Roomba Testers Feel Misled After Intimate Images Ended Up on Facebook (technologyreview.com) 76
An investigation recently revealed how images of a minor and a tester on the toilet ended up on social media. iRobot said it had consent to collect this kind of data from inside homes -- but participants say otherwise. From a report: When Greg unboxed a new Roomba robot vacuum cleaner in December 2019, he thought he knew what he was getting into. He would allow the preproduction test version of iRobot's Roomba J series device to roam around his house, let it collect all sorts of data to help improve its artificial intelligence, and provide feedback to iRobot about his user experience. He had done this all before. Outside of his day job as an engineer at a software company, Greg had been beta-testing products for the past decade. He estimates that he's tested over 50 products in that time -- everything from sneakers to smart home cameras.
But what Greg didn't know -- and does not believe he consented to -- was that iRobot would share test users' data in a sprawling, global data supply chain, where everything (and every person) captured by the devices' front-facing cameras could be seen, and perhaps annotated, by low-paid contractors outside the United States who could screenshot and share images at their will. Greg, who asked that we identify him only by his first name because he signed a nondisclosure agreement with iRobot, is not the only test user who feels dismayed and betrayed. Nearly a dozen people who participated in iRobot's data collection efforts between 2019 and 2022 have come forward in the weeks since MIT Technology Review published an investigation into how the company uses images captured from inside real homes to train its artificial intelligence. The participants have shared similar concerns about how iRobot handled their data -- and whether those practices conform with the company's own data protection promises. After all, the agreements go both ways, and whether or not the company legally violated its promises, the participants feel misled.
But what Greg didn't know -- and does not believe he consented to -- was that iRobot would share test users' data in a sprawling, global data supply chain, where everything (and every person) captured by the devices' front-facing cameras could be seen, and perhaps annotated, by low-paid contractors outside the United States who could screenshot and share images at their will. Greg, who asked that we identify him only by his first name because he signed a nondisclosure agreement with iRobot, is not the only test user who feels dismayed and betrayed. Nearly a dozen people who participated in iRobot's data collection efforts between 2019 and 2022 have come forward in the weeks since MIT Technology Review published an investigation into how the company uses images captured from inside real homes to train its artificial intelligence. The participants have shared similar concerns about how iRobot handled their data -- and whether those practices conform with the company's own data protection promises. After all, the agreements go both ways, and whether or not the company legally violated its promises, the participants feel misled.
In a word? EULA. (Score:2)
"...But what Greg didn't know -- and does not believe he consented to -- was that iRobot would share test users' data in a sprawling, global data supply chain, where everything (and every person) captured by the devices' front-facing cameras could be seen, and perhaps annotated, by low-paid contractors outside the United States.."
Wait don't tell me, let me guess...this is the user who represents 0.00001% of society who actually READ the EULA, right?
Right?
Uh huh. I thought so.
Re:In a word? EULA. (Score:4, Informative)
That really just pushes the point that EULAs shouldn't be a thing. No one is going to read an 80 page legal document before running an appliance, it needs to be simplified with the important points made more visible
Re:In a word? EULA. (Score:5, Insightful)
Contracts aren't laws. They are civil agreements. Buried complex gotchas in unilateral contracts does seem like something one should be protected from.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
People have no power to negotiate contracts like this. It's take it or leave it. While in most cases, the court will side with the wording of the contract, the law really shouldn't be this way.
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
EULAs are like laws. There are lots of words, written in legalese. They have open animosity for mere plebes like me.
How many felonies does the average American commit daily? How many EULAs and TOSes do they break? Is it even possible to live a normal life without breaking all of these?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Richelieu, Beria, same commie scum, right? /sarcasm
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You do know who Richelieu was, right?
As for me, I'm not from US, so no, I'm not for subjugating an individual's freedom for state control.
Re: (Score:2)
In this case, consumers have the ultimate power to negotiate the contract -- the "walk away" power.
This isn't even like a smartphone where you have two realistic options for what is becoming an essential product - you can buy an Android phone and consent to Google's data collection and dissemination of your personal information or you can buy an iPhone and consent to Apple's collection and dissemination of your personal information (the latter allegedly being more limited -- but when competition results in
Re:In a word? EULA. (Score:4, Informative)
Of course, don't pretend you're any different.
But then again, these aren't laws. EULAs vary from company to company, even per app so it's not reasonable for anyone to learn them all and there's not any way to appeal or change them through the legal system.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:In a word? EULA. (Score:4, Insightful)
No, fuck off.
A device you can buy in a shop for money doesn't require a fucking license to use it.
Sure you paid $500 but we can arbitrarily fuck you over if you didn't read the thousand pages of small print is not in any way reasonable.
Re: (Score:1)
Sure you paid $500 but we can arbitrarily fuck you over if you didn't read the thousand pages of small print is not in any way reasonable.
This reminds me of the time I asked the closing agent at the title company how long it actually takes if people were to read every page of the mortgage contract, which ironically is worth a metric fuckton more than $500.
The answer I got was simple and quick. "Four hours, forty-five minutes on average. And only lawyers do it."
Go figure as to why they do.
If you choose to not read it, the company will be the one telling you to kindly fuck off.
Re: (Score:2)
I sped skimmed it, where I could get the gist of each point, the closing agent was pissed that I spent those 5-10 min to do so.
Re: (Score:2)
So this one user is the only one who read it, but a bunch of others somehow agreed to it, signed it, and sent it back? WTF!
Wait.. you're saying they didn't do all that, but they're still suspected of having agreed? Double WTF!!
Dumb (Score:4, Insightful)
Unless you're a fucking idiot.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You don't invite the surveillance equipment into your home and then make a pikachu face when it surveils you.
Unless you're a fucking idiot.
Isn't the issue that they shared the images on social media? WTF were they thinking?
If you have a robot that is trying to identify objects in the environment, it should probably also be trained on humans with their dangly bits hanging out so so it doesn't try to vacuum clean the dangly bits post training.
What is not ok is sharing the images for other humans to see or worse, putting it into a generative AI where it can make a myriad of images trained on your dangly bits.
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't the issue that they shared the images on social media? WTF were they thinking?
"They" in this case, were low paid contractors overseas, and not employees of iRobot. This is a failure of the contractor, but we know how this will play out.
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't the issue that they shared the images on social media? WTF were they thinking?
"They" in this case, were low paid contractors overseas, and not employees of iRobot. This is a failure of the contractor, but we know how this will play out.
"I'm just fine with my unfit programmer body being strewn naked over the internet - it was only contractors" - Said nobody.
Re: (Score:2)
Said nobody.
Correct.
Re: (Score:2)
Work done for hire still comes back to the person who hired them. If Amazon's contract driver runs off with your package, they owe you a new package - whether they can recover damages from the contractor or not. If iRobot's overseas contractor runs off with pictures of your package, they are still responsible.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Scale AI would have no access to these images if it weren't for iRobot handing them over. iRobot should definitely go after Scale AI, who definitely has no chance of going after underpaid contractors overseas.
Re:Dumb (Score:5, Informative)
Yes your comment is dumb. He's not complaining about the fact that he was surveyed, he is complaining that this data was misused, and that is a very legitimate complaint in the modern world where you literally can't do any transaction without handing over some form of data.
Re: (Score:2)
In the US, if data can be misused then it almost certainly will. Additionally, you should assume that any collected information will be publicly divulged. This may mean you have to do without a few modern conveniences but it's better than this kind dystopian outcome.
This isn't paranoia but rather, it is prudence. Corporations are bad actors and they will act in bad faith when it suits them. Never trust a corporation act to in your best interest.
Should be illegal (Score:3)
Software companies should not be allowed to collect data without explicit consent written in 25 words or less.
Re: (Score:2)
As dumb as this guy was, this kinda shit should be illegal. Software companies should not be allowed to collect data without explicit consent written in 25 words or less.
Let me define that 25-word "consent" in a single price tag for you to understand how it's so generously accepted by the Gig Generation, and how we got here.
"Free"
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
As dumb as this guy was
Literally every interaction you have with any company in any way requires you to hand over some form of data. The issue here is that iRobot execs should have their testicles chewed up buy one of their vacuum cleaners for mishandling data. The issue here isn't the consent to collect data, that was requested and was given. The issue is that said data was outsourced to third parties and wasn't securely handles and was leaked to the public.
There should be no level of consent possible for this kind of reckless u
Re:Should be illegal (Score:4, Informative)
They contractually agreed to be the custodian of the data they collected from the testers. They failed to honor the contract.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Posting as AC to protect me/firm.
I am an attorney, but I do not specialize in this. Anyway , , ,
The words "fault" and "blame" may be misleading here. The word "liability" is more applicable. The law-of-agency makes iRobot liable (for damages) here.
Re: (Score:2)
As stated in the article and in my comment above, this mishandling of data was not iRobot's fault.
No it's 100% iRobot's fault. As someone entrusted to something important it is *YOU* who needs to manage it securely. If you hand it over to someone else, you don't hand over responsibility. Contractor management is a thing and iRobot is completely and exclusively at fault for not properly vetting the business practices of Scale AI.
Re: (Score:2)
And was the NDA mutual?
It seems that irobot has violated the NDA by disclosing (or allowing third parties who presumably were also under their own NDAs to disclose) the photos from the devices.
Amazon (Score:4, Interesting)
This is why Amazon bought iRobot. Alexa is the audio recordings of your household. Now the Roomba has given them detailed floor plans.
and when the 1099's sub driver for amazon robs you (Score:3)
and when the 1099's sub driver for amazon robs you on an in house delivery. Amazon get's off and the only person you can sue is someing makeing $0.25/mile
We Need Strong Privacy By Default Laws (Score:2)
How does one get this sweet testing gig (Score:2)
Greg had been beta-testing products for the past decade.
So put aside the fact he installed an invasive monitoring system that just happened to clean floors, how does this guy get the opportunity to beta test so many things?
I've been a product beta tester before but just a few times - it was always kind of hard to get into position where a company will use you for that, I wonder how he managed to be a tester for so many products.
Re: (Score:2)
It's amazing what you can get when you're willing to have naked pictures of you shared on the interwebz.
Re:How does one get this sweet testing gig (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Interesting, I do review products on Amazon but have not yet been offered any free items.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You must have been really crap at it. My girlfriend also beta tested products, she clocked 10 in one single year.
Sounds familiar (Score:4, Informative)
I wonder if this has anything to do with this story [slashdot.org].
Stop fucking your roomba! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I know victim blaming is uncool, but if you didn't fuck your roomba, there wouldn't be any Intimate Images to share. :)
I don't think it's specifically victim blaming, but how do people think this stuff works? Majick?
I suppose the "worst" thing is the lady sitting on the toilet. Big deal. We have a Roomba, it does it's work and then goes back to it's recharge pod. Actually works pretty well. Don't take a dump when it's in the room if that's a problem for yinz.
And it would be cool if the images were timestamped. Might be handy as an alabi.
If a person is so soviet that they demand their floor layout be some sort of secr
Someone had to say it (Score:4, Funny)
I hate that corporations feel they can hoover up all the data they want. In a nutshell, this situation sucks.
Imaging camera on a vacuum, it's gonna happen (Score:1)
I knew this would happen when I heard there was an actual imaging camera on the devices. A sonic or laser ranging can make useful results with relatively simple processing ("Oh, I'm close, better go over here, and remember that in my map"), but a visual camera would take additional processing power to make any use of it. And that's just talking on-device. The leap that made me never want one was that for it to make any "intelligent" inferences from what it sees, it must be trained, and that takes all that b
XHamster now has Roomba cam (Score:2)
XHamster announces a new Roomba cam category for all your fetish needs.
dance with the devil (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
zero mercy these idiots. Same for the morons who have "ring", "echo", "dot", "alexa", a "smart refrigerator" or any other home spywear.
"Cellphone"? You must despise most of the world then. And yourself too probably.
This cant be hard to prove? (Score:2)
Opt in /out argument (Score:3)