Issa Bill Would Kill A Big H-1B Loophole (computerworld.com) 248
ErichTheRed writes: This isn't perfect, but it is the first attempt I've seen at removing the "body shop" loophole in the H-1B visa system. A bill has been introduced in Congress that would raise the minimum wage for an H-1B holder from $60K to $100K, and place limits on the body shop companies that employ mostly H-1B holders in a pass-through arrangement. Whether it's enough to stop the direct replacement of workers, or whether it will just accelerate offshoring, remains to be seen. But, I think removing the most blatant and most abused loopholes in the rules is a good start. "The high-skilled visa program is critical to ensuring American companies can attract and retain the world's best talent," said Issa in a statement. "Unfortunately, in recent years, this important program has become abused and exploited as a loophole for companies to replace American workers with cheaper labor from overseas."
as someone who is suffering from this... (Score:5, Insightful)
I can only hope that our voices are STARTING to be heard and taken seriously.
I can't compete with an h1b. I have more experience, I know silicon valley quite well, I have good contacts and can get things done; but I'm 'an expensive american' because I have US healthcare to pay and US rents to pay, etc. and I'm not willing to have 5 other room mates and live-for-work just to stay employed.
we need a break from this heat wave. many of us who need work cannot get it. companies stopped caring about us and refuse to even consider us. we badly need relief from this or we'll find more of us slipping into the poorest underclass and that's just an absurdity. intelligent and capable thinkers and builders unable to get work because our corp overlords sold us all out.
I'll believe in the relief when I see it. so far, though, its killing many of us. in some ways, almost literally (I may lose my home soon, that's how bad it can get).
Re: (Score:1)
But libertarianism! But free market! But no more evil government! You'll ruin everything with those bills. We will never reach the libertarian utopia with those bills!
Re: as someone who is suffering from this... (Score:2)
Re: as someone who is suffering from this... (Score:2, Insightful)
If h1-b's are supposed to be the best and brightest, why is the Indian government fighting H1-B reform in the WTO?
Wouldn't they want to retain them?
No fallacy. H1B designed for geniuses, Kaku is one (Score:2, Informative)
There's no fallacy of appeal to authority here, for two reasons. The fallacy of appeal to authority would be citing Michael Jordan's opinions on DNA editing, or Kaku's style preferences. It has the form:
Proposition A must be true because person B says it is, and person B is authoritative in some field (but not the field in question).
GP says "for more details", listen to Kaku's explanation in the video. There's no claim that Kaku must be right because Kaku is Kaku. Rather, Kaku explains and supports his pos
Re: (Score:2)
listen to Kaku's explanation in the video.
This country (and apparently everyone else's) has a terrible aliteracy problem. There's hardly any illiteracy, but the last I read, only something like 3% of Americans read a book last year.
I for one do NOT want to see a talking head. A video that actually uses the video to demonstrate something is fine, but I can read five times as fast as you can talk and get a hell of a lot more out of it.
Re: (Score:2)
In a Libertarian idealistic world, labor would be as free as capital is to cross borders.
Re: (Score:2)
The power of government is what maintains borders - visas are government-issued documents, and immigration officers are government employees. In the absence of government regulations, people are free to move between countries as they see fit.
Re: (Score:2)
Libertarianism is not just any limited government. It's government limited to those functions that are necessary to maximize individual liberties (or individual negative rights, to be more specific).
Libertarians also believe that all people, not just those that happened to be born in a "right" country, have said rights.
Now, go ahead and explain how government-sponsored economic protectionism (which borders are, at least in the context of this discussion) maximizes individual rights and liberties.
Re: (Score:2)
you do not want government involvement at any level for any reason.
The 13th Amendment says hi.
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry the First amendment is the talker. He says he will pray for you.
The 2nd amendment is gunning for you.
Re: as someone who is suffering from this... (Score:1)
We live in a global economy, and there are people who have much, much less than you, and making half your salary will feel like winning the lottery.
There isn't any stopping it. Evertone should be saving their money right now. Ten years from now the tech industry will be drastically different, and expensive employees will be all but weeded out.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As if H1Bs don't have rent and health insurance to pay. What do you think they are, incorporeal spirits?
Re: (Score:2)
From last week's Illinois Times: [illinoistimes.com] a story about H-2B workers. If you read it, it will anger you. It isn't just tech workers who suffer.
Re: (Score:2)
--Seriously man, you should consider banding together with whoever else in your area is in the same fix and start your own company. Feel free to contact me off-slashdot if you want to discuss this, I may have a few ideas and stuff that can help you out.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
A group of people work their asses off to raise the standard of living for the next generation, to give their kids a better life where they won't have to work themselves to death just to put food on the table.
Then you come along and tell everyone they have to throw all that work away, because another country didn't bother to do the same thing and now wants a piece of the pie here. Lowest common denominator. As long as someone out there is living in a shithole, nobody else is permitted to have a higher stand
Re: as someone who is suffering from this... (Score:2, Interesting)
I am doing piecemeal work when I can in the IT field despite having been employed many years in it. I also drive for Uber and I drive many of the H-1B visa workers who are usually Indians home at night. They basically have indentured servants who will work any amount of time and they do not even want to look at an American. When we have carnivorous companies that basically want indentured servants to support the Fortune 500 company where one particular CEO made 500 million last year we have a corrupt gover
Re: (Score:2)
Then they're incompetent. There is absolutely no reason to think people here, already in the industry or working their way up out of school, can't do the job just as well.
From what I see every day about the people from Silicon Valley, if these are supposed to be smart people I can only wonder what their definition of stupid is. The utter crap of software and services they pump out is staggering. Even more so when one considers the amoun
Re: as someone who is suffering from this... (Score:5, Informative)
I have been living and working in the bay area for about 25 yrs, now. before that I spent a bunch of years in the boston area, doing the boston software thing.
when I work at some of the big names in the bay area, I see who is working there and what their skill level is. I hear the talk in meetings and see the tech discussions. I see the writings on whiteboards left from meetings. I hear hallway talk. I see the bugs from co-workers. I see the lack of qa and testing and blatant bugs in routines that have 5 lines of code. I see docs that were clearly not written by native english speakers.
the best and brightest? h1b? you HAVE to be shitting me.
big huge lie. they are the cheapest warm bodies you can buy and dominate and boss around. but they are not, and never were, best and brightest. their curve is like our curve; we have some that are stars and most are average. the ones that come over have the same bell curve. some really good stars, but for the most part, you could find the same level of quality here, already.
h1b is bullshit. we all know it.
Re: as someone who is suffering from this... (Score:1)
Getting rid of the H-1B program cannot come fast enough.
Re:as someone who is suffering from this... (Score:5, Interesting)
It sounds like you don't have relevant skill sets anymore
I am not a web gui jokey, if that's what you mean. I can hold my own in C, C++, I can do ok enough in python, and probably get by as well as others in the languages they don't use regularly.
I am pretty in touch with computing in most areas. and I don't even insist on specialist jobs. there are a ton of 'can you write C code?' jobs and I'm be ok doing that. they won't give it to me; I'm too qualified, then. even when I beg for the job, I'm too overqualified and they won't give it to me.
there has been writing and teaching in my background and I'm happy enough to do that. nope, once you write C code, they won't take you as a tech writer. I'm happy to do it! I enjoy it. but the stigma stops them from taking me on. I'm not making this stuff up, either.
I can design hardware, do board bring-up, order parts and eval things. write the firmware, do the networking, solder the parts, document it, write the host based back ends. ensure the whole system works. take it to trade shows and demo it. write the docs for it, do the RMA service. in other words, I can do a whole company's worth of jobs and in some ways I act as a whole hardware/software company of size 1. I can do most anything.
and yet, here I am. unemployed and finding it very hard to break thru that 'but you are an older expensive american' boundary. its a killer, even if you're highly skilled and capable.
I will confess, I'm over 50 and that's a major 'problem' right there for silicon valley employers. they mostly don't hire us anymore and if they do, its always as contract and never fulltime. they're afraid to touch us, in effect. (when you let go a person over a certain age, they have to document a lot more and show that it wasn't due to age. other things come into play when you take on an older guy, and I realize this crap is going on, but its still a show-stopper in your goal of getting employed).
I also know that its common to say 'you are not keeping up' but that's a BS line. I am keeping up. that's not the issue and it never was.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I ended up deleting my LinkedIn. I'm happy at my current company and tired of getting spam.
Re: (Score:2)
I do see lots of older contract workers in Silicon Valley. Often it's just their choice, they can get more money that way (especially if a spouse has a family health insurance plan), it's flexible, etc. It's probably easier to get hired that way, and I've never seen a contractor being formally interviewed, sometimes you don't even see them ever walk in the door or talk with the project members. I wouldn't do it myself, I can barely keep track of my finances as it is much less have to deal with the extra
Re: (Score:2)
Have you considered working for the state? They don't care about age there. Where I am, being over 50 is considered a plus.
In addition, you get all kinds of perks, health care, dental, vision, mental sick days, vacation, all manner of goodness.
Re: (Score:2)
Two points.
First, do what everyone does and tailor your CV to different jobs. If they don't like people with C experience, just don't mention it. Limit work experience to the last few jobs so you look younger.
The age discrimination is much harder to get past. Your generation screwed everyone by making the cost of living so high that older people need huge wages to maintain their lifestyle and have a reasonable pension and healthcare cover. The only solution for you is to move somewhere cheaper and take a lo
Re: (Score:2)
Your generation screwed everyone
Hey, watch that "your generation" thing. Gen X is just now going over 50. If you mean boomers, you're going to have to say boomers.
Re: (Score:2)
for silicon valley employers
Well maybe you should try working somewhere other than Silly Valley? I'm sure you could find work as an embedded systems guy (which is basically what you have described) in Austin or Dallas.
Re: (Score:2)
for silicon valley employers.
Then it sounds like you're insisting on a geographical area to find a job and blaming the job market on the lack of jobs. People that want to be crab boat deckhands don't go to Arizona.
I tossed a few key words & technologies into Indeed and had 0 problems finding available positions around Farmington Hills, MI. (The only geographic area I decided to search).
All of those have direct ne
Re: (Score:2)
heh, if you're a good C developer and you're in the bay area, drop me a line - adrian@freebsd.org . We need more. :P
Re: as someone who is suffering from this... (Score:3, Insightful)
H-1Bs are supposed to be the cream of the crop, not entry level people. Local recent grads in the US often find it hard to get their foot in the door in the job market because there are no entry level jobs left.
On the other hand, the program has always needed an extremely high minimum wage limit because 60k isn't even a realistic starting salary straight out of school these days. Here in Seattle, 125k is what a fresh-out-of-school CS grad can expect to make in their first programming job. I know a community
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's easy to get cheap labor. What's hard is getting good labor. If you've got an important project then it helps to have good people on it instead of going about it half assed with the cheapest bodies you can get. Though if it's just rote IT grunt work web application touch up then go for it. But if you need quality work done you need quality workers.
sounds good, too bad it depends on congress (Score:1)
This should be a no-brainer.
I'll be shocked if it even makes it to a vote.
(captcha: divisive)
Re: (Score:2)
Suspect a trap... (Score:1)
I have not read issa, but i suspect that it is a trap. Big issue the general public wants, wrapped around some onerous provision for even deeper anal penetration by thier real constituents, monied interests, and corporations. Perhaps even carte blanc for a tla or two.
That seems to have been the major play the past 30 years. Anyone read it yet?
It's obvious it won't accelerate offshoring (Score:2)
Re:It's obvious it won't accelerate offshoring (Score:4, Insightful)
Yeah.... But half of my department are h1b or some sort of opt/ept graduates, so this would fuckin kill my startup. No way can I pay 100K to someone with next to no experience.
There's a whole country full of people with "next to no experience" - the country you're living in in fact, which should be quite convenient.
Re:It's obvious it won't accelerate offshoring (Score:5, Insightful)
I hate to sound crude or callous, but--
The government, nor the labor force are beholden to your vision of a successful startup. The labor you seek costs money. Even if it does not cost you, it still costs that money. Preventing abuse of h1b labor prevents the sideloading of that cost onto the rest of society. If your startup requires impossible wages (wages only possible via h1b or other wage shenanigans) then your startup is not really viable as a business venture. Hard thing to swallow, but that is the way it is.
As an employer, the sooner you understand that you too have to negotiate at the hiring table, and that you can't get AAA+ talent for D- wages, the better. You are beholden to the economy, the same as the rest of us. We only succeed when we both benefit.
My suggestion to you: hire new grads at new grad pay. Hire a small number of AAA+ people, and use them to improve the quality of your new grad workers. Set company goals that are attainable with that arrangement, and reward employees that exceed those expected goals.
The age of getting the best while paying next to nothing are nearly gone forever. Plan for that future. Hire the lackluster, at lackluster pay, then improve them. Contrary to what you have been trained in MBA school, employees are a valuable asset that you invest in. If you are good to your people, they will be good to you. Treat them like disposable trash, and they will dump you in a minute, the soonest they can, and spit on your memory.
Re: (Score:3)
If you are good to your people, they will be good to you. Treat them like disposable trash, and they will dump you in a minute, the soonest they can, and spit on your memory.
That used to be the way of business before the age of the bean counters getting their fingers on everything and believing that workers are as disposable as a broken calculator. Hell one of the first jobs I ever worked at in the 90's had a pension plan, even for the people on the ground floor making $6.25/hr(today's min wage is $11.25). Good luck finding that now.
Re: (Score:3)
When you demand impossible education requirements for basic employment, you impose a significant cost on your potential applicants.
Specifically, the cost of the education level you are demanding. It can easily enter triple digits, and take a third or more of a worker's lifetime to pay off, and is non-dischargeable.
That cost is real. It does not go away when you hire H1B laborers. The local economy is still saddled with the debt created by this wasted educational burden. (Wasted, because you never had any
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds good on paper... (Score:1, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:3)
and in some time afterwards, when they realize that we have infrastructure that pretty much WORKS and they do not, they'll be back.
yeah, its cheap in india. when the electricity works. and when the workers actually DO real quality work.
let them go to india and china. once they realize that cost savings is not all there is, they'll be back.
perhaps they need to truly learn the value of having us, the US born workers who know this country and how to get things done, be in their employ.
I hope more companies
Good example (Score:2, Interesting)
Your example is a perfect example for unintended consequences of each and every government's decision.
I can give one more example. There may be some bona-fide less desirable locations with low wages, that do have difficulty attracting qualified personel. This will be a burden for some organization in the midland of America trying to hire a skilled worker.
That being said, every law will have consequences, the outcomes that the politicians would not want to think about it. Here are the few: the limit of $100K
Re: (Score:2)
You're expecting wages to rise at ~7% annual rates over the next decade? What info do you have that the rest of us don't?
Re: (Score:2)
Unless your 50% American workforce is all H1B workers, I don't think you understand this bill at all.
Re: (Score:3)
Can you provide some details as to why this would happen and how?
Pretty simple really. Our shop isn't going to fork out 100K/year for US talent when off-shore talent is about 1/2 the cost...
Re:Sounds good on paper... (Score:5, Insightful)
Offshore has always been cheaper than H1B onshore. If it were possible to make it work with 100% offshore, then it would have been done already.
Re: (Score:2)
Howsabout forking out $60 K to Amercicans, rather than to foreigners?
Re: (Score:2)
Goverment already does cost-of-living adjustments (Score:3, Insightful)
The government already does cost-of-living adjustments for government employees. How hard is that to apply to H1-B? Here in Detroit, $60K probably isn't a bad minimum for H1-B workers, but it's crazy low in the San Francisco Bay. Why not tie the minimum to the region?
Re: (Score:2)
Agree completely, but then they location-shop before body-shopping.
Problem I have is small companies and other fields. I am in architectural empngineering, and there really are limited grads. We were willing to sponsor one person over the past decade, but the salary would destroy it. (He had one year of "internship" and would be starting around $65k in Los Angeles.). Worth it in the greater good, but a challenge none the less.
Re: (Score:2)
65k is princely in other parts of the country. Is the cost of the loss of in person business meetings so high, that the value of a telecommuting architect is totally lost?
Your applicant does not need to be local. Just easily able to collaborate. It may seem strange, but there really is high speed internet, and people interested in becoming architects in the flyover land parts of the country, where costs of living are much lower, who would be willing to work for a much smaller wage than could be offered wit
Re: (Score:3)
architectural Engineering. A starting electrical engineer with a Masters is around $60-65k in Los Angeles, more in Bay Area. Junior staff cannot be effective remotely; they do not work independently for a few years, and when they hit that mark they need to be helping to mentor the next generation.
Senior engineers can be remotely with only limited loss in productivity, and mid-level can safely be remote a day or two per week. We do have a remote office, as well as one full-time remote employee. It works
Re: (Score:2)
It sounds like your rates in your high cost areas are not congruent with the actual costs of operating your business.
Since you are doing surveys for new building constructions, and other essential civil engineering services for the locality you service-- remind your local civic authorities that lowballing you will result in their deadlines not being met, because you cannot keep the staff required to service their needs in a timely manner on the rates they are demanding. Your competitors will likewise be un
Re: (Score:1)
H1-Bs are supposed to be highly skilled. I live in the Detroit Metro area. 60k is what you pay a fresh college grad with a STEM degree, even in Detroit.
VISA program is GOOD. H1B is NOT. It is a joke (Score:2)
Hopefully, this will be addressed in the next CONgress, or perhaps in the lame duck.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't think we need a visa system, either. you think we're UNDER POPULATED here in the US? maybe in the flyover states we are, but in the tech area hubs we are overcrowded in a way that is not beneficial to anyone but the corps, who prey on us like vultures.
when we have locals who can't get or keep a job and you have 90% indians and chinese walking around in google, intel, cisco, facebook, twitter, etc - there is something really wrong, here. locals can't get work and we import people who don't really
Re: (Score:2)
Desktop browsers don't capitalize by default. Some of us still use them. (Some of us also know where the Shift keys are and learned to type somewhere along the way, even if it was only using Mavis Beacon.)
That said, I've roundfiled plenty of resumes where the person clearly didn't bother to do any spell- or grammar-checking.
Re: (Score:2)
We need green cards to be given out for techs,
Why? What are we short on?
Re: (Score:2)
I work for Google and there are constantly great Ph.D. theses where we hire the inventor to integrate their thesis work into our products. Here's an example of an area that can have major impact on our products and at the same time there is typically one person out there (the Ph.D. student) who knows the topic well and understands all small nuances of it.
Google has offices all over the world, so this is a ridiculous argument at best. Even if you did need them to be face to face, there's no need for anything more than a temporary work visa for that purpose. Got any better explanations than that one?
Nice try (Score:2)
It's a nice try - but it'll NEVER pass much less get signed by Oblahblah! Too much BIG $$$ in politics! Politicians ONLY listen to $$$!
it is (Score:1)
Simple Reforms Needed (Score:5, Insightful)
Just make two simple reforms:
*) H1B visas convert to Green Cards after two years.
*) Limit them to no more than 5% of the workforce for any work site.
Re:Simple Reforms Needed (Score:4, Insightful)
I had a suggestion for simple reforms to Canada's Temporary Foreign Worker program that was being similarly abused, except it wasn't limited to tech workers. Specifically the TFW program was set to for companies that couldn't find Canadian talent to fill roles. It was meant to be used for things like say a high end Indian restaurant needed to bring in a chef from India with 30+ years of experience, but instead was used to replace teenage cashiers at McDonalds franchises.
My suggestion was very simple: If you cannot find a worker for a particular job, you apply to the TFW program for a permit to hire a foreign worker to fill the slot. The government does market studies and knows what an average wage for that position is and to fill it with a TFW, the company will pay 150% of the average wage for that position to get that worker into Canada and employed. The company pays the ministry the worker's 150% wage and then the worker receives a cheque from the government at the average wage for that position as per the market study. The excess monies are used to pay for operation of the TFW program and also to set aside grants to train Canadians to fill these worker deficiencies.
Another reason the pay goes through the TFW office was that there were several cases of the workers being underpaid once they arrived here, or in one particularly egregious instance, a McD's franchisee was also acting as the landlord for his TFWs in a house he owned and would "helpfully" pre-deduct rent and utilities from their paycheques.
I'd be willing to bet that if the TFW and H1-B programs enacted this simple reform, the demand for foreign workers would plummet like a stone and it would still leave the door open for those businesses that actually cannot find someone in-country for a particular job.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, the H1b program was *supposed* to work like this. Unfortunately, there are big fat exemptions to having the market wage determined on a case basis:
1. Just pay them over $60K/year
2. Have a masters degree or better
3. Don't hire more than 15% H1bs in your company
4. Hire a bunch of people under the same *nominal* title and share the wage certification determination between them.
You can easily use #1 in a high wage area like SF bay or NYC...
Diploma mills make #2 pretty easy
Big US based consulting comp
Re: (Score:2)
The H1B fees in the US go to public education. Though, it is not 50% of the salary of the employee.
Re: (Score:3)
There's actually a legit reason for doing this. When a company provides living quarters, that technically counts as additional income (at least to the IRS - I assume the same is true for CRA). You're supposed to pay taxes on it. Sometimes the employee doesn't report that income on their taxes. When the comp
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> This is particularly important if the company is giving the employee the room at below-market rates.
HA Ha ha ha. ha. Trust me, that wasn't his motivation. At all.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/mcdonald-s-foreign-worker-practices-face-growing-investigation-1.2607365
"This housing complex in Lethbridge is referred to as 'the compound.' Local McDonald's employees said up to eight foreign workers live in each suite and they pay the franchise owner $400 per month each for rent. (CBC)
The McD
get rid of the tied to the job part and force OT p (Score:2)
get rid of the tied to the job part and force OT pay for H1B's
Current laws not enforced (Score:5, Insightful)
Most frustratingly, there is no one to really complain to, no regulatory agency that will listen. Even when the law is broken...until it gets to the level of a Congressional hearing nothing is done. Even then, nothing happened to Disney, or SEC, or any of the other giant corps. A few donations to re-election campaigns via shadowy 501s and the issue is dropped every time. Sometimes I think the only solution is to destroy the staffing corps pushing this, and by that I mean literally set fire to the US locations of companies like Tata and Infosys.
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly, I think one of three things (or some combination) is going to stop this:
1. (unlikely) U.S. services consumers will start asking the companies they do business with, how much of their IT staffing is met by H1B visa workers; and refusing to do business with them until the number drops to some acceptable level. This will put pressure on companies to stop cutting corners on IT labor expenditures.
2. (a little more likely) The continuing demand for H1B workers will drive up the salaries and bring them back
Re: (Score:2)
I would personally volunteer to work as a 'secret shopper' for the government in order to weed out these bullshit companies that screw over our own people with this h1b crap.
I'm qualified for a lot of jobs and I have a ton of who's-who names on my resume. I can do the job, in more cases than not. and yet, when I apply, its the same as you - some BS excuse and you never hear from them again.
I would love to help weed out this unpatriotic selfish bastard companies and really sock it to them where it hurts, i
Re: (Score:2)
beware greeks bearing gifts (Score:2)
It's odd that the richest person in congress would put forth this proposal. It's true that he has a democrat joining in the bill, but what's in it for him? There must be something evil hidden in the text that we haven't discovered yet.
Re: (Score:2)
It's odd that the richest person in congress would put forth this proposal. It's true that he has a democrat joining in the bill, but what's in it for him? There must be something evil hidden in the text that we haven't discovered yet.
FWIW, Darrell Issa is a big advocate of Open Government as an analogy to Open Source and has partnered with Mark Shuttleworth to create the Open Government Foundation which makes Project Madison [opengovfoundation.org]...
You can question his motives, and disagree with his politics, but unlike other legislative efforts, typically for the ones that Mr Issa generates, you can generally inspect the process and look for bugs...
Although Issa made his money long ago in the "please step away from the car" alarm business and nowadays make
Income Equalization is removing the offshore value (Score:1)
This comment won't address the low-cost labor question. It will cover the on-vs-off shore question.
About 12 months ago, we benchmarked the Silicon Valley vs Bangalore salaries that we have across a 200 person organization.
- Architect Level engineers had a fully loaded cost about 1/2 of the US engineers.
- Mid-career enginers were about 1/3
- Junior engineers were about 1/5 the cost.
General salary increases in Bangalore are about 10%, US (and most western countries) is about 3%. Cost
Re: (Score:3)
I feel like lots of people here are seeing only one face of the H1B program. I got hired as an H1B and I am permanent resident now. Though I entered the US on a J1 program. When I entered the US, I did not even want to stay, then life being life, I decided too. I work for a university and there are not many qualified applicants.
It is very unlikely that you would someone that is skilled and permanent resident or us citizen for a professor position. They pretty much just do not exists. There are some, but not
Make it direct pay as well so there can't be kick (Score:2)
Make it direct pay as well so there can't be kick backs from staffing firms where on paper the works are being paid a lot more then they are really getting.
Can you tell it's ELECTION Season??? (Score:4, Interesting)
Do-nothing Darrell Issa is NOW concerned about H1B abuse, because people in his district (a high-tech hotbed North of San Diego) have been having their jobs overtaken by imported, lower-cost workers...conveniently, just before his performance is questioned by challengers for his Seat in the House of Representatives.
He could've done this anytime in the past two (or four) years, but, no-o-o. He waits until he can make it a CAMPAIGN ISSUE to help his faltering reputation. His Democratic challenger is now approaching parity in polling, so, pull out the project he SHOULD have been working on for the past several years in office. But, schemer that he is, he's held it in reserve until it could save his butt...and he hopes you forget about all the butts of working who've lost their jobs because of his passive attitude toward constituents in prior years!
Re: (Score:2)
Oops: error correction: Last sentence: ...about all the butts of working PEOPLE who've lost...
Forget minium wage - auction them off (Score:1)
Step 1) create 150k new job opportunities for American citizens by reducing the number of H1Bs by 150k.
Step 2) auction off the remaining H1B slots so companies who truly need exceptional skills can get them, but at a market price
It is not just . . . (Score:1)
. . . IT and private industry that misuses the H1B system. In Monterey, CA there’s a school called Defense Language Institute (run by Uncle Sam himself) that employs a boatload of H1B visa holders and they are being treated very poorly in both pay and work conditions. That is, our own government is breaking the law with regards to H1B visa holders, so please don't expect them to fix it. Apples to Apples, the DLI worker works twice as much for half the pay compared to other colleges in the immediate ar
In order to makeit lasting,,, (Score:1)
$60k minimum salary? (Score:2)
I seem to recall reading here about a study finding that ~90% of H1-B visas were given to people taking low-skilled entry-level positions. Are they really being paid $60k/year for that? Either entry-level IT positions pay way better than I remember, or something else is going on here.
Off-shore Off-shore Off-shore (Score:2)
Those who claim the US benefits by draining the best and the brightest from around the world are doing two things wrong:
1) They bad liars. Everyone knows they just want cheap labor. Just cut the noise already and accept the fact that they may have to send some mangers overseas.
2) Even if they happen to get someone particularly gifted to leave their native land and work cheap in the US, they're ignoring the negative impact this has on those -- usually developing -- economies which need their best and brigh
I Call You A God Damn Liar (Score:2)
H1-B visas are unconstitional (Score:2)
They amount to de facto indentured servitude which the US constitution bans.
Funny math or straight pay for that $100K? (Score:2)
I've lost count of the number of times I've gotten letters from HR after discussing raises detailing (in words, not actual $ values) how my pay is so much more than what shows up in my bank account. There's the paid vacation time, how much they pay toward my insurance, sick days, other benefits I have absolutely no use for (but I'm sure someone convinced the company that for $X, they could claim it was worth $Y).
Unless this bill says the H-1Bs are to get $100K (before taxes) in actual spendable money witho
Two instant solutions (Score:2)
Two instant solutions:
1) Remove H1B program and replace it with green cards. Most of H1B employees get green cards eventually anyway. If visa holders don't depend on company like they currently do, if they can change jobs at will, they have no reason to accept sub-par offers. One may do an investigation for what money green-card lottery winners work. I really doubt that they work for pennies H1B employees get.
2) As there is more demand than allowed visas, there is some kind of lottery. Instead of lottery, g
How's the UK market comparing? (Score:2)
Sorry to hijack a story to go on a tangent, but this may be one read by people I'd like to query:
I'd be very interested to know how older (35+) IT workers (ops & dev) in the UK are feeling at the moment, eg:
* My long experience gives me more confidence in my employability
* I've kept up with trends, so I'm OK
* My experience counts against me (eg "you know C", "you know UNIX", so you must be past it)
* My age counts against me
* There are no jobs going for my skillset
* I'm doing fine, thanks!
* Jobs I can d
Re:Free movement of labor for other jobs... (Score:5, Interesting)
Most americans were actually against removing the trade barriers that allowed labor market shopping of the kind you imply. The agreements were railroaded through anyway.
Most Americans would actually support reintroduction of tariff and excise costs on foriegn goods and services, even though this will increase domestic product cost.
Re:Free movement of labor for other jobs... (Score:4, Informative)
In this case, there is no counter-benefit to the trade, other than "inexpensive purchases", without a subsequent offsetting or balancing return transaction. Tariffs and excise duties help to balance out these kinds of inequalities, and help to artificially secure such comparative advantages, where otherwise it would be impossible to sustain them.
The goal of a tariff is not to squelch foreign products in the market. It is to ensure that the domestic products remain in the market, and continue to be produced by the country engaging in the trade. The counterpoint to the principle thesis of the theory of comparative advantage is that a country that is very prosperous, and able to supply itself with any and every good conceivable in a more efficient manner than any other nation it could trade with, will still engage in trade-- is that countries that are less capable of producing goods, still produce goods to trade to the more capable country.
The US produces fewer and fewer trade goods, and consumes more and more trade goods every year, and with it, employment (and financial liquidity) decline, and with those, standard of living declines, or at least progresses at slower and slower rates.
Again, the goal of a tariff is not to completely squelch the flow of foreign trade goods--- Foreign trade goods enrich the local market by leveraging the creativity and resources of other nations, allowing the local consumers to benefit from other country's advances as well-- The goal is to ensure that local production CONTINUES.
Now, are you satisfied, AC?
Re: (Score:3)
That's the textbook goal of a tariff. Countries have used tariffs to effectively shut off imports.
Tariffs also only work if the imposing country has a significant advantage. It's possible to vastly overdo them, as the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act did (trade dropped by half in both directions). In a global trade era, the effect of tariffs against a given country can be quickly countered by that country offering more advantageous trade opportunities to other nations. China could offer more generous status to th
Re: (Score:2)
So, let me get this straight AC--
A country that imports more than it exports is "Great!" in your estimation, and pointing out that the actual quote from ricardo concerning his theory is as follows, with a little added emphasis of my own:
[blockquote]
"If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it, better buy it of them [b]with some part of the produce of our own industry employed in a way in which we have some advantage.[/b] The general industry of the country, bein
Re: (Score:2)
On the contrary.
If you properly impose a tariff, which includes yearly limits on quotas of imported goods, you put the imported good artificially at the same or very similar market price as the locally produced product.
EG, in your example of 4$ per pound cotton textiles, the government artificially raises the price of that import via the tariff, making it say-- 19$ per pound once it gets to the market.
People don't stop wearing clothes just because the price goes up. Instead, they start looking more strongly