Prisons Are Banning Books That Teach Prisoners How To Code (vice.com) 193
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Motherboard: The Oregon Department of Corrections has banned prisoners from reading a number of books related to technology and programming, citing concerns about security. According to public records obtained by the Salem Reporter, the Oregon Department of Corrections has banned dozens of books related to programming and technology as they come through the mail room, ensuring that they don't get to the hands of prisoners. At least in official department code, there is no blanket ban on technology-related books. Instead, each book is individually evaluated to assess potential threats. Many programming-related books are cited as "material that threatens," often including the subject matter ("computer programming") as justification. The Oregon Department of Corrections (DOC) worries that prisoners could use the tools mentioned in some of the programming-related books to compromise their systems. But what's odd is the scope of the ban. Justin Seitz's Black Hat Python book failed the prison's security test since it's geared towards hacking, but so did the book Windows 10 for Dummies, Microsoft Excel 16 for Dummies which simply teaches proficiency in Excel and Windows 10.
Officials at the DOC argue that knowledge of even these basic programs can pose a threat to prisons. "Not only do we have to think about classic prison escape and riot efforts like digging holes, jumping fences and starting fires, modernity requires that we also protect our prisons and the public against data system breaches and malware," DOC spokesperson Jennifer Black said in an emailed statement. "It is a balancing act we are actively trying to achieve."
Officials at the DOC argue that knowledge of even these basic programs can pose a threat to prisons. "Not only do we have to think about classic prison escape and riot efforts like digging holes, jumping fences and starting fires, modernity requires that we also protect our prisons and the public against data system breaches and malware," DOC spokesperson Jennifer Black said in an emailed statement. "It is a balancing act we are actively trying to achieve."
Well yeah (Score:5, Insightful)
Felon and former inmate here (Score:5, Interesting)
So, I did a bid. Computer access was probably the single most useful enabler to allow me to get my life back together.
I mean, I didn't read programming books in jail; didn't need to relearn that. I taught myself calculus and bookkeeping instead.
Also, screw them for being such greedy, petty shits.
Re: (Score:2)
Congrats on getting your life together and keeping on the path!
University, and other sorts of study can be immensely useful to the rehabilitation process, When I was at uni I had a friend, an older gentleman who was a former outlaw biker (possibly Coffin Cheater, not sure) who did 14years for homicide and during that time had a religious conversion to buddhism then completed a sociology degree and a masters in criminology via corespondence. After prison he decided not to return to the biker life and did his
OMG how dumb are you. (Score:2, Insightful)
Because we have to live with them when they get out. They're still part of our country/economy. Because you selfish ass you'll pay MORE if you don't rehab them for reintegration with society and being able to make their way back.
If you don't provide that you pay more, you stupid Republican short-sighted MORONS.
Re: (Score:3)
Why should law-abiding taxpayers be forced to pay for your education while you're in prison, in addition to their own educations?
If you get the equivalent of a community college education while in prison, then you should be forced to pay back the equivalent of the tuition that law-abiding taxpayers would have been burdened with for their own educations.
They might have just made a bad decision in life. You are a douchebag on purpose.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why should law-abiding taxpayers be forced to pay for your education while you're in prison, in addition to their own educations?
let me guess, trump supporter?
knew it.
and, go fuck yourself!
Too stupid to read the title? (Score:3)
The prison is banning books. Books that are stopped 'coming through the mail-room' are purchased by the inmates or their family and friends. This article has nothing to do with the community paying for education while incarcerated.
You are so triggered by anger at people you've never met that you can't even troll the actual conversation being held.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well that depends on the profit motive.
When the profit is in warehousing people then yes, helping convicts re-integrate and become productive members of society is financially counterproductive for the prison.
Imagine a restaurant where the food is free but they charge by the hour to rent a table. How long do you think it would take to get your food or even to flag down a waiter? Hah!
Let's try making prisons more like fast food restaurants where they serve (rehabilitate) you quickly and get you on your way t
Re: Well yeah (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: Well yeah (Score:1)
Correction: white people in the US don't get jail time for weed. African Americans absolutely do, that's an unfortunate fact.
Re: (Score:1)
AC insults somoene but is unable to provde any facts to contradict the post..
this is what slashdot has become..
Re: Well yeah (Score:2)
Re: Well yeah (Score:2)
Grain of salt, seriously.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Yea. Maybe he had some cotton candy. You can never be sure. Could have been a terrorist, or sex criminal. Not sure but better just lock them up to be safe
https://wtvr.com/2018/11/27/woman-jailed-for-3-months-because-police-thought-her-cotton-candy-was-meth/
Re: (Score:3)
I recall reading of a guy who was jailed because cops thought his homemade soap bars were drugs.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Well yeah (Score:5, Interesting)
The reason people don't just look up evidence that this kind of thing happens *all the time* - there are numerous articles, documentaries etc all showing the same thing is a thing called the "just world fallacy" aka the "just world hypothesis". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Basically, some people don't want to believe that bad things can happen to good people, because if they believe that, then they have to believe that bad things could also happen to themselves. So, when confronted with evidence of unfairness, they attribute blame to the victim. There's no point even arguing facts with them because a giveaway for the just-world-fallacy is when they start saying stuff like "sure, he was locked up for that specific crime for which he was innocent, but I'm sure he did other bad things that justify him being locked up!" which is high-level confirmation bias.
There's no actual point arguing against those people because it's like arguing with creationists or something. This idea that the law only punishes the wicked (and the more general idea that the universe / "order" does too) is central to their entire worldview.
Re: (Score:2)
As opposed to assuming criminals are always the hapless victims of a fascist, racist police state?
Have you studied the exceptions to the 4th amendment and due process recognized by the court? If so, how does current jurisprudence differ from a police state? It does not.
If that is not enough, then just consider civil assets forfeiture.
Re: (Score:2)
I had a guy that worked for me that has a felony. He was in AZ when it was a zero tolerance and they found a seed. One frickin seed in his glove box.
A felony conviction for one seed? We'll need a citation for that. Got the case number? Or a link to any of the thousands of newspaper articles that would surely we written about such a conviction?
Re: Well yeah (Score:4, Informative)
According to this page, MJ possession of less than 2lbs can be charged as a Felony.
https://www.drugpossessionlaws.com/arizona/marijuana/
Same thing according to this page, which specifically says it is a felony to transport (they found the seed in his car)
https://www.arizonarevisedstatutes.com/possession-marijuana-ars-13-3405/
People like you are the people OP was warning people like me about.
Re: (Score:2)
Mod up
Re: Well yeah (Score:5, Informative)
Because it's a for profit system, they make up reasons to put people there.
TFA is about the Oregon Dept of Corrections. Oregon does not have for-profit prisons, nor do they house prisoners in states that do use private prisons.
About 8% of inmates in America are in for-profit prisons.
Private prisons are a bad idea for many reasons, but they are not the main problem with America's prison system.
Re: (Score:2)
Some people forget that cops are dumb wherever you go.
Re: Well yeah (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes, for-profit prisons are a big problem when they lobby for stricter criminal punishments in order to raise revenue. Example:
https://theintercept.com/2016/... [theintercept.com]
Oh, wait.
"POLICE AND PRISON GUARD GROUPS FIGHT MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION IN CALIFORNIA"
Unions are for-profit businesses, also, and they also stand to gain from the same rotten incentives.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Also, any corrupt element in the police force can't profit off things once they're legalized. Less laws means less things those bent coppers can harass and stand over you for.
Re: (Score:2)
So because one problem exists (corrupt unions) you are arguing in favor of preserving another problem (corrupt businesses)?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
About 8% of inmates in America are in for-profit prisons.
Private prisons are a bad idea for many reasons, but they are not the main problem with America's prison system.
European here. I was stunned when I first learnt that there is such a thing as for-profit prisons in the US because it does create a party in whose interests it is that the number of convicted criminals goes up. And even if some individuals obviously have to be locked up, a prison sentence is always the most expensive and least productive form of sentence. When I've heard arguments for more or less extreme privatisation of everything, which I strongly disagree with, I've tried to play devil's advocate and t
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know how they handle things in Europe (probably quite varied) but here a conviction will follow and prisoner for life. But here in the states prisoners will essentially be unemployable forever more and if they do get a menial job they have no chance of advancement. A conviction is essentially a death sentence to the pursuit of happiness in a country where success and worth is largely measured in the eyes of others (including those who act as if they are too idealistic) by professional success. A for
Re: (Score:2)
One of the worst cases I heard about was a juvenile court judge getting kick-backs to put kids in privately run juvenile detention. It even has a name: the "kids for cash scandal": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
"Ciavarella disposed thousands of children to extended stays in youth centers for offenses as trivial as mocking an assistant principal on Myspace or trespassing in a vacant building."
I mean, seriously. This is just the tip of the iceberg though. If there are judges in America are willing to do that to little kids, you can guess the kind of crooked stuff they'd be willing to deal out to adults. When people are saying all the people in prison are criminals they forget that a sizeable chunk of the enforcement
Re: (Score:2)
On the one hand, I've been illegally searched by the cops for having long hair and the wrong clothes, so that part is easy to believe.
OTOH, everybody busted for something has a story like this.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
When the US government even owns its own for profit prison system [wikipedia.org], you know the game is rigged. Originally it was only to manufacture stuff for the government (like military fatigues), but in the 80s corporations cut their way in.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The state can put forth any argument they want, and if you're lawyer is stupid enough (or public defender swamped enough) they may just take a stupid plea deal.
Over 80% of convictions never see a jury. Welcome to America.
Re: (Score:2)
They might have argued the seed was evidence of his intention to grow and distribute and then strongarmed him into a felony plea deal. He also might have been exaggerating the "single seed", perhaps he saved them and had a little bag of seeds. It doesn't make it any less ridiculous.
Re: (Score:1)
In Ohio, life sentence for possessing a joint. ..for a joint.
I will never, ever, never drive through Ohio.
All a cop has to do is flick a joint in your vehicle
and you spend the rest of your life in prison...
So I can see how this could have happened.
CAP === 'housing'
Oh Bull-fucking-shit. We legalized medical marijuana in Ohio. When I served on the grand jury all the first time users were offered alternatives with an expunged record if they passed treatment. In the three months I served, we indicted exactly one case involving pot and that was for a dealer who had two five gallon buckets of pot delivered by USPS. That was nine years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes it does. The US prison state is bad but there are still countries doing much worse. *cough* China *cough*
Re: (Score:2)
Judges and juries rarely put people in prison. Thanks to plea deals prosecutors do and their job performance is typically measured by convinctions giving them the same motivation as the for-profit prisons.
I myself was pressured into taking a deal and pleading guilty to something I didn't do but looked guilty of on paper. The public defender went so far as to say she'd have the judge rule her to be my temporary guardian to override my mother if I continued to refuse. Luckily I was a juvenile so it is mostly
Re: (Score:2)
Depends on what he's convicted of. Living in the same house as somebody dealing weed?
Re: Well yeah (Score:4, Funny)
Yeah, I definitely want a convict working on my SAP system.
There is little correlation between job performance and criminal history.
Do you know what has a much better correlation to poor performance? Posting to social media in either ALL-CAPS or all lowercase. Seriously.
How software helps firms hire more efficiently [economist.com]
Prisoners and the job market [economist.com]
That's me!! Oh, wait... (Score:2)
I learned to use SAP during my incarceration (UNICOR furniture factory in Federal Prison). We all kind of thought it would help us get jobs when we got out. Funny how that turned out.
Re: (Score:2)
Rehabilitation as you believe it means in prison is not a right.
Indeed it's not. It is however a tremendous boon to society, which is why all civilised nations make it a priority.
Nor is there a right to learn any subject under the sun when in prison.
Everybody has a right to education, even if you did choose not to exercise yours.
Idiots (Score:2)
NT
Re:Idiots (Score:5, Funny)
I'm sure a book about NT administration would be banned as well.
Yeah, because it's cruel and unusual punishment.
That's awesome (Score:1)
Prisoners (Score:2, Insightful)
Once a prisoner, you are entitled to nothing except perpetual punishment in the US. That also includes a ban on any attempt at reformation. Once they've "paid their dues to society" (HA!), they just move from the initial prison to the big house: The United States of Vengeful Americans.
We've designed the big house to be even less humane than the lower prisons. In the big house, we take away all support, remind the trash of their misdeeds constantly, use said misdeeds to deny them life, liberty, and the pursu
Re: Prisoners (Score:1)
You don't just end up in prison in America. You have to actively do something to get in there. Usually it's several somethings, all quite harmful and all known to result in possible prison sentences.
Don't do crime and you won't end up in jail.
(And don't waste our time with the "disadvantaged minorities" junk. Any group that has members who tend to commit more crimes will have more of those members in prison.)
Re: Prisoners (Score:5, Informative)
Are you serious? there are a number of stories like this one : https://www.nytimes.com/2009/0... [nytimes.com]
The answers became a bit clearer on Thursday as the judge, Mark A. Ciavarella Jr., and a colleague, Michael T. Conahan, appeared in federal court in Scranton, Pa., to plead guilty to wire fraud and income tax fraud for taking more than $2.6 million in kickbacks to send teenagers to two privately run youth detention centers run by PA Child Care and a sister company, Western PA Child Care.
There are a number of stories where local law enforcement own part of for-profit jails.. so they are keen to keep the occupancy rates hight as well..
Re: (Score:3)
You don't just end up in prison in America. You have to actively do something to get in there.
Yeah, you have to actively choose to be too poor for proper legal representation, or actively opt to plead guilty because your lack of proper legal representation means you may not be rightly found innocent of the three centuries worth of crimes for which you're being wrongfully prosecuted, or actively obey the law in your own country then make the stupid mistake of actually travelling, or make the even bigger mistake of marrying a vindictive woman willing to lie about domestic abuse in order to improve her
Wrong focus (Score:4, Insightful)
Prisons need to be about both re-education as well as punishment and prevention,.
They should assume the prisoners ALREADY know how to code. If you do that, then you never let them near any computer that is connected to security. It should be physically impossible for them to get to those PCs.
If you don't do that, then no book control will stop an escape.
If you DO do that, then it doesn't matter what books they read and reading coding books will help them get a job that will pay more than crime does.
You need to give these people an alternative to getting back into crime. Stopping books ensures that they will be stuck in the prison loop forever. Makes the corporations overcharging money, but we citizens get screwed - from both more crime and more costing us more money to maintain prisons.
Re: Oregon. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If only there was some way to prevent computers (Score:3)
If only there was some way to prevent users (Score:1)
They can just use tutorials (Score:2)
They can just use their phones and look up online tutorials. Seriously, I don't know what Oregon has going on, but in Texas, they have few computers for anything. I inquired about an IT position at some prisons about 15 - 20 minutes from my house, and they were like, "...yeah, right....there are no computers". That was a while back, so maybe it has improved.
Maybe if they had decent security (Score:2)
So, do we want to rehabilitate them or not? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: So, do we want to rehabilitate them or not? (Score:1)
You are being naive. Prisons do not care about rehabilitation.
Re: (Score:2)
I hear you. But what the courts hear is something akin to a drunk driver complaining about how hard it'll be without a car. Many judges still grew up without the Internet and is like if I could then you can too but horse and carriage isn't really an alternative anymore.
Ego (Score:2)
Probably hurt the Guards' ego that the prisoners were smarter than them. Many things have to go wrong in your life for you to end up in prison as a prisoner but to end up as guard in prison there is only one thing needed - be too dumb for any other job. Being sadistic is a plus but not a requirement.
When prisonner are already coder? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Quite. There's nothing worse than writing programs for a 65C102.
Ah... the ole rage train... (Score:1)
Everyone see's injustice and leaves a comment on Slashdot or their favorite social media page.
Election time comes... no one remembers the innocents being punished, but they seem to remember a bunch of other meaningless political BS and keep voting the same way as usual.
If you want to change this then change it! And here is one way how!
https://fija.org/ [fija.org]
Do you know why people have lost faith in juries? Go and look in the mirror, that's why! You don't give a shit, you just act like you do!
Re: (Score:1)
Not guilty? That's the opposite of what is needed. The lawless inner city thugs that are committing the bulk of the nations murder, rape and robbery need the hammer brought down on them.
"innocents being punished", lolz
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
making resources available? we're already paying them to breed more criminals and not be responsible adults. politicians in big cities get elected for promising to do even more of that and the problem gets worse.
It is not a "shitheaded right wing solution" to insist adults be responsible for themselves and their own children, nor to punish lawbreakers and get them off the street.
Letting them off the hook and saying "not guilty" makes even more problems
Re: (Score:2)
Same groups doing it in both places.
Yeah. Those fucking 'humans' and their predilection for breaking societal norms.
Security morons (Score:3)
If they have no access to it, physical or remote, they can't do shit to it!
Now if they get physical access, they've already taken over the prison you dumb shits!
Sorry, I can't help but be angry at morons working security in what's effectively a security company, even if it's not a software or network based company.
Hacking (Score:2)
"Not only do we have to think about classic prison escape and riot efforts like digging holes, jumping fences and starting fires, .."
So I guess weight training or any other sport is banned too, because the muscles can be used to dig holes, jumping fences, hurt employees....
Dumb Beyond Belief (Score:1)
Commercially run prisons need repeat custom... (Score:2)
...and preferably if they can train them and other to be "badder", all the better for future profits.
(That's the real problem with commercially run prisons)
Re: (Score:1)
Because some guy who isn't in prison is a dickhead, everyone _in_ prison must be lost causes like him?
I don't think logic works like that....
Re: (Score:2)
Well, yes, because by demonstrating the ability to read and self-educate using library resources they'll rapidly prove themselves superior to you.
I'm not sure your ignorance can survive such a revelation.