T-Mobile's Outage Yesterday Was So Big That Even Ajit Pai Is Mad (arstechnica.com) 103
T-Mobile's network suffered an outage across the U.S. yesterday, and the Federal Communications Commission is investigating. "The T-Mobile network outage is unacceptable. The @FCC is launching an investigation. We're demanding answers -- and so are American consumers," tweeted FCC Chairman Ajit Pai. Ars Technica reports: No matter what the investigation finds, Pai may be unlikely to punish T-Mobile or impose any enforceable commitments. For example, an FCC investigation last year into mobile carriers' response to Hurricane Michael in Florida found that carriers failed to follow their own previous voluntary roaming commitments, unnecessarily prolonging outages. Pai himself called the carriers' response to the hurricane "completely unacceptable," just like he did with yesterday's T-Mobile outage. But Pai's FCC imposed no punishment related to the bad hurricane response and continued to rely on voluntary measures to prevent recurrences. T-Mobile CEO Mike Sievert confirmed the outage in a blog post. "Starting just after 12pm ET and continuing throughout the day, T-Mobile has been experiencing a voice and text issue that has intermittently impacted customers in markets across the US," Sievert wrote. Sievert reported that the "issues are now resolved" just after 1am ET, about 13 hours after the outage began.
The outage may have been self-inflicted when T-Mobile was making network configuration changes. Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince last night tweeted that T-Mobile was "making some changes to their network configurations today. Unfortunately, it went badly. The result has been for around the last 6 hours a series of cascading failures for their users, impacting both their voice and data networks." The T-Mobile problem was "almost certainly entirely of their own team's making," he also wrote. [...] The T-Mobile outage was so large that it apparently caused some people to think other carriers and websites were down, too.
The outage may have been self-inflicted when T-Mobile was making network configuration changes. Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince last night tweeted that T-Mobile was "making some changes to their network configurations today. Unfortunately, it went badly. The result has been for around the last 6 hours a series of cascading failures for their users, impacting both their voice and data networks." The T-Mobile problem was "almost certainly entirely of their own team's making," he also wrote. [...] The T-Mobile outage was so large that it apparently caused some people to think other carriers and websites were down, too.
two incompetent companies (Score:2)
When you combine them, you add their profits and multiply their fuck-ups.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: two incompetent companies (Score:2)
Because he's commenting on everything. Because he thinks he and his company is a moral leader.
Don't underestimate the amount of sites that run through cloudflare though. :)
Cloudflare knows ddos, handles xx% of all traffic (Score:4, Informative)
Some people theorized that it was a huge ddos - maybe the biggest one ever. Cloudflare knows about ddos. That's their original business.
The other side of their business, to monetize their terabits of bandwidth in the opposite direction, is that they deliver possibly most of the content on the web in the US. I don't know the exact percentage, but at least 20% of the traffic on the internet, certainly in the US. If something major is going on that affects the internet across the US, Cloudflare knows about it. They have instrumentation in every significant internet exchange in the country.
Re: (Score:2)
Some people theorized that it was a huge ddos
Two other options: 1. A certificate expired somewhere, the standard self-inflicted DoS, or 2. Two already-incompetent companies merging their incompetence to double the chances of a fuckup.
Re: (Score:2)
Everyone working from home probably didn't help.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Why is the cloudflare CEO even commenting on T-mobile's problems, he isn't their CEO.
They quoted the Cloudflare CEO, they could just as easily have quoted any number of other sources. I had already read about the causes of this outage at least 5 hours before this story was posted. The configuration change was something to do with the introduction of 5G networks although my news source did not specify in which country - yes, it was not just the US which was affected and T-Mobile is a major player where I am as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You must have a dual sim phone one sim for t-mobile one for sprint.
Re: (Score:1)
The FEMA should suggest the intergation of FRS and MURS radios into cellphones at least you could meet back up with family members at the mall or state fair if cell service is down. Ham radio operators can buy equipment from RFinder.net. They are called android radios, combo cellphone and vhf or uhf amateur radio tranceivers.
Re: (Score:1)
Cancel service and you still have walkie talkies.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
It's not so much that I was bothered by the outage (Score:5, Informative)
But I was very much bothered by the fact that T-Mobil implied the outage was A) Not their fault, B) Affecting other carriers, and C) maybe a DDoS and that it was hitting other services, not just communications systems.
The lack of communication that resulted in the rumor mill ramping up was bad enough. But they could easily have come out and said, Hey, it's our bad, we're working on it and we'll let you know when it's fixed. This would have gone a long way toward reducing some or most of the bad taste this has left in everyone's mouth.
Re: (Score:2)
Bring back John Legere! ... not that it would've changed anything, but his tweets would've contained some entertaining swear words.
No outage with Legere (Score:1)
Bring back John Legere! ... not that it would've changed anything
John Legere is like the Chuck Norris of Telcos, had he still been there he would have routed call packets by hand while cooking up a mean batch of chili in the slow-cooker.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Bullshit T-Mo never said or implied anything like that that was idiots online spreading crap.
Go back and look at my posts from yesterday I ended up being 90% correct.
Kickbacks (Score:3)
he's probably mad because it interfered with getting his regular kickback check from Tmobile
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Things might be different this time around, T-Mobil is not from the US and my impression is that the US is much happier imposing fines on non-US companies. Rather like the French, I suppose.
Re: No wonder they had an outage (Score:2)
It's a German conpany. And as a Geman: Your rules for the hours around the switch from AM to PM are ridiculous. Those for the very minute or second even more so.
Please use zero-based 24 hour time, like normal people. Your military already kinda does.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
No, there is not. You do research. What do a.m. and p.m. stand for? Ante meridiem and post meridiem. Tell us, at what point is 12 A.M. if ante meridiem stands for the time before midday?
I wished I had kept that newspaper article about the guy who fought, and won dismissal of, a parking ticket. The sign said no parking between some time and 12 PM. He argued, correctly, there is no such time as 12 PM. The city then went back and changed all the signs to avoid either 12 PM or 12 AM.
In Australia, their sig
Re: (Score:2)
Reference here [dictionary.com].
I bet that guy that sued and won felt mighty special costing taxpayers money to reprint the signs.
-time is relative.
Re: (Score:2)
Hey Mr Potato head guess what comes after 11:59:59 AM..
12:00:00 PM...
You are incorrect. 12:00:00 is 12M, neither A nor P.
AM is the abbreviation for Ante(before)Meridian(noon). PM is the abbreviation for Post(after)Meridian(noon).
Noon is the Meridian.
There is a 12AM and a 12M, but there is no 12PM.
Re: No wonder they had an outage (Score:2)
I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but you're not making sense.
12a.m. and 12p.m. absolutely exist and are well defined.
We start the day at 12a.m. 11:59:59p.m. is one day, and then at 12:00:00a.m. it is the next day. Noon is the meridian, so anything earlier in the day which started at 12:00:00 is ante meridian.
And no matter what precision you use, any time you specify will actually be a slice of time, not a single moment. E.g., "it is now 3:45; how long will it be 3:45?" The answer is one minute. So an
Re: (Score:1)
Really ? That's common IT vernacular.
Re:No wonder they had an outage (Score:5, Informative)
>"There is no time in the day as 12 PM."
I don't know what planet YOU live on, but for the rest of us, 12PM is noon and 12AM is midnight.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Interestingly you used language to specify a time and I know exactly and unambiguously what time you mean. So yes 13 PM does exist.
Re: (Score:2)
I want you to think of a purple-and-pink polka-dotted dragon with lavender wings that produces rainbow flame from its nostrils.
Better yet, don't think of a zebra-striped platypus.
Now, I've used language to specify animals, and you know unambiguously what those animals are.
By your logic, both of those animals exist.
(There is no '13 PM'.)
Re: (Score:2)
Noon cannot be before or after itself,
You presented this without proof, nor did you give any support for it, but it's not obvious.
Re: (Score:2)
Noon cannot be before or after itself,
You presented this without proof, nor did you give any support for it, but it's not obvious.
from Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]
It is not always clear what times "12:00 a.m." and "12:00 p.m." denote. From the Latin words meridies (midday), ante (before) and post (after), the term ante meridiem (a.m.) means before midday and post meridiem (p.m.) means after midday. Since "noon" (midday, meridies (m.)) is neither before nor after itself, the terms a.m. and p.m. do not apply.[2] Although "12 m." was suggested as a way to indicate noon, this is seldom done[17] and also does not resolve the question of how to indicate midnight. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language states "By convention, 12 AM denotes midnight and 12 PM denotes noon. Because of the potential for confusion, it is advisable to use 12 noon and 12 midnight."[21]
Re: (Score:1)
What you're quoting is little more than technical curiosity of interest only to language nerds and people on the autism spectrum. For everyone else in the world 12 pm is unambiguous.
Re: (Score:2)
However, in the time between saying "it's 12" and "PM" time has moved to the PM time segment. It cannot be expressed instantaneously.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. I think it's a dumb arrangement, but it is what it is. I prefer a 24 hr clock (aka military time). GMT can be useful for logging or a world-wide event. I'd like to see Zulu time on news articles, etc.
Re: (Score:1)
There was literally a court case some years ago where this was the topic, the plaintiff (who won, btw) having received a parking ticket based on timing rules he felt were too vague.
https://www.leagle.com/decisio... [leagle.com]
"...Defendant had parked in a space controlled by a parking meter which displayed a legend showing the hours of the meter's operation to be from 8 a.m. until 12 p.m. The underlying municipal ordinance regulated parking from "8:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight," but the sign which was the only notice of t
Re: (Score:2)
>"There is no time in the day as 12 PM."
I don't know what planet YOU live on, but for the rest of us, 12PM is noon and 12AM is midnight.
Noon and midnight are neither AM nor PM.
Re: (Score:2)
>"Noon and midnight are neither AM nor PM."
Tell that to your computer, your alarm clock, your phone, or any other device that displays AM and PM.
Re: (Score:2)
>"There is no time in the day as 12 PM."
I don't know what planet YOU live on, but for the rest of us, 12PM is noon and 12AM is midnight.
Most of the planet doesn't use the AM/PM scheme. When I use it, I always avoid 12PM or 12AM because there is a risk of misunderstanding.
See also the Wikipedia section [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Dear Mr Pai. The FCC is not your personal army. (Score:2)
You would not have done anything, it this hadn't affected you personally and you if you were not such an easily triggered brown Trump.
Keep your private problems separate from the fate of an institution that exists to serve all Americans. (I'm an idealist who hasn't given up, OK?)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, he saw the prospective value of the stock T-Mobile will give him as a board member after he finished his term of "public service" drop. No wonder he's annoyed.
Re: (Score:2)
Mod suicide (Score:3)
Please excuse my referene to reality here, but this mentality (where the Big Company gets blasted by the head of the agency appointed to police these things, but nothing happens) is what some have chosen to refer to as "White Privilege". Just sayin. Despite what you may or may not think, there is merit to it. I, myself, refer to it as "Class Privilege". But I'm only of average intelligence, if not, lower.
Shocked, I say! (Score:2, Informative)
Pai has been around for far, FAR longer than most. This should tell you a LOT about what he does, and doesn't do. This guy has basically let telecoms do whatever the hell they want, whenever the hell they want. No regulation, n
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
I get why Republicans and conservatives couldn't bring themselves to vote for a Clinton. I understand why 2016 happened and I'm not sore about it. But at this point we've got 4 years of data showing this one is an absolute loser. My god, he couldn't even manage to get a coherent "we're all in this together" in response to a frikkin VIRUS attack. T
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly it's looking more and more like that's about all Biden is going to be competent to do, he's already less coherent than Reagan was in his 6th year in the White House. Unfortunately what we need is a Clinton now, someone who can kick ass and get shit done in spite of outrageous opposition. (Honestly, I couldn't stand the bastard or most of his policies, but he did get most of his agenda through except for privatizing Social Security.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The corporate-owned DNC sees him as someone easy to control, which is probably right. I'm really curious what monster they're going to inflict on us as their VP pick. Traditionally they had to at least make a gesture towards the Left, but this time the press corpse isn't even pretending to give any coverage to any alternative party. Besides, who else are we going to vote for, Rump?
Re:Shocked, I say! (Score:4, Funny)
Oh, they also have to be good looking and suited for the job.
Not sure what your evidence is regarding that last point...
Re: (Score:2)
Speaking of Donald Trump's Cabinet appointees, hdyoung posited:
Oh, they also have to be good looking and suited for the job.
Prompting 93 Escort Wagon to respond:
Not sure what your evidence is regarding that last point...
Mod +1 Funny, please ... !
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure electromagnetic spectrum is a right.
It's not anymore, because it is regulated. But I'm pretty sure Marconi did not have to apply for a license.
Re: (Score:2)
Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 3, 7, and 18 all seem to apply. The Commerce Clause is a no-brainer for anybody who understands Constitutional law. The Postal Clause could be argued, given that it clearly envisions setting up a national communications network.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Let's put a few things in perspective. The average person in the Trump administration lasts around 36 hours. The only people who last any longer are the ones who literally nod yes to him and do absolutely nothing more. Oh, they also have to be good looking and suited for the job.
Pai has been around for far, FAR longer than most. This should tell you a LOT about what he does, and doesn't do.
Or it could be that FCC commissioners are appointed for terms of five years, rather than serving at the pleasure of the president, as most other political appointees. But don't let facts get in the way of a good rant (which, FWIW, is otherwise true enough--anyone working for Trump long term is probably a sycophant).
Still having problems Tue 16 June (Score:1)
The poor techs (Score:2)
Am I the only one who feels really bad for the techs that fâ(TM)d this up? Or the gang that has to put Humpty Dumpty back together again? Iâ(TM)ve planned changes that could (and have!) send the whole shithouse up in flames. I ask the backups I invite to bring marshmallows in case it does.
Re: (Score:2)
>"Am I the only one who feels really bad for the techs that fÃ(TM)d this up? Or the gang that has to put Humpty Dumpty back together again? IÃ(TM)ve planned changes that could (and have!) send the whole shithouse up in flames. "
I can sympathize. It is amazing how fragile some networks and systems can be. It is also amazing stuff like this doesn't happen more often. Some heads will roll, no doubt. This major outage is a HUGELY negative PR event, and at a sensitive time....
I have never, ever
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
A few posts down notes that they had a layoff yesterday, 400 people. Wonder if some of those folks had something to do with this. I've seen coincidences like this in the past, never could prove anything. I'm sure there will be a thorough investigation.
Re: The poor techs (Score:3)
I was thinking something less sinister; like if they suddenly lost the one guy who knew how that one thing worked. Add in the chaos of a mass layoff where you are trying to keep privileged people out of the loop, and it's a recipe for disaster.
lol (Score:1)
Crocodile Tears, Anyone? (Score:3)
It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
Pai has been shilling for the telecom industry for years now, fashioning the FCC into a near-perfect textbook example of the term "regulatory capture."
Screw him and the sorry-ass mule he rode in on.
Re: (Score:2)
He's just carrying the same torch that Michael Powell lit.
Re: (Score:2)
He's just carrying the same torch that Michael Powell lit.
Right...Colin Powell's son, appointed to the FCC panel by Bill Clinton on Nov 3, 1997, promoted to Chairman of the FCC by President George W. Bush on January 22, 2001. He was a bad appointment as a member of the panel and a terrible appointment as Chairman of the FCC. He took the revolving door journey from his government role into a seat on the board of directors of RAND Corp, then completed the journey when he became a lobbyist the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA).
Re: (Score:2)
Prior to all that he worked in the Antitrust division, if you can believe it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
T mobile is a Verizon competitor and Ajiit Pai works for Verizon. (yes I said it).
Re: (Score:2)
Did he wield his huge Reese's coffee cup? (Score:3)
More importantly, did he threateningly wield his offensively huge Reese's coffee cup?
I'm fed up! (Score:3)
The more things change... (Score:2)
The more they stay the same [mit.edu]...
Where was Crowley? (Score:1)
TMobile problems (Score:1)
Happy to see that... (Score:1)
If so, I am happy to see that. Pai needs to know first hand what getting screwed feels like.
Perhaps now is a good time to poke the Net Neutrality thing back at him again!