Can Online Reporting System Help Prevent Sexual Assaults On Campus? 234
jyosim writes Studies have shown that as many as 90 percent of campus rapes are committed by repeat offenders. A new system is designed to help identify serial assaulters, by letting students anonymously report incidents in order to look for patterns. But some argue that having the ability to report someone with just the click of a button may not be a good thing. Andrew T. Miltenberg, a New York lawyer who represents young men accused of sexual misconduct, says though the system seems well intended, he is concerned about dangers it may pose to students who are accused. 'We're all guilty of pressing send on an angry text or email that, had we had to put it into an actual letter and proofread, we probably wouldn't have sent,' he says.
Students + Anonimity (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:5, Insightful)
No kidding, there needs to be accountability when you claim rape.
The accusation, even when later proven false, destroys lives.
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:5, Insightful)
Did anyone else see that report last weekend on "60 Minutes" about the Duke lacrosse coach? The guy wasn't even accused of a crime, only COACHING the men who were accused. And those men were all PROVEN INNOCENT. And even still, it cost the guy his job and still follows him to this day. And that was for coaching innocent men!
That's the kind of damage even being ASSOCIATED with someone FALSELY ACCUSED of such a crime can do.
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:5, Insightful)
Worse than that, not one member of the Duke Lynch Mob has suffered any repercussions at all for their actions in demanding penalties against the accused before they were tried.
In the UVa case, "Jackie" has faced no repercussions for making false accusations, and neither has Rolling Stone Magazine. At least Jackie tried to retract the story before it was published, but RS went ahead even though the "victim" no longer stood by the story. But more significantly, the University of Virginia has suffered no repercussions, despite taking drastic and broad punitive action against the fraternities, before doing any fact checking, much less waiting for a proper investigation.
Re: (Score:2)
They didn't even fire the reporter who wrote that bullshit story.
The reason she wasn't fired, it that the decision to go with the story was made at the top. The editors and management at RS were fully aware that the story had not been vetted, and that the "victim" had tried to retract. It would have been hypocritical of them to push all the blame onto Ederly. The problems at Rolling Stone go far beyond one author. Their recent cover story that tried to make a sympathetic sex symbol out of the Boston Marathon bomber was another egregious example of a poor editorial de
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't think anyone who was reading Rolling Stone saw the Boston Marathon bomber as a sex symbol, at least anyone who wasn't inclined to see him that way in the first place.
It isn't like RS never covered anything but pop culture either.
That said, when someone who commits a heinous crime is part of your target demographic, I actually think it's rather responsible to pull the veil of "it couldn't happen to you" off your readership, and if it provided some insight that could help someone recognize the signs in someone like that before it's too late, I think it's a far more responsible choice than you're willing to give it credit for.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a bit more than that.
Sabrina Rubin Erdely already had a history of sensationalistic sexual abuse stories, but she was award-winning and pretty much beyond reproach.
That no one decided to maybe look into her past history of negligent reporting was suspect, but rape culture is the zeitgeist of the times. Can't let something like facts and accountability get in the way.
And even now, the campus rape epidemic has taken on the tenor of the satanic ritual sexual abuse moral panic of the 80s. And just like McM
Re: (Score:2)
And even now, the campus rape epidemic has taken on the tenor of the satanic ritual sexual abuse moral panic of the 80s.
The biggest similarity is that neither actually exists. The satanic ritual abuse is now believed to have had zero actual perpetrators or victims (other than the falsely accused). While there are certainly rapes on campuses, they are actually less common there than in society as a whole. So to talk about "campus rape" as if that is a specific problem, is misleading.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Welcome to the applied definitions of 'social justice', 'diversity' and 'equality.' What they say and what they do are complete opposites. It's newspeak to a T.
Re: Students + Anonimity (Score:2, Interesting)
I can tell you first hand that false accusations destroy lives just as much.
Re: Students + Anonimity (Score:5, Insightful)
That doesn't mean it's ok to falsely accuse, or for the accuser to stay hidden while she and her lawyer trash their target with impunity before a trial is even started, hell, sometimes before an arrest is made. Maybe false accusers should be dealt the same punishments their targets would've had to endure.
In a free country everyone deserves equality before the law. What you're suggesting just encourages witchhunts and social vendettas (he cheated on me, I'll get him!). All I can really read from your post is that 'women matter, men do not.' Fuck that.
Re: (Score:3)
False accusations of rape is present in ~80% of disputed divorce cases. It's so bad, some lawyers are having the clauses in form paperwork. Demonstrably false accusations are around 10-20% of all investigated rape cases. If females wouldn't use rape accusations as a tool, real victims would have a much better chance.
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:4, Insightful)
When looking at best practices, we have to examine the common cases, the places where things can do the most harm or most good, NOT the super rare edge cases that get the spotlight.
Yes, who cares if a minority of innocents get their lives destroyed. Better be safe and punish the innocents this is how a good justice system works. And they're just a minority anyway, fuck minorities. (/sarc)
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:5, Informative)
My uncle was a Family Court judge for many years. He used to joke that he got so used to hearing allegations of child molestation and abuse in divorce and child custody cases that he was surprised when at least one parent DIDN'T accuse the other of molesting or abusing their kid.
If he and other judges like him had accepted it as dogma that 99.99% of such accusations were true, then there wouldn't be enough people walking around free today to run all the prisons for everyone locked up.
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:4, Insightful)
His common sense probably let a lot of child molesters go free. Family court judges are notorious for being dismissive about abuse claims and I know a lot of a adults who still bear a grudge because a judge would not believe one of their parents was abusing them.
Sadly, your uncle is not a counter example, he is more likely an example of the problem.
Sorry "you know" a lot adults who got diddled by grandpa (I don't know a single fucking one, but then again I don't hang around with people like you). That's what we call "anecdotal evidence" and it isn't worth jack shit. The exact same reason family court judges can't just throw everyone in jail based on some he-said, she-said bullshit. Common sense is not an example of the problem, pussies like you are. If you had your way, I'm sure a judge could just (without evidence, of course, like all authoritarians enjoy) throw people away because mommy said daddy touched little Johnny or Janie. Sadly, people who let emotions rather than facts or common sense (like yourself) are starting to ruin enough lives that these things are finally coming to light.
Better to let 1,000 guilty men free than imprison 1 innocent man. You know, the way it's supposed to work. In a free country, not the kind you like (I hear Saudi Arabia, North Korea, and Iran are nice this time of year). If you want innocent people to be jailed because of feewings, get the fuck out. You don't understand what freedom and liberty really are.
Re: (Score:2)
That's because of the 'girl who cried wolf' syndrome, not because of this particular judge.
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:5, Interesting)
Look, rape happens all the time. It happens more often in economically disadvantaged communities, and by family members, but we don't talk about that. We talk about frat guys, or jockeys, or the people we "least expect," because that makes headlines. Rape is not an epidemic on college campuses, although there is an epidemic of paranoia. Most guys are scared shitless of possibly doing something uncool, let alone "creepy," let alone being accused of rape. If we want to deal with the real epidemic of rape and sexual assault, then we should create programs in grade school for students to tell an adult about what happens at home. If we teach children and young teenagers that they won't be ignored, and that someone cares about them, then they won't be afraid to report things when they're adults on college campuses. Most rapes and sexual assaults are committed by people who themselves were abused or assaulted, who never found resolution. If we get to those people before they get the chance to victimize others, then we've made everyone safer. I'm not one to beat the "think of the children" drum, but this is a problem that's rooted in childhood, so that's where our focus should be.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
But don't forget:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMartin_preschool_trial
Re: (Score:2)
I notice you don't provide any stats to back up that bland assertion. The connection of a rape charge (even obliquely) is sufficient to ruin your life. A lot of the damage is done *prior* to being vindicated. Does the innocent party get reimbursed for the loss of time/freedom/property/job/friends/acquaintences? No. It's gone.
Re: (Score:2)
We have to look at *all* cases, because the justice system is designed to punish the guilty and only the guilty. By letting innocent people be punished, you're destroying the entire reason for its existence.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:5, Insightful)
Considering the penalty the accused faces, tough shit.
Rape is a SERIOUS accusation, not to be made lightly.
Re: (Score:2)
This is one reason why rape victims get anonymity in the UK.
This is reasonable, and public sentiment almost universally agrees with it.
Someone found guilty in court of making a false accusation loses their anonymity, which reinforces the emphasis that the protection is for actual victims of violent sexual assault.
Where the law goes wrong is that people accused do not also get anonymity. Witch hunts ensue. Lives get destroyed. It's a shitty situation.
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
This is especially true if the local community places a high value on the person being accused. For example, if a small town's football superstar rapes someone and she reports it, she will be treated as a horrible person for trying to ruin the team's chance at the playoffs. Accusations will be made regarding her promiscuity and her general character. Her name will be dragged through the mud. And all of this before the case even sees one day in a courtroom. She might have to leave the town entirely whil
Serious things treated seriously and w/ dignity (Score:5, Insightful)
There needs to absolutely be a mechanism in place for a woman to:
- safely be transported to a hospital in a fashion which maintains chain of evidence
- be examined by a sympathetic, but impartial medical professional using a rape kit to collect evidence
- make a formal statement, and if it includes an accusation, that to be duly sworn out in a reasonable fashion
There needs to be in place mechanisms for the hospital, police and other social structures to take the above seriously. If there aren't, that needs to change.
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:5, Insightful)
Rightly or wrongly, the police may be influenced by their familiarity with the criminal justice system and circumstances that were reported. So many rape accusations boil down to a he said/she said situation that would be impossible to get charged by a prosecutor, let alone result in a convicton in court.
A woman I used to know was raped by a coworker. The woman and her roommate were waitresses at a restaurant and bar. They had the company Christmas party at the restaurant and the rapist was one of the employees. Everyone had too much to drink and the rapist was too drunk to drive and asked if he could crash on their couch. They said sure. In the middle of the night, he crept into her room and raped her and left the apartment afterwards.
In the morning, she told her boyfriend who insisted she go to the police who were basically dismissive of the claim, not because they thought she was lying but because there was no way to conclusively prove it was rape. There were witnesses who saw the three of them (the woman who was raped, her roommate, and rapist) voluntarily leave together. All had been drinking. The apartment wasn't forcibly entered. The rape itself didn't involve enough violence that she had bruises, scarring or signs of a physical struggle.
The cops said they would bring him in for questioning but that unless he actually admitted raping her outright, what would almost certainly happen is that he would say that after they got back to the apartment she invited him into her room for sex and that he left afterwards and that the rape accusation was that she felt guilty because she had a boyfriend. And because there was no way to disprove this version of events, the prosecutor wouldn't even file charges. They also said the presence of the roommate would work against her, since he would claim that since her roommate didn't wake up she wasn't fighting or resisting.
Are the cops insensitive? Maybe, but what can they do when there's no evidence?
I believed her personally because I knew her fairly well, but if I think about it too long even I can start to enterain doubts. Why was there no physical struggle? Why didn't she yell and wake her roommate? If I was a cop confronted with this a lot, I can see why they come off indifferent.
Re: (Score:2)
That doesn't strike me as indifference from the cops, just facing reality. What more could they realistically do if he denied it? It's not anyone's fault, it's just the way the universe is - there is no way to validate either claim.
Re: (Score:2)
Who stole your account?
Re: (Score:2)
So many rape accusations boil down to a he said/she said situation
Well, that is the point of this app. If there is one he-said-she-said date rape situation, that isn't enough for a conviction. But if there are several women making accusations about the same guy, that is a lot more credible. If you look at a case like Bill Cosby, none of his accusers would have a lot of individual credibility, but taken together, I don't think anyone seriously doubts that Cosby is a serial rapist.
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Recent events, such as the Rolling Stone farce, have shown that universities and the public are not responsible enough to act in the way you suggest. If the cops want to set up a rape reporting website, that's one thing, although I still think it's useless because a rape conviction should require physical evidence. Universities or random people doing this? That's just asking for a witch hunt.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's a good way of putting it. It might actually be a decent tool for the cops to use. The difference being that the police and courts are (supposed to be) knowledgeable about the law, trained in its enforcement, and accountable for their actions. The university offices in charge of these things, not so much.
On the other hand, if you're not even willing to walk down to the campus police station and file a report, any prosecution probably isn't going to go very far anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
So why not grant total anonymity to the consipirators with an app like this
You might want to RTFA. There is no "total anonymity". It is hidden from public view, but the accuser is still asked to leave contact info. If there are multiple credible accusations about the same perp, from people that are willing to identify themselves, then the police are contacted.
This app prevents the victim from having to go public with accusations, and prevents the perp from being publicly accused before a credible case has been established. So your concerns seem completely backwards.
If "Jackie"
Re: (Score:3)
If "Jackie" had gone to the cops, which is what they're there for, there wouldn't have been a problem. She wanted a media shit show, and she got it.
Re: (Score:2)
And who controls the people looking at the info?
The organization that owns the site.
And who controls the people looking at police reports? How is this any different, other than that the police are less trustworthy, less likely to consider victim privacy a priority, and more willing to leak/distort information for political purposes, as happened in the Duke case?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That line of thinking is where a lot of the danger of this kind of thing comes in. Eyewitness testimony, never mind a "witness" clicking a button in an app, is incredibly unreliable. Rape is a serious crime, and should require physical evidence to convict.
The real solution to this problem is to eliminate the stigma behind reporting rape and having the proper evidence gathered. A bunch of reports of rape don't mean anything. A bunch of reports of rape with positive rape kits is evidence.
Re: (Score:2)
Indifferent is not the right word, but they're looking to see if there's a reasonable chance whether an investigation could result in a conviction and that's far from just rapes. I've had my car vandalized at night, no witnesses and really just reported it for the insurance claim. I've had a pair of brand new shoes stolen at the gym, no cameras pointing in that direction, I just reported it for the statistics so they know how much crime is really going on.
They come into the police station thinking now I'm g
Re: (Score:2)
Correct conclusion, but one point is entirely wrong. The police acted correctly, but only because there was no evidence to support her story and you can only convict people if you can prove guilt. There is no reason at all to assume that she was lying. The guy can not be found guilty, but that does not mean he is innocent.
Re: (Score:2)
No. Not being found guilty means you must be treated as innocent, not that you are innocent.
It's a subtle difference, but it does exist.
Re: (Score:2)
Yup and when it was not a completely unprovable he said she said they did. A friend was the only female officer so pretty much had to show up at every domestic dispute and rape allegation while on duty. The vast majority were unprovable two people in the room no evidence of force, often the women were questionable witnesses being drunk or high at the time. Plenty of cases where when there were witnesses that were impartial the drunk/stoned girl was willing and eager to take on drunk/stoned guy before the
Re: (Score:2)
there are "consent apps" now (Score:2)
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:5, Informative)
Anonymity plus rape accusations will equal lawsuits and destroyed lives.
Actually, if you RTFA (I know, this is /., why would you?), you'll see that a student cannot accuse anonymously.
They can either non-anonymously report the event to the authorities using the system, or they can record details but not report. If they choose to record, and someone else makes an accusation on the same person, the system will then allow the student to non-anonymously report.
Re:Students + Anonimity (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
It's the same old battle of equally opposed forces. On the one hand we want victims to come forward, be listened to and get justice. On the other hand we want to protect the innocent and not have their lives ruined by false allegations or the investigation itself.
To make matters more difficult many victims don't come forward if the are not guaranteed anonymity, or if they think they will be interrogated during the investigation or at trial. On the other hand we need to interrogate them to get to the truth o
Students + Anonimity = some false accusations (Score:2)
I was thinking the same thing. Is there a way to report a false accusation too? Because I see a lot of innocent people having their lives destroyed by this. A rape or sex offender accusation today is like being labeled a witch in medieval Europe. It's straight to the gallows with you, innocent or not!
Re:Students + Anonimity = some false accusations (Score:5, Insightful)
Get raped, and generally one will be treated like they deserved it, or are making it up, or are just having regrets, or are simply trying to 'take advantage' of some innocent man.
You know, I keep HEARING that claim. But I don't think I've ever once seen any actual evidence of it (not in recent decades, anyway). When a rape victim walks into a police station today saying "I've been raped," I'm pretty damned sure they don't immediately take her to an interrogation room and start accusing her of making it up. AFAIK the SOP in just about any police station is to quickly get her story, get to her a hospital for a rape kit, and then arrest the accused if there is sufficient evidence of the crime. Many police stations and hospitals even have rape counselors who show up now and assist the victim. The standard presumption initially is to believe the accuser, particularly if there is physical evidence to back up the crime.
It's only later in the process that good police officers (ones not being spurred on by grandstanding prosecutors [wikipedia.org]) will follow up with a more thorough examination of the evidence. And then, yes, they will ask more detailed questions of both the accuser and accused--and possibly even question their stories. Because that's THEIR JOB, to not take accusations or denials at face value and to look at the evidence, question witnesses, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I see far more people getting raped and not believed then I see people being falsely accused, and this is coming from someone who has had people close to me in both categories.
The incidence and severity of the crime of rape does not excuse the life destroying impact of a false accusation.
Both are bad. Neither should happen. It's correct to attempt to prevent both, and to draw attention to something that makes either become more likely.
The vast majority of the time, accusations are turned back on the accuser. There are occasional examples of the accusation ruining the accused, but most of the time people (including officers) assume the accusation is 'probably false' and treat the victim accordingly. Get raped, and generally one will be treated like they deserved it, or are making it up, or are just having regrets, or are simply trying to 'take advantage' of some innocent man.
In the UK the formal (and I believe primary informal) response of the police is to treat the accusation seriously and treat the complainant as a victim of a serious crime.
On the flipside, a woman can now legally withdraw consent given while intoxica
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
ARE YOUR CLASSMATES JEW-^h^h^h COMMU-^h^h^h^h^h RAPISTS? Don't delay, speak out today! Report suspected sedi-^h^h^h^h sexual assaulters to Big Brother! Remember citizens, it is for YOUR protection!
Re: (Score:2)
ARE YOUR CLASSMATES JEW-^h^h^h COMMU-^h^h^h^h^h RAPISTS? Don't delay, speak out today! Report suspected sedi -^h^h^h^h sexual assaulters to Big Brother! Remember citizens, it is for YOUR protection!
Re: (Score:2)
This story also assumes that she was lying and he was telling the truth, have you considered that he was lying? Most victims are given a hard enough time by going forward that they drop out of cases since they have to defend themselves over and over and fucking over from people saying 'well, it is probably just a false accusation, think of the men hurt by sluts like you!'. It gets really draining and a lot of women just give up because th
This won't end well (Score:3)
Re:This won't end well (Score:4, Insightful)
I guess it depends on how mature and responsible college students are... so yeah, I agree with you!
We've forced them to be extended children, so they come out of High school with the maturity of 14 year old's of say 40 years ago. So they are sowing their wild oats in college a bit more than they used to. So with a combination of legitimate reports, vendetta and rejection reports, and simple pranks, this is a system built to fail.
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Here's what I don't get (Score:5, Interesting)
The most common reason I hear for not doing this is that the victim doesn't want their assailant to go to prison. Why? So they can continue raping other people? Chances are the victim isn't the rapists first victim, or if they were, they won't be the last. Suspending a rapist from school or making them transfer does not protect other people.
The other problem I have with having colleges or universities handle this problem is that I've heard of several instances where there wasn't due diligence in fact finding, and there was a presumption of guilt against the alleged assailant. Let the justice system handle what the justice system was created for. Colleges & universities should stick to educating people and doing research, not adjudicating serious crimes.
Re:Here's what I don't get (Score:4, Insightful)
Colleges want students to feel like they are protecting them, that's why they have campus security. Students are consumers, they have a choice of where to go to college, and providing security is part of the offer.
Re: (Score:3)
Providing their own rent-a-cops is one thing. Performing their own investigations of major crimes is entirely another.
Re: (Score:2)
For some colleges, relying on local police instead of campus security would be a huge negative. The college I went to was in a bad neighborhood, but our campus was pretty safe. Generally, you could walk around the campus at night without any problem. Walk two feet off campus, though, and I couldn't guarantee your safety. The local police might have had a hand in this, but I doubt they kept only the college safe. More likely, it was campus security providing focused protection (of a kind that the surrou
law called Titlte IX forces internal ivestigation (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Universities are private property; the have duties to their staff, their customers, and to people who take up residence there.
But they can find a role assisting law enforcement instead of being in their way.
Re: (Score:3)
I've seen that claimed before. Before I believe anything, I'd like to see the methodology. This strikes me as one of those things where you can prove almost anything by looking at the right numbers and making the right assumptions.
Better (Score:4, Insightful)
Girls don't hang out with drunk men. Men don't hang out with drunk women. The standard behavior on a university campus invites sexual misbehavior. Mod me into oblivion.
Re: (Score:2)
And what happens when a sober woman hangs out with a sober man who overpowers her? Not all rape cases are alcohol related.
Re: (Score:2)
For those, there's the real police department. They can do things the campus police department can't do -- like "send someone to jail", or "be responsible for applying the due process guarantees that our constitution insists we provide to everyone (including accused and/or actual rapists)".
Re: (Score:3)
So if a woman is friends with a man, they can't hang out in private ever? And if the man decides that he wants more - and to force that "more" on her - then it's the woman's fault for hanging out with him without others around?
On the flip side, does this mean that women should regard all men as sexual predators? As a man, I'm offended by that.
Re: (Score:2)
because a man never raped another man?
Re: (Score:2)
Fun fact: if it's nonconsentual, it's still rape even if it's your wife. Wait, actually by fun I meant "totally the opposite of fun", sorry about that.
How Did We Get Here? (Score:2)
While I strongly believe this is a Bad Idea(tm) of epic proportions with a list of unintended consequences that seemingly has no end, after my initial visceral reaction, I am left to wonder. What led anyone, or group of anyone's, to think this was the answer? Even assuming we are all Good People(tm), do they believe someone will report an incident just because they can do some anonymously? Okay, so we'll put their potential targets on notice but, the report isn't really actionable. The attacker will sti
Re:How Did We Get Here? (Score:5, Informative)
Rape rates have been falling drastically since the 70's.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ZlRN... [blogspot.com]
Rape rates on colleges are LOWER than outside of college:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi... [wikimedia.org]
And rape rates in some other 1st-world countries are HUGELY higher--but nobody here cares apparently:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi... [wikimedia.org]
But none of these facts comply with the myth of the "oppressive white male" who thinks he can rape and take whatever he wants.
Nobody disagrees with the idea that rape is a bad thing. But people are willing to hijack that axiom to create hysteria and generate political power.
Re: (Score:2)
And rape rates in some other 1st-world countries are HUGELY higher--but nobody here cares apparently: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi... [wikimedia.org]
The numbers may say so, but they comprise only official data. In more advanced countries, the case must be that less rapes go unreported, so the figures may be closer to reality, while not so in the US. Consider the Japan rates, which are among the lowest, while having a strong culture of sexual harassment, (it's the same culture that created things like RapeLay [google.com.br]): http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.1525/as.2007.47.5.811?uid=3737664&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21106029734881 [jstor.org]; http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/c [upenn.edu]
"This student is a potential rapist" (Score:2)
When I was in college oh so many years ago, this was a problem; guess it's still going on now.
Anyhow, some student activists (turned out to be just a couple of students with access to a photocopier and a stapler) put up posters around campus. The posters had a photo of a guy with prison bars clipart overlaid and the subject tagline below. Whether the photo was actually of a student currently enrolled was never revealed.
Their argument was "he has a penis. therefore he is a *potential* rapist. no lie; no
Email anger management (Score:2)
'We're all guilty of pressing send on an angry text or email that, had we had to put it into an actual letter and proofread, we probably wouldn't have sent,'
Ah, lawyers, thinking since they represent the highest infallibility standard, they can speak for all humanity?
Did you ever sent an inappropriately angry email or text? I don't recall that I ever had that problem.
Terrible idea (Score:2)
Campus rapes? You mean like the one that occurred at the University of Virginia? Except that it never occurred. And the press is still treating the accuser like she is some sort of victim when the real victims are the young men that were falsely accused. If i were one of those guys I would be suing that devious bitch to high heaven.
It's just too easy to make false accusations without any real consequences. I could see this sort of system very easily used as revenge or blackmail.
Why don't female students shame rapists? (Score:2)
I'd think that social media would give women more ability to take a stand against their rapists, outing them for criminal, immoral, and reckless behavior.
A Couple Friends (Score:2)
Ladies always taking a couple friends along when venturing out will solve this. Their names are Mr. Smith and Mr. Wesson.
It has been proven over and over that citizens carrying the means of self defense greatly deters violent attack against them. The fatal flaw in this is the "defenseless victim" being present. Eliminate the defenseless victim by allowing her some effective defense. Only firearms are effective in all situations. Some a-hole hopped up on PCP won't even notice pepper spray. Tasers
Re: (Score:2)
Some a-hole hopped up on PCP won't even notice pepper spray.
It had better be a pretty big handgun, maybe something like this [alloutdoor.com], otherwise they likely would just shake it off [washingtonpost.com] if they are on PCP.
Re: (Score:2)
let me explain my strategy (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because a violent attacker with greater strength and size could never remove those items from you and use them against you.
No, I think I'd prefer alternate strategies.
Re: (Score:2)
liability for authors of misused apps? (Score:3)
The question is.... (Score:2)
Rapists, especially of minors, deserve the worst our criminal justice system can dish out, more so than your run of the mill murderer, IMO.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Funny, because no one in this comment line has made the argument that false reports don't happen/aren't important. That would make the position suggested imaginary and easily confuted, because we ourselves would argue against those not mattering. As a result, it fits the definition so perfectly that were it any more obvious, it would be used to scare crows.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: How can anyone think this is possibly a good i (Score:2)
Long story short, you're not very good at this. Drink Coke, Play Again.
Re: (Score:2)
You can thank obama:
from an article online " Title IX, the federal law that protects against discrimination in education. Schools are legally required by that law to address sexual harassment and violence on campus, and these activists filed complaints with the federal government about what they describe as lax enforcement by schools. The current administration has taken up the causeâ"the Chronicle of Higher Education describes it as âoea marquee issue for the Obama administrationââ"and
Re: (Score:2)
Schools are legally required by that law to address sexual harassment and violence on campus
Then they should do something to address the harassment of male students, including violence threatened and perpetrated if they dare to suggest a "Men's rights" group on campus.