Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Facebook Privacy Technology

Facebook Gave More Than 150 Companies, Including Microsoft, Netflix, Spotify, Amazon and Yahoo, Unprecedented Access To Users' Personal Data: NYT (buzzfeednews.com) 114

The New York Times obtained hundreds of pages of Facebook documents which were generated in 2017 that show that the social network considered these companies business partners and effectively exempted them from its privacy rules. From a report: Facebook allowed Microsoft's search engine Bing to see the names of nearly all users' friends without their consent, let Spotify, Netflix, and the Royal Bank of Canada read, write, and delete users' private messages, and see participants on a thread, allowed Amazon to get users' names and contact information through their friends, and let Yahoo view streams of friends' posts "as recently as this summer" despite publicly claiming it had stopped sharing such information a year ago, the report said. Collectively, applications made by these technology companies sought the data of hundreds of millions of people a month.

The records also show that Russian search giant Yandex, which was accused last year by Ukraine's security service for giving user data to Kremlin, also had access to Facebook's unique user IDs in 2017. A Yandex spokeswoman told the Times that the company was unaware of the access to user data provided by Facebook. Yandex did not immediately respond to BuzzFeed News' request for comment. In response to the report, Steve Satterfield, Facebook's Director of Privacy and Public Policy defended the actions of the social network.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Facebook Gave More Than 150 Companies, Including Microsoft, Netflix, Spotify, Amazon and Yahoo, Unprecedented Access To Users' P

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Of course they did. If you put anything on Facebook you better be ok with everyone seeing it eventually.

  • by SuperKendall ( 25149 ) on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @11:14PM (#57828464)

    I was wondering why Netflix started to bring up a video category "Shows for People Who Wear Blue Underwear on Fridays".

  • Zuck sucks....

    ad $ $,$$$,$$$,000,000
    • Zuck sucks

      Difficulty to manage at a young age. He might not be that bad, but with that high level of responsibilities and that low level of experience he is more prone to other people influence, people who care more about blind profit (they're paid by the company) than ideas and ethics (more the CEO side).

  • by SensitiveMale ( 155605 ) on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @11:30PM (#57828498)

    That's why people who know what Facebook does couldn't believe the uproar over the Cambridge Analytics "scandal." Selling user data is what facebook does.

    Well, they sometimes sell and they sometimes give it away as they did when they learned Obama's team sucked "the whole social graph." Not only didn't they stop Obama's team, they actively helped them afterward.

    Yeah, this'll be modded down, but it's all true.

    • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @01:55AM (#57828750)

      "...and the Royal Bank of Canada read, write, and delete users' private messages..."

      That's the problem. These companies have more administration rights over your profile than the owner does.

      If you don't want to be dragged into courts by the techno-police you'd better not be writing about bombs and stuff on your Facebook feed. This is basically saying that these companies can write whatever they want into your IMs. The potential for abuse is quite staggering.

      In any other jurisdiction this is called wiretapping, and it's expressly illegal.

      Don't use Facebook. Get off of Facebook. These companies are pure scum out for profit above even human decency.

  • The Business model (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Arzaboa ( 2804779 ) on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @11:30PM (#57828502)

    Someone had to be sharing that data. How else is every service so perfectly in sync? These stories about Facebook handing out data, collecting data, and correlating data are simply stories about how Facebook operates.

    --
    If men were angels, no government would be necessary. - James Madison

  • Everything makes sense when you see them for what they actually are.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    That's like, a trademark of quality, man. Nothing beats integrity and professionalizm of the Ukrainian security services.

  • Just shows... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by msauve ( 701917 ) on Tuesday December 18, 2018 @11:59PM (#57828546)
    "more than 150 companies..."

    And the Goog isn't listed. Which only means Google knows more about you than the bookface, and so wouldn't gain anything from their data.
  • has to go full ads.
    Whats paying for the services offered? Ads and the way the users interact.
    • by MrKaos ( 858439 )

      Whats paying for the services offered? Ads and the way the users interact.

      Users are the product and the ads are the service they offer to their customers.

    • by raymorris ( 2726007 ) on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @01:55AM (#57828748) Journal

      Showing ads doesn't require giving Microsoft data dumps of all the users' data. In fact, that's counter-productive to selling ads to Microsoft. Facebook could:

      A) get Microsoft to pay every month to have Facebook run ads using the profile data that only Facebook has

      B) Get one payment from Microsoft and hand over the data, the golden goose, allowing Microsoft to run and target their own ads without Facebook

      It seems Facebook chose option B.

      Google does option A. Google collects as much information as they can from you, because it's very valuable to them in order to be able to target ads for their customers. The data they have on users is their biggest asset, so they guard it. They don't hand out data dumps to competitors, as Facebook has been doing, and as many marketers used to do before Google took over the industry by keeping the valuable data in-house, secret.

      • by AHuxley ( 892839 )
        Ads always result in data moving around. Some brands just hide that movement from users in fancy ways :)
        The user is always the product been sold for a "free" service :)
  • well, surprise surprise!

    when are you guys going to FINALLY make good on your promise to delete this crap from your lives?

    you can email anyone who is on FB; you wont lose contact.

    just leave that godforsaken place, already!

    the longer you stay, the more rope you give them. why empower those bastards? they could not care less about you. and you don't need them, either.

    grow a pair. leave FB.

    • by MrKaos ( 858439 )

      well, surprise surprise!

      when are you guys going to FINALLY make good on your promise to delete this crap from your lives?

      I never joined facebook and found that the friends I make are the ones I share an interest with. The other thing I've found is that when I see people I haven't seen for a while there is plenty to talk and ask them about themselves.

      Talking about cutting out things I cut TV out back in 2013, I do binge watch Netflix occasionally with my wife though. Cutting out commercials dropped a noticeable amount of stress in my life, they're a waste of attention.

      The point I'm making is that, from someone who was

    • Yes, they're [sociopathic] (evil is a child's word) but email solves a different problem than social media. This is just axiomatic - everybody had email before social media arose. There are CS terms for the collection of services social media provides, but that's not the main point here; email does not.

      The problem is ISP bans on "running servers". Everything Facebook does is possible (and better) in a fully distributed manner but governments grant service monopolies and then allow them to impose a "no se

  • by astrofurter ( 5464356 ) on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @01:02AM (#57828664)

    Creepy Faceboot is creepy.

    That much _everyone_ knows by now. Including those people who for social or business purposes continue to use Faceboot.

    It's time for Congress to ban cyberstalking as a business model. One way to do that would be too impose very high (instant bankruptcy high) mandatory fines for data spillage. And require that data hoarders be _fully insured_ against the maximum fine. Let the insurance companies take care of the rest.

  • Lock up Zuckerberg, burn Facebook to the ground.
  • What revelation, what scandal, what breach of trust, what humiliation, what complete lack of concern for your private life by these "social media" corporations will it take for people to stop posting every personal intimate detail on social media? Tune out, turn off, experience life and keep yourselves private.
  • surprised every social media company makes their money selling every bit of user data they collect on all of their users to anyone with cash. That is what made Zuck a billionaire.

    Just my 2 cents ;)
  • by Anonymous Coward

    The article is hidden behind a privacy invasion wall where you can't simply say no do not track

  • They didn't "give" anyone anything.

    They sold it. That has always been their model.

    How precisely did you think zuckerberg got to be one of the world's richest men ?

  • by GameboyRMH ( 1153867 ) <gameboyrmh@@@gmail...com> on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @07:34AM (#57829324) Journal

    Actually that's not a great analogy, in privacy terms this is even worse than the quasi-sabotage of Chernobyl, but the damage is worse than Chernobyl, Fukushima and Kyshtym combined.

    Everyone involved in this should be banned from working with personal information for life, and a concrete sarcophagus should be built over Facebook HQ.

    • by MrKaos ( 858439 )

      Actually that's not a great analogy, in privacy terms this is even worse than the quasi-sabotage of Chernobyl, but the damage is worse than Chernobyl, Fukushima and Kyshtym combined.

      No, it isn't. Privacy laws can be revised however civilizations can rise and fall in the amount of time that those radio isotopes have decayed through their daughter products.

      Everyone involved in this should be banned from working with personal information for life, and a concrete sarcophagus should be built over Facebook HQ.

      What do you personally do? Do you write to a congress critter expressing your outrage? Do you read proposed bad laws and try to stop them from passing? Did you lobby your representatives to work in your interests?

      No, you just keep whining and hoping someone else will defend your freedom and rights. Get used to disappointment, I

      • I'm still using Facebook as much as before, which is 0 because I don't have an account.

        Radioisotopes decay but the Internet never forgets.

        • by MrKaos ( 858439 )

          I'm still using Facebook as much as before, which is 0 because I don't have an account.

          ok good, a least you are not a hypocrite - Apologies if I was a bit harsh there however it seems like there are a lot of people prepared to join outrage culture without doing anything to change the situation. I too have never signed onto FB.

          Radioisotopes decay but the Internet never forgets.

          This is a belief system that is being subverted and used against us. Our truth is that it is gradually being used as a tool to enslave us. I'm more inclined to believe that everything on the internet is a lie until it can be aligned with what is known to be true.

          Unfor

  • you are the product. Why are people still so surprised by this?

    Heck, you get people here at /. who are incensed that you actually have to pay full price for Apple products.

  • by Dan East ( 318230 ) on Wednesday December 19, 2018 @08:41AM (#57829628) Journal

    I don't understand. When you have a company like Facebook, making BILLIONS of dollars from aboveboard, legit, standard advertising, why are they stooping so low to totally thrash user privacy for.... what? Another fraction of a percent additional revenue? This hints at some god-complex thing going on in the upper echelons of Facebook for these kinds of LARGE decisions to be made with other big corporations. My hunch this is for status symbol / power demonstration to show off to other multimillionaire executives the power you wield.

  • ... the worse Facebook looks. Is there a bottom to Facebook's decline?
  • Yet another reason to not have a Facebook account.

    (or delete yours if you have one)

My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells down by the seashore.

Working...