Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Facebook Government Privacy Security Software The Almighty Buck Twitter United States Technology

Surveillance Firm 'Geofeedia' Cuts Half of Staff After Losing Access To Twitter, Facebook (chicagotribune.com) 31

In mid-October, an American Civil Liberties Union issued a report accusing police of using Geofeedia -- a CIA-backed social-media monitoring platform -- to track protests and other large gatherings. As a result, Instagram, Facebook and eventually, Twitter cut the company off from its valuable data stream, causing them to cut half of their staff to "focus on a variety of innovations" that will allow them to serve their customers and continue their "rapid growth trajectory as a leading real-time analytics and alerting platform." Chicago Tribune reports: Geofeedia cut the jobs, mostly in sales in the Chicago office, in the third week of October, the spokesman said. It has offices in Chicago, Indianapolis and Naples, Fla. The cuts were first reported by Crain's Chicago Business. An emailed statement attributed to CEO Phil Harris said Geofeedia wasn't "created to impact civil liberties," but in the wake of the public debate over their product, they're changing the company's direction. Harris said Geofeedia's software has been "impactful" for schools, sports leagues, customer service, marketing and event planning, per the statement. He also referred to the company's $17 million funding round in February -- which brought its total funding to nearly $24 million -- and "strong sales and growth" as strengthening the company. "Our strong financial position has allowed us to carefully consider the appropriate areas of focus for our technology going forward," Harris wrote in the statement.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Surveillance Firm 'Geofeedia' Cuts Half of Staff After Losing Access To Twitter, Facebook

Comments Filter:
  • Civil Liberties (Score:3, Insightful)

    by ConnerT ( 4113731 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @05:21PM (#53342437)
    What Civil Liberties...
    • Re:Civil Liberties (Score:4, Insightful)

      by rtb61 ( 674572 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @09:34PM (#53343857) Homepage

      Fuck worrying about civil liberties, these guys surveil for profit, produce nothing actionable and they'll be dropped, so they will fabricate by selectively shifting data from one source to another, deleting contrary data and straight up fabricating data. Their profits have to be based upon it. Nothing to report, they go bankrupt, something to report (tough luck for their victims) and the profits roll in. Exactly the kind of people who were used to create 'Anonymous', it can be fun but those ass hats are extremely dangerous and will fabricate all kinds of lies as truth in order to fabricate profits. It is insane to put that kind of power in contractors who have a built in profit motive to lie. Stupid enough to do that and they will be manipulated into serving other people's purposes.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Sounds like nonsense. You aren't going to cut off anyone (in a meaningful way) without damaging most all of your commercial clients

  • CIA smoke screens. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by geekmux ( 1040042 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @05:32PM (#53342521)

    Geofeedia wasn't "created to impact civil liberties,"

    Yes, I'm sure you had the CIA as one of your primary customers in order for them to ensure their Christmas card distribution list was accurate. Let's keep pretending they just sell donuts for the government or some shit...

  • This is bullshit ... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by CaptainDork ( 3678879 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @05:32PM (#53342525)

    ... because those of us who dabble in this space have been banned too many times to count.

    We just put on a hoodie, grab a freemail and get back into the game.

    Those guys are still grabbing data and selling it.

  • Geofeedia 2.0 (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @05:44PM (#53342589)

    Multiple, apparently respectable, companies, each with their own data feeds from twitter, facebook, etc. Sharing all the data with another company that does the actual spying.

    This then via highly complex technical; and legal constructs, so that the source of the 'leak' cannot be traced. Possibly even all legal, and technically not violating any agreement they may have with Twitter, Facebook, etc., but certainly setup in such a way that, if the shit does hit the fan, nobody can be held accountable.

    You know this will happen. Likely it is already happening.

  • by CaptainDork ( 3678879 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @05:44PM (#53342593)

    ... is: "..a CIA-backed social-media monitoring platform.."

    • by elrous0 ( 869638 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @05:50PM (#53342629)

      I pretty much just assume that any company these days with an office or HQ in northern Virginia, Maryland, or DC is a CIA front company. Shit, they're one of the biggest industries in those states.

      • by AHuxley ( 892839 )
        Re " they're one of the biggest industries in those states.".
        The growth is in tools the CIA needs to track digital cover stories for its future staff. Other nations, detective agencies, brands that do background work on staff, all have the same web 2.0 info and look at all US staff, workers, tourists, NGO's.
        The big fear is that undercover CIA is going to have one image, photo that was not found in time that shows their true origins, politics and interest in serving the US gov.
        Their created cover as a ra
    • by swalve ( 1980968 )
      Hey, if people are going to advertise their intent to commit crimes on Twitter, SHOULDN'T the government be paying attention?
  • This is a true win for freedom!
  • by skr95062 ( 2046934 ) on Tuesday November 22, 2016 @06:23PM (#53342823)

    Being the patented dicks that they are. When asked if they were using this platform, instead of coming out and answering the question, they respond like the douchbags that they are with "file a FOIA request" so they can deny it and force the requester to take them to court. Why make it easy on the public they are supposed to protect and serve.

    • by swalve ( 1980968 )
      They are too busy ignoring street crime to mess with your fancy questions. Blue Lives Matter!

You are always doing something marginal when the boss drops by your desk.

Working...