ISPs Drop Challenge of Maine's Privacy Law (apnews.com) 6
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Associated Press: One of the strictest internet privacy laws in the United States has withstood a legal challenge, as a group of telecommunication providers has dropped its bid to overturn the Maine standard. Maine created one of the toughest rules in the nation for internet service providers in 2020 when it began enforcing an "opt-in" web privacy standard. The law stops the service providers from using, disclosing, selling or providing access to customers' personal information without permission.
Industry associations swiftly sued with a claim that the new law violated their First Amendment rights. A federal judge rejected that challenge, but legal wrangling continued. The groups, which include the country's biggest telecommunications providers, filed to dismiss the lawsuit on Sept. 2, said Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey. Frey said the state's privacy law held up despite the efforts of an "army of industry lawyers organized against us," and now other states can follow Maine's lead. "Maine's Legislature wisely sought to protect Maine residents by restricting the disclosure and use of their most private and personal information," Frey said.
The Maine Legislature passed the bill, proposed by former Democratic state Sen. Shenna Bellows, who is now Maine's secretary of state, in 2019. Internet service providers then sued in February 2020, and attorneys for Maine have been in court defending the law since. The proposal stemmed from a Maine effort to bring back rules implemented during President Barack Obama's tenure that were repealed by Congress during President Donald Trump's term. Industry plaintiffs agreed to reimburse Maine for more than $55,000 in costs incurred defending the law, Frey said. Maine is also home to the strictest facial recognition law of its kind. It was passed last July and "prohibits government use of facial recognition except in specifically outlined situations, with the most broad exception being if police have probable cause that an unidentified person in an image committed a serious crime, or for proactive fraud prevention," reports Motherboard.
"Crucially, the law plugs loopholes that police have used in the past to gain access to the technology, like informally asking other agencies or third parties to run backchannel searches for them. Logs of all facial recognition searches by the BMV must be created and are designated as public records."
Industry associations swiftly sued with a claim that the new law violated their First Amendment rights. A federal judge rejected that challenge, but legal wrangling continued. The groups, which include the country's biggest telecommunications providers, filed to dismiss the lawsuit on Sept. 2, said Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey. Frey said the state's privacy law held up despite the efforts of an "army of industry lawyers organized against us," and now other states can follow Maine's lead. "Maine's Legislature wisely sought to protect Maine residents by restricting the disclosure and use of their most private and personal information," Frey said.
The Maine Legislature passed the bill, proposed by former Democratic state Sen. Shenna Bellows, who is now Maine's secretary of state, in 2019. Internet service providers then sued in February 2020, and attorneys for Maine have been in court defending the law since. The proposal stemmed from a Maine effort to bring back rules implemented during President Barack Obama's tenure that were repealed by Congress during President Donald Trump's term. Industry plaintiffs agreed to reimburse Maine for more than $55,000 in costs incurred defending the law, Frey said. Maine is also home to the strictest facial recognition law of its kind. It was passed last July and "prohibits government use of facial recognition except in specifically outlined situations, with the most broad exception being if police have probable cause that an unidentified person in an image committed a serious crime, or for proactive fraud prevention," reports Motherboard.
"Crucially, the law plugs loopholes that police have used in the past to gain access to the technology, like informally asking other agencies or third parties to run backchannel searches for them. Logs of all facial recognition searches by the BMV must be created and are designated as public records."
ISP suing means you're doing the right thing (Score:5, Insightful)
If the ISPs are suing, then you know you're on the right track.
Re: (Score:3)
Otherwise we're looking at some of the largest ISPs in the nation simply walking away from a revenue source.
Maine (Score:1)