Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Bitcoin The Courts

FTX Employees Discovered Alameda's $65 Billion Backdoor Months Before Collapse (theblock.co) 36

James Hunt reports via The Block: A group of FTX U.S.-based employees stumbled across a backdoor for its affiliated trading firm Alameda Research months before the crypto exchange collapsed in Nov. 2022, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing people familiar with the matter. The backdoor allowed Alameda to have a negative balance of up to $65 billion using customer funds, according to previous court filings revealing code buried in FTX's systems. Negative balances were not possible for other FTX users, who would be automatically liquidated if they fell into the red.

The employees reportedly alerted their division boss to the discovery, who discussed it with former FTX CEO Sam Bankman Fried's lieutenant Nishad Singh, but the issue was never resolved. Instead, the leader of the team who raised the concern was sacked, the WSJ said. [...] The backdoor forms a key part of the prosecution's case in Bankman-Fried's trial. Bankman-Fried faces multiple fraud charges and could serve decades in prison. He pleaded not guilty to all charges.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

FTX Employees Discovered Alameda's $65 Billion Backdoor Months Before Collapse

Comments Filter:
  • by The Evil Atheist ( 2484676 ) on Thursday October 05, 2023 @07:47PM (#63904481)
    I want this fucker to get the maximum sentence possible, with no plea deal.
    • by tlhIngan ( 30335 ) <slashdot&worf,net> on Thursday October 05, 2023 @09:29PM (#63904683)

      I want this fucker to get the maximum sentence possible, with no plea deal.

      The prosecution has refused to make a plea deal with SBF, actually.

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      Do you see who he donated to? He's getting off. They already dropped some of the charges. He''ll be a last-day pardon for sure.

      • by ls671 ( 1122017 )

        You could be right but I can't see how yet given the info I have got. Maybe on the technicality or something, it works great in many cases.

      • They already dropped some of the charges.

        One out of like 8 charges were dropped and this was dropped on a technicality due to our extradition treaty with the Bahamas. When the Bahamas agreed to extradite SBF some rather minor campaign finance violation was added later, when it was pointed out this wasn't part of the extradition treaty we had with the Bahamas it was dropped .

  • by S_Stout ( 2725099 ) on Thursday October 05, 2023 @07:50PM (#63904491)
    This Singh guy should also get prison for life
  • If you scam people by falsely promising them they'll make money relatively quickly by giving you some of the money they already have, that's quite illegal.

    However, if you tell people from the moment they're old enough to understand the concept, that they'll be wealthy and successful if they work hard enough and they end up slaving their life away just to make someone else rich while never becoming wealthy themselves, well, that's just capitalism working as intended.

    It all makes a lot more logical sense once

    • by FuzzMaster ( 596994 ) on Thursday October 05, 2023 @10:39PM (#63904793)

      You (and everyone else) were born without a job. If you want to live like an animal and scavenge or hunt for your survival until you die, you can do that, but no one is forcing you to opt into the trade relationship that affords you a better living than what a bear in the woods would endure. It's up to you to decide what compensation would coax you out of the woods and into that productive trade relationship. However, you cannot deny that such productive trade relationships exist among cooperating humans for their mutual benefit, despite the existence of some who take advantage.

  • by phantomfive ( 622387 ) on Thursday October 05, 2023 @11:05PM (#63904827) Journal
    I was working for a Fintech company, and the company was hiding some relatively minor (compared to this) discrepancies from banks. I pointed it out, made a plan to fix it, and very quickly I was fired. I don't know why anyone would do that, but these CEO types seem to be deluded. They think they can pretend they didn't know or something.
    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      > I don't know why anyone would do that

      Because it wasn't an accident.

      Same way Alameda was caught stealing money, laundering it with Ukraine war funds, and then washing it back through the DNC to US politicians (who are willing to shut down the USG if funding to hide their crimes is not forthcoming from the jamokes*).

      At least that's the evidentiary case - we'll see how much can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

      * jamokes is DC-speak for hard-working American taxpayers who owe unlimited contributions to

      • > I don't know why anyone would do that

        Because it wasn't an accident.

        Probably. Though I suppose there's a slightly less incriminating story where the discrepancy was an accident, but they wanted to cover it up anyway.

        Same way Alameda was caught stealing money, laundering it with Ukraine war funds, and then washing it back through the DNC to US politicians (who are willing to shut down the USG if funding to hide their crimes is not forthcoming from the jamokes*).

        At least that's the evidentiary case - we'll see how much can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

        * jamokes is DC-speak for hard-working American taxpayers who owe unlimited contributions to smart and beautiful politicians for anything they want.

        Alameda stealing money sure, laundering it with Ukrai.... WTF new dumbass conspiracy theory is this?!?

        Oh, it's not that new, just really dumb [forbes.com].

        Lets go through the problems:
        1) Zero evidence that the Ukrainian government invested the money back into FTX.

        2) Even assuming #1, which we have absolutely zero reason to believe but could make sense as a form of corruption

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Why isn't there any news on hot office orgies with Caroline?

    • by Ed Tice ( 3732157 ) on Friday October 06, 2023 @07:29AM (#63905473)
      Remember, that if you discover a $65B fraud and don't report it and continue to work there, you might find yourself on the receiving end of a criminal prosecution. Although it might not be fun at the time, the guy who reported the fraud and got fired is probably fortunate. Hopefully he is now working somewhere better that isn't a Ponzi scheme and not risking criminal prosecution.
      • I don't know this for sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if has been black-balled out of the industry: Punished for not being a "Team Player". Team Player of course meaning go with the flow, don't rock the boat, and under no circumstances do anything that might reduce the boss's profit.

        • by Ed Tice ( 3732157 ) on Friday October 06, 2023 @09:00AM (#63905699)
          He might have been black-balled out of the crypto-Ponzi industry and that's, again, probably good. I can assure you that there are many employers who would be happy to hire somebody who reported a $65B fraud of this sort and those are probably better employers. I'm aware that reporting smaller infractions and/or HR violations doesn't always end well, but reporting something of this magnitude is something that most companies would want.
  • It seems to me that this team lead should be able to sue because he was wrongfully terminated. Whether the lead gets something or not is irrelevant. A suit should be made on record, me thinks. But I could be talking bs, IANAL.

Hold on to the root.

Working...