Whistleblowers Fear Prosecution Under New European Trade Secrets Law (bbc.com) 27
An anonymous reader writes: The European Parliament is debating the Trade Secrets Protection Act critics say threatens to turn whistleblowers into criminals. The bill is aimed to protect European companies from corporate spying by their rivals in other parts of the world. But critics fear that the legislation will make it possible for corporations to define any information they do not want released as a trade secret, and then prosecute journalists or whistleblowers who release it to the public. Campaigner Martin Pigeon, from Corporate Europe Observatory in Brussels says the Trade Secrets Protection Act would have potentially criminalized the release of the Panama Papers. On the flip side, supporters of the bill say there is nothing to worry about because it contains a defense for those who release information exposing criminal wrongdoing or who are acting in the public interest. The bill will still need to be passed into law by national parliaments across the 28 nations of the EU, assuming the bill is approved by the European Parliament.
Re: (Score:2)
That's a trick question. I need a whistle.
Re: (Score:2)
This looks safe, maybe. Also, it does not seem to be a secret.
http://www.instructables.com/id/3D-Printing-Whistle/ [instructables.com]
Clear exemptions...as written by the author? (Score:5, Insightful)
French MEP Constance Le Grip - "We have also set out very precisely and clearly set out the exemptions for both journalists and whistleblowers."
Yes, maybe that's what we're afraid of. That you have decided on precisely where and when journalists and whistleblowers are allowed to act. Our fear is therefore that you might have decided to curtail their activities, to keep in line with your agenda, and away from ours, the public.
Re:Clear exemptions...as written by the author? (Score:4, Insightful)
"Exemptions" are never the correct way to draft a law. Wherever anyone anywhere is exempt from anything, that's a law that should probably be repealed right now.
Otherwise you're in the business of making different laws to apply to different categories of people. Which is the opposite of "justice".
Re: (Score:2)
They should blow secret euro whistles... (Score:2)
Secret whistles conform with the spirit of the law.
Tor, VPN (Score:4, Interesting)
This law changes nothing. If you have something juicy or illegal to disclose, you should ALWAYS do it anonymously, because they will find a way to get back at you sooner or later.
Oh, and of course scrub any signs of the information from your equipment as soon as you've made the disclosure and deny, deny, deny, if asked about it.
The Corporation uber alles (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
So it boils down to who has the more-expensive lawyers?
Ummm (Score:2)
"On the flip side, supporters of the bill say there is nothing to worry about because it contains a defense for those who release information exposing criminal wrongdoing or who are acting in the public interest."
And who is defining what is criminal or what is in the public interest?
Right.
this bill is wrong (Score:2)
here's why. the public needs to know everything without restriction in order to better themselves and help manage corporations, military, and government.
this is also designed to foster and create monopolies. by being able to keep information secret, it basically becomes classified and closely held, and withheld from the public. the public then becomes misinformed, and only these mega corporations have the education and technical science know how of the world. this has already happened in the united states.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
It probably facilitates corporate espionage for the bigger players. Steal information, and accuse smaller firms or individual developers/engineers/etc of having stolen your trade secrets.
There's no way this law will not be used in anything but draconian and tyrannical fashion.
This keeps happening to democracy (Score:3)
For a while the EU was really a step forward for citizens. It was the opposite of the "free" "trade" agreements.
Now it's a corrupt system like all the other corrupt systems.
Re: (Score:1)
That's because democracy is three bears, two wolves, and two sheep all voting for bears to decide what's for dinner (to paraphrase, of course). The bears get smart and run candidates (all of whom will feast tonight), the wolves are worried only about themselves, and the sheep are too far inland to GTFO before they're slaughtered.
Re: (Score:1)
The EU derives from the EC, which in turn derived from the EEC, the European ECONOMIC Community. The EU is all about trade, business and a framework that makes privatizations mandatory while allowing businesses to drive wages lower and lower thanks to the abundance of cheap workforce. That's all there is to it.
Abuse (Score:2, Interesting)
Every time we're told not to worry about these things, it means that not only do they plan to abuse it beyond anything we could have imagined, but they've actually begun to do so already.
This law probably won't even get used more than once or twice over the next decade for actual protection of actual trade-secrets. It's nothing but a way to keep wrongdoings in the dark.
The Battle Continues (Score:2)