected hands.

        So surgical masks are fine to take off as long as they're changed with a fresh one - you're keeping the rest of the world from getting your germs. But respirators are only to be removed when in a clean area to avoid getting contamination in. That's also why they're fitted to the user so they make a good seal, whereas the surgical mask doesn't require a full seal.

        Respirators are the opposite - the N95 and others keep the nasty stuff out of you. So as a healthy person, you should wear those. However if you break the seal, then you can get the diseases you were filtering out into the mask thus nullifying the protection.

        Funny thing is for me, I can wear a respirator, but not a surgical mask. I was in the hospital and when I was moved they put a mask on me as a precaution and I hated it - the surgical mask doesn't let me exhale out that well so I just got hot and bothered. But I can wear a respirator all day just fine - full face or half face (never did the N95 ones). Sure they can get clammy after a little while but I'm fine with that. Full faces are nice in that you can generally speak easier and be understood and heard better because they have a speaking diaphragm, whereas the half face you have to shout because it muffles your voice significantly. That gets annoying.

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @07:59AM (#59700938) Homepage Journal

      In China people pay for everything with their phone. Many of them are constantly checking their phones for messages too, just like in the west. So having to lift your mask every time quickly gets annoying.

      These are cheap masks, they need adjustment every time you lift them. If you wear glasses it's even more annoying because you need to kind of mould the mask around your nose or your breathing fogs them up.

    • by sjames ( 1099 ) on Saturday February 08, 2020 @05:03PM (#59705706) Homepage Journal

      And thus you transfer the germs the mask kept from spreading to the rest of the population to your hands and then to the buttons on the ATM. I doubt very much that the ATMs have a scrub nurse on standby.

  • by aeropage ( 6536406 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @09:44PM (#59700066)
    Six is having problems
    Adjusting to his clone status


    --An Atypical Theist
  • Make it fashionable (and then — mandatory) for the masks to carry personal ID-numbers.

    Consumers world-wide are already accustomed to license-plates on their vehicles, and there is no argument in support of those being mandatory, which would not also apply to mandating similar implements on their persons.

    The IDs would be government-issued — for some period of time, which a citizen in good standing would have no problem extending, of course.

  • by MrKaos ( 858439 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @10:05PM (#59700126) Journal

    What about a stocking over the entire head, it's not as if there is a law against it - yet.

  • by bogaboga ( 793279 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @10:07PM (#59700130)

    ...Biometrics, including facial recognition, are essential to daily life in China, on a scale beyond other nations. It's used to do everything from ordering fast food meals to scheduling medical appointments to boarding a plane in more than 200 airports across the country...

    I am waiting to hear folks here scream..."Our IP!"..."Our tech!"

    Heck, if the quoted statement is true, then I think the Chinese are more advanced than many western countries. One "super power" I know (in its busiest subway located in one of the world's financial hubs), still runs trains from the late 60s today; a far cry when compared to some of the transportation technology available to the Chinese.

  • by b0s0z0ku ( 752509 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @10:12PM (#59700140)
    Hopefully this will be the start of the slow, painful death of the Chinese surveillance state.
  • by ikhider ( 2837593 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @10:13PM (#59700142)
    Then then problem with government in China is SOLVED! Heck, we should do this for all governments.
  • by dcw3 ( 649211 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @10:16PM (#59700152) Journal
  • by TheGratefulNet ( 143330 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @10:20PM (#59700154)

    wait, what? what was that part, again?

    are you seriously saying that there are devices in the restrooms that take your photo?

    if this is true, I think I've just decided never to travel to china, business or otherwise.

  • by SlashDotCanSuckMy777 ( 6182618 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @10:45PM (#59700210)

    Oh well. Too bad. Suck it up commies.

  • by Koutarou ( 38114 ) on Thursday February 06, 2020 @10:49PM (#59700220)

    I just had my first brush with this issue today. To make matters worse, my Huawei phone (supplied by my company for testing, not my first choice) doesn't work with touch gloves like all my previous phones did and ended up having to take them off in the bitter cold.

  • by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @12:23AM (#59700446)

    "[I've] been wearing a mask everyday recently and I just want to throw away this phone with face unlock," laments one user.

    Turn face unlock the fuck off and use a PIN. Problem solved w/o getting a new phone. I mean, *seriously*.

  • by AHuxley ( 892839 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @12:35AM (#59700466) Journal
    Some fictional movie advice:
    Are you listening?
    Gait.
    There's a great future in selling Communist China gait related software.

    Play back all the last stetted and working clips with a good ID.
    Learn the gait. Match the gait to people in a mask.
    Some good sales/rent for a US team with the software skills..
  • by bistromath007 ( 1253428 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @01:08AM (#59700518)

    If you need to unlock everything with your face, how did anyone log on to complain about it? Somebody's cheating!

  • by Barny ( 103770 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @03:56AM (#59700714) Journal

    Your link pointing to "face masks trip up facial recognition-based functions" goes to https://techcrunch.com/2020/02... [techcrunch.com] instead.

    That link is from the previous story. Goes to show how many people read TFA that I'm the first to report it...

  • by nospam007 ( 722110 ) * on Friday February 07, 2020 @07:12AM (#59700882)

    How about the state?

    Now you can use as much toilet paper as you like to wipe your ass instead of getting a bad rap in the social evaluation score.
    Even if you have to use your thumb to open your phone on the crapper.
    What's not to like?

  • by sad_ ( 7868 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @07:42AM (#59700916) Homepage

    how can this even possibly work securely?
    everybody knows all chinese look alike!

  • by AndyKron ( 937105 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @08:24AM (#59700972)
    Fuck the Chinese government.
  • Custom face masks (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Foundryman ( 306698 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @09:12AM (#59701042)

    Sounds like an opportunity for some entrepreneur to start a company that sells face masks with your lower face printed on it.

  • by spinitch ( 1033676 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @11:11AM (#59701372)
    1 flu over the cuckoos nest. Strange days indeed. Kesey did not believe that these patients were insane, but rather that society had pushed them out because they did not fit the conventional ideas of how people were supposed to act and behave. ...
  • by Daralantan ( 5305713 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @11:23AM (#59701430)
    Read the article that was linked there. At first I thought it was pretty hilarious, but it sounds like people in China were stealing entire backpacks worth of toilet paper from some religious temple. Which is still funny. However here were some fun parts from the article:

    Those seeking relief must first stare into a computer attached to the machine for three seconds. It records their image before spitting out a two-foot long sheet of tissue paper.

    -

    The computer won’t dispense a second round of paper to the same person for nine — potentially excruciating — minutes.

    And then the past of pooping in China....

    As Peter S. Goodman wrote for The Post in 2005 of China’s public bathrooms:

    In a public toilet — be it at the park, on a main thoroughfare, at the airport or in a train station — the air is often so foul that you limit your breathing. The smell wafts out into the surrounding neighborhood. You keep your eyes turned upward, to avoid fixing on the squalid floor. Most toilets have no toilet paper. Many lack running water. Everywhere, flushing seems optional. People with major business to attend to must typically execute it in full view of everyone else over a big gulley without privacy walls. Sit-down toilets? Rare.

    Followed by the great future!

    That’s why the country announced a “toilet revolution” in 2015, a plan to bring both its facilities and the general etiquette of their patrons up to “the standards of the international traveler.”

    More than 12.5 billion yuan ($1.9 billion) was expected to be spent constructing tens of thousands of new public toilets and renovating older ones to include not just “Western-style toilets and deodorization technology” but also potentially big screen televisions, ATMs, WiFi and sofas.

    -

    authorities planned to dole out punishments — such as blacklisting locals from certain facilities — for poor lavatory decorum.

  • by Chas ( 5144 ) on Friday February 07, 2020 @02:46PM (#59702218) Homepage Journal

    I hope the Chinese make it through this.

    But I could cheerfully drop their government, screaming, into a volcano.

"Just Say No." - Nancy Reagan "No." - Ronald Reagan

Working...