Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government EU

Scotland Will Pardon Thousands of Witches (theguardian.com) 115

Thousands of people — included hundreds of men — were accused of witchcraft in Scotland, the Guardian reports, "from allegations of cursing the king's ships, to shape-shifting into animals and birds, or dancing with the devil."

Many were executed. Now, three centuries after the Witchcraft Act was repealed, campaigners are on course to win pardons and official apologies for the estimated 3,837 people — 84% of whom were women — tried as witches, of which two-thirds were executed and burned...

[W]ell-known cases include Lilias Adie, from Torryburn, Fife, who was accused of casting a spell to cause a neighbour's hangover; while Issobell Young, executed at Edinburgh Castle in 1629, was said by a stable boy to have shape-shifted into an owl and accused of having a coven....

The [pro-pardon advocacy site] Witches of Scotland notes that signs associated with witchcraft — broomsticks, cauldrons, black cats and black pointed hats — were also associated with "alewives", the name for women who brewed weak beer to combat poor water quality. The broomstick sign was to let people know beer was on sale, the cauldron to brew it, the cat to keep mice down, and the hat to distinguish them at market. Women were ousted from brewing and replaced by men once it became a profitable industry.

Wikipedia has a page with a list of people executed for witchcraft. Citing modern scholars, it places the total number of people executed for witchcraft in Europe and America between 40,000 and 50,000.

But the Guardian also notes a recent statement from the head of the pro-pardon advocacy group Witches of Scotland. "Per capita, during the period between the 16th and 18th century, we [Scotland] executed five times as many people as elsewhere in Europe, the vast majority of them women."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Scotland Will Pardon Thousands of Witches

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward

    After all, he warned you, but no, it's just a harmless little rabbit...

  • by AndyKron ( 937105 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @05:39PM (#62134461)
    We're obviously looking at reparations here. How much does each get?
    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      by pusoozer ( 8606671 )
      Yup, Massachusetts took less than 20 years for the pardons and restitution (from https://www.history.com/news/s... [history.com]): ...Then in 1711 Massachusetts passed legislation exonerating those executed as witches and paying restitution to their families. There'll be a little more interest due now!
    • by hey! ( 33014 )

      A brace of toads and a hogs head of newts.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 01, 2022 @05:41PM (#62134471)
    Pardoning the dead, especially the long dead, achieves nothing ... except distracting attention away from how you're not making things any better for the living.
    • Probably some weird political ploy to help their next attempt to have the referendum redo to leave the UK. (like the old EU joke, keep voting until you get the outcome you want.)
      • Re: (Score:2, Troll)

        by Dorianny ( 1847922 )
        People have the right to change their minds. Who is Boris Johnson to tell them, nope you are now stuck in the UK like it or not.
    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      The pardon is just part of it, they want a memorial too. I don't know about you but I feel that memorials commemorating people who were unjustly tortured and killed by the state are a worthwhile and important way of acknowledging the darker parts of our own history, lest we forget and repeat them.

      For example, I fully support pardoning Alan Turing and putting his face on the £50 note.

      • Be careful what you wish for. No doubt one of the usual red state suspects will be going - That's a good idea we haven't done that for awhile.
  • My ex (Score:5, Funny)

    by drainbramage ( 588291 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @06:05PM (#62134517) Homepage

    I know my ex will be relieved.

    • Iâ(TM)m still paying reparations to mine in the form of alimony-she cast a spell and my bank account started to shrink.

    • Not really, no convictions in some while IIRC.

      So, whereas not all people who ride brooms and turn the occasional person into a toad are necessarily bad, your ex still ain't off the list of people to avoid.

      I got no skin in the game. Mine went back to her home planet.
      • I've known a couple horrid stone cold bitch teachers during grade school that I still wouldn't mind hearing about them being burned at the stake.

  • witch hunts were a program against mass violation of medical acts that went out of control.

  • by FeelGood314 ( 2516288 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @06:14PM (#62134533)
    A pardon means you were guilty of a crime but society will forgive them for being witches. Kind of like the pardon for Alan Turing. Turing did nothing wrong. The law itself was immoral. There is no crime to pardon. How likely are you to want to be pardoned for violating someone else's weird moral convictions. The pardon for Turning was disgusting and these pardons are the same.
    • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

      by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @06:52PM (#62134607)
      Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • The thing is, the convictions were quite sound under the law of the day. So it has to be a pardon since the convictions themselves were sound at the time they occurred.

        This issue has cropped up again and again in different countries, a prime example being Carl von Ossietzky [nobelprize.org], whose 1931 treason conviction was upheld in 1992 because it was sound under the laws of the time.

        • A boy in a stable claiming he saw a maid transform into an owl, might be "sound under the law of that time", but is still ridiculous.
          So a pardon is fine.

          Basically all witch craft convictions should be pardoned.

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        The way it works in Scotland is that a conviction can't be challenged on the basis of new laws, only on the basis of the law at the time of the alleged crime. It's done that way to stop endless appeals every time the law changes, and politicians are expected to issue a pardon if the law was changed because they are changing the law in order to decriminalize what that person did.

    • by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @07:09PM (#62134657)

      Turing did nothing wrong. The law itself was immoral. There is no crime to pardon.

      That's literally not how legal system works. The morality of law has no bearing on whether someone committed a crime by breaking it. The pardon was a recognition that the law was wrong.

      The pardon for Turning was disgusting and these pardons are the same.

      These actions ammount to correcting a record. If you thnk the pardon for Turing was disgusting then you're effectively claiming that yes, Turing did do something criminally wrong.

      I find your point of view disgusting.

      • by xalqor ( 6762950 )
        I think the sentiment being expressed is that in the common dictionary, a pardon means forgiving or excusing someone for an error or offense. So even if the "legal" meaning here is correcting a record, it should be called an apology and a retraction, not a pardon. My own opinion is that a good way to honor the victims would be to ensure the story continues being told and to make changes that would protect people from being persecuted.
    • Moderated +6 Common Decency and Tolerance
    • by fermion ( 181285 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @07:35PM (#62134733) Homepage Journal
      How woke. Judging an entire society on your values, dismissing the concerns of the time. Ignore the fact that crop failure caused by witches resulted is massive deaths. That prominent gay men would infect society and lead to children believing things that would send them to hell.

      Next we are going hear woke propaganda like white girls should be allowed to marry black boys, and that women be allowed to own property. Or that the incantations of video games donâ(TM)t cause kids to be more violent

      • Crop failure caused by witches?

        U wot m8?

        • nm sarcasm detector must have been broken, carry on

        • by fermion ( 181285 )
          Laws are sometimes based on beliefs. Think of flag burning and prayer in school. Think of the laws that allowed prosecution for transporting of vagrants in California. Think of sodomy laws. These are not really evidence based, but to satisfy someoneâ(TM)s superstition or fear.
    • Well if Issobell didn't shape-shift into an owl then why did the stable boy say she did? Hmm? He has no reason to lie so probably she was guilty.

      But now that shape-shifting into an owl is perfectly legal, she deserves a pardon.

      • Well if Issobell didn't shape-shift into an owl then why did the stable boy say she did? Hmm?

        Because she wouldn't give him head. That'll teach her!

        • Mental illness with outward signs could get you branded as a witch. A medical problem such as epilepsy could give solid physical reasons for people to believe you were "possessed" and "barganing with the devil". Or maybe the crops were poor this year, and the town just didn't like you. You get used as a scapegoat, labeled as a witch, and executed.

          The boy who said that a maid turn into an owl might have been a sociopath, coached by others to make that claim, or may have been severely mentally ill him

    • Woke

      You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.

    • A pardon means you were guilty of a crime but society will forgive them for being witches.

      A pardon means what the pardoner intended when they gave the pardon. For current offences it's often a sign of forgiveness, but pardons for historic crimes are generally seen as an acknowledgement that the law itself was immoral.

      Kind of like the pardon for Alan Turing. Turing did nothing wrong. The law itself was immoral. There is no crime to pardon.

      Except there was a conviction on record for a specific criminal offence at the time. Which is why they granted a pardon that everyone understood to mean "this law was horribly immoral".

      How likely are you to want to be pardoned for violating someone else's weird moral convictions. The pardon for Turning was disgusting and these pardons are the same.

      Fortunately most people don't share your weird view of what pardons mean.

  • Why Sturgeon would be for pardoning witchesâ¦
  • My family, and many others from the region, were cursed [bbc.co.uk] by the Bishop of Glasgow in the 1500s.

    I personally hope the curse is never revoked, it's a reflection of the historical over-reach of the "first estate" and if they don't know where they can stick their religion it I'll be happy to meet the current bishop and explain it

    • Wow, that is quite a curse. I would consider it an ancient honour though. To be cursed like that, your great grampaw must have been quite a man.
  • And they weren't witches. Yeah, right.
  • by splutty ( 43475 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @07:19PM (#62134685)

    It says they executed some 40K to 50K witches. Obviously they did a good job of that, since there are no witches left anymore nowadays.

    Our forefathers (and mothers, not witches), saved us from a witch infestation.

  • by rsilvergun ( 571051 ) on Saturday January 01, 2022 @07:21PM (#62134695)
    Accusations of witchcraft were usually about money. More specifically land back then. The most common targets were widows especially without children whose husbands had died leaving them desirable land.

    It's amazing how many atrocities you can trace back to somebody wanting take stuff away from somebody else.
  • It's not like pardoning people who were convicted under anti-sodomy laws which, at least plausibly, sends a valuable message on a matter of current public concern. I don't think there is anyone even sorta reasonable who doesn't see witchcraft trials as absurd and grossly unjust.

    Given that people bothered to fight for it I guess it's better to just do it than resisting as that would just waste more time and create more possibility for division but it seems kinda silly to push for in the first place.

  • will be thrilled.

  • by 140Mandak262Jamuna ( 970587 ) on Sunday January 02, 2022 @12:23AM (#62135147) Journal
    how?
    • Hm, a small group of people who allegedly had special knowledge and were treated badly by the majority ...
    • Once legalized, legitimized and mainstreamed, witchcraft and other divine magic promises great advancements in computers. For too long, has our profession been described as arcane.
  • They are just being pardoned.

  • When the witches with the power of necromancy revive themselves and the fellow witches they were executed with come back now that they are legally allowed to re-enter given the apology Scotland is in for a world of hurt. This is a huge mistake. The next thing they are going to pass an allow all vampires indoors act.
  • > Women were ousted from brewing and replaced by men once it became a profitable industry.

    They punished the wrong people.

  • So much easier to pardon long-dead people than to investigate where the First Minister and her husband hid that half-a-million quid that's gone missing from the party funds.

  • by Chas ( 5144 ) on Sunday January 02, 2022 @07:47AM (#62135589) Homepage Journal

    All these "grand gestures".

    That's all this crap is.
    None of it brings back the people killed.
    It doesn't compensate the families.
    And everyone involved is long dead.
    It means exactly nothing.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      It means exactly nothing.

      It means you are a short sighted piece of shit.

      It means, after a pardon, something that can be pointed at and said "Look, we fucked up in the past, lets not do that again".

      • by Chas ( 5144 )

        Short sighted?

        Something that's been openly acknowledged int he past.

        But now, it's framed as if it were an actual pardon, instead of just theater.

        Sorry, it's bullshit.

    • by quantaman ( 517394 ) on Sunday January 02, 2022 @01:04PM (#62136107)

      All these "grand gestures".

      That's all this crap is.
      None of it brings back the people killed.
      It doesn't compensate the families.
      And everyone involved is long dead.
      It means exactly nothing.

      Well then it can't cost much either.

      But you're also missing a big piece of the context. Who created the anti-witchcraft laws? The government. Who convicted the witches? So with the posthumous pardons the government is admitting it made a mistake.

      Considering the dates involved the loss in credibility is quite small, but still there's a reason why this sort of "stupid, preformative BS" is the product of liberal Democracies far more than autocratic states. It's an admission by the government that the government can be wrong and immoral, which is a very important symbolic gesture.

      • by Chas ( 5144 )

        So you;re saying you're responsible for the sins of your forefathers?

        No. You're NOT.

        And the fact that these "witch-slayings" have been acknowledged in the past.

        Just not with all the fancy dress bullshit.

    • There's probably people living in tiny villages in Scotland who are still called witches behind their backs by townspeople, and still feel pain from realizing their great-great-grandparents were killed for just being different. The apology does make a difference.

      • by Chas ( 5144 )

        If you say so.

        If you're so fragile that actions 2-300 years gone are upsetting your day to day...

  • if we didn't get it right back then. we'll never get it. we're a fuckin doomed piece of shit existence.
  • I wonder if their list of pardons includes Hillary?

  • So if you happen to be at the same rave as Dick Cheney you get burned at the stake?

    That's almost as bad as Fyre Festival.

  • Whata we gonna do with the witches out there NOW?!?!?!

The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh

Working...