Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Cellphones Privacy Security

Comcast Set Mobile Pins To '0000,' Helping Attackers Steal Phone Numbers (arstechnica.com) 30

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: A bad security decision by Comcast on the company's mobile phone service made it easier for attackers to port victims' cell phone numbers to different carriers. Comcast in 2017 launched Xfinity Mobile, a cellular service that uses the Verizon Wireless network and Comcast Wi-Fi hotspots. Comcast has signed up 1.2 million mobile subscribers but took a shortcut in the system that lets users switch from Comcast to other carriers. To port a phone line from Comcast to another wireless carrier, a customer needs to know his or her Comcast mobile account number. Carriers generally use PINs to verify that a customer seeking to port a number actually owns the number. But Comcast reportedly set the PIN to 0000 for all its customers, and there was apparently no way for customers to change it. That means that an attacker who acquired a victim's Comcast account number could easily port the victim's phone number to another carrier. Comcast told Ars that "less than 30" customers were affected by the problem, that it has implemented a fix, and that the company will eventually roll out a real PIN-based system to further protect customers. But Comcast declined to describe the recent fix in any way, saying that information could help attackers. Comcast also did not say when its new PIN-based system will be ready. Here's what Comcast had to say about the changes it's made and will make: "We have also implemented a solution that provides additional safeguards around our porting process, and we're working aggressively towards a PIN-based solution. We are reaching out to impacted customers to apologize and work with them to address the issue. We take this very seriously, and our fraud detection and prevention methods, policies and procedures are continually being reviewed, tested and refined."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Comcast Set Mobile Pins To '0000,' Helping Attackers Steal Phone Numbers

Comments Filter:
  • by tysonedwards ( 969693 ) on Friday March 01, 2019 @06:32PM (#58202280)
    Why do companies insist on doing this "less than x" thing?
    • by Anonymous Coward

      because if they said 29, people would round that up to 'about 50'. then when it gets passed around or spreads again, it'll get rounded to 100.. or 'hundreds', even..

      it could also be that they don't know exactly how many people got their numbers stolen... and also very possible they aren't done counting (and we eventually end up at 'hundreds' anyway).

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Less than 30 companies do.

    • Because they're as bad at grammar as they are at security.

      It's fewer than 30.

      But it should be fewer than ONE.

  • Now everyone has a nice random PIN and is safe.

  • by Anonymous Coward
    That was probably an empty field in a database that was never set to anything.
  • Watching out for their customers since, well, never.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    âoeWe take this seriously..â - every time I hear yhis phrase, or something similar, I believe it less and less ... sigh.

  • Setting a pin to 0000 is basically making a choice to not use the PIN - easier than changing software to not have a pin at all.

  • "But Comcast declined to describe the recent fix in any way, saying that information could help attackers."

    Translation:

    "But Comcast declined to describe the recent fix in any way, saying that information could help attackers even more than Comcast did with a bonehead move like setting all PINs to '0000'."

    Alternate translation:

    "Ha ha ha, fuck you!" said Comcast executives as they snorted cocaine off an underage hookers ass.

  • Why would anyone want to lock his phone? Are you trying to hide something from the police?

Did you know that if you took all the economists in the world and lined them up end to end, they'd still point in the wrong direction?

Working...