Snowden: 'Governments Can Reduce Our Dignity To That Of Tagged Animals' (theguardian.com) 110
An anonymous reader writes: NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden writes a report on The Guardian explaining why leaking information about wrongdoing is a vital act of resistance. "One of the challenges of being a whistleblower is living with the knowledge that people continue to sit, just as you did, at those desks, in that unit, throughout the agency; who see what you saw and comply in silence, without resistance or complaint," Snowden writes. "They learn to live not just with untruths but with unnecessary untruths, dangerous untruths, corrosive untruths. It is a double tragedy: what begins as a survival strategy ends with the compromise of the human being it sought to preserve and the diminishing of the democracy meant to justify the sacrifice." He goes on to explain the importance and significance of leaks, how not all leaks are alike, nor are their makers, and how our connected devices come into play in the post-9/11 period. Snowden writes, "By preying on the modern necessity to stay connected, governments can reduce our dignity to something like that of tagged animals, the primary difference being that we paid for the tags and they are in our pockets."
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I am a sockpuppet (Score:5, Informative)
Which avenues could Snowden have taken? Keep in mind that Snowden claims that he did raise his concerns with a legal division at the National Security Agency but was rebuffed; this happened years before he leaked to the public. Keep in mind that NSA staffer Thomas Drake tried to use proper channels to report allegations of improper contracting but wound up the target of an investigation.
There is this analysis that shows that Snowden couldn't take any other avenue.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/14/hillary-clinton/clinton-says-nsa-leaker-snowden-failed-use-whistle/
What kind of foreign intelligence efforts could possibly be compromised from the public knowledge that the government indiscriminately spies on the people? That's utterly stupid.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
So you think exposing and revealing state secrets willy-nilly harms no-one and is totally desirable?
The same goes for any other crime. Exposing crimes harms the criminals and is undesirable to them. Systematic and wide-spread violations of the Constitution of the United States by government employees who are paid by the people to uphold the Constitution they have sworn an oath on is highly criminal, and we are talking about organized crime on a large scale here.
So why are you mad at those crimes on the payroll of the American people being exposed? Are you a participant?
Re: (Score:2)
Care to name one? Pick one that has already disappeared to make sure no damage is done.
Re: (Score:1)
When he "leaked" what he had, it had names of people working for the US and Western interests, as well as their family and friends.
I do not know of any documents that Snowden released to the public. Please provide the link. I thought he provided it to a news writer.
it is really doubtful that Snowden can be considered a hero
Thanks for letting me know what is likely vs doubtful in the consideration of my own mind. Before you said this I fully believed the exact opposite. I was incorrect to think that opinions are personal.
Re: (Score:2)
If they didn't want the American people to betray them, they shouldn't have betrayed the American people first.
Re: (Score:2)
First, it wasn't willy-nilly. He passed it on to people he trusted to release the information selectively. Next, he tried those other avenues and it went nowhere. What makes you think an agency that purgers itself before Congress will behave legally when things like this come up?
The people had a right to know their tax dollars were hard at work taking a dump on the Constitution and the flag. If it's inconvenienced the NSA, perhaps they should start working on their mandate rather than becoming a domestic en
Re: (Score:1)
A traitor to what exactly?
Technically the banksters that own the oval office, and everything in the west, right down to your ass.
Re:I am a sockpuppet (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
how is that different from, say, google (the company I dislike the most; or at least on the top 5 hate list) ?
people at google ALL know what the company's mission is. its not about helping mankind, either.
they all take home huge fat paychecks and get all that free lunch and perk stuff; but at the end of the day, they work for a traitorous company who, many believe, is just the civilian arm (dressed up so you could not know it) of the TLA's in government.
same with yahoo and all the rest of the modern 'ad ag
Re: (Score:3)
You ask, "How is that different from Google?"
Show me where you take an oath to defend the Constitution, when Google hires you.
Re: (Score:1)
I think his point is that Google is also a domestic enemy and needs to be defeated militarily.
Re: (Score:2)
an oath? really? that's what you bring to this thread?
speechless.
as if 'promises' mean a FUCKING THING today. especially when the almight dollar or almight power is at stake.
the gentlemanly ways are long gone. oaths? HA! the constitution is 'just an outdated bit of paper' by today's thinking, by those in power.
the fact that people sell each other out (which is my main point; one you obviously didn't get) is what is the issue here.
the end result is also the same, oath or no oath. we the people are wo
Re:I am a sockpuppet (Score:4, Interesting)
Some people that have posted here seem close to realizing the government is less and less the holders of power, and the corporations like google, are more and more in a position of authority.
I would merely caution against whom you anger, for in a post government corpocracy there will likely be no enforceable laws preventing corporations from seeking 'damages' from negative 'feedback'.
Re: (Score:2)
Let's not forget that Snowden promised to keep secret the information he leaked.
Re: (Score:1)
Perhaps he did. We don't actually know what oaths he may have taken or legal contracts he may have signed. Let's not forget the government promised to abide the constitution - our legislators, justices and executives have all taken oaths on record, and in most cases, in public.
That said - Two wrongs don't make a right. Put another way, one wrong does not excuse another. The actions of the government don't excuse Snowden but Snowden's actions don't excuse the government either. Guilt is NOT mutually exc
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps he did. We don't actually know what oaths he may have taken or legal contracts he may have signed.
He held a clearance. To do so, it was required that he make several legally-binding promises. Among them, he would have promised (in no particular order):
There is no wiggle room. If
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
He held a clearance. To do so, it was required that he make several legally-binding promises. Among them, he would have promised (in no particular order):
There is no wiggle room.
He did report through appropriate channels and in the correct order. The reason he had to go through the other appropriate channel was because the first one turned out to be a traitor. Snowden would never have leaked the information if the first channel had followed the law.
And no, there is no wiggle room, the constitution goes above the others. Negotiating away the constitution or suppressing it would make you a traitor.
Re: (Score:2)
If he swore to protect the Constitution, his oath might have bound him to leak after getting nowhere internally.
Re: (Score:2)
No, that's kind of my point. The Constitution is the source of authority for the laws that he broke. By leaking, he's defied the Constitution himself.
"Getting nowhere internally" is exactly what he's allowed to do under the Constitution. He has the right to protest, but he does not have the right to release classified information. Thus there is a classified channel for such protests. However, the Constitution does not guarantee that one's protests will actually affect anything, and if indeed nothing changes
Re: (Score:2)
No, not if his orders and the NSA's actions are in defiance of the Constitution. Nothing in the Constitution says blindly obey your glorious leader.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Let's not forget that Snowden promised to keep secret the information he leaked.
So, there were two conflicting promises, he couldn't keep both and took the option that was best for the people.
NSA might have been full of traitors, but Snowden wasn't one of them.
Re: (Score:3)
If Google was working for the government or a TLA, I don't think they would have enabled strong encryption by default in their mobile OS or made a concerted effort to encrypt all their own web services, and then adjusted search result rankings to favour encrypted sites.
Of course a conspiracy theorist would argue that those changes are all for show and the government has a back door anyway, but given the hassle that the FBI has had recently with Apple (who were listed along side Google in the leaked NSA slid
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
It's actually pretty cut and dry. If you are part of the government, and you are intercepting communications without a warrant signed by a judge with probable cause, you are a traitor to the US Constitution. This is coming from a former Army Officer. I don't give a fuck if you think you are protecting people because if we look at the record of the 3 letter agencies, they suck donkey dick when it comes to actually stopping attacks. Fuck, the FBI can't even make a bust on a terrorist they didn't create, and t
Re:I am a sockpuppet (Score:5, Interesting)
A traitor to whom?
To the government that tries to usurp your freedoms? Most certainly.
To you? Most certainly not.
Re: (Score:1)
Instead of worrying about who said it, look at what was said. Why should someone shut up (or be shut up) because you don't like what was said? Should the same apply to you?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Public consensus says you're wrong. If the government wasn't worried abut his opinions, they could just let him back for a fair trial instead of one where he's not able to make the fullest defense possible.
More people are coming to the conclusion that, while legally wrong, it was morally right.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah that's for the movie stars and sports heroes to do. You know cause they really know better than all of us because they well they do.
Government can? (Score:2, Insightful)
What? Government abuses the power it is given to control and oppress its own citizens?
CLEARLY WE NEED TO GIVE THE GOVERNMENT EVEN MORE POWER OVER OUR LIVES! #FeelTheBern
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
If you think that "conservative" means less government, Wake the FUCK up!
Less *corruption* leads to less government.
Neither 'liberal' nor 'conservative' as a "side" (what a bullshit concept you've bought into there) are fighting for less corruption.
Trump is not going to fight for less. He gets his money from more rent-seeking. So, he is gonna screw you and everyone else over if he can.
Bernie? Seems less corrupt.
Re: (Score:1)
[citation needed]
Citation 1. [facebook.com]
Citation 2. [twitter.com]
Citation 3. [uber.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Citation 3. [uber.com]
What?
He should know (Score:1)
Irony, coming from a tagged animal.
Re: (Score:2)
Odd that it says "from the local-zoo dept."
Zoo animals are observed, fed and cared for in a large cage or enclosure paid for by the proceeds of their observation.
We however are just observed and we get to pay for it ourselves out of pocket.... Well unless they for some reason don't like you then you get put in a small cage with a bunch of others and then they will pay for your observation, food and care.
-- /. Please fix.
Disable advertising broken. Minimum threshold broken
Sounds familiar (Score:4, Informative)
Datajack Sinder Roze, Alpha Centauri
Re: (Score:1)
Can Reduce our Dignity? (Score:5, Insightful)
I think it already had reduced beyond dignity. Just visualize airport lines.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't have to visualise i've been there.
It's been a few years since i've flown but the worst part of the last trip (involving 6 planes and about 12 hours of flight time each way) was going through security at the airport. One of the people flying with me one was flagged for some type of explosives false positive of course but still.
Not an experience I care to repeat.
-- /. Please fix.
Disable advertising broken. Minimum threshold broken
With all due respect (Score:2, Informative)
Nothing has changed since Snowden's revelations. Politicians like Diane Feinstein continue to support mass surveillance and The Patriot Act, even making new statements like the government should "censor the Internet" to deal with terrorist communications and recruitment.
As citizens -- as voters -- we're complicit in our government's actions because we continue to reelect the same people.
I used to be undecided on my thoughts of him... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
I thought it was funny when they put up a statue of him and no one knew who he was.
http://www.businessinsider.com... [businessinsider.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Now we get these little press releases from him...
Not necessarily from him, but from the story writers milking the crowd.
Re: (Score:3)
To be fair, he wasn't asked to right any wrongs this time. He was asked to write the forward to a book about drone warfare, which he did, probably for money. This "press release," as you call it, is just a reprint of that essay.
A very Libertarian argument (Score:1)
Of course, they can! And in some countries, they don't even bother with tagging [wikipedia.org]. But try to call for reduction of government and empowering the individuals [slashdot.org], and you'll be shouted and modded down in no time...
Re: (Score:1)
He said 'Governments Can Reduce Our Dignity To That Of Tagged Animals'.
Lets try what IT managers get away with, yes where I work HR is just the enforcer.
'(Public Sector) Companies Reduce Our Dignity To That Of Tagged Animals'.
But I'm not bitter.
Just doomed.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for providing the US government propaganda department's point of view.
Cows (Score:1)
Maybe it's Snowden who's been posting "you are all cows" on /. all this time.
We've already tagged ourselves (Score:2)
Quality over Quantity (Score:2)
Did he study history of government of Stalin? (Score:1)
If Mr. Snowden had studied history in addition to studying technologies, he should have known that governments who wanted to "reduce our dignity to something like that of tagged animals" is not something new. In fact, in the country where he is staying now, namely Russia, the government of Joseph Stalin was one of the most oppressive government who worked hard to reduce the dignity of its people. Joseph Stalin did all these things before the invention of telecommunication technologies. Perhaps if Mr. Snowde
Re: (Score:1)
If Mr. Snowden had studied history in addition to studying technologies, he should have known that governments who wanted to "reduce our dignity to something like that of tagged animals" is not something new. In fact, in the country where he is staying now, namely Russia, the government of Joseph Stalin was one of the most oppressive government who worked hard to reduce the dignity of its people.
Correct. But it's the U.S. that is currently indulging in Stalinism (with internation camps without due process, "Espionage Act" laws without defense, secret rubberstamp courts without oversight, arbitrary confiscation of people's property by the police and so on and so on). And Trump is a big fan of Hitler.
Yes, Stalin was bad news and Russian, and Hitler was bad news and German (well, Austrian, but the Germans swallowed his bait), but the blame is on the U.S. for resuscitating the two and their history a
1984 (Score:2)
TFS: [...]people continue to sit, just as you did, at those desks, in that unit, throughout the agency; who see what you saw and comply in silence, without resistance or complaint [...] They learn to live not just with untruths but with unnecessary untruths, dangerous untruths, corrosive untruths.
1984: And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed – if all records told the same tale – then the lie passed into history and became truth. "Who controls the past," ran the Party slogan, "
What would Brian Boytano do? (Score:2)
Free Will Is An Illusion (Score:1)
Only YOU can take your dignity away. (Score:2)
Dignity: "the state or quality of being worthy of honor or respect."
The only way you can lose your dignity is if you believe you are not worthy of honor or respect. That's why shame and stigma are such effective weapons. But if you refuse to be shamed without cause on your part and treat attempts to stigmatize you with the contempt they deserve, you are still just as worthy of honor and respect as before.
Only a MOO or a sheeple would act otherwise.
Re: (Score:1)
it is the way of their kind.
Re: (Score:1)
To be exactly like the Democrats.
Re:Seal Team 6 (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)