TikTok To Pay Record $5.7 Million FTC Fine For Alleged Violations of Children's Privacy Law

The company behind TikTok, the popular short-form video app that incorporated Musical.ly last year, has agreed to pay $5.7 million to settle Federal Trade Commission allegations that it illegally collected personal info from children. "According to the FTC, it's the largest civil penalty ever obtained by the agency in a children's privacy case," reports Variety. From the report: The FTC's complaint, filed by the Department of Justice on behalf of the commission, alleges that Musical.ly violated the federal Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), which requires websites and online services aimed at kids to obtain parental consent before collecting personal information from children under 13. Under the terms of the settlement, TikTok is also required to remove all videos from the app posted by children under the age of 13 and also must comply with COPPA going forward.

In the wake of the FTC fine, TikTok announced in a blog post that on Feb. 27 it is launching a new app environment for users under 13 that does not permit the sharing of personal information and "puts extensive limitations on content and user interaction." Both current and new TikTok users will be directed to the age-appropriate app experience, beginning Wednesday. In the post, TikTok said in part: "While we've always seen TikTok as a place for everyone, we understand the concerns that arise around younger users. In working with the FTC and in conjunction with today's agreement, we've now implemented changes to accommodate younger U.S. users in a limited, separate app experience that introduces additional safety and privacy protections designed specifically for this audience."

FTC Chairman Joe Simons said in a statement: "This record penalty should be a reminder to all online services and websites that target children: We take enforcement of COPPA very seriously, and we will not tolerate companies that flagrantly ignore the law."

And in 2020 the news will be...

[ebrandsberg]

TikTok's child friendly app used by predators to target children.

Nothing compared to Nest

[ron_ivi]

The hidden microphones Nest / Google installed in people's homes, have no doubt collected far more dirt on kids. https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/security/a26448907/google-nest-hidden-microphone/ [popularmechanics.com]

What I see going on here.

[sharkbiter]

When the Internet started out, it was a place for everyone. Now we see what's happening when an "It's for the children" campaign is run on an unscrupulous advertiser who probably got more than the fine back by collecting data on future citizens and selling it.

What I see is that the Internet isn't for everyone and that the "precious" children should be banned from it until they reach an age where they can understand what it is they're getting into.

Unless a separate Internet can be put into place with a small

This "record fine" business is crap

[Required Snark]

Please, does anyone think a $5.7 million fine has any significant deterrent effect? It's pocket change.

Every time some douche bag company screws up and gets caught the authorities always give them a slap on the wrist and pretend it has an impact. At least once a month I hear about some "huge" penalty, monetary or otherwise, and it's a bad joke. Next time the fine will be $5.8 million and it will still be "record breaking".

Over 99% of the time the top of the corporate ladder feels no pain. They just fire some lower level workers and charge more and sail right on. Can you say Wells Fargo?

Does anybody fall for this anymore, or do we all accept it as a meaningless ritual and ignore it? Why do they even pretend?

Re:

[socheres]

the price of childrens' data ...

Are they orphans?

[sabbede]

The children under 13 that is. They must be, right? Otherwise their parents would have made sure their kids weren't throwing personal information all over the place and posting videos. Right?