Microsoft Patent Suggests HoloLens Could Keep Track of Your Small Items (theverge.com) 62
A new Microsoft patent has been published that describes a system that would let its HoloLens glasses track small items like car keys, ultimately helping users find their lost belongings. What's more is that the system can "monitor the status of objects without any instructions from users, keeping tabs on anything that's important to their lives," writes Adi Robertson via The Verge. From the report: The patent's basic idea is pretty simple. HoloLens has outward-facing cameras that can make a spatial map of a room, and machine vision technology can identify or track specific objects in an image. So if, for example, you put your keys down on a table, HoloLens could hypothetically spot them through the camera and quietly note their position. When you're about to leave the house, it could give you the keys' last known location, even if they've since been covered up by a newspaper or slipped under a couch cushion. But what's really interesting isn't the idea of HoloLens tracking an object. It's HoloLens learning what items matter to you and choosing what to follow, before you ever worry about losing something. To be clear, you could designate objects: one example has a traveler telling HoloLens to track their passport while abroad. In other cases, though, it could check to see how often you interact with an object, or when you move it around, and start tracking anything that hits a certain threshold.
Re: (Score:1)
Why do you dorks dislike technology so much? I'm sure you all love the idea of the computer on the Star Track Enterprise responding to voice commands and using complex AI to provide the best experience to people. However, you dislike and complain incessantly about modern technology trying to provide a lot of the same functionality. If you like it on Star Track, there's no reason to dislike the technology in the real world. Of course the AI will need to know some information about you and listen for voice commands, so there's no reason to complain about this. Overall, Star Track is quite worthless, but you should embrace the few redeeming qualities it has.
And yes, I know, I posted this yesterday. But the article is a dupe, and I'm sure you Star Track idiots would benefit from seeing this dose of reality again.
It is spelled "Star Trek".
A track is a set of rails that a train rides on.
A trek is a long arduous journey.
Keep working on your vocabulary!
Re: (Score:2)
Give up seiya! you can't attack a golden saint twice with the same attack!
Re: (Score:2)
-no opressive government
-no shoddy security on private data
A bit idealistic, but none of the things we currently deal with in how those technologies are abused.
Re:Why do you dorks hate technology so much? (Score:5, Insightful)
Where were the ads and the TLAs (Score:2)
in Star Trek monitoring and controlling every aspect of their lives? I'm not a Trekkie but the evil that comes with these fucking corporate implementations is palpable.
Soon you won't be able to opt out because everyone you fucking know will be using it and you'll be collateral damage; just like Facebook/Google/M$/Amazon already are for everything else. Guess who their biggest customers are? (Hint: It ain't you).
Re: (Score:2)
in Star Trek monitoring and controlling every aspect of their lives?
They didn't have advertisements, but they did have a shadowy agency behind the scenes controlling things [wikipedia.org]. So yes, their surveillance society had a dark heart.
Re:That pesky privacy thing (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Early Sci-Fi authors worked in the military and academic research, and could see how technology was evolving. The earliest screens in the 1960's used CRT's and light pens to select menus on screens for CAD:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse... [linkedin.com]
Finger controlled touch-screens became available for infotainment and training systems back in the 1980's. The whole point was that you could update the user interface would having to rewire control panels. All you had to do was update the GUI script files. That was a big
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
This is an easy one: In Star Track [sic] there are no problems with network security or unethical corporations that will scoop all your personal information onto a remote server from which it can never be deleted, let their employees snoop around in it, sell it to third parties, and then suffer a data breach where everyone in the Federation (or other real or fictional society) finds out that you misplaced your (hypothetical) dildo, bag of weed, etc.
The problem isn't the technology, the problem is the shitty
Re: (Score:2)
If the computers on Star Trek were run by Google, then every time someone activated the main view screen, there would be a 10 second advert, followed by smaller adverts running along the bottom. Whenever someone activated a desktop screen, there would be the spinning disc of downloading.
If they were run by Microsoft, then there would be an "updates available" message appearing every time someone activated a desktop view screen.
This is awesome! (Score:2, Funny)
Now where did I put my Microsoft HoloLens?
antisocial and loving it (Score:1)
I don't lose small items ever since I stopped socializing, because I don't have the constant distraction of blithering idiots competing for my attention. You'd be amazed how much concentration a person can muster by ignoring the shit out of worthless fucking people.
Dupe (Score:1)
Wake me up when it can track dupes [slashdot.org].
Re: (Score:2)
Wake me up when it can track dupes [slashdot.org].
I"ll wait till this is posted again tomorrow to comment.
Re: (Score:2)
I see a douche. He's not wearing a HoloLens though...
"track" (Score:4, Interesting)
The word 'track' appears several times in TFS. Readers here know where that leads.
We can expect that M$, Google, Apple & Fecebook will soon have maps of our homes, our workplace and our dungeon and all the goodies inside.
Re: (Score:2)
Will it track duplicate posts.... (Score:3)
... on slashdot across days?
https://slashdot.org/story/16/... [slashdot.org]
Maybe not so novel? (Score:1)
OrsonObject
https://wp.josh.com/2013/07/01/orsonobject-google-for-your-lost-keys/
Ferrets and Small Objects (Score:2)
Welcome to the machine. (Score:2)
So is obvious that the future is shaping up to be one where our own brains are hardly used any more, so like all other unused parts of our bodies will begin to shrink/disappear.
We will be literally lost, even in our own homes, whenever we take off our visors because there will be nothing to tell us what to think and when.
We will become the perfect unthinking, unquestioning, remote-controlled labour force.
Re: (Score:2)
Dr. Walter Gibbs: [laughs] "You've got to expect some static. After all, computers are just machines; they can't think."
Alan Bradley: "Some programs will be thinking soon."
Dr. Walter Gibbs: "Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop."
Also this gem that is branded onto my heart
"USER REQUESTS ARE WHAT COMPUTERS ARE FOR!"
Why should they want to track my dick? (Score:1)
Ancient "whistle" Key Finder (Score:1)
Small items (Score:2)
How often do you Lose Things? (Score:1)
Sod that (Score:2)
It's bad enough the TSA looking in my pants, but now Microsoft want to do it.
Huh Huh. Huh huh. Micro soft. Heh heh.
Keeping track of my HoloLens (Score:2)
Once I've come to rely on my HoloLens to find things for me, how am I supposed to find my HoloLens?
Wut (Score:2)
"A new Microsoft patent has been published that describes a system that would let its HoloLens glasses track small items like car keys, ultimately helping users find their lost belongings."
This may be useful for absent-minded folks or people with Alzheimer's, but not really for me. For example, for the last 40 years my car keys are in one of three places: in my pocket, on the counter in that little bowl, or in the car's ignition switch. Even though I'm old and decrepit I just don't misplace a lot of stuff.
APPLICATION, not PATENT (Score:2)
This is just a patent application. That doesn't mean it's been granted, or will be granted. And I'm not a lawyer, but it doesn't sound like this comes anywhere close to meeting the supreme court's "not an abstract idea" standard. This is totally something a human could do, if you just hired a human to follow you around and write down where you left things. That means it's not patentable.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm pessimistic and think, sadly, that you have too much faith in the patent office.
The correct response to this doesn't even have anything to do with "an abstract idea" - it should be "You have a device that is designed to take pictures and can identify objects in those photos, and that device has location information and storage. Using that device to keep track of the locations of objects is obvious - not patentable.
The only thing patentable would be if they had some novel way of storing location informat
...unless they're under/behind/in something (Score:2)
So basically only if they're already in the line of sight of that thing, as well as in the field of view which is smaller than what your eyes normally see. Just get a TrackR [wikipedia.org] or something, and then you don't have to do all that searching. And it's probably cheaper than a HoloLens.
It's "almost" the future I wanted. (Score:2)
If it was simply "My user has put keys down at X,Y,Z. Store this data somewhere this side of their router", I'd love it.
Whereas I kinda suspect it's going to be "My user has put keys down at X, Y, Z. They appear to be keys for a Ford Mondeo. Possibly the 2014 model. Store this data on the Microsoft servers for data mining. Provide access to every damn Government agency around the world."