Paul Ceglia: Facebook Is Doing the Forgery, Not Me 135
An anonymous reader writes "Last week, Facebook said it found the original 'authentic contract' between Mark Zuckerberg and Paul Ceglia, a man who claims he owns half of the company according to a 2003 contract. Now, Ceglia says the original 'authentic contract' Facebook claims to have found is really just a Photoshopped image the company planted on his computer."
Riiight... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Facebook hired a PR firm to shop articles to journalists, bloggers, and information security experts in order to smear Google. They are not above playing corporate dirty tricks, especially when there are billions of dollars at stake. That said, TFA is lame since it's not 100% clear that the guy the reporter is communicating with is actually Paul Ceglia.
Re: (Score:1)
Jesus, you're fucking stupid...
Facebook admits hiring PR firm to smear Google [engadget.com]
Re:Riiight... (Score:4, Funny)
and that's from the very first Google hit, dumbass.
it doesn't show up in Facebook search?
Re: (Score:1)
since the media is so in bed with Google.
Not true at all. Especially not for the American media conglomerates.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, that's actually quite different. There was immediate and factual evidence on his person, and he admitted to placing it there. Whether or not it was his, by putting it on his person he is now responsible for it. He might have been able to argue the crack wasn't his if he left it on the floor under the passenger seat or something.
Both Ceglia and Facebook have no solid evidence, and as two technically-inclined parties, they are basically having a he-said-she-said fight about fabricated evidence on both s
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And if FB tried to cover up tampering with the drive, it gets worse.
You said like, nothing.
Re: (Score:2)
yeah, the courts will buy that one
They don't need to. There is software that authenticates originals vs. 'shopped versions. IIRC, it analyzes entropy in the frequency domain and can make a 'heat map' of doctored images.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That sounds like forensic voodoo.
You should read the papers. It might be possible to fake, but it's very useful for everything that's carefully constructed to foil this sort of analysis.
Re: (Score:2)
err, 'not carefully constructed'
Re: (Score:2)
In the digital world, if it can be measured, it can be faked. Only a small subset of those things are too expensive or time consuming to be in play here.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Cheap storage I guess. Such a small quantity is not really going to have much smell. Either this guy was smoking dope in the car or the cop lied about the smell. Just like he claimed 36 in a 30 was a "high rate of speed".
Re: (Score:2)
I have a question. Why do people always put drugs in clear plastic bags or pill bottles? I'd put it in a jar, then put that jar in a bigger jar and fill the bigger jar with blueberry jam, so you couldn't see or smell anything.
It's so that you don't accidentally swallow a couple of tablespoons of cocaine when you're off your head and looking for a late night snack.
Sheesh (Score:5, Funny)
"I was cheated out of half of Facebook" is going to be this century's "I was the fifth Beatle."
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Are you saying there was no 5th Beatle? Or that Facebook didn't cheat Ceglia? Can you cite evidence either way? What, in fact, are you saying? Do you know why the legal system exists?
oooh I do, I do. A> To allow lawyers to screw over citizens.
Re: (Score:2)
Lawyers are just as likely to be citizens as whoever they're screwing over.
When you're hating on lawyers you have to be very precise to get anything to stick.
Re: (Score:1)
Are you saying there was no 5th Beatle?
No.
Or that Facebook didn't cheat Ceglia?
No.
Can you cite evidence either way?
No.
What, in fact, are you saying?
That, when there is a lot of money/power/fame/etc at stake, there will inevitably be many, many people who claim they are entitled to said money/power/fame.
And that most of them are probably deluding themselves.
Do you know why the legal system exists?
Yes, and I'm smart enough to know that I'm not a lawyer (Are you?), a judge, or a party to this litigation. Do you know why Internet discussion sites like Slashdot exist? Do you ever get confused between "court of law" and "Internet discussion site?"
Re: (Score:2)
Nice. It's not often an AC owns a three digit UID so handily.
Re:Sheesh (Score:4, Informative)
More like the Howard Hughes last will and testament of the 21st century.
This guy makes a good Melvin Dumar.
Obviously (Score:2)
I mean, if I were Facebook that's exactly what I'd do.
I'd hack into some random guy's computer, and create a photoshopped image of a contract that says he owns half the company.
Re:Obviously (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
At what point does a judge say "If I see you again, you'll be thrown in jail for contempt and perjury"?
Re: (Score:2)
Ask Jack Thompson.
Re: (Score:2)
I've got no idea what's really going on, but this Ceglia guy could have been the one that goofed when using the wrong address.. and been using his parents' computer to try and keep evidence off his own machines.
Everyone already knows that Zuckerberg and his buddies are scum.
Ceglia is obviously also highly dubious - why didn't he bring all this up a long time ago if what he says is true?
Re: (Score:2)
Why would Z want to use that contract, when it is clearly a forgery? The problem with your theory is that Z is claiming that is the real contract.
Re: (Score:2)
Correction, misstyped something (Score:2)
Well, I'm Embarrassed Just Reading This (Score:3)
It is obvious that these major outlets continue to protect Mark and his "new image". He is an admitted forgerer, he was forced to admit it under oath, not because he feels compelled to tell the truth, like ever, but because he carelessly wrote as his home adress on the document he was forging an address that he didnt know about or move to until more than a year after the document was supposedly written! A rational person would think I need not say more, and that surely my arrest for mushrooms 14 years ago or the fact that I fell behind on wood pellet orders that have long since paid back is irrelevant compared to the more daming and far more on point evidence that Zuckerberg is an admitted forger and an admitted hacker, yet a read of the major media outlets shows what most people know already, that our “Free Press” slant the news to the big boss’s views. A luxury afforded the Billionaires of this world that clearly have their own agendas. Perhaps calling them out like this will force some two sided coverage of the story.
Ceglia gets hilariously specific about his past problems ... and hilariously unspecific about Zuckerberg's. I am in the very uncomfortable (and unfamiliar) position of defending Zuckerberg and pondering whence we begin ignoring this crackpot Ceglia.
If anyone is wondering why Ceglia has milled through four law firms, you need only read the letter he submitted to the press and (apparently) did not attach any NDAs to. I would guess this letter would be a defense attorney's wet dream (assuming Ceglia allows them to prove it came from him).
From the Arab Spring to the riots of London last week, I see that social networks are the peoples tools to not only talk about how bored we are today, or to worry about everyone seeing that last photo we put up, but also when users are oppressed somewhere and realize it, it obviously can be used to overthrow tyranny and outmanuever the forces that protect the establishment. It’s become the peoples voice and a powerful tool to unite the masses. It’s a tool that deserves to stay in the hands and control of the people.
You know what's really pathetic and disgusting to me? Watching someone try to abduct an entire set of social causes and violent radical movements for their own fucking he said/he said lawsuit that stands to benefit them to the tune of billions of dollars. Really, I don't see what that has to do with the legitimacy of your ownership of any part of Facebook. Justice shouldn't care what you do with what belongs to you, it should only be concerned with you having what belongs to you. Disgusting.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Come on, Zuckerberg is an "admitted forgerer" [sic]. Someone who is capable of forgerery is capable of anything.
Someone who is capable of forgerery is only capable of producing documents that prove they are capable of anything. There's a difference.
Admited hacker. (Score:2)
So we are here already? the name hacker has ben demonized, so if you admit you are a hacker, is like admiting you have commit crimes?
Society, I am dissapointed.
Man this is annoying (Score:2)
OK, on one hand some of this stuff is news-worthy. It's a huge company, and there are allegations flying around involving the ownership and origins of said company. Likewise, there's a bunch of stuff going around about falsified documents or supposed chat logs.
So yes, on one hand it IS news... and news for nerds at that since Facebook is such a huge presence online. And while I don't use it, I'm sure a fair percentage of /. readers us it.
But part of me just wants to throw my hands up in the air and say "
I see... (Score:2)
(Again, barring monumental incompetence on the part of at least one party in a hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-on-the-l
Re: (Score:3)
(Again, barring monumental incompetence on the part of at least one party in a hundreds-of-millions-of-dollars-on-the-line case) this just isn't the sort of situation where the computer in question would have been left in Sheriff Bubba's evidence locker/misc. supplies closet with a sticky note asking people not to touch it.
Yes, but in this sort of situation, all it takes is one person with a "look at the upside, and what are the chances we'll be caught?" attitude to try to make this sort of thing happen.
I'm not saying it did, but the higher the $$$ on the line, the more people SHOULD be looking at the chain of evidence and all, but also the more incentive to make things "happen".
Re: (Score:2)
What took so long? (Score:1)
If the contract was from 2003-2004, why the hell did he wait 6-7 years to file suit?
Ceglia appears to be just another deranged attention whore who wants to steal someone else's money.
Re:What took so long? (Score:4, Funny)
Does he realize... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
yeah, so he falls... and faces that shitty middle-class life; what a downer. meanwhile he could gave a little fight for that 10 billion dollars that might actually be his.
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't know jail was known as "middle-class life" these days..
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That depends on the jail. The Window that described "middle class" these days is pretty low and small compared to what it was 10-15 years ago.
ugh (Score:5, Insightful)
I hate to say this, but facebook's already won this battle. They probably cheated but unless someone can prove it this guy needs to shut up.
Ceglia should have kept a watchful eye and documented the shit out of everything.
What's more, this lawsuit is ages old and he could have nipped this situation in the bud a long ass time ago.
If someone rips you off, you take care of it promptly. You don't just sit on your ass and let damages accrue.
I would dismiss his case with prejudice on grounds of either laches or statute of limitations or both. Besides, he already made a binding settlement in the form of what proved to be very lucrative stock options.
Unless he can show that Facebook somehow committed fraud *in that settlement* he has no standing to sue.
I'm all for fighting the good fight but once you've waved the white flag the game is over.
Re:ugh (Score:4, Funny)
On what exactly do you base this?
Re:ugh (Score:4, Insightful)
it's what all big corporations do. Nobody gets rich off of hard work and diligence like they preach to you. you either inherit money or steal it.
Re:ugh (Score:4, Interesting)
There's no doubt Zuckerberg fucked people over on his way up. In fact, the parties that have at least some claim to having be screwed by Zuckerberg are all well known. This Ceglia guy isn't one of them. He's either delusional or the world's worst con man.
Re:ugh (Score:5, Insightful)
Nobody gets rich off of hard work and diligence like they preach to you. you either inherit money or steal it.
Uh.. okay. And all gross generalisations are true, clearly.
The business I work for has worked its way up from the ground, with products we designed, built and hire out with operating crew. All through hard work and diligence. We're not exactly a "big corporation" yet, but we're currently looking at selling off our sales division for several million, and ploughing that money back into more R&D.
There are a lot of rich, scummy people out there sure, but you don't need to be scum to get rich..
Re: (Score:2)
So you made big money by charging more than you had to, right?, stealing from the customers who apparently had no better choice than to work with you, and therefore no leverage in the price negotiations.
Re: (Score:1)
1. Charging more than you "have to" isn't stealing, it's making a profit. This is a good thing, since it's the only way to stay in business. Stealing is a crime, selling a product at a mutually agreeable price is not.
2. If customers have no better choice than you, then you're the best choice available. Either the lowest price, fastest delivery, best product, or any combination of these. Again, being the best is a good thing.
Re: (Score:2)
2. If customers have no better choice than you, then you're the best choice available. Either the lowest price, fastest delivery, best product, or any combination of these. Again, being the best is a good thing.
#2 may be literally true but the conclusion you draw is false: You may be the best choice available, but there are very questionable or downright illegal reasons why, i.e., monopoly, coercion, anticompetitive behaviour. So you're "the best" because you're the only, but it doesn't follow that this is necessarily good. Just wanted to point that out, in general I agree with you :)
Re: (Score:2)
No, there are other choices available for all of our products, but in certain cases, we can do things faster, and therefore cheaper. Offshore work makes good money.
Re: (Score:2)
i forgot my (sarcasm) tag. The scary thing is that i got modded insightful. I was trying to say the most ludicrous thing I possibly could.
Re: (Score:2)
Haha. Well, I've spoken to a few people that believe exactly what you said.. they find it easier to swallow the idea that someone else is successful because they cheat, and not simply because they worked harder or had a lucky break.
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
I once worked for a great small company, and the smartest thing they ever did was let one of the big players (the most friendly big player) come around and buy them. They're allowed to operate independently, and they benefit from their parent corp's legal team and other resources. Most of their ol
Re: (Score:2)
There are other choices, but in some cases, our method is faster, cheaper, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
That's another wrinkle.
Often times there's a Statute of Frauds that requires certain contracts to be in writing to be enforceable.
Commonly among those are interests in real estate, surety for a debt, and shares in a business.
Re: (Score:2)
It brings in money for one part of our business, but we have a reputation for our other tools and don't need a sales team for them.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, presumably partially saved up personal funds, maybe also with a bank loan. He's actually my uncle, and he was an accountant before starting this business. My grandfather was a minister, not wealthy at all, didn't even own his own house. He said he started up the business with £50,000, and now 15 years later it's worth milliions. Not bad at all.
Re: (Score:2)
Zuck: [Users] "trust me"
Zuck: Dumb fucks
The fact is later he actually did use people's information to hack into private email addresses and read them, in an attempt to get better news coverage for his website. He basically sucks.
Re: (Score:2)
If he really did that then why was he not prosecuted for that?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If someone rips you off, you take care of it promptly. You don't just sit on your ass and let damages accrue.
but it works so well for patent trolls.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually I wonder why they're allowed to get away with it.
Re: (Score:2)
because there is to requirement for them to enforce it - and the burden is on the "offender" to research the ~8,000,000 different patents to ensure they aren't violating any.
Facebook would not have had access (Score:2)
In a case like this, the computer doesn't EVER get touched by the opposition. It gets analyzed by a third party. So there would have to be a conspiracy encompassing the bribing and corruption of an otherwise unrelated party.
Re:Facebook would not have had access (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
He is claiming that they planted the evidense on his mothers computer before the requested it as evidense. That it was planted prior to him handing it over.
Ah, OK. Wow...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If Ceglia didn't watch it change custody at every single turn and personally examine the conditions under which it was stored and analyzed he won't either.
I'm pretty sure he already knows ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
This case comes down the the existence, validity and enforceability of the contract between Zuckerberg and Ceglia. There are 2 versions of all the
Should have quit when he was ahead (Score:2)
Some people know when to stop digging the hole they're in.
Other people, at that moment, take out the blasting caps and dynamite.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I just want to hear his lawyer say "I've seen a few photoshops in my day..."
Just look at the images (Score:2)
The awesome thing is that Ceglia's version of the contract just looks wrong. Indentation is screwed up with handwritten stuff pasted in.
The 'recovered version' looks like a properly drawn contract, formatted properly, etc, with that same handwritten line in a much more appropriate place lower on the page.
You would expect a manipulation of an image of a contract page to screw up the formatting in order to leave a lot of stuff in place. Also, in Ceglia's version the dollar amounts appear manipulated in thei
Don't know who to side with (Score:3)
Which shady scumbag am I supposed to trust here?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Mutually assured desctruction (Score:1)
Don't Care If He Is Legit (Score:2)
He shouldn't get half of Facebook given his investment. Other people invested real time and money into the company to make it what it is. From employees who got shares for their work to investors who provided millions of dollars for marketing and salaries. It is unreasonable to allow a submarine investment of $1000 trump all that effort. If he were a good investor he would have stayed in contact with the company in the early days. He would have paid attention and shown up for share holder meetings and made
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Abusive ad hominem (also called personal abuse or personal attacks) usually involves insulting or belittling one's opponent in order to attack his claim or invalidate his argument
Insulting people doesn't make you argument valid. Neglecting your property is a sure fire way to lose it. That is what Ceglia is claiming to have done. He is claiming that he forgot he owned half of a company. When this company was meeting and deciding how to split things up when new investors came along where was Ceglia? He wan't
He said/she said arugement. (Score:1)
pedo uses this too! (Score:2)
If this will fly in court, it will be nice to see if all the pedos will line up afterwards and use the same excuse with this precedent.
I guess only time will tell if the pockets are deep enough to buy off the judge.
Mark Zuckerberg new Jimbo Wales? (Score:1)
I love to see some drama .. but it sounds like Ceglia doesn't have the case that Larry Sanger has/had with Wikipedia. Hmm.. at least Zuckerberg angered the Ayn Rand cult.
Sure you did (Score:1)
Zuckerberg vs Ceglia (Score:2)