Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Cellphones Government Japan

Japanese City Passes Two-Hours-a-Day Smartphone Usage Ordinance (theregister.com) 29

The Japanese city of Toyoake has passed (PDF) a symbolic ordinance limiting recreational smartphone use to two hours a day, aiming to improve citizens' sleep -- especially for students after summer vacation. The Register reports: "The primary purpose of this ordinance is to ensure that all citizens receive adequate sleep," states a Council information page, which explains that many Japanese people ignore Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare recommendations to spend six to eight hours a day dozing. An accompanying FAQ [PDF] explains that Council passed the ordinance because students who return to school after summer vacations sometimes need a nudge the re-establish an appropriate daily regime.

The ordinance also points out "Excessive phone users and their families are facing difficulties in their daily and social lives," and suggests the two-hours-a-day guidance might help. Council's documents point out that smartphones have myriad uses beyond recreation, and that the ordinance should not be taken as a suggestion to reduce overall use of the devices. Toyoake is part of the Nagoya megalopolis and is home to around 70,000 people. The town's government plans to survey residents about the ordinance, and the FAQ also mentions it wants to tackle other digital menaces, among them harmful effects of using smartphones while walking.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Japanese City Passes Two-Hours-a-Day Smartphone Usage Ordinance

Comments Filter:
    • See how far that works !

      One doesn’t need to rid the world of heroin to prove someone is a junkie.

      Social media is a drug that creates addiction like anything else. We deal with that problem the same way we always have. By waiting until the addict will admit they have a problem and want the help. Otherwise they’ll simply replace social media with some other addiction.

      This ain’t rocket science. Society is only confused as to how easily we allowed children junkies to manifest, but make NO mistake as to WHAT the p

    • by JeffSh ( 71237 )

      its a symbolic ordinance, its not a law or regulation that's intended to be enforced. its just saying hey, this is a good idea and a reminder from your city leaders about some things you might want to think about.

  • Make smartphones illegal for tourist sites and concerts! Glaciers are melting because 50 million people need their own 'unique' photo of the Eiffel Tower or a poor quality recording of Taylor Swift from 200 metres away
    • Re:Concerts (Score:4, Insightful)

      by CubicleZombie ( 2590497 ) on Thursday September 25, 2025 @10:43AM (#65682656)

      I attended a school orchestra concert where one of my children was performing, and I was shocked to see 90% of the audience holding their phones over their heads filming the event. The Whole Time.

      There should be a no recording policy, and the event filmed with a real camera up front and then published on the school web site.

      I haven't been to a concert since before camera phones. I guess this is what people do nowadays. (Get off my lawn.)

      • I've been downvoted for saying the same thing it seems. People can't even live in the moment because they watch every awesome moment through a phone camera, it's ridiculous. Oh, and it's a massive waste of digital storage etc
      • They did this back in the day as well, but with handheld camcorders and before that some giant shoulder mounted monstrosities. There were fewer of them, and fewer still if you go back to the era before VHS when it was reel to reel cameras and almost no one could afford one even if they wanted one. Now everyone has a high quality camera in their pocket. It's little wonder that everyone is getting in on the act.

        What you propose makes sense until you realize that all of those videos are all different. Every
  • Meh. After all this time, I still don't own a smartphone. Don't want one. Don't need one.

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by ZERO1ZERO ( 948669 )
      Are you 'man who doesn't own a TV' from The Onion?
      • No, that would be me.

      • You and The Onion jest, but there are people who could easily afford a TV and who use other technology but don't own a TV for religious or philosophical reasons.

        In the pre-internet days I knew a family who didn't want their children exposed to TV so they didn't have one.

    • They're quite useful if you just refuse to put any social media apps on them. I have a low-price combined portable world map/audio player/camera/flashcard system/notepad/shopping list/library/chess grandmaster/emergency internet browser and no reason to look at it outside of those contexts, which is quite useful.
  • The technology has been creative to be as addicting, intrusive and abusive as possible. The affects are turning up in our medical journals, politicals and the destruction of our social fabric. they should had been recognized as a public safety threat a long time ago and regulated.

  • By keeping track of everybody and/or their phones 24/7? Even when they are in the privacy of their homes? Even if this is symbolic, as claimed, it is ridiculous.
    • by JeffSh ( 71237 )

      its not meant to be enforced, its a symbolic ordinance meant to communicate. read the article and don't overreact

  • by Snotnose ( 212196 ) on Thursday September 25, 2025 @08:54AM (#65682410)
    I use my phone to stream music, to headphones when I work out and to my sound bar when at home. Does that count as using my phone?

    Likewise, I know a woman who loves to take pictures with her phone. You'd think she has a $2k DSLR, everywhere we go she's framing shots. Does that count?
  • Not an expert on smartphone use but are people using smartphones because they cannot sleep? Are people getting more sleep just less likely to use things like smartphones that keep them up at night? Are we comparing two different types of people, or have we actually determined that taking away the smartphone leads to more sleep, rather than the person with that tendency finding something else to keep them up at night?

  • Japan is heading into a demographic death-spiral. If less phone use will get people naked, great. But, how much dating is phone-based?
    • The notion of demographic death spirals are vastly overblown. Japan may have an oddly shaped population distribution for a while, but when the older generations pass on and there are fewer people vying for their housing, etc. it will result in a baby boom for the country.

      Countries have faced far worse demographic-related crises from wars, famines, diseases, or other disasters over the past several centuries, yet they're still around to get through this problem.
  • Uh, I'm not watching YouTube for recreation. It's therapeutic. Problem solved!

  • It doesn't take a genius to figure out that this is not intended to be at all enforceable and is instead entirely symbolic. Again with the clickbait, Slashdot! The register article is not great either but at least mentions it is symbolic.
  • Clickbait headline deserves none, I suppose.

  • I actively use my Pixel phone less than 2-3 hours per day... my iPad, however...

  • Smaller batteries mean bigger screens.

    The bad news is, they're all burn phones

Mathematicians practice absolute freedom. -- Henry Adams

Working...