Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy IT

Amazon To Monitor Customer Service Workers' Keyboard and Mouse Strokes (vice.com) 57

Amazon plans to monitor the keyboard strokes and mouse movements of customer service employees in an attempt to stop rogue workers, imposters, or hackers accessing customers' data, according to a confidential Amazon document obtained by Motherboard. The document also includes several concrete instances where people managed to steal Amazon customer data. From the report: Although the document says Amazon has considered deploying a solution that captures all of a worker's keystrokes, the tool the company has seemingly leaned towards buying is not designed to record exactly what workers type or monitor their communications. Instead, the system generates a profile based on the employee's natural keyboard and mouse movements, and then continuously verifies whether it seems the same person is in control of the worker's account to catch hackers or imposters who may then steal data. The move highlights the sorts of tools companies may increasingly deploy as working from home or remotely continues during the ongoing pandemic, and the issues Amazon is already facing with the theft of customer data.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Amazon To Monitor Customer Service Workers' Keyboard and Mouse Strokes

Comments Filter:
  • Another power grab in the guise of helping customers. I don't care how much Amazon pays, will never work there if they treat their employees like babies.
    • Power grab? On their computers? How dare they!

    • Re: (Score:2, Troll)

      by Aighearach ( 97333 )

      If you ever get a job you will discover that most employees are indeed like babies.

      If you already have a job and didn't know that, guess what it means?

      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        by Opportunist ( 166417 )

        Employers are more like 3 year olds.

        "I wanna! Mine! Mine!"

        Then throws a tantrum when he doesn't get his way.

      • by nucrash ( 549705 )

        Remind myself never to work for anyone like you.

        I note that some employees whine a bit more than others. Then again, if I had to deal with customers all day long, I would probably find myself typing and deleting several four letter words.

        Then again, I would take the job just to see how much damage I could do to a company like Amazon in a short time. I should become independently wealthy so that I can do that.

        • No reminder would be needed, if you accidentally were hired, you're be fired soon enough with that attitude. Or you'd quit. Either way, both parties would benefit by your not having that job.

          These things are completely symmetrical.

          People who want a "job" shouldn't whine that people who start a business need to make the decisions. There are much better things for them to worry about, like equitable pay and having high quality, consistent worker rights.

      • My experience of corporate america is that most low level employees (more than 3 hops from the CEO) are genuine down to earth hard working adults. The higher up the food chain you go the more likely you are to meet egotistical twats who behave like 5 year old children.
        • It is a basic fact of the American workforce that people can work hard and still whine like children. They can even thump their chests with macho proclamations while whining.

          "Down to earth" just means being a jerk who uses words like "twat" and then whines like a baby when people point out that they're misogynistic morons.

    • Another power grab in the guise of helping customers. I don't care how much Amazon pays, will never work there if they treat their employees like babies.

      It's called trust, but verify. You trust your employees are doing the right thing, you trust your security is secure, but you verify both.
    • by ComputerGeek01 ( 1182793 ) on Thursday August 12, 2021 @01:33PM (#61684757)

      This is how it works. We monitor every website our employees go to. Do you know at what point I care? When VP Greg wants to fire supervisor Ron, because Greg's nephew is looking for a job, but HR tells him he needs a real reason. Oh look, Ron spends an average of 90 mins a day on sports betting sites, bye Ron. No one cares that Doug has a foot fetish or that Chris is a furry and that they both watch a very concerning about of pornography a day.

  • Or, an attempt to determine which employees are operating below acceptable keystroke and and mouse movement KPIs.

    Or maybe I'm too cynical and it truly is an attempt to stop a hacking problem that I had not heard about.
    • For employees whose job is data entry, they already know how many entries they make per unit of time, so it seems unlikely that they care about that.

      It is probably related to something else, like the question, "Is this employee working, or doing personal things?"

      • by raymorris ( 2726007 ) on Thursday August 12, 2021 @12:21PM (#61684541) Journal

        It's none of the above. It gives an indication of whether the employee is using the computer, or their roommate or someone who stole the laptop. It's about WHO is using the computer, not what they are doing.

        From the web site of the people who make the product:
        --
        Behavioral biometrics uses characteristics of human behavior to authenticate individuals based on how they digitally engage their devices and apps, such as mouse movements, typing rhythm, touch and swipe gestures, or how they hold their device.
        --

        Having made a similar system many years ago, I tested all of these variables. The best parameter is the gap in-between keystrokes. That is, when the type their password, how long is the time period where no key is pressed, in between the keyUp event of one key and the keyDown event of the next. That timing is pretty consistent for the same person and often quite different for someone else.

        No one parameter is great by itself, but by combining four or five parameters it works pretty well.

        • by OzPeter ( 195038 )

          The best parameter is the gap in-between keystrokes.

          I use passwords with a mix of upper and lower case. But for what ever reason I can be slow in lifting the shift key before typing a lower case letter. This of course results in me effectively typing the wrong password on occasion. When that happens 2 or 3 times in a row I slow down my typing considerably in order to ensure what I am typing is what I think I am typing. So how do you compensate for that?

          • They won't, ditto for people who suffer from RSI, or break their hand or fingers, or any thousand other possibilities. They will simply fire the person for "suspected hacking" and replace them with one of hundreds standing in line for a job.

            Good luck fighting that one in court...the biometric software will all be hidden behind an NDA and you'll go broke trying to prove innocence.

            • Grown ups who actually know how it works are talking here.
              If you want to spout stupid bullshit that comes from your ass, Facebook seems to be the place for that.

          • Slowing down on subsequent tries is normal, and gives us additional data which increases accuracy.

            On the other hand, if it takes you five tries to get the password right that's kinda questionable and you might be prompted to select the date of your last order, or in this case your boss's name, or some additional piece of information.

        • So, from the start, always sign in in different ways, once with one ballpoint, hunt and peck style, once only using your left hand (half of 10 finger typing), pen held between your teeth, both pinky fingers hunt and peck...
          • Lol yeah that'll cause problems.

            My system that my company was built on was for web sites. Every so often we'd get someone using incognito mode with an anonymizing VPN and whatever else they had set up to try to make sure sites couldn't recognize them, then they'd wonder why we had trouble recognizing them when they tried to log in.

            Most of the time, the more they tried to hide the easier they were to recognize. Because they were the ONLY user we had using the Tor browser etc and that VPN. So it was easy to r

      • by OrangeTide ( 124937 ) on Thursday August 12, 2021 @12:22PM (#61684549) Homepage Journal

        Personal things ... like forming a union.

    • I assure you that Amazon is already tracking how many support requests they can get through per hour, average time before responding to the customer (if chat-based support), customer ratings, etc. Actions per minute on keyboard/mouse doesn't really tell you anything interesting about how a well efficient a customer service rep is, beyond the data that Amazon (and every other call center operator) already doubtlessly collects.
      • Amazon has support? [checks date for April 1st]

        I guess they would have for AWS, but for the shopping site you are more likely to win the lottery than to actually get contact with a human.

        If you go through their contact channels, finding a contact who can (or wants to) help is [in my experience] impossible.

        I started to boycott Amazon long before it was fashionable because of the way they treated my request for help/complaint. The amount concerned (approx GBP 150) is small change for Amazon , but for me to

  • of this as people start working remotely.
  • It wouldnâ(TM)t surprise me if part of the motivation behind this is to train an AI to replace a lot of what the service reps are doing.

    Software doesnâ(TM)t unionize or take time off and it canâ(TM)t really quit.

  • by PPH ( 736903 )

    Stop stroking your mouse on company time!

  • Just wait until they require cameras in your house for your own safety
  • it will be interesting to see if the number of mouse clicks collected increases for doing the same tasks when they update to windows 11
  • You can rule people with respect, and you grow to trust them.
    Or you can rule them with an iron fist, and it's only a matter of time before you're brutally murdered and stabbed in the back yet.

    The former one is what social species, like humans, do.
    The latter is what lizard brains and psychopathic dictators do.

    The former is way more successful, and hence a property of every species with a higher intelligence, for a reason.

  • It always takes two, a dictator, and a spineless mollusc, to ruin it for everybody else. Both are equally guilty.

    Yes, there's other options. There's villages in the middle of nowhere forest, having their own economy without anyone else. They're fine too. There's better countries with human rights, if you can afford it. There's revolutions to do. Hell, there's being willing to die for your cause too. (If it's worth it it's worth it).

    Frankly, I will ALWAYS have a bed in my home for anyone willing to flee from

  • The real problem is infiltration by international resellers. It is a HUGE problem with customer service reps at two companies I support. They get someone hired, learn the mechanisms of the company and use every angle to take financial advantage of various leeways in return policies, giftcards, and product promotions.
  • how did I miss the announcement? Maybe this WAS the announcement?

If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.

Working...