Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet United States Social Networks Your Rights Online

Watching Porn Now Requires Age Verification in Louisiana Because of New Law 328

An anonymous reader shares a report: The porn industry has been around for a while and in today's digital age business is booming. When Laurie Schlegel isn't seeing her patients who struggle with sex addiction, she's at the Louisiana State Capitol. The Republican state representative from Metairie passed HB 142 earlier this year requiring age verification for any website that contains 33.3% or more pornographic material. "Pornography is destroying our children and they're getting unlimited access to it on the internet and so if the pornography companies aren't going to be responsible, I thought we need to go ahead and hold them accountable," said Schlegel. According to Schlegel, websites would verify someone's age in collaboration with LA Wallet. So, if you plan on using these sites in the future, you may want to download the app. "I would say so," said Sara Kelley, project manager with Envoc. "I mean, I think it's a must-have for anyone who has a Louisiana state ID or driver's license."

Kelley added there are other ways websites could ask you to verify your age if you cannot access LA Wallet. She added that although some personal information will be required, companies must not retain personal data after complete verification. "It doesn't identify your date of birth, it doesn't identify who you are, where you live, what part of the state you're in, or any information from your device or from your actual ID. It just returns that age to say that yes, this person is old enough to be allowed to go in," explained Kelley. It will be the website's responsibility to ensure age verification is required when accessing their site in Louisiana. Schlegel said there will be consequences for those who fail to follow the law.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Watching Porn Now Requires Age Verification in Louisiana Because of New Law

Comments Filter:
  • Simple solutions (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward
    Commercial entities - block Louisiana IP addresses.
    Consumers - VPN access from an IP outside Louisiana.
    • requiring age verification for any website that contains 33.3% or more pornographic material.

      I think I already see a flaw in this plan....

      All a web site needs to do is provide a few pages of junk content and the law won't apply to them.

  • Collection (Score:4, Interesting)

    by muh_freeze_peach ( 9622152 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @01:24PM (#63176658)
    This is a data collection effort with the ever present, tell tale, "think of the children" tag line. People in Louisiana will simply use a vpn or proxy to avoid the state collecting a database on the pornography that they are consuming.
    • You're wrong. Most people will not use vpn, they will give their details, just like they do to Facebook.

      • I didn't say most people.
        • I dont think the state is collecting this info, the site operator is just doing an age verification. Makes sense. We require the same for alcohol so children with brains in development are not harmed. We have decided porn also should be restricted from children. If the state was requiring that kind of Orwellian surveillance whereas the state knows who is watching what videos, I would have a problem with is. Porn is for adults. If the providers are ensuring that; like liquor stores, no problem.
          • If a [porn site] needs an age verification, it contacts the LA servers to get an age check. The LA servers now have info on when and what the person is watching online. And not just children, anyone. Because everyone will need to do this. Big Brother will know what you are watching. In a backwards republican god squad state, it really doesn't sound good. Maybe a better solution would be to force the sites to broadcast some sort of flag that can be picked up by a filter on home routers. Then parents can do t

            • Parents are not responsible for their children in the USA anymore. Blame the schools, businesses, and government, but not the people actually RAISING the little bastards.
              • by DarkOx ( 621550 )

                Blame the schools, businesses, and government

                All three of those entities are hell bent on interfering with the ability of parents to RAISE their kids, bastard or otherwise.

                • You got it backwards. Parents are voting for people who offload that responsibility on to those entities and then make a pikachu surprise face at the resulting mess.
            • Re: Collection (Score:5, Insightful)

              by stwrtpj ( 518864 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @03:00PM (#63177098) Journal

              If a [porn site] needs an age verification, it contacts the LA servers to get an age check. The LA servers now have info on when and what the person is watching online. And not just children, anyone. Because everyone will need to do this. Big Brother will know what you are watching. In a backwards republican god squad state, it really doesn't sound good. Maybe a better solution would be to force the sites to broadcast some sort of flag that can be picked up by a filter on home routers. Then parents can do their job and block them for their kids and leave everyone else's first amendment rights alone.

              I'm not so much worried about what the state would do with the personal information as the servers having a data breach by some self-righteous douchebag who then posts the data so everyone can see all the "sickos" who like to watch porn.

    • 67% (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Kunedog ( 1033226 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @01:34PM (#63176718)

      age verification for any website that contains 33.3% or more pornographic material

      People in Louisiana will simply use a vpn or proxy to avoid the state collecting a database on the pornography that they are consuming.

      Simpler still, Pornhub will debut a safe-for-work Home & Garden section containing two thirds of its content. Who cares where it comes from . . . just have AI generate it.

      • Does the content have to be on their servers? Any site can just create a link farm page with a ton of youtube embed tags.
      • Re:67% (Score:4, Funny)

        by serviscope_minor ( 664417 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @03:31PM (#63177226) Journal

        they've already got plenty on pizza deliver and plumbing. Though it transpires that they weren't nearly so informative as I had hoped. Can you believe that the plumber started by removing his PPE? how can such a lackadaisical attitude to safety in an instructional video that anyone can watch be acceptable?

        I stopped watching there and filed a complaint with the management.

  • Don't really feel like self-reporting to the government if I ever wanted to watch porn.

    A more important restriction would be on the LA Wallet to *not* record age checks once they are validated.

  • by Petersko ( 564140 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @01:26PM (#63176668)

    I wish you the best with that particular brand of whack-a-mole. If there's a way to get to it, pre-teens will figure it out.

    • by e3m4n ( 947977 )
      Way back when, I suggested all porn sites must exist in the .xxx TLD space. Makes blacklisting super easy. Get caught hosting content from any other domain, get a huge fine. Wont matter if its a legit site, the actual url to the images or video must be behind a .xxx TLD. Then parents have a super freaking easy button. Wont matter if you retweeted it on twitter, the actual content would fail to load.
      • This. Then parents can parent like they are supposed to and block those domains at their home router. Or rather block them except for mom's (she's the sex addict) mac address. Just being equatable.

        • by e3m4n ( 947977 )
          apparently I got modded down... must interfere with their gay midget porn streaming from mom's basement somehow. No fucking clue why someone would spend mod points based on nothing more than opinion. Nothing offensive or even political, just didnt subscribe to whatever groupthink cicle-jerk they belong I guess.
  • by thedarb ( 181754 )

    Better to pay for a vpn than to have some state government watchdog track what you watch.

    • You think they need this to know? Besides if the government wants to punish you but lwck evidence, they magically "find" underage porn on your PC. Just ask the contractor that leaked the cia vault7 toolkit.
  • by CoolCash ( 528004 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @01:30PM (#63176684) Homepage
    It's very common for kids to use VPNs to bypass restrictions on their school chrome books and other devices. Irony is that all these RED states want smaller government, but they are the ones creating all the new rules to restrict people's freedoms.
  • by Joe_Dragon ( 2206452 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @01:34PM (#63176724)

    how many websites will recode to work with LA Wallet?
    and what happens if other states do there own thing and it needs differnt code?

    • Bingo. Interstate Commerce. The state of Louisiana is on shaky ground. That law may not pass court challenge.

      • Legality doesn’t matter. Eventually when it is struck down the politicians will blame woke liberals or some other nonsense. Their voter base will eat it up. These supposedly fiscal conservatives tying up the courts with frivolous laws.

      • by DarkOx ( 621550 )

        It will be just fine. If it wasn't all those laws about shipping liquor would be invalid. Yet there plenty of states where I can order a bottle of booze and have it mailed to plenty of other states but some where you can't.

        LA isn't telling a site in CA they have to do anything special to serve content to a MN resident, but if they want to do business in LA they have to play ball.

        The left asked for this when cheered CA being able to have CARB standards more strict the Federal standards, same deal. Same dea

    • by Terwin ( 412356 )

      But it is so easy, you just add a pop-up to the front page that says 'by accessing this site you agree that you are not a resident of one of the following regions that prohibit access to this site: ..., The state of Louisiana, ...'
      And any time you get harassed by a state or country, just add it to the list.

  • The sites can just add four blank txt files for each video uploaded.
    Should keep the percentage between 20 and 25%.
  • Accountability? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by smooth wombat ( 796938 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @01:36PM (#63176736) Journal
    "Pornography is destroying our children and they're getting unlimited access to it on the internet and so if the pornography companies aren't going to be responsible, I thought we need to go ahead and hold them accountable

    I'll bet she never says the same thing about the rapes committed by Catholic or other priests, and the institutions which keep trying to hide the rapes. Because obviously that has no effect on young people.

    As a reminder, one needs to present an ID when purchasing alcohol, and look at how well that's worked for young people to stop them from drinking.
    • By in large part, the instances of rape (as awful as they are) in the Catholic church didnt affect most kids. Especially those children who are not Catholic.

      It is quite possible for porn exposure and rapist priests to both be bad for children, albeit in different ways and on different scales. Failure to address one problem does not prohibit one from identifying and acting to address the other.

      The law in question seems like a poor substitute for good parenting. It also seems a bit like grandstanding since

  • by gurps_npc ( 621217 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @01:38PM (#63176746) Homepage

    Because it is so easy to view porn without actually going to the website, just do a web search.

    Oh, and one more thing, Porn does not hurt children no matter what your shameful, perverted preacher told you. The Judeo-Christian-Islamic bible do not say anything about it, nor does science. In fact, several studies show that the easier access a culture has to porn the less rape and other sexual crimes occur (if you can get off with a picture, you do not need a person).

    Note, the Quran mentions 'shameful behavior' but does not specify sex or nudity as shameful. Yes, most Islamic preachers preach that porn is shameful but the Quran itself makes no specific claim. Similar wording is both the Old Testament (Jews) and the New Testament (Christians).

    The belief that porn is harmful to children is entirely a POLITICAL belief, not a religious one.

    • The belief that porn is harmful to children is entirely a POLITICAL belief, not a religious one.,/eM>


      Just because your or I didn't go bananas after watching porn as kids doesn't mean it didn't affect other kids.
    • Nakedness is mentioned in the book of Genesis and it is not looked upon fondly.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wik... [wikipedia.org]

    • Eh, it's not really as political as you think.

      https://www.chicagotribune.com... [chicagotribune.com]

      Even generally-liberal Billie Eilish has come out describing how porn exposure screwed up her childhood/adolescence.

    • by PPH ( 736903 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @04:39PM (#63177504)

      Porn is harmful to children.

      It gives them an unrealistic idea of how fast a plumber will come to your house.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Oh, and one more thing, Porn does not hurt children no matter what your shameful, perverted preacher told you. The Judeo-Christian-Islamic bible do not say anything about it, nor does science. In fact, several studies show that the easier access a culture has to porn the less rape and other sexual crimes occur (if you can get off with a picture, you do not need a person).

      Indeed. Removing porn from illegality reduces rape significantly. Of course the religious fuckups do not want you to know that and the equally fucked up feminists do not either. There are some minor issues stemming from porn and porn performers generally not depicting the average. These can be solved by education. But most teenager (kids are generally just not interested in porn) already know and understand that porn is not realistic, just like they understand the same about an action movie, because it is k

    • by DarkOx ( 621550 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @04:43PM (#63177530) Journal

      The Bible has plenty to say about it, you don't know that because you never actually read it.

      Thessalonians, Corinthians, Galatians would be great places to start if you wanted to actually learn what the bible says on the subject. "Rely on your spouse alone", "walk in the Spirit, you will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh"

      I don't know how much clearer you could get writing in a world before photography. You are not supposed to be thinking sexually about individuals to whom you are not married. What is the use case for pornography if not think sexually about people that are not your spouse?

      But I know its more fun anti-Christian bigots to supposed all Christians are ignorant of their own Holy texts (which certainly many are) but generally speaking anytime someone says "derp the Bible does not say that about sex/porn/abortion/tithing/political participation that's just something Christians made up" to name few topics, its virtually certain they have read little or none of the Bible in any widely accepted translation and if they did it was 30 years ago in a CCD class while trying to get it over with as fast as possible to move on to the pizza and coke.

  • by OzPeter ( 195038 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @01:41PM (#63176768)

    From TFA

    Kelley added there are other ways websites could ask you to verify your age if you cannot access LA Wallet. She added that although some personal information will be required, companies must not retain personal data after complete verification. "It doesn't identify your date of birth, it doesn't identify who you are, where you live, what part of the state you're in, or any information from your device or from your actual ID. It just returns that age to say that yes, this person is old enough to be allowed to go in," explained Kelley.

    But from the LA Wallet Website FAQ [lawallet.com]

    (Assuming that the Remote Verify is what the porn sites are expected to use to validate someone's age, as that is the only function I can see on their website that relates to this idea)

    What is VerifyYou Remote Verify?

    The VerifyYou Remote Verify feature is a new identity verification system that allows a business or organization representative to securely verify a Louisiana resident’s identity from a remote location.

    How does VerifyYou Remote Verify work?

    When a Louisiana resident needs to register or sign-up for a service online, a business or organization can use VerifyYou Remote Verify to provide a unique code to the individual. Using their LA Wallet app, the individual can use the Remote Verify function in the VerifyYou section of the app to send and verify their personal information, including name, date of birth, license number, and address information.

    It may be that you can opt into what information is actually sent, but the LA Wallet site doesn't expand on what information can be sent, and there is currently no video or walk-through of using this feature.

    • EPID (https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/121.pdf) is a cryptographic scheme which can be used to prove membership of a group (the over 17s say) without identifying the member of the group (the visitor to a fine web site).

      So this can be done, but I bet it's not being used in this instance.

  • Patients? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by coop247 ( 974899 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @01:44PM (#63176780)
    Love how it's worded to sounds like she's a doctor. She's a former drug rep that got a diploma mill bible thumping degree in counseling and works for some catholic center who's answer to everything, I presume, is "pray it away and dont be gay."

    Expert in the field, clearly.
    • Re:Patients? (Score:4, Informative)

      by NotInKansas ( 5367383 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @02:17PM (#63176944)

      Interesting! From her own online BIO:

      Rep. Schlegel is a licensed professional counselor with Lighthouse Counseling Center in Old Jefferson and resides in Old Metairie. Prior to following her passion to become a counselor, she was a top sales representative at AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals and Marriott Hotels for over a decade.

      She has been active in her community, volunteering countless hours over the years feeding the homeless at the New Orleans Mission and serving as a CASA Advocate for abused and neglected children. She also interned with Catholic Counseling Services while earning her master’s degree. She is a member of a number of women’s Republican clubs in Jefferson Parish and serves on the Advisory Council for Louisiana Women Lead.

      Rep. Schlegel earned her Master of Arts (Marriage & Family Counseling) from the New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary

      https://www.counselingdegreegu... [counseling...eguide.org]

      The Louisiana State Board of Licensed Professional Counselors issues licenses for mental health counselors in Louisiana, known as Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs). The Board does not provide a list of approved programs, but you must have a 60-credit graduate degree in mental health counseling or a related field from an accredited school to apply ...

      Louisiana does not have any formal reciprocity agreements for licensure ...

      https://www.collegeevaluator.c... [collegeevaluator.com]

      New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary is accredited by Commission on Accrediting of the Association of Theological Schools
      It has 1 programmatic accredited program.

  • Flip floppers (Score:5, Insightful)

    by reanjr ( 588767 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @01:45PM (#63176788) Homepage

    Don't Red states Hate Real ID and other forms of tracking and controlling citizens?

    I guess that's just another one of their tantrums they threw when Democrats were doing it.

    • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @02:27PM (#63176990)
      that's the gov't they want. One that's small enough they can control. The goal is divide and conquer. They want small, state run elections they can buy off with billionaire cash and control with gerrymandering. For anything statewide or national they want either an appointment by the gerrymandered/bought off legislature or they want something like the electoral college they can manipulate.

      The right wing wants power. Nothing else. They will say and do anything to get it. The fundamental feature of the right wing is a belief in a hierarchy where people naturally sort themselves into upper, lower and middle, with themselves near the upper.

      Once you understand that, and that all other beliefs are subordinate to that central belief, everything about them makes sense. It's why 1984 had that line about power being the only thing that matters.
  • 1. It isn't the job of the internet to raise your child. I'll go out on a limb and make a wild guess that raising a child is the job of their parent.
    2. Yeah, because I want my government to know my browsing habits and intimate details because no one ever abuses that sort of info or fails to secure it, ever.
    3. Good luck enforcing a site in another state with your stupid, silly, ill considered "law" let alone one in another country.
    If my tag/sig line was ever more appropriate I'm not aware of it.

  • VPNs offering endpoints out of louisiana will be a killer app this year...
    time to invest in VPN companies !

  • by Murdoch5 ( 1563847 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @02:00PM (#63176864) Homepage
    Canada is trying to do something similar, and there's no way to accomplish this kind of verification without massive, unacceptable data logging, analytics and the violation of liberties and freedoms. To say "Porn is destroying society" or "Porn is teaching kids unhealthy ideas about sex", etc... is just stupid, wrong, irresponsible, and negligent.

    Porn is a safe way to explore your sexuality, in a non-invasive environment, that is more educational and useful than our current sexual education standards. Speaking as a parent living in Ontario, Canada, our curriculum doesn't even require accuracy, fact, responsibility or science. Our schools will respect the view that women came from the rib of man, in a garden, 6000 years ago, instead of the responsible action of stating outright that the "theory of biblical rib women", and excuse my gross liberal use of the word theory, is absolutely hogwash, and has been debunked, disproven and is absolutely fantasy. Our schools will outright respect the "theory of biblical rib women", while actively refusing to acknowledge BDSM or the vast sexual world that exists outside hard coded liberal ideology.

    Ask a teacher in Ontario, Canada, to explain to a class of grade 7 / 8 students about basic BDSM concepts, and watch them dig in, refuse, and in many case trying banning your input. When you realize that sexual education is less about education, and more about dogmatic liberalization and radically stupid modern liberal concepts about gender and pronouns, all of a sudden "Porn", starts to become a valid and use education tool.

    These bills that require age verification are restricting access to educational material, while violating freedoms and liberties, and all for what? When a kid has questions they can't ask a parent, or they feel very odd / strange for having a fantasy, that they've always been told is wrong, bad, or unacceptable, "Porn" can be the educator. Sites like Sexually Broken, Device Bondage, The Upper Floor, HuCows, etc... allow the safe and expansive exploration of sexual interest, and to limit them behind strict age verification is dangerous, irresponsible and stupid.
    • Re:Terrible idea! (Score:4, Interesting)

      by buss_error ( 142273 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @02:31PM (#63176996) Homepage Journal

      " there's no way to accomplish this kind of verification without massive, unacceptable data logging, analytics and the violation of liberties and freedoms."

      Actually, there is.
      Sites set X-HEADER with X-AGE=13 for 13 &m up or what ever age. No X-AGE means no age restriction
      Parents set age on kids browser and lock it - requires browser changes

      Most if not all porn sites will set the header with out a law making them do it. Kids are bad for business becuse they steal credit cards to use then the site gets charge backs. Too many and they lose their merchant account and can't take cards.
      Edge - MS would implement it before the hat hit the floor.
      Chrome would too, because.
      Firefox too.
      Leaves out "fixing" older browsers but like I said elsewhere, it's not the internet's job to raise your child in the first place.

      • Okay, but how do you actually verify that someone is 13, 18, etc...? If you need to formally verify the age, instead of requesting it, then you need a reference point that is absolute, which essentially means identifying the person, and at that point we have to trust that site X or browser Y isn't going to reuse that information, which I have absolutely no faith in.
  • Looking on https://legiscan.com/LA/bill/H... [legiscan.com] at the enacted HB 142 [la.gov], it says

    9 B.(1) Any commercial entity that knowingly and intentionally publishes or
    10 distributes material harmful to minors on the internet from a website that contains
    11 a substantial portion of such material shall be held liable if the entity fails to perform
    12 reasonable age verification methods to verify the age of individuals attempting to
    13 access the material.

    So basically they want to control the entire world .. lol

    I was also amused by (my emphasis)

    (iii) Sexual intercourse, masturbation, sodomy, bestiality, oral copulation, flagellation, excretory functions, exhibitions, or any other sexual act.

    I understand flagellation as a religious practice, but apparently there are sexual connotations as well.

  • ...is perfectly OK. That the USA gets so uptight about one particular, everyday bodily function but pretty much ignores, & in some cases actively promotes, contrived, staged, inauthentic, glorified violence... You know, sometimes you gotta stop & reflect. What does that say about you? What kind a society do you wanna live in?
  • A solution that absolutely can't be bypassed by a free browser-based VPN/Proxy which avoids everything having to do with this farce.

    /s
  • by gweihir ( 88907 ) on Tuesday January 03, 2023 @04:32PM (#63177474)

    Because the connection to free access to porn and rape numbers being lower is solid. The other way round as well. And no, pornography is not destroying any children, that is just extremist conservative propaganda, with zero scientifically sound evidence for it. Of course, proper experiments cannot be done (due to illegality of showing porn to teenagers (children are known to just not be interested), how convenient), but indirect studies (ask them) are possible and routinely show that teenagers old enough to be interested have had access to porn for a long time, much longer than the Internet exists. There are some negative effects, sure, like feeling inadequate or confusing what is basically an athletic performance with what people do with each other in the real world. The solution to that is explanation and education. And then the problem is solved.

    Of course is zero chance of this law having any positive effect. It is just some assholes and some idiots doing virtue signalling. This law may well have some negative effects though.

"Gravitation cannot be held responsible for people falling in love." -- Albert Einstein

Working...