China To Bar People With Bad 'Social Credit' From Planes, Trains (reuters.com) 170
China says it will begin applying its so-called social credit system to flights and trains and stop people who have committed misdeeds from taking such transport for up to a year. From a report: People who would be put on the restricted lists included those found to have committed acts like spreading false information about terrorism and causing trouble on flights, as well as those who used expired tickets or smoked on trains, according to two statements issued on the National Development and Reform Commission's website on Friday. Those found to have committed financial wrongdoings, such as employers who failed to pay social insurance or people who have failed to pay fines, would also face these restrictions, said the statements which were dated March 2. It added that the rules would come into effect on May 1.
So Sesame Credit is out of beta? (Score:2)
Video from 2015 on it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHcTKWiZ8sI
Very chilling.
Re:So Sesame Credit is out of beta? (Score:5, Informative)
Black mirror S03EP1
Re: (Score:3)
Black mirror S03EP1
Yep. China govt must have finally pirated black mirror and thought "wow that's a great idea!"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Break Motherland's rules and she grounds you. Literally.
Re: (Score:2)
Break Motherland's rules and she grounds you. Literally.
And there's no info on how long you have to remain in time-out.
Re: (Score:2)
That video does not scare me one little bit, why would it apart form it being a massive waste of tax payer funds. I am great a computer games, I am certain with hours, I could learn to game the system with my real name and get a fantastic MMORPG score, would not even take much effort. I hope you can win something for a really great score though, otherwise it would take the fun out of it. You know what really great about the digital privacy invasion age, they all got as lazy and fat and spying on everyone di
Re: (Score:2)
> That video does not scare me one little bit, why would it apart form it being a massive waste of tax payer funds
Then you obviously weren't paying attention.
> Have a secure wallet for you phone, nowdays you don't wear the tinfoil hat, you phone does, turn it off and pack it away and you disappear, make use of their laziness to secure your privacy and if they are tracking you, annoying the crap out of them.
Hmm. Citizen rtb61 is engaging in obviously deceptive behavior. Knock 50 points off his Sesame
Re: (Score:2)
You are surprised? So, what part of "Communist Dictatorship" did you not understand?
Sounds good for scumy employers (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Dunno how I feel about the law over all...
Instead of reading what the law says it will do, try projecting into the future a little bit. Imagine the unintended consequences, the potential for abuse. Consider what you know about China. It all becomes rather black and white pretty quickly, doesn't it?
Re: (Score:2)
It's very bad. You should not be cheering this in any way, as its primary purpose is to groom the citizenry for compliance. I posted this elsewhere in these comments:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHcTKWiZ8sI
That's how it will work. Like an even more invasive version of the Black Mirror episode on social networks. In a nutshell your score determines privileges like being able to travel, or in the next step, getting jobs, credit/mortgages, etc. If you post things critical of the government (even if - E
Re: (Score:2)
It's not grooming the citizenry for compliance. It's China. They're already mostly compliant. It's about enforcement at this point.
Cool (Score:1)
actually, no. (Score:2)
So no more Politicians on trains and planes? Cool.
... then they can justify the cost of charter flights, billed directly to the tax payers.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, party officials loyal to Xi never lie. And ones not loyal are going to get arrested for anticorruption charges. Why let them get on the train and make a scene?
And people wonder why the TSA wants to search phns (Score:2)
And people wonder why the TSA wants to search passengers smart phones.
Wasn't there a Black episode about this? (Score:1)
Horrific (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
"The modus operandi of ANY GOVERNMENT is to service and protect itself first and foremost. All other objectives (and people) are expendable in that pursuit."
FIFY
Re: (Score:2)
"The modus operandi of ANY GOVERNMENT is to service and protect itself first and foremost. All other objectives (and people) are expendable in that pursuit."
I don't know. That certainly wasn't true for the Weimar Republic. Nor Buchannon's presidency in the USA.
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Nothing new here.
The exact same system applies in USA :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
I mean, we can discuss a blacklist vs. an automated score and the differences if you like. As well as the importance of whether the system is used to punish dissenters or a constrain security risks.
Re: (Score:2)
Wow....Social Credit that you would have to keep track of in order to live. That's simply horrific.
If you drive them into poverty, then they will commit crimes, and then you can break them up for parts and sell their organs to the highest bidder [wikipedia.org]. Or, perhaps, to whoever has the most social credit.
Nazis had pieces of flair that they made the Jews (Score:5, Insightful)
The Nazis had pieces of flair that they made the Jews wear
Depends if the 'Crime' Fits the Punishment (Score:2, Interesting)
If this were to go into effect in North America, I would think that stupid little twat who wouldn't take her feet off the seats of that train would have been afforded a more suitable punishment than beating her ass (although I think these whiny people who don't think they should show some personal
Re:Depends if the 'Crime' Fits the Punishment (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually, I think this is a pretty decent idea
Trying to up your social credit already :)
That idea is bad in so many ways one cannot count. Who decides what "social credit" is ? If a Citizen of China reads anything about Taiwan, Tibet or Tiananmen Square will that decrease their social credit. What about "Term Limits", I just heard that is a banned phrase in China.
What about this post on a US Site by a non-China citizen, will this very post get me marked as having bad social credit in China, thus denied a visa ? I can see China can easily export they thought control to other countries.
Well I guess I will never get to visit that country now. For visa denial, this social credit thing seems to be being done by a lot of countries, even the US in rare cases. But so far at least the US and most countries does not use "Social Credit" for internal purposes.
Re: (Score:2)
It will be immediately farmed and an industry will be created to increase your credit. Trolls will abuse it, cops will abuse it, the government will use it to subvert the legal system that is already a joke...
I expect Britain will adopt it soon.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with any system like this is due process.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you mean that there might actually be a "due process" in the PRC? That would be a problem, I suppose.
Re: (Score:2)
If this were to go into affect in say any five eyes countries, I would expect a whole series of web sites open up about gaming the system. Consider this game, am I being tracked. So register with a web site and make a whole lot of anti US government post and hmm flavour of the month, pro Russian government posts and then start exhibiting random digital behavioural acts, phone location and on or off state. So if you can, travel to a location near a Russian embassy and switch off you phone and have lunch. To
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The black payoff for all this tracking tech (Score:5, Insightful)
What else can be said. Obedience or your life is hell. And we walked, ran, danced into the flames.
Re: (Score:2)
All this does is replace the Stasi with computers. Given that the Stasi employed a large fraction of the DDR, this will probably increase unemployment in the PRC until the aperatchiks band together, overthrow the system, and re-institute a HUMAN secret police force.
And Xi's "colleagues" not killing him, like the Russians did with Lavrenti Beria when HE wanted to take the top job, is the "walked, ran, danced into the flames."
Black mirror (Score:2)
Looks like Xi Jinping is a fan of Black mirror...
Re: (Score:1)
The show isn't supposed to be an instruction manual damnit.
Re: (Score:3)
And what makes it even scarier is findings like this: https://motherboard.vice.com/e... [vice.com] which I can confirm from personal experience. D
Re: (Score:2)
Related (Score:2)
http://www.independent.co.uk/n... [independent.co.uk]
You can say that's different, but I'd argue it's just a little farther up the slippery slope.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It works both ways though.
There is zero chance that this system would ever be applied equitably to anyone with substantial political connections. The country's leaders will somehow always manage to have excellent "social credit" no matter what they do.
Political crimes? (Score:5, Insightful)
My main concern is that the Chinese government might use this as low-level punishment (lower than imprisonment) for political crimes. For example, punishment for talking about the heroic [wikipedia.org] "tank man [youtube.com]" in Tiananmen Square on June 5, 1989.
Or rolling your eyes [npr.org] at easy questions asked by a reporter.
By the end of the day, Liang Xiangyi's name had been censored on China's largest search engines, the video deleted from Chinese websites and millions of Chinese netizens were suddenly worried about what would become of their newfound hero.
start turning your population into terrorists! (Score:2)
Anyone watched the anime psycho pass?
Seriously, if I'm going to be disallowed access to things in society due to my personality, I'm going to have a pretty bad reaction.
Welcome to the reputation economy (Score:2)
Discipline
- A system punishes people once they break the rules (law), but not before.
- Transparent and accountable, at least in current western societies.
- Ultimately builds on the governments monopoly of power. You play by the rules because the gover
Re: (Score:1)
Look, people are responsible for their actions.
If you smoke on a train where it is prohibited, do you expect no consequences? How does that even work?
Maybe I'll not pay my taxes this year. I live in a free country (US), I shouldn't expect any punishment for my actions right?
Re:No soup for you, comrade (Score:5, Insightful)
Also, the punishment should fit the crime. Being banned from trains and planes is a fitting punishment for someone who repeatedly smokes on a non smoking train, or harasses the flight attendants. It is not appropriate for not paying your parking tickets.
Re: (Score:2)
Officially every citizen of China has the right to petition their government. In practice it has problems, but in theory it is a way to handle grievances and appeals.
A system where a certain count of offenses results in punishment? I can't think of anything like that in the US, well except the three-strikes system. Court orders that a particular person no longer work in the banking industry in light of their specific fraud conviction.
Criminal behavior and socially undesirable behavior has always been a cont
Re: (Score:3)
Not paying you parking tickets seems pretty serious to me.
It isn't. The real crime is not planning for enough parking (or public transportation or whatever) so that you don't have to be writing parking tickets. And if you ban people from using transportation that they need to get to work, then you'll only create crime. This only makes sense if they want to create crime, for example for the purpose of legitimizing murdering their citizens for their internal organs [washingtonpost.com].
It's like they're trying to have a religion (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Even atheists can believe some really dumb shit.
Re: (Score:2)
Ignoring Stalin, some atheists are good people.
Re: (Score:2)
<sarcasm>Absolutely no way this could be used for any corrupt purposes, though, like ruining the lives of anyone that criticizes the government as a whole, or for the personal vendetta of any government officials, no siree bob!</sarcasm>
I seriously wonder how much of this shit the Chinese peopl
Re: (Score:2)
I seriously wonder how much of this shit the Chinese people will put up with before there's a Civil War over it.
There was a civil war already. People banded together to end the rule of warlords (little military dictatorships). Then those people didn't agree on what kind of government to have so Nationalists and Communists duked it out for decades, with multiple atrocities and millions dead.
As long as people are fed and you can get entertainment in the form of television or smartphones, I doubt there is going to be a civil war over the injustices done against the people. Much like how it is in the US.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There goes China.
Oh, it'll take a while, but this, Xi Jinping's newly-minted dictatorship and other crackdowns make it quite clear that China is beginning a fast slide into 1984-land. Their screw-tightening will provoke resistance from the large, recently-created middle class, which will in turn provoke more oppression, and the need for tighter central control of everything -- including the economy. Bye, bye capitalism and the growth that it brings. I'm guessing the new leaders are smart enough not to evi
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing in China is about punishment, all is about control and making people realize that obedience and submission is the way to live their life.
Re: (Score:3)
If you are accused of breaking the law you should have the right to confront your accuser in an open court.
Try that when you have a ticket from a red light camera. In many states you have no chance.
Also, I'm curious why you assume citizens in China don't get to do this? A right to petition is baked in the PRC's Constitution. And recently citizens have had their rights extended to allow them to sue the government too.
If you aren't accused of breaking the law you should not have to live your life according to the "social rules" made up by [REDACTED]
But it is a law. That's how society works, someone decides some behavior is bad, and devises a law for it, and then you are punished if you do it.
Do you think jaywalking or open container laws make s
Re: (Score:2)
But it is a law. That's how society works, someone decides some behavior is bad, and devises a law for it, and then you are punished if you do it.
You mean, that's how society fails. Someone decides that some behavior is bad, and then they devise an excessive law for it, and then they ruin your life because it's their job and if they don't, someone will ruin their life.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean, that's how society fails. Someone decides that some behavior is bad, and then they devise an excessive law for it, and then they ruin your life because it's their job and if they don't, someone will ruin their life.
"Someone", a committee, a duly elected representative, a pure democracy of your peers. These are mechanism for defining laws, and the basis of the social contract. If the laws are unjust, society breaks down. A parody of society can be rigged together with the use of force against people, as we have seen throughout history. But eventually some of the enforcers defect, control slips from the grasp of the dictatorship, and change occurs. Because societies built on injustice and use of force against the genera
Re: (Score:2)
And in sane states, red light cameras are banned precisely because they don't allow you to confront your accuser in court.
It's certainly the choice of those states to do so, for whatever reasons they choose to assert. But it's not[ currently] a Constitutional issue.
It is about political control not $ (Score:2)
Xi Jinping wants people to be obedient. But he cannot throw everyone that makes a careless remark in jail, and he does not want to because it will upset too many people.
So he introduces a system of social credit. It is not just about trains, a high credit is very good for getting jobs, promotions etc. A low credit can have you punished by trains, as a warning that you are on you way to worse things if you do not behave.
Once everyone is focused on their social credit, self censorship will be very strong.
You've made a name for yourself here (Score:2)
Looking at your post history you're quite the snide little shit.
Re: You've made a name for yourself here (Score:2)
Re: You've made a name for yourself here (Score:2)
Getting everyone on the "left and the right" annoyed and frustrated because you're logical while they're idealogical... also no great accomplishment, I'm afraid... but I appreciate the recognition nonetheless. ;)
Re: (Score:2)
ZZZzzzzzzz...
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, losing the right to travel for wrong-think.
Don't want people wrong-thinking against the corporate/government alliance.
Re: (Score:2)
Bring it on keyboard jockey.
Re: (Score:2)
Diamond Age?
Re: (Score:2)
The trouble with banning people who haven't paid a fine from trains is that preventing them from getting to their job certainly isn't going to help them pay off the fine any faster.
Re: (Score:3)
I tagged this article "nosedive" as soon as I saw the title. Imagine if you prevented people who spread false information about terrorism from riding trains or planes in the US? An easy 1/3rd of the country would be banned immediately. And then they'd say it's a tactic to cover up the Bowling Green massacre or hide Obama's true origins.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine if you prevented people who spread false information about terrorism from riding trains or planes in the US?
"False" being whatever the current administration says is false.
Re:Nosedive (Score:5, Insightful)
Honestly, the examples they give don't sound all that bad at first
For "false information about terrorism", read "complaining about the government in any way". For "Can't ride the train if you owe a fine", read "debtor's prison".
Re:why is this news (Score:5, Insightful)
They're not even slightly communist anymore. They're very capitalist but also very authoritarian. And they've only recently become a dictatorship (again), previously they were a pseudo-democratic oligarchy.
the old is new again (Score:2)
They're not even slightly communist anymore. They're very capitalist but also very authoritarian. And they've only recently become a dictatorship (again), previously they were a pseudo-democratic oligarchy.
Fascism? Like the only thing remotely socialist about National Socialism was when they reappropriated private properties to inner party members.
Feudal System. (Score:2)
It is very stable. It took about 1000 years of oppression, decay and degeneration of the ruling class for it to break down. How long it will last in the current age when the ruling elites and their henchmen could use face recognition tech and completely track every activity of every citizen?
Re:why is this news (Score:5, Insightful)
What's communist about them other than the name of their party? Nothing. If Trump renamed the Republicans to the Liberal party this evening, they would also not be liberal.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
It's what ALL communist government always turn into.
Nobody knows if that's true, because nobody has ever had a communist system larger than... well, a commune. Every so-called communist government in history has been a cynical ploy to control the masses and pacify them with fairy tales about worker's rights.
Re: why is this news (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
2000 - true communism
2004 - true communism
2006 - true communism
2008 - mostly true communism
2010 - kinda true communism
2012 - evil capitalist pig dogs trying to stop true communism
2014 - evil capitalist pig dogs have made us give up communism temporarily
2016 - TRUMP made communism fail
2018 - Never was true communism and we never claimed that.
Re:why is this news (Score:5, Insightful)
You're right, but that's not communism, that's authoritarianism - a practically universal feature of communist countries in the real world, but no more an element of communism than flies are an element of a corpse. There have been small hippie communes that were communist but not authoritarian.
There are also authoritarian capitalist countries that would never be accused of communism - start a peaceful protest in Singapore without government permission and see how long you stay out of jail.
Is there a limit on a communist commune's size? (Score:2)
There have been small hippie communes that were communist but not authoritarian.
How many of these hippie communes survived for long once the population surpassed 150, the size of one monkeysphere [cracked.com]?
Re: (Score:2)
I've read of communities of a few thousand living communally for about a generation. This appears to require isolation and a charismatic leader. (Figuring out the line between charismatic leader and tyrant is left as an exercise for the reader.) Strong uniform religious beliefs can also help (which is functionally authoritarian).
Re: (Score:2)
2-3 years ago I would've said yes. But since Trump's election, I think the USA's democracy deserves more credit. If there were any shadowy cabals pulling the strings behind US elections, they would never have allowed a dangerous moron like Trump to occupy the presidency. The fact that someone who is so corrosive to every aspect of the country's wellbeing can make his way into office and remain there for so long is a good indicator of a functioning democracy.
why is this news ? USA is the same. (Score:1, Insightful)
The exact same system applies in USA :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
The No-Fly list applies to those who have suspected terrorist ties and may actually try to commit an act of terror on the plane.
Are you sure of that? Can we actually see this list? Who has oversight? What criteria is used to put somebody on the list. Terrorism is already a poorly defined word and could mean a lot of things. And somehow, a lot of people seem to mistakenly end up on the list without even knowing it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
CEOs in China are not punished because their companies break the law. Don't be silly. When a CEO fails to kowtow to the Communist overlords, or to immediately comply wit some crazy whim of someone in political power, then the government finds some law the company is breaking (or invents one) so that he can be publicly punished. But it's never about the stated offense, and you never hear the real offense.
Because fines don't last, or affect the rich (Score:3)
The move is in line with President’s Xi Jinping’s plan to construct a social credit system based on the principle of “once untrustworthy, always restricted”.
in otherwords he just invented the fabled "This goes on your permanent record, young man".
This can be used to coerce the Rich who aren't loyal enough. You are corecing them not through economic measures, or curtailing their off shored wealth but by physically limiting them in a way they cannot escape by their wealth. And if the
Re: (Score:2)
You seem to think this isn't about control and is about instilling good behaviour.
Re: (Score:2)
There's a difference?
Re:Why not a fine (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Ah so it's like our US no fly list for "terrorists", or rather people with names similar to aliases used by terrorists (including inactive ones)
Re: (Score:2)
Ah so it's like our US no fly list for "terrorists", or rather people with names similar to aliases used by terrorists (including inactive ones)
Wish I had mod points to mod this up.
Re: (Score:2)
Yea, I'm really looking forward to renewing my driver's license [ca.gov] into a REAL ID card.
Just so I have permission to travel within the borders of my own country (USA).
Re: (Score:2)
"Can't you just make some bot accounts and open any locked door because then you'd be the most trusted person?"
As far as I know, no. They take a specific number of points off your starting score per type of infraction.