Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Crime Government Privacy Security Software The Courts Technology

DOJ: Russian 'Superhacker' Gets 27 Years In Prison (thedailybeast.com) 50

According to the Justice Department, a 32-year-old Russian "superhacker" has been sentenced to 27 years in prison for stealing and selling millions of credit-card numbers, causing more than $169 million worth of damages to business and financial institutions. The Daily Beast reports: Roman Valeryevich Seleznev, 32, aka Track2, son of a prominent Russian lawmaker, was convicted last year on 38 counts of computer intrusion and credit-card fraud. "This investigation, conviction and sentence demonstrates that the United States will bring the full force of the American justice system upon cybercriminals like Seleznev who victimize U.S. citizens and companies from afar," said Acting Assistant Attorney General Kenneth Blanco said in a statement. "And we will not tolerate the existence of safe havens for these crimes -- we will identify cybercriminals from the dark corners of the Internet and bring them to justice."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

DOJ: Russian 'Superhacker' Gets 27 Years In Prison

Comments Filter:
  • Separation of powers (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mi ( 197448 ) <slashdot-2017q4@virtual-estates.net> on Friday April 21, 2017 @05:45PM (#54279753) Homepage Journal

    The Department of Justice has sentenced a Russian "superhacker" to 27 years in prison

    WTF? Since when is the Executive Branch doing the sentencing?!

    • Since Guantanamo Bay and similar "extra-jurisdictional" prisons, starting about 2001.

      Obama was droning people daily by the dozen... while the intended targets probably deserved it, the actual targets (mostly civilians/kids in Syria/Lybia/Yemen cannot even sue, cause they do not have "constitutional rights").

      Somebody hurry up and get that man another Nobel Peace Prize, and get one for George W. while you are at it...

    • by tomhath ( 637240 )
      DoJ didn't sentence him. A federal judge did.
    • by Jonner ( 189691 )

      The Department of Justice has sentenced a Russian "superhacker" to 27 years in prison

      WTF? Since when is the Executive Branch doing the sentencing?!

      In Trump's America, the executive justices you! Or maybe the justice executes you.

  • It's about time the US ditches its 3rd world credit card system and uses something better protected, like mandatory using the chip on the card with a pin code. No more transactions alowed with only the card number, verification date and a 3 digit number that is printed on the card.

  • When I see stories of credit card fraud, I have to ask a very simple question:

    Why haven't card companies moved to make the fraud process less prone to being abused?

    It's trivial to commit CC Fraud even with chips in the card, and it's not likely to have prosecution if you don't do it too frequently or too blatantly. Or if you are a large company. Further, the merchant is the one the frequently has to pay for the fraud, not the card issuer, even if the merchant has "run the card" and been validated.

    On the fli

  • by rtb61 ( 674572 ) on Friday April 21, 2017 @07:56PM (#54280333) Homepage

    So the neocons hacked the US government and started a war over nonexistant weapons of mass destruction, penalty, zero. The banksters purposefully ran a scam to inflate profits and their bonuses whilst cheating customers and investors of billions, penalty, zero.

    The Russian broke the law, hacked computer networks and copied credit card numbers, which he then sold to criminals. Those criminals did the stealing, fraudulently using those insecure numbers. Compared to those other crimes with zero penalty, what is going on. I was surprised there was no claim of refusal to help or it appears any effort what so ever to get those criminals who used those credit card numbers (makes the whole thing stink of politics). I would have liked to have seen a reduced sentence, say minus a month for each prosecution the defendant helped to gain against the criminals who used the credit card numbers, or at the very least that effort made. Perhaps the Russian government would have cooperated but no politics seemed to have been the focus.

    It seems a major opportunity to track down more Russian criminals was wasted, stupid as.

  • He becomes the next RU president with a nice retirement and in the meantime, he has mafia ties for protection. If a guy is that good, he shouldn't be sent to prison, but made to work in cyber security. If anything, they just helped him find other criminals to make friends with. What a waist. Besides, last time I checked, they considered hacking a form of terrorism, and their SWAT shoots first and asks questions later in that regard. So, it wouldn't surprise me that they're telling the public one thing and r
    • by GNious ( 953874 )

      If anything, they just helped him find other criminals to make friends with. What a waist.

      Are waist-sizes a specific thing in prisons?

      • Hahahah...-_-. We usually say "trash" or "garbage" where I am from, where as other countries say "waste bin" or " waste basket." So, I'm blaming auto-correct on that one.
      • But to answer your question, yes it it is. Big spoon versus little spoon issues.
  • Wrong focus. (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Gravis Zero ( 934156 ) on Friday April 21, 2017 @09:33PM (#54280743)

    Everyone involved is completely ignoring the fact that the companies involved were not properly secured. It doesn't take a "superhacker" to get past shitty security and we shouldn't be protecting companies with shitty security. Sure, punish the hacker but you need to also punish the executives that decided security shouldn't be the highest priority. When you put profit comes before security, you are asking, nay, begging to get hacked and that's exactly what happened here.

    • Nonsense. It's not as black and white as that. They could invest every penny of their profit into security and still get hacked - what then? You make a decision based on the information available to you; in too many cases, the security team is unable to articulate the risk in terms that are clear and defensible to the executives, so they're just as much at fault.

You know you've landed gear-up when it takes full power to taxi.

Working...