Ohio Schools Drop Webcasts Because Of DMCA 43
An anonymous reader writes "The Toledo Blade is reporting that several Ohio universities have dropped their internet radio broadcasts due to the DMCA and CARP fees. It mentions how conviently parents, students and administrators used to be able to keep track of school news from accross the country and world. Now their silent thanks to the money and time that would be needed to comply with the new regulations."
Us Too (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Us Too (Score:2)
Join the list. (Score:2)
I remember when the rates were being discussed on NPR with a recording industry exec there, he flat out stated that the rates being proposed would only be a guideline and that they would gladly negotiate lower fees or possibly drop them all together for non profits (and also even commercial stations who played the music they "want promoted"). It sure sounds like they forgot all about that part now that the fees are set doesn't it?
Yeah (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Yeah (Score:1)
then again, this is slashdot, don't let facts get in the way of posting!
Re:Yeah (Score:2)
*ducks*
Re:Yeah (Score:1)
lol...
21+, 18+....
Umm... no. She was manufactured by her agent (Score:3, Interesting)
quick, get these stations back up (Score:2, Offtopic)
Without these stations, the qwality of edducation is droppinng as we speek!
Editors: it is acceptable to correct spelling. Sometimes even to paraphrase. Without editing, you're just a glorified usenet feed.
Re:quick, get these stations back up (Score:1)
This sucks, but not as bad as they are saying (Score:4, Insightful)
Listeners need to quit crying, and producers need to quit scurrying away like scared animals at the thought of having to change their content because of those DREADED COPYRIGHTS. Give me a break people. Alternative content exists.
Re:This sucks, but not as bad as they are saying (Score:3, Interesting)
Plus, the law is set up to assume that absolutely all music in the world comes from the RIAA, and then they have some weird agency that would supposedly give the money back to whoever it was supposed to go to in those cases where it doesn't.
Re:This sucks, but not as bad as they are saying (Score:2, Informative)
Do the Artists care? (Score:1)
I wonder when MP3.com will be hit hard with RIAA stuff, because the Artists submit their stuff willingly...
Build yer own... (Score:2, Troll)
Re:Build yer own... (Score:1)
Questions about CARP (Score:2, Interesting)
Independent content (Score:2)
Re:Just ignore it (Score:1)
WOXY 97X (Score:2)
Recently, they sent out a poll asking whether listeners would be willing to pay a small monthly amount in order for them to continue broadcasting online. Although they haven't announced the results yet, I'm sure that many people, like me, indicated that they'd be willing to pay to have great music available to them. I said that $5/month sounded reasonable, but I might be willing to go higher.
So if the station in the article is really that important to all those students, and those alum, maybe they can find ways of financing it. Besides monthly subscriptions, you could have a fundraiser with a band, sell tshirts, get more sponsors, whatever. I'm not familiar with the entire situation just from the article, but it doesn't look like the school in question even tried to keep this venture going.
Am I missing something? (Score:2)
What I don't understand are the user comments. They complain about losing school news and sports broadcasts. I don't see why the compromise of "stream sports and news, not music" isn't mentioned. Dropping the station just seems to be a gross overreaction to prove the point that the legislation sucks.
Am I missing something?
Remember who runs schools (Score:2)