Man Arrested for Scamming Amazon's Textbook Rental Service Out of $1.5 Million (theregister.com) 106
"A 36-year-old man from Portage, Michigan, was arrested on Thursday for allegedly renting thousands of textbooks from Amazon and selling them rather than returning them," reports the Register:
From January 2016 through March 2021, according to the indictment, Talsma rented textbooks from the Amazon Rental program in order to sell them for a profit... His alleged fraud scheme involved using Amazon gift cards to rent the textbooks and prepaid MyVanilla Visa cards with minimal credit balances to cover the buyout price charged for books not returned. "These gift cards and MyVanilla Visa cards did not contain names or other means of identifying him as the person renting the textbooks," the indictment says. "Geoffrey Mark Talsma made sure that the MyVanilla Visa cards did not have sufficient credit balances, or any balance at all, when the textbook rentals were past due so that Amazon could not collect the book buyout price from those cards."
As the scheme progressed, the indictment says, Talsma "recruited individuals, including defendants Gregory Mark Gleesing, Lovedeep Singh Dhanoa, and Paul Steven Larson, and other individuals known to the grand jury, to allow him to use their names and mailing addresses to further continue receiving rental textbooks in amounts well above the fifteen-book limit..."
The indictment says the four alleged scammers stole 14,000 textbooks worth over $1.5m.
The U.S. Department of Justice adds If convicted, Talsma faces a maximum term of imprisonment of 20 years for each of the mail and wire fraud offenses; a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years for interstate transportation of stolen property; and a maximum term of imprisonment of 5 years for making false statements to the FBI.
Additionally, if convicted of the aggravated identity theft charges, Talsma will serve a maximum term of imprisonment of four years consecutive to any sentence imposed for the other criminal offenses. Restitution and forfeiture of certain assets obtained with the proceeds of the scheme may also be ordered as a result of a conviction.
As the scheme progressed, the indictment says, Talsma "recruited individuals, including defendants Gregory Mark Gleesing, Lovedeep Singh Dhanoa, and Paul Steven Larson, and other individuals known to the grand jury, to allow him to use their names and mailing addresses to further continue receiving rental textbooks in amounts well above the fifteen-book limit..."
The indictment says the four alleged scammers stole 14,000 textbooks worth over $1.5m.
The U.S. Department of Justice adds If convicted, Talsma faces a maximum term of imprisonment of 20 years for each of the mail and wire fraud offenses; a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years for interstate transportation of stolen property; and a maximum term of imprisonment of 5 years for making false statements to the FBI.
Additionally, if convicted of the aggravated identity theft charges, Talsma will serve a maximum term of imprisonment of four years consecutive to any sentence imposed for the other criminal offenses. Restitution and forfeiture of certain assets obtained with the proceeds of the scheme may also be ordered as a result of a conviction.
Probably a C student (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
He clearly was no too bright if he didn't think Amazon would catch on and be able to find him. They might ignore a few unpaid rental buys but 10,000? From the same geographic area? They had addresses, prepaid car numbers, etc., all of which could be used to narrow done the list of suspects. One visit by the FBI to one of the persons he later recruited to the scheme and he is screwed. Even if the prepaid cards don't have a name associated with them, unless he is buying them all over the state, a visit to a store where a lot were bought is likely to reveal who might be behind the scheme.
Crooks usually aren't very smart. They are rarely super geniuses like in TV shows and movies.
Re:Probably a C student (Score:4, Informative)
Crooks usually aren't very smart. They are rarely super geniuses like in TV shows and movies.
Or as a cop friend put it, we only catch the dumb ones.
Re: Probably a C student (Score:2)
Im in a silly mood this morning, and i can already picture it...
Prosecuting lawyer: ... and they had fricken lasers you say?
Defendant: no.... but they were very ill tempered!
Re: (Score:2)
The dumb scammers do the shit in this article, the smart ones are CEOs of San Francisco startups.
Re:Probably a C student (Score:4, Insightful)
The dumb scammers do the shit in this article, the smart ones are CEOs of San Francisco startups.
You mean Palo Alto [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:1)
Even in TV and movies they aren't super geniuses. How many movies end with the mastermind criminal getting away with it?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
He clearly didn't think it through to the end, or he would have bought some "get rich doing this one simple thing on the Internet" ads from Google and recruited a network of patsies to insulate him from the consequences.
Re: Probably a C student (Score:2)
He CDC was plenty smart, he exploited Amazon's system to his (criminal) advantage, his failure was to not know when to stop. He rented, sold, then shipped 14K books, he wasn't lazy, and his trick worked 14K times, obviously he found a failure in the system, so not dumb.
Re: (Score:2)
He CDC was plenty smart, he exploited Amazon's system to his (criminal) advantage, his failure was to not know when to stop. He rented, sold, then shipped 14K books, he wasn't lazy, and his trick worked 14K times, obviously he found a failure in the system, so not dumb.
He may have been smart enough to see a weak point, but stupid enough to think he could get away with exploiting it. Amazon could have stopped such scams by pre-authorizing an amount equal to the purchase price to verify funds available at that time, but then many who used their rental service would be without funds until the hold was lifted by their bank.
Re: (Score:2)
Amazon could have stopped such scams by pre-authorizing an amount equal to the purchase price to verify funds available at that time, but then many who used their rental service would be without funds until the hold was lifted by their bank.
I thought if you did your own payment processing - ie not outsourcing to square or something - you could query if the card was a pre-paid/gift card. Its been a long while since I was that deep into it but I thought that was the case. Amazon clearly could have made the process for recovering funds in the event the book isn't returned more robust at the expense of making the process more onerous and limiting the options of renters. I also doubt nobody considered some version of this scheme at Amazon before th
Re: (Score:2)
LOL, ripping off people (or companies) is easy...getting away with it, not so much.
So yeah, he was smart enough to find a way to steal, but not smart enough to realize that he wasn't smart enough to get away with it. It's like an advanced form of the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Re: (Score:2)
After a lifetime of watching corporations get slap-on-the-wrist fines for their malfeasance, perhaps he thought that would be his punishment too?
When companies are found to have over-charged millions of customers, the customers get a coupon, and nobody goes to jail. And even that comes about via a civil suit, not a criminal one. When was the last time you saw a corporate exec get criminally charged for completely willful behavior?
It is a felony for you to lie to a bank. It is no crime whatsoever for them
Re: (Score:2)
It is a felony for you to lie to a bank. It is no crime whatsoever for them to lie to you.
It is a felony for you to lie to a insurance company . It is no crime whatsoever for them to lie to you.
It is a felony for you to lie to a credit reporting agency. It is no crime whatsoever for them to lie to you.
That is not altogether true. If they make materially false statements to you, with the intent of causing you to act against your own interests; that would still be fraud. Its still a crime.
I will agree that the law is lopsided and unfair in this regard as there are laws specific to falsification of bank and insurance records by the client that lower the standards of the crime, like you don't have to prove harm etc. However its simply not true that its 'no crime whatsoever' if they lie to you. If the maker m
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly this is true. When I worked at home Depot we had cashiers getting arrested about once or twice a year for thinking that because it was easy to pocket the money from transactions it would be easy to get away with it...
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Heh, give him some credit.
I did, hence the "C" grade.
Once you have to recruit other people, it's only a matter of time before someone turns on you.
Thats the key - squeeze a low level person to catch the leader.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, he knew they would catch on. That is why he took the countermeasures he took. He might have gotten away with it if he hadn't gotten complacent and greedy.
Right. It's the "and not find him part" of his logic that shows he was not too bright in the end.
The real scam is the cost of textbooks (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
The real scam is the cost of textbooks.
Fortunately there's an answer. [umn.edu]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You have an illegal scam cheating a legal racket. I can't get worked up at thieves stealing from thieves.
Books today are so much more wildly expensive than they were for my undergrad. Well beyond any inflation adjustment. Current higher education finance is a racket. The flow of money is from government to university via the student. The student is put on the hook for paying that money back so then the flow is from student to government.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Rat bastards.
Parentheticaly .... (Score:5, Insightful)
... this scheme wouldn't have been worth it (or possible; who would rent normal books??) if textbooks were not so insanely expensive.
He made a racket out of ... a racket.
Re: (Score:1)
... this scheme wouldn't have been worth it (or possible; who would rent normal books??)
People who use a library? Though, yea textbooks are a scam.
Re: (Score:1)
No, they're a scam. They're even more of a scam when the professor teaching the class and mandating the book is the author. They're even more of a scam when there's a revised edition every year that just jumbles the pages around. They're even more of a scam when there's a software component that expires, completely rendering the previous year's text useless.
When I was in college I mostly had good professors. Good professors who wrote their own texts but didn't send them to textbook publishers, but inste
Re: (Score:2)
Throw the book at them! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Libraries have been scammed this way for centuries (Score:2)
The 'Amazon' part is what makes it apparently news for nerds, even if it doesn't matter.
Re: (Score:2)
At least my library, for books which have a high replacement cost, makes you sign a contract/waiver when you borrow one of these books. I needed to borrow a copy of the Canadian Electrical Code, and the replacement cost on that book was something like $300. Before they'd let me take it out, they made me sign a notice that I was responsible for that if it were to be not returned.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
But the punishment should fit the crime.
Do all the other white collar criminals get multi hundred thousand year jail terms? Or just a few months for stealing far far more?
Re: LOL @ USA (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
If Jeff Bezos had gotten rich baking the best cookies in the land himself, I would maybe defend his right to hoard such immense wealth. But, he didn't, and his wealth represents untold ruin of actual human lives.
As Walmart before him, as Sears before them, etc. Capitalists call it "creative destruction" and consider it an unadulterated good.
Re: (Score:2)
So you would rather any offenses perpetrated against you should be yoked to how much you money you have? What a unique legal theory.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
So if I steal $1, fourteen thousand times. I'm punished extraordinarily more than a person who steals $14,001? Because he did it all at once?
Strange system of justice you believe in.
Re: (Score:2)
It's the number of offenses, not the amount.
Re: LOL @ USA (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So damn liberal of you.
I'm just telling you how it works. And that's how it works. Maybe facts aren't a normal part of your diet, but you'll get used to them.
Regardless, if finding out how it works makes you unhappy or causes you distress, then perhaps you have just learned a valuable lesson in how this society works.
Re: LOL @ USA (Score:1)
Yes, if you rob thousands of houses of poor people, you get a heavier sentence than robbing a single rich person. Thatâ(TM)s how justice works, the more people you victimize (in this case the poor authors of the books who are missing revenue), the heavier your sentence.
Your world vision is scary, make sure never to enter politics.
Re: LOL @ USA (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I don't think you are aware how this works. Anytime you rent or buy a book from Amazon, a portion of it (even if it is very small) goes to the publisher who them gives a portion of it to the author. Even if it isn't money in case of a public library, they do give exposure to the author.
Amazon is the plaintiff because it has a duty to represent the publisher, the publisher does not have a relation with the defendant in this case, it does with Amazon, if Amazon refuses to handle the issue and they are aware t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Interstate transportation of stolen property? (Score:2)
Was it? When the books crossed the state line, weren't they simply rented at that point?
Like you know, the man could have repeatedly thought "Okay. THIS TIME... I'm REALLY renting. ONLY renting." and then after a few days "Aaw, who am I kiddind? I'm so keeping this shit..."
Lovedeep Singh Dhanoa (Score:2)
That dude wouldn't even need to change his name if he worked in the Adult industry instead :)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
And then he's going to Singh about it :)
Who wrote this? (Score:2)
1. He used Amazon gift cards to rent the textbooks
2. He used prepaid
Re: Who wrote this? (Score:5, Interesting)
He rented multiple textbooks all backed by the same $150 myvanilla credit card to cover every one of his rented text books. At rental, there were sufficient funds, but when all dozen books backed by the same card didn't come back, Amazon could only get $150, not the $1,200 it was owed for a dozen books.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, that's the part that was missing from the summary.
Thank you, it makes much more sense now.
Conclusion: Anonymous pre-paid credit cards allow people to act illegally, so they should be outlawed! /sarcasm
Re: (Score:2)
Sentence seems overkill (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Everything seems trivial when you reduce it to simple words. The guy got Life imprisonment because some guy stood in the way of an axe? The guy got Life imprisonment for driving through a school zone on the way from a pub while people were on the road?
Rather than saying stealing textbooks use terms like write fraud amounting to theft in excess of a million dollars.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not comparing his punishment to murder. I'm comparing your language to murder.
He's facing penalties related to wirefraud. Those penalties are defined and consistent with other penalties for similar amounts and similar cases. You seem to just be confused because you can't get over the fact that this involved stealing textbooks.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes.
Just like he'd face imprisonment for any other large-scale fraud.
The fact that it was textbooks is irrelevant; it's the fraud that he's being prosecuted for.
Re: (Score:2)
Just like he'd face imprisonment for any other large-scale fraud.
Unless he ran a large financial company and they were selling securities that they claimed to be backed by assets that turned out to be fake. Or a large telecom and knowingly fraudulently billed millions of people for services they did not use. Or a financial services company (not sure how else to describe Western Union, so I'll just use their name) and you knowingly aid and abet wire fraud. Or you're an aircraft manufacturer and you bribe people left and right. Or a car manufacturer and you intentionally h
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
24 years is a different number of years than you'll serve on a live sentence.
Didn't learn to count, did you?
Re: (Score:2)
It is 25 years per count. There are 14,000 counts, because he ran the scam that many times.
Re: (Score:2)
Federal sentencing guidelines do not call for consecutive sentences. The sentences all run at the same time.
The reason it is 24 years instead of 20 years is that the four years is added onto the rest of the sentence, by statute. The rest of the charges are by sentencing guidelines. 24 years is the maximum sentence. It will likely be less.
Re: (Score:2)
So I guess you should let the DOJ know what you found.
If convicted, Talsma faces a maximum term of imprisonment of 20 years for each of the mail and wire fraud offenses; a maximum term of imprisonment of 10 years for interstate transportation of stolen property; and a maximum term of imprisonment of 5 years for making false statements to the FBI. Additionally, if convicted of the aggravated identity theft charges, Talsma will serve a maximum term of imprisonment of four years consecutive to any sentence imposed for the other criminal offenses. Restitution and forfeiture of certain assets obtained with the proceeds of the scheme may also be ordered as a result of a conviction.
Though I guess that would be 20(*20?)*14000+10+5+4
It does say the four years are consecutive, but it is to whatever the rest of the sentence is, which according to the DOJ is a considerable longer period than 20 years. Not to say that the sentence won't drop before all this is over, no one gets charged with anything like that kind of time. I mean heck, the DOJ said they had Hillary on 1000+ counts of revealing classified information, and that wasn't ev
Re: (Score:2)
That should have been 20(+20?) instead of 20(*20?), I am unsure if they are meaning that mail and wire fraud are separate charges, or a single charge.
don't like getting ripped off? (Score:3)
Then don't accept anonymous "credit cards". The point of credit is that a person is operating in good faith with their own identity to back it up. If you eliminate the identity part of things and just pretend that an anonymous account with a balance is the same thing as credit ... well I don't have much sympathy for Amazon for not figuring out how this is a problem. They should probably sue Visa, they're the real scam artists here.
Re: (Score:2)
Visa has been selling financial technology for decades, and they are located in Foster City, CA in the Bay Area and often lumped in with "Silicon Valley" (as SF often is as well)
A micropayment service that works like a credit card is full of holes. Because it's just "new-fangled fintech schemes that Silicon Valley shits out daily"
Misleading subject line (Score:2)
The placement of the word "for" in the subject makes no sense. It's like he was an employee of the Amazon Textbook rental service and they paid him to scam for them, and now he's getting arrested.
The real issue here is that he used burner credit cards with zero balance on them so that he was never charged for the books that he flat out stole and resold.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a typo. Maybe this makes more sense:
"Man Arrested for Scamming Amazon's Textbook Rental Service Out of $1.5 Million:
ebooks anyone? (Score:1)
Woah (Score:2)
"Talsma faces a maximum term of imprisonment of 20 years for each of the mail and wire fraud offenses"
If convicted on each charge, this guy will be in prison until the Sun burns out.
Re: Woah (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If he had committed 14,000 burglaries, even of the same person, would you feel the same way?
Could have killed someone in Walmart (Score:2)
Law Enforcement for Some (Score:2)
Let us say that Amazon defrauded you out money, what do you think would happen if you went to the police?
Iâ(TM)ll tell you â¦.
They will say it is a civil matter and that you are free to file a lawsuit at your own expense. Of course, you cannot even do that as Amazon wrote themselves out of the law in their TOS.
When we the last time a corporate CEO went to jail for knowingly over-charging tens of millions of customers?
Gift card holes (Score:1)
My dad lost a lot of money via a gift-card scam (not Amazon). Those things are poorly regulated.
$1.5 million in text books? (Score:2)
So.... he stole 6 textbooks?
expensive books (Score:1)
Accused of stealing $1,500,000 with 14,000 books = $107.14 per (used) book.
They must be really good books.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Yet Amazon paid zero in taxes (Score:4, Insightful)
I give up, what part of his "equality and freedom" are part of his stealing?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The part where he gets caught and serves prison time, just like anyone else would (should).
Re: Yet Amazon paid zero in taxes (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)