Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Privacy Technology

Google Now Allows Users To Auto-Delete Their Location History (blog.google) 87

Google today began rolling out location history deletion tools to Android and iOS, giving users a relatively simple way to limit the scope of Google's location tracking. Users can only choose between deleting data after three or 18 months. In a blog post, Google wrote: Choose a time limit for how long you want your activity data to be saved -- 3 or 18 months -- and any data older than that will be automatically deleted from your account on an ongoing basis. These controls are coming first to Location History and Web & App Activity and will roll out in the coming weeks.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Now Allows Users To Auto-Delete Their Location History

Comments Filter:
  • "Deleted" (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @01:09PM (#58829466)

    Deleted from your account does not mean it is deleted from everywhere....

    • Stale old data is probably worthless anyway.

      • If the data was analyzed and any "metadata" saved forever, deleting the data is effectively irrelevant.

    • by dbialac ( 320955 )

      This is all just smoke and mirrors anyway. Many of the places you go, you'll have been in the last 3 days, so it's still valuable tracking for them.

    • Re:"Deleted" (Score:4, Interesting)

      by swillden ( 191260 ) <shawn-ds@willden.org> on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @06:09PM (#58831318) Journal

      Deleted from your account does not mean it is deleted from everywhere....

      Yes, it does.

      Both because to tell you it was being deleted and then not delete it would almost certainly be a violation of the FTC consent decree, and because I know people on the takeout/deletion team and they're fanatical about this stuff... it will be gone for good.

      My guess (and this is only a guess, but it's an educated one) is that since Google always encrypts all user data at rest, they've probably set up a system of rolling encryption keys, so when it's time to delete the data they don't actually have to go wipe backups, etc., just delete the keys.

      • Deleted (weasle word 1) doesn't mean deleted (weasle word 2).
        Say, Google said they deleted it and they did. After sharing the data with another Alphabet unit of course, who will be keeping it.
  • Don't collect it in the first place!!

    Don't offer false choices which disallows any private location use without Google getting a copy.

    Don't transmit location data to Google even when you explicitly disable it.

    I will assume deletion "from your account" != "from Google's servers"

    • by es330td ( 964170 )

      Don't transmit location data to Google even when you explicitly disable it.

      As much as I would like to do this, I live in Houston and drive with Google maps on at all times. I have lost track of the number of times it has re-routed me around an accident or other congestion delay and saved 45 minutes or more of drive time. It kind of needs my location for that to work.

      • by 93 Escort Wagon ( 326346 ) on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @01:25PM (#58829600)

        I have lost track of the number of times it has re-routed me around an accident or other congestion delay and saved 45 minutes or more of drive time. It kind of needs my location for that to work.

        It needs your current location to do this. It doesn't need your location history, which is what we're talking about.

        I wonder if there's a hack to this new setting which would let us set the time period at one day - or one hour?

        • Yes for accidents it needs current location data. For longer trips Google uses historically aggregated data to route you around suspected areas which may end up with traffic by the time you get there. It also uses this to make traffic predictions for if you need to select a future leave / arrive time.

          Google also uses historical data in it's reasoning of whether to divert you off the current route. I.e. It won't route your along a route that is suspects will get busy (usually due to every idiot taking it whe

          • by dgatwood ( 11270 )

            Also, if you've ever gotten into your car and glanced at your iPhone and seen predictions about where it thinks you're about to go and what route to take, that's based on your location history, too. (Admittedly, AFAIK, Apple is dong that, not Google, but you get the point.)

        • I have lost track of the number of times it has re-routed me around an accident or other congestion delay and saved 45 minutes or more of drive time. It kind of needs my location for that to work.

          It needs your current location to do this. It doesn't need your location history, which is what we're talking about.

          I wonder if there's a hack to this new setting which would let us set the time period at one day - or one hour?

          That already exists: Just disable location history. This is separate from disabling location services, for exactly this reason. (Recall that people getting confused because these are separate settings caused a hullabaloo a few months ago when some reporter realized that turning off location history only turned off history, not all location services.)

      • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @01:32PM (#58829642)

        It kind of needs my location for that to work.

        It most certainly does not!

        Your local device needs your location for that to work, but Google absolutely does not. They could simply send the locations of major congestions without knowing where you are, and allow all the routing to take place on your local device with that knowledge. It is not an unreasonable amount of data to transmit for a whole area.

        We have fallen into the trap of believing that we must give all our data to ginormous ad agencies for our devices to do anything at all. We have lurched from monetization to monetization without a thought for our privacy.

        • by Anonymous Coward

          It kind of needs my location for that to work.

          It most certainly does not!

          Your local device needs your location for that to work, but Google absolutely does not. They could simply send the locations of major congestions without knowing where you are, and allow all the routing to take place on your local device with that knowledge. It is not an unreasonable amount of data to transmit for a whole area.

          Given no location info, google would have to send you locations of major congestions worldwide... think that through for a second

        • Google used to do this. It resulted in you taking a worse path as traffic quickly built in those other areas you were routed through. People started complaining when Google stopped routing them around traffic issues, but the reality is historical data is very valuable in making a decision about the current traffic conditions.

          Do I take the side street, or does it always get messed up when the main road does?
          Do I take the other highway or will I just hit a building peak hour jam that will occur when I get to

  • ... how long before mobile phone companies get around to making it available to their customers? My phone hasn't seen an Android upgrade since last August---and that was to 8.0.0.

  • by sinij ( 911942 ) on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @01:44PM (#58829728)
    In related news, Google now promises to kick your dog only on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

    It boggles my mind that we are not scandalized by such violation of privacy. We should be demanding politicians dismantle Google and bury all of it at sea in a lead-lined barrels. Imagine how harmful such prevasive tracking would be in hands of Stasi or Soviet Politburo. There would be a whole lot more dead people and many awful regimes would still be standing.
    • What violation of privacy? Google explicitly tells you it's collecting the information and explicitly gives you the opt out when you first start your phone. Hell right now Google sends out emails with information it knows about your history. Including how many hours you walked, ran, drove, or whatnot, how many new unique places you visited, this month, etc.

      Equating them to the Stasi shows either incredibly ignorance or a complete breakdown of mental function. Pull yourself together man.

    • It boggles my mind that we are not scandalized by such violation of privacy.

      What violation of privacy? If you don't want location history to be kept, just turn it off. You had to turn it on in the first place. The new thing here is just a feature that lets you leave it on, but have it automatically go away after a while.

      Personally, I really like location history. My Google Maps timeline has an almost complete record of everywhere I've been for the last 5+ years, which I've found useful many, many times. It's "almost" complete because a couple of times I got a new phone and f

    • I had to think about it for several days before I reluctantly agreed to let Google track my location on my phone. I use Google maps *a lot* to avoid traffic. The service is made possible by people in cars giving their location (and speed) to Google via their phones. While it's possible to use the service with your location tracking off, doing so means you're essentially leeching off the system without contributing anything to it. Like someone who knows blood will be readily available for them at a hospi
  • by WillAffleckUW ( 858324 ) on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @01:50PM (#58829756) Homepage Journal

    The location metadata is still illegally stored on the G databases, and is subject to court orders.

    Now, if you used Firefox as your browser, and turned off certain things ...

    • Citation required. I mean if it is what you're saying that Google is opening themselves to be royally fucked by the EU privacy laws.

      So, present evidence of your claim that the company is breaking the law.

      • Or we can just wait for the inevitable lawsuit that I'm not allowed to tell you the details about, the one they'll lose too.

        Look, we've all seen the corrective actions to date.

        • I know, Google's CEO murdered someone in the street the other day. The only evidence I will present you with is: "They've broken a law before, and the phrase 'wait and see'"

          I hope you realise how stupid my comment is and use it as a self reflection exercise on the "evidence" you just presented.

    • The location metadata is still illegally stored on the G databases, and is subject to court orders.

      Cite? I strongly, strongly doubt that this is true. Google would have to be incredibly stupid to store user information illegally, particularly while under an FTC consent decree that lets the FTC come in and regularly audit stuff. Plus it would be extremely out of character for Google employees. I guarantee that if someone discovered internally that that sort of thing was happening and the response were anything but "Fix it right now", the result would be a howl of internal complaints and discussions...

  • by PineHall ( 206441 ) on Wednesday June 26, 2019 @01:55PM (#58829784)
    The way I see it, Google has decided that they can save some money by saving some space, and that 3 months of data will get just about all the relevant data they need from you. And at 18 months they have all relevant data, confirmed and verified. Beyond 18 months of data, it is not worth it for them to save the data. That is what I think they must be thinking.
    • Of course. Think of what is required for location services: Any data older than 3 months could be suspect. Businesses change, traffic changes, roads change, etc. So why the 18 months? Well from a subset of people you still want seasonal data to help your algorithms along. While I don't see any evidence of seasonally adjusted data in Google results it stands to reason that Google may know in the coming month traffic in my country will be lower than the past few as people take off on vacation and there's a po

    • The way I see it, Google has decided that they can save some money by saving some space, and that 3 months of data will get just about all the relevant data they need from you.

      Nah. Storage is very, very cheap. Especially the way Google does it, with tiers of different access speeds. Deleting data is more expensive than keeping it.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    For just toggling that horseshit off, and only enabling it on a minimum when needed, as needed. Otherwise off. Disable JavaScript. Use duckduckgo. Pollute the datastream with false data, etc, etc., etc.
    These are the new ways to protect your privacy. Not some fucking 'tools' from some fucking company.

  • When will Google let me delete the WiFi passwords it's remembered/sync'd from various devices, apps, setup processes (Google Home), etc.?

    Google seems to pretend this isn't a thing.

  • I can control my location history well enough. i turn it on for me and those who want it, I turn it off for those who don't want it. But what I really need is the ability to have a rolling history for email. I get my Woot newsletters and BestBuy and Amazon newsletter emails and I DO want them. I just don't need any newsletter email older than say a month. It would simplify my life if I could just set email to delete every Amazon newsletter older than a month unless it was starred or something. It's my dream
  • i doubt they really delete it. probably sets "show_to_user" to 0 for that data row >_>
    • Of course they delete it.

      Meanwhile the NSA says it doesn't need to do its own warrantless domestic spying any longer.

      Sorry, but an NSL doesn't allow for elaboration.

  • Like farts in a hurricane.
    Sure, Mr Google, I trust you!

Hotels are tired of getting ripped off. I checked into a hotel and they had towels from my house. -- Mark Guido

Working...