Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy

Telegram Allows Private Chat Reports After Founder's Arrest (techcrunch.com) 48

An anonymous reader shares a report: Telegram has quietly updated its policy to allow users to report private chats to its moderators following the arrest of founder Pavel Durov in France over "crimes committed by third parties" on the platform. [...] The Dubai-headquartered company has additionally edited its FAQ page, removing two sentences that previously emphasized its privacy stance on private chats. The earlier version had stated: "All Telegram chats and group chats are private amongst their participants. We do not process any requests related to them."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Telegram Allows Private Chat Reports After Founder's Arrest

Comments Filter:
  • So I guess he found out what the case is about and now they're trying to fix it? I mean, that was all it needed to be kid-safe.

    My question is, is this about CSAM, or copyright? While they take down copyrighted content, it's not scanned like Facebook. Copyrighted content is definitely on their platform. TV Shows, Movies, etc. have been found in various groups.

    Hopefully this is all it takes, because channels and groups having CSAM should require good old fashioned police work. They also should be nipped
    • I don't know how to scan for copyrighted works but scanning for CSAM that is uploaded is not a big deal at all.

      Sure a person can flag CSAM, or report it when/if they come across it, but there's another way too. Known CSAM images are hashed and those hashes are distributed. [inhope.org] So searching for it is kinda like running a virus scanner that way. [iwf.org.uk]

      • There's also image recognition services that are typically run on many anti-social media platforms. Most of this stuff can be automated & flagged for a human confirmation before passing it on to law enforcement. I think this is why they arrested Mr Telegram; it's encouraging criminal behaviour by deliberate omission of basic safeguards.
    • by Rujiel ( 1632063 )
      You seem to be credulously accepting CSAM as the explanation for why Telegram is being targeted. You should look to the wave of suppression that is going on against social media platforms and journalists and pundits, and the fact that you yourself need Telegram for news (and I do too)
      • Politicians can never go wrong with "think of the children" when it comes to fulfilling their desires to shut down services that threaten their positions. After all, we can't allow bad stuff to be said or revealed regarding our esteemed betters by the peasantry.
        • If you think that anti-social media platforms help or even care about ordinary people... well, ... Hahahahaha!

          It turns out that platforms are more interested in sowing division & discontent for profit than making any kind of positive contribution to societies.
          • by Rujiel ( 1632063 )
            Who said that? Nice straw man there, but that could have been written by AI for how meaningless it is
            • The point is that politicians, law enforcement, & campaigners often (not always) have genuine concerns for the public good when addressing anti-social media issues. They shouldn't be allowed to hinder law enforcement investigations & allow serious crimes to go unpunished simply because "FREEDOM!" i.e. free speech absolutism, which seems to be a bit of a cult on /.

              Our children are not the price we pay. As the Spanish Republicans put it in the 1930s when fighting against the despotic Francisco Fran
          • I guess everyone loves a good trainwreck. A fluff piece about puppies and gardens does not make the media/social media dough. Trainwrecks do. :-/
            • Except that the anti-social media platforms are profiting from stoking the fires that cause the train wrecks in the first place.
      • and the fact that you yourself need Telegram for news (and I do too)

        And by news you mean crap. If you're getting your "news" from Telegram you obviously aren't being informed by real journalists, or even people who know what they're talking about.

        No one "needs" Telegram for "news" since it doesn't provide "news". The only ones suppressing journalists are countries such as North Korea, Russia, Venezuela, and Israel, to name just a few.

    • Re:So I guess (Score:5, Interesting)

      by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Friday September 06, 2024 @01:59AM (#64767252)

      My question is, is this about CSAM, or copyright?

      Copyright is a civil matter when it comes to taking down or reporting content. If you're not the primary distributor then no one is going to jail. It's nothing to do with copyright.

      If it's other boogeymen you're looking for you're missing the "t" word. Terrorism. Actually you're missing a whole lot of other words related to illegal activities which Telegram has refused to acknowledge. Chat messaging apps in Europe are major hubs for organised crime as well which is why there's so much focus on them by the Dutch Police (I say police, but they are more akin to the FBI's cybercrimes unit).

    • by Luckyo ( 1726890 )

      That's going to be the next spin, isn't it?

      First it was "Telegram has no encryption, don't use it". Then it was "We grabbed Durov because it has too much encryption and he won't give us the keys". And now it's "oh it was reporting child porn, nothing to see here, move on".

      Meanwhile Durov is still stuck in France and they're going to get him to make this into another whatsapp where "it's point to point encrypted (and we have all the keys, and so do all the spooks). And while we can't read any of it because i

  • That was fast. I guess it's hard to remain true to your principles of free speech when the lifestyle you're accustomed to gets taken away. As I've said in previous discussions, I'm not even sure where on Earth he wouldn't have some government coming after him because his platform has a few criminals among its userbase. Even Apple, with its massive amount of wealth, is still in the government's crosshairs for providing device and chat encryption.

    • I'm not even rich, and the lifestyle I'm accustomed to includes a strong preference for not living in prison.

      I guess the problem is that this is a service. Nobody ever arrested Phil Zimmermann for PGP.

    • Why stick to principles pertaining to other people when you know no one cares to get you out of jail when shit hits the fan, or if they did care they wouldn't have the authority to get you out. See Julian Assange
    • That was fast. I guess it's hard to remain true to your principles of free speech when the lifestyle you're accustomed to gets taken away.

      Telegram has surrendered [tech.co] data [livelaw.in] before. WIll do so again. The claims of not ever having done so are bogus.

  • by Malay2bowman ( 10422660 ) on Friday September 06, 2024 @02:02AM (#64767254)
    Can Google be held responsible for crimes of third parties? What about internet providers? Cloud storage companies? The phone company?
    • by wildstoo ( 835450 ) on Friday September 06, 2024 @05:43AM (#64767470)

      The justification for the arrest was made possible by the very loose moderation that Telegram seems to practice - according to reports, investigators found CSAM material easily in publicly accessible groups, which suggests that moderation is entirely possible but that Telegram is doing a terrible job of it. Investigators also said that when they reported illegal material, it wasn't removed.

      Durov isn't necessarily culpable for just allowing crime to occur on the platform, but under EU law he's culpable for not detecting crime that is easily detectable, and not removing illegal material when notified. It's a fine distinction, maybe, but an important one. There's obviously a geopolitical component too, with Telegram being especially popular in Russia.

      The same companies you mentioned would also face criminal investigations if they didn't properly moderate their platforms and remove illegal material when notified.

      • under EU law he's culpable for not detecting crime that is easily detectable

        An unfunded mandate, while governments allow crime though they collect protection money.

  • Apologies for the repost ..
    --

    Re:So I guess (Score:-1, Flamebait) [slashdot.org]

    “So you think it is that simple, It seems like this is about censorship. They (Telegram) don't enforce the censorship that the western governments want so lets do what we did to Assange.”

    “Telegram is the platform of choice to publish free from censorship. Want to post Ukraine attacks in Kursk then go to Telegram, want to post that you think Ukraine is losing and it is Telegram. Remember when Assange posted the video
  • Why is WhatsApp allowed to host CSAM loaded chats while Telegram is made out the villain?

    Might have more to do with who owns the company than the actual actions of the company?

  • Ever since Slashdot was sold off to the Chinese the tone has drastically changed around here. Freedom [the technical capability to tell the man to fuck himself no matter what society decided was best] used to be a core moral imperative for most folks around here.

Real programmers don't bring brown-bag lunches. If the vending machine doesn't sell it, they don't eat it. Vending machines don't sell quiche.

Working...