Critics Decry Vietnam's 'Draconian' New Internet Law (theguardian.com) 16
Vietnam's Decree 147 mandates social media users on platforms like Facebook and TikTok to verify their identities and requires tech companies to store and share user data with authorities upon request, sparking concerns over increased censorship, self-censorship, and threats to free expression. Furthermore, the decree imposes restrictions on gaming time for minors and limits livestreaming to verified accounts. It becomes effective on Christmas Day. The Guardian reports: Decree 147, as it is known, builds on a 2018 cybersecurity law that was sharply criticized by the US, EU and internet freedom advocates who said it mimics China's repressive internet censorship. [...] Critics say that decree 147 will also expose dissidents who post anonymously to the risk of arrest. "Many people work quietly but effectively in advancing the universal values of human rights," Ho Chi Minh City-based blogger and rights activist Nguyen Hoang Vi told AFP.
She warned that the new decree "may encourage self-censorship, where people avoid expressing dissenting views to protect their safety -- ultimately harming the overall development of democratic values" in the country. Le Quang Tu Do, of the ministry of information and communications (MIC), told state media that decree 147 would "regulate behavior in order to maintain social order, national security, and national sovereignty in cyberspace." [...]
Human Rights Watch is calling on the government to repeal the "draconian" new decree. "Vietnam's new Decree 147 and its other cybersecurity laws neither protect the public from any genuine security concerns nor respect fundamental human rights," said Patricia Gossman, HRW's associate Asia director. "Because the Vietnamese police treat any criticism of the Communist party of Vietnam as a national security matter, this decree will provide them with yet another tool to suppress dissent."
She warned that the new decree "may encourage self-censorship, where people avoid expressing dissenting views to protect their safety -- ultimately harming the overall development of democratic values" in the country. Le Quang Tu Do, of the ministry of information and communications (MIC), told state media that decree 147 would "regulate behavior in order to maintain social order, national security, and national sovereignty in cyberspace." [...]
Human Rights Watch is calling on the government to repeal the "draconian" new decree. "Vietnam's new Decree 147 and its other cybersecurity laws neither protect the public from any genuine security concerns nor respect fundamental human rights," said Patricia Gossman, HRW's associate Asia director. "Because the Vietnamese police treat any criticism of the Communist party of Vietnam as a national security matter, this decree will provide them with yet another tool to suppress dissent."
The real story (Score:1)
Is how many women and children they executed for violating this law, with no proof except the testimony of Crystal Gale Mangum, Christine Blasey-Ford, or equivalent.
Re: (Score:2)
I see you fail to remember that only ~10% of kills by socialism were done by the brown variant, the rest by the reds.
It's disgusting to see both sides of the US politics water this down by calling everyone they even slightly disagree with "nazi" or "commie" (by the "D" or "R" parties respectively). Sorry but that alt-right crazy next thread is not a nazi: he doesn't follow Adolf's "ideals", and is neither nationalist (alt-right doesn't hate any country as long as it's white) nor a socialist. And neither t
Re: (Score:2)
"On Slashdot -- and more intensely on places like Imgur -- we're told that communism is a good thing."
I'm honestly not sure where you're seeing that. I haven't seen that on here. Also china is not a communist country. I agree rhese words are wrongly used. Calling everyone a nazi waters down the term when there are real sieg-heiling nazis out there.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh no! Sic the internet police at reddit on them.
Re: (Score:2)
Having just been permabanned from participating in r/news for not having The Right Opinion this made me laugh out loud.
More draconian than /. ads? (Score:2)
You mean more draconian than how lately /. has been pushing ads?
More Draconian than Draco. (Score:2)
You mean more draconian than how lately /. has been pushing ads?
The penalty for basically every crime according to Draco, was death. In 6th Century BC. Let’s stop with the stupid “draconian” bullshit already. It’s been over 2,000 years since NO comparison has even come close. Hell. I’d welcome Godwin by comparison. And that’s saying some shit.
I'll be honest... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why don't they just ban TikTok? (Score:2)
After all China is a traditional enemy of Vietnam, I know they have fought wars...
Big deal (Score:2)
Britain and Germany are little different.