Lawmaker Proposes Cyberthreat Sharing Group 41
alphadogg writes "A proposal in the House of Representatives would set up a new semi-independent organization allowing the U.S. government and private companies to share information about cyberthreats, but some critics questioned whether the group would be too removed from congressional scrutiny. The draft proposal (PDF), from Representative Dan Lungren, a California Republican, would create a nonprofit National Information Sharing Organization (NISO) that would serve as the collection and distribution point for cyberthreat information shared among the federal government, state and local governments, private companies and education institutions. NISO would also fund cybersecurity research and development."
Cyberthreat (Score:1)
This post has been reported as a cyberthreat.
Re:congressional scrutiny (Score:5, Insightful)
My best guess is that it's all bullshit to take that 15% DHS funding and funnel it directly into the private members. From the article:
The proposal is a "positive step" toward a national cybersecurity policy, said Cheri McGuire, vice president of global government affairs and cybersecurity policy at Symantec.
There you go.
Re: (Score:2)
"take that 15% DHS funding and funnel it directly into the private members"
Mod that comment up.
America (and others users globally benefiting from the Internet) will be much more secure with a distributed ecosystem with many independent groups each working toward assuring their own independent, autonomous security, rather than attempting to pass the buck to yet another outsourced committee operating as a puppet for the federal government. DHS is moving us toward dystopia with all of the federal intelligence
Re: (Score:2)
Because if it has congressional scrutiny then the congressmen on the oversight committees can get kickbacks and campaign donations from the companies involved.
Seems a whole lot of effort to set up a few mail lists & phone auto attendant message system :-)
Silly noob, welcome to our world. (Score:4, Insightful)
We've had CERT for a long time.
Re: (Score:3)
Of course.
And who wants to bet that "cyberthreat" will soon include protection of "intellectual property"? It's no accident that "educational institutions" will also be included in the groups that "benefit" from this new national cyber police force. Will "cyberthreat" include groups of protestors that organize civil disobedience online?
Any time somebody in Congress comes up with a solution to combat some "threat", my radar goes off. Too many of the "threats" that these peop
Re: (Score:1)
The FBI also has Infragard, which is designed to extend the CERT model to include other industries (thnk chemical, utility, public transportation, etc.)
Oh, and the ISACs (REN-ISAC, MS-ISAC, etc.)
Seriously, WTF are these people doing with our tax dollars if they can't hire an intern to spend an hour Googling what's already out there before going off half-cocked? Or, I don't know, ASK IT Security people what we want/need?
This is why so many intelligent, well-informed and thoughtful people (as opposed to cons
Ok, this looks alright (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, this was supposed to be an angry rant about government forming yet another stupid and unnecessary organization, probably designed to crack down on copyright all in the name of "protect the children". Then I read the draft (or, rather skimmed a large part of it), and it actually seems focused an preventing wide-scale attacks on infrastructure and creation of more secure Internet protocols. Seems... alright, although this is, of course, just a draft. Also, it'll never live up to it's promises, but hey, I suppose trying to secure the nation against computer-based attack is laudable.
It's probably still stupid and redundant, but at least it seems redundant in the right direction, anyways.
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't there a budget problem?
Yup. The currency issuer (federal government) is not issuing enough money (running a high enough "deficit") to match private+foreign sector aggregate savings rates. This is directly evidenced by current unemployment rates.
There is also a secondary problem of mis-allocation of resources in the federal government, in other words, the federal government is spending money on the wrong things. But that doesn't change the fact that the current deficit is too low.
Infragard? (Score:1)
Yeah, they don't do any of that.
The usual question... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This involves government for the most obvious reason of all. Private industry is always focused on profits even to the insane level of profits on economic and environmental collapse. When it comes to establishing a government authority the focus is on savings, the money saved by avoiding conomic and environmental collapse.
Government authorities also help to avoid copyrights and patents from blocking the universal adoption of highly beneficial technologies.
Privatisation is proving to be nothing but a bo
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, the FAA does nothing for airline safety. NIH does nothing of consequence in combating disease outbreaks from those friendly listeria farming operations. OSHA hasn't lifted a finger for workplace safety. The nerve of NSF funding fundamental research, don't they know research grows on trees to be cherry picked by Business School Product for the good of Americans? If only America could be returned to the people....like the housing crisis. People have a G-d-given right to sign contracts they are too stupid
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The insane marketing view of the corporate race to the bottom. Corporations where the executives are not legally and criminally liable for all acts of that corporations are fabrications of the sociopathicaly insane and a current reality. No wonder modern corporate public relations and marketing agencies are will known for their drug use, that could be the only excuse for the continual stream of mendacities that flows from them. I only hope that should you suffer a severe illness that your relatives put the
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why does this need to involve government? Let the industries and individuals interested help fund and found the organization.
Lmao, oh you must be kidding! Private enterprise be interested in secure coding? No my friend, they be all about the latest product they can pimp out, they will never, ever, ever be interested in secure code. To paraphrase notion put forth: cheap, fast, secure...pick two. To get fast and secure you have to hire someone who knows his way around a project, who's been around the block a few time and who has seen more than one block of unsecure code. And they do not come cheap, so that is out. For fast and se
Re: (Score:2)
Because it lets them pick winners and loosers. (Score:2)
Why does this need to involve government?
Because it lets the government pick winners and losers. Winners are given early information about cyber threats. Losers are not.
Winners tend to correlate well with campaign contributors.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, like the interstate highway system. Boy, they made out like bandits on that one.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, like the interstate highway system. Boy, they made out like bandits on that one.
Yep. A lot of nephews and cousins of politicians (and members of their political machines) "won" the construction contracts and made out like bandits.
Still are, too. Especially with large amounts of gas tax money diverted from road construction to "alternative transport" projects to "get people out of their cars". Lots of graft to go around there.
ren-isac and friends? (Score:2)