GitHub Secures License To Operate In Iran (mspoweruser.com) 26
Last July, GitHub prevented users in Iran and several other nations from accessing portions of the service due to U.S. sanction laws. Today, the world's largest host of source code announced that it has secured a license from the U.S. government to operate in Iran. It's also working to secure similar licenses for developers in Crimea and Syria as well. MSPoweruser reports: "Over the course of two years, we were able to demonstrate how developer use of GitHub advances human progress, international communication, and the enduring U.S. foreign policy of promoting free speech and the free flow of information. We are grateful to OFAC for the engagement which has led to this great result for developers. We are in the process of rolling back all restrictions on developers in Iran, and reinstating full access to affected accounts," wrote Nat Friedman, CEO of GitHub. GitHub is also working with the U.S. government to secure similar licenses for developers in Crimea and Syria as well.
Now perhaps they will turn their attention (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The parent means you to say you should be using Git (mostly pull only) rather than GitHub (a central repository, using push and pull). I do think we should be doing more of that, but the amount of overhead is so large that having a central repository is a good choice when there is some other mechanism of code quality control.
Re: (Score:2)
Every one of you, every single time?
Wow.
There are 60 of us devs generating probably 40 - 50 PRs a day in our organization (spread across Australia, New Zealand, Sri Lanka, India, Africa and the US, and a GH org with around 250 repositories in it), just asked around and of the 30 people around right now, no ones seen an issue with the PR system this week. In fact, no one can remember the last time they had an issue with the PR system on Github. Can't see anyone complaining on relevant Slack channels either
Re: Now perhaps they will turn their attention (Score:2)
You think the problem might be your team and not GitHub? The rest of us manage just fine.
Why Necessary (Score:4, Insightful)
The fact these regions get isolated from a source sharing website is just another example of the freedom of the internet being completely broken and it's being done by a country that proclaims democracy, liberty, and freedom.
This never should be done and some of these regions are so arbitrary. Crimera but not Russia or Ukraine? It's like screwing people from contested regions just because governments cannot play nice. It's effectively one of the greatest attacks on the "world wide web" ever outside of China's GFW which is a different issue all together. Literally China pushed harder for a GitHub clone after this and then I bet the US realized the information privilege it had to potentially spy on private repositories... oops.
Because corporations. (Score:2)
The fact these regions get isolated from a source sharing website is just another example of the freedom of the internet being completely broken and it's being done by a country that proclaims democracy, liberty, and freedom.
The US government does not want companies exporting goods to areas that are deemed to be in conflict with US interests. The purpose of this is to avoid having US companies directly or indirectly helping a foreign government we're in conflict with because well... treason is generally frowned upon.
This never should be done and some of these regions are so arbitrary. Crimera but not Russia or Ukraine?
Crimea is an area in conflict so all companies are prevented from sending stuff there. That may not fit the bill very well for Github which is why they were granted a license. If you don't think corporations woul
Re: (Score:2)
Crimea is an area in conflict so all companies are prevented from sending stuff there. That may not fit the bill very well for Github which is why they were granted a license.
They weren't they were granted a license for Iran while Crimera's license is still in the works.
I get that sending weapons is problem but forking the BLAST algorithm on github isn't going to lead to developing the next biological weapon -- not without a lot more infrastructure -- all of which can be effectively cut off with the sanctions you mention.
This is effectively like banning the export of books to a country because books can lead someone to become educated enough to make a weapon. Let's not sell chem
Re: (Score:2)
I understand "the mistake" of allowing the policy to not omit the work of Github but when the issue was raised more than a year ago, the issue should of been fixed quickly with an exemption.
Feel free to blame the outgoing administration. They have been a thorn in everyone's side the entire time.
Re: (Score:2)
Okay. Here we are in complete agreement.
Re: (Score:2)
In war, the winner is the one selling the weapons. So it's completely believable that companies in the US will sell to both the US military and her enemies.
It's just like in any lawsuit, the winner is always the lawyers.
We should do more of this (Score:3)
We should work together with Iran and become friends with them. America doesn't have an innate disagreement with them, we aren't competitors and we could easily collaborate in many areas. It's just a historical situation where we each call each other names (on both sides).
Re: (Score:2)
There is no way the US can ever be friends with a country who's leaders want Israel to be wiped off the map.
Re: (Score:2)
That's nothing, Iran has a celebration every year for "Death to America." Yeah, we get it, they want America wiped off the map.
These are meaningless words though, much like Trump's "Lock her up!" Certainly people felt that way, but innately Trump had no interest in locking up Hillary. It wouldn't benefit him. Similarly, the US has no interest in wiping Iran off the map.
The "innate disagreement" is over Israel. (Score:2)
US polices and public prejudice thanks to superstition ensure our political alignment with Israeli ulta-nationalists and support for perpetuating their ethnostate.
The American public are mostly delighted with this (the opposition are so small as to be politically irrelevant) so don't expect change.
Our ties to the Gulf states which are superstitionist opponents of Iran and recent pragmatic clients of Israel likewise ensure US opposition to Iran.
Then there's Operation Ajax which if any other country perpetrat
Re: (Score:2)
US policy conflicts with all Iranian interests.
No LOL. For one thing, Iranians were working with America to get rid of the Taliban.
Re: (Score:2)
We should work together with Iran and become friends with them. America doesn't have an innate disagreement with them, we aren't competitors
They aren't competitors because America and other nations have successfully shit upon the middle east for decades. America's greatest accomplishment in the region was the creation of the nation-state of Israel, which has been a successfully persistent irritant (which we have supported with dollars ever since.) The UK pondered it and then decided against (see also: Lawrence of Arabia) and we picked up the torch and ran with it.
Our coup against Iran was another... uh... coup. We kept them down quite successfu
Re: (Score:2)
Iran needs to stop trying to kill Israel.
Re: We should do more of this (Score:2)
They had, but then we fucked it up.
Israel needs to stop with the apartheid.
Decentralized serverless git repos (Score:2)
Then the next Trump could revoke it on a whim (Score:2)
That's the risk of people everywhere else carelessly relying on US controlled infrastructure now faces.
Sane people/business would do well to avoid relying on anything that the US can pull out under you on a whim.
I'd Like To Order ... (Score:2)
Some Yellow Cake please!
How much will the delivery fee be? I have DashPass.
Two topics: GitHub and Iran (Score:2)
GitHub: I don't see why this is any sort of news. GitHub is just a random commercial service, one of many that host some form of Git. Anyone wanting to do software development has all sorts of choices - I doubt anyone in Iran particularly missed having GitHub as an option.
Iran: Why, exactly, does the US have this deep craving to mess around in the Middle East? They have already screwed up lots of countries there, most recently Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria. Thanks for that. Now they're screwing around