Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Government The Almighty Buck United States Technology

Amazon Lobbied More Government Entities Than Any Other Public US Company Last Year (fortune.com) 41

Amazon lobbied more government entities last year than any other public U.S. company, covering issues like healthcare, transportation, defense, and labor regulation. "Across 2018, Amazon contacted 40 different federal entities on 21 different general issue areas," reports Fortune, citing a report from Axios. "The only tech giant to lobby on more issues than Amazon was Google's Alphabet." From the report: In terms of money spent, Amazon's $14.4 million is topped only by Alphabet's $21 million, says Bloomberg. While the tech industry overall spent less than half of the $280 million from pharmaceutical and healthcare products companies in Washington, Amazon has increased spending 460% since 2012, growing quickly within its trade. According to Axios, Amazon lobbied on self-driving car and drone issues, hinting at new methods of delivery. It supported a law allowing pharmacists to tell patients when using their insurance is actually more expensive, aiding Amazon's new investment in PillPack. It also covered the labeling of bioengineered food and a pilot program allowing online shoppers to use the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program -- signs of Amazon's emerging grocery business.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Amazon Lobbied More Government Entities Than Any Other Public US Company Last Year

Comments Filter:
  • Why is this front page news... an also-ran in terms of money spent for influence winds up here? The opening statement shows that Alphabet is already spending more... and Big Pharma makes both of them look like junior varsity.

    Quote: "The only tech giant to lobby on more issues than Amazon was Google's Alphabet."

    So we're now covering the first loser as news?

  • Lobbying, at its most basic, is peddling monetary influence in exchange for political influence.

    All these target markets for influence, and nothing for Bleecker Street. The saddest part of it all is the American President out-thought you there.

    • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

      The saddest part of it all is the American President out-thought you there.

      Which one? Oh, and every member of Congress too?

  • Shame on you, GOP judges.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    news at 11

  • by SvnLyrBrto ( 62138 ) on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @08:15PM (#58270106)

    Tech companies engaged in hardly any lobbying back in the '90s during that tech boom. And we got screwed because of it. Established industry players, with long histories of LOTS of lobbying bought laws like the DMCA, for example. How many tech companies were wiped out by that one abuse alone? I had friends at Napster, and at two other Napster-like companies, that were put out of work by the RIAA/Metallica lobby. And the demise of one of the companies I worked for was hastened by being forced to waste engineering time and effort, and waste money to bring a lawyer onto the payroll; to deal with DMCA BS. And some of you will recall that 2001 was a BAD time for your employer to be going under.

    And that's just one of a number of laws that those entrenched interests bought that have adversely... sometimes grievously... affected tech. Yeah, it's a dirty game and it would be nice for it to go away entirely. But as long as scum like the RIAA/Metallica play it; tech really has no choice now. Bringing a knife to a gun fight seldom works out.

  • by Solandri ( 704621 ) on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @08:52PM (#58270246)
    Amazon lobbieslots of government branches because they do business in basically every jurisdiction in the U.S. in multiple industries. If you look at raw number of dollars spent lobbying [opensecrets.org], Amazon doesn't even make the top 10.
  • What do USA /.'s think of socialised medicine?
    Every other developed western country has a public health care system that will fix most issues for free, (chronic issues with a wait), and overlay that with a private system secondary to the public system.

    You pay twice as much as everyone else for health care. People are regularly bankrupted. You still have major out of pocket expenses.
    So do you think the USA needs tax funded public primary health care?
    And if so, whats is preventing the change?

    • The fantastically large prices paid by Americans subsidize medical advances that benefit the rest of the world. To "fix" this problem would mean bringing healthcare advancement to a halt. Are you sure that's what you want?

      People are regularly bankrupted.

      Normal people have good health insurance. The only people who get bankrupted are the deplorables. Are you really going to stand up for them? Seriously?

  • Lobbying is evil. Oh, they gave me "free" 2-day shipping? What was I saying?"
  • I thought I saw where they didn't have to pay any federal taxes last year?!

"It might help if we ran the MBA's out of Washington." -- Admiral Grace Hopper

Working...