Amazon Sues To Block Fake Reviews 126
An anonymous reader writes Amazon has filed suit against operators of sites that offer Amazon sellers the ability to purchase fake 4 and 5 star customer reviews. The suit is the first of its kind and was filed in King County Superior Court against a California man, Jay Gentile, identified in Amazon's filings as the operator of buyazonreviews.com. The site also targets unidentified "John Does" who operate similar sites: buyreviewsnow.com, bayreviews.net, and buyamazonreviews.com. From the article: "The site buyazonreviews.com, which the suit claims is run by Gentile, didn't respond to a request for comment. But Mark Collins, the owner of buyamazonreviews.com, denied Amazon's claims. In an email interview, Collins said the site simply offers to help Amazon's third-party sellers get reviews. 'We are not selling fake reviews. however we do provide Unbiased and Honest reviews on all the products,' Collins wrote. 'And this is not illegal at all.'"
Fake reviews (Score:2)
Tortious Interference (Score:5, Informative)
Interesting, how would you prove a review is fake, written with no experience of the product?
Doesn't really matter if it is fake or not if it is paid. If the review is a paid review then it is by definition written with at least a secondary motive and therefore by definition cannot be considered unbiased. Buying reviews arguably harms the reputation of Amazon and could affect their sales and thus would potentially constitute tortious interference [wikipedia.org] with their business.
Re:Tortious Interference (Score:4, Insightful)
Amazon believes so strongly that buying non-fake reviews does not harm the reputation of Amazon that they setup an in-house service to help sellers buy non-fake reviews http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki... [wikipedia.org] [wikipedia.org]. If tortious interference is occurring here, you've got the directionality wrong.
After reading the wikipedia, there is a different between the Amazon Vine and those 3rd party reviewing site if the 3rd party site review is to pay for good/bad review. The product owners pay Amazon so that their product would be enlisted for reviewers, not pay reviewers for good/bad review. The criticism is that the process is not transparent enough which could let to unqualified reviews (from unqualified reviewers but are still not a fake review).
Re: (Score:2)
Product is politician they support. They all post BS reviews of their pet congresscritters etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Define "paid review" please.
If you review movies on a tv show, you're paid by your advertisers, a lot of whom will be movie production companies showing trailers for their movies...
It's easy to see the correlation these fake amazon reviews have to their bankrollers, but there's a lot of existing gray area in the entire "review" industry, and people seem mostly ok with them.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
According to TFS, that's not what they're doing. They can't sort out paid reviews in general. What they can do is act against anybody who's advertising reviews for payment. If they can keep out the commercial astroturfers, we'll have the ordinary biased reviews that we normally have to deal with.
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting, how would you prove a review is fake, written with no experience of the product?
You don't. You assume all reviews are fake, therefore useless. Looks like the pay for review outfits will have a very short lifetime.
It's too late (Score:3, Informative)
I ignore reviews on Amazon because the majority of them are already fake. I've purchased items on Amazon only to receive promotional material with them offering coupons and gift cards in exchange for writing a 5-star review.
I do not trust the system at all.
Re: (Score:2)
If Amazon cares (and they appear to), shouldn't there be a route to reporting this stuff? Sending them a photo, or something?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The linked article starts out: Most online reviews are worthless and the communities can be hotbeds for corruption and cheating.
So, basically, the 'tool' to detect a fake review is any web browser.
Community still matters. The 'review' of a book or recording that somebody you actually know in the real world is much more relevant than an 'online' review generated by a stranger.
Retarded reviews too (Score:2, Informative)
There are the retarded reviews too:
I just got it! It looks great! - 5 stars.
I haven't finished the book yet, but 5 stars.
Then there are the 5 star reviews by folks who come across as the author's pals or sycophants.
And the ALL TIME champ for shit reviews (1 stars) is Pickety's "Capital in the 21st Century".
Everyone who calls him a Communist obviously didn't read the book because for those of who did - or at least the introduction - would know what he thinks of Communism.
Re:Retarded reviews too (Score:4, Informative)
There are the retarded reviews too:
I just got it! It looks great! - 5 stars.
You get both sides on that. "Arrived 1 date late. Christmas ruined! - 1 star."
"My PS4 will not play my xbox games - 1 star."
I usually filter reviews that have the most comments and reviews in the 2-4 range. If it's a tech product and you can tell the product description was translated online from Chinese to English (like you see for a lot of lower end Android stuff), I ignore any review that looks like it also went through the same online translator..
My final filter (before actually reading the comments) is to ignore any positive or negative reviews that were written in all caps. Too much raw emotion screaming at me.
Re: (Score:2)
There are reviews which really really baffle me as well - I did a review for a TV I bought off of Amazon.co.uk in the Black Friday sales - it was a Seiki 4K 39" TV at a reasonable price.
It arrived, I set it up and the sound was terrible, so I used an external sound bar - but there was horrific video lag regardless of the input used, it was between a third and half a second behind the audio. Also there was no way to set the TV audio to just optical out, you had to either mute the sound entirely (which left
Re: (Score:2)
You also get products for which satirical reviews are themselves a meme, such as Three Wolf Moon shirts [amazon.com].
(or are they fake?)
Are they going to start suing over that as well?
Re: (Score:2)
and the infamous 'steering wheel tray' with the great user submitted photos:
http://www.amazon.com/AutoExec... [amazon.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I learn more from bad reviews than good ones, but I do use the average rating to limit the sheer number of options.
1 Star reviews can be quite useless (Score:3)
If I see a bunch of 1 star reviews saying it breaks after several months of use, I'm going to go onto the next product.
You have to bear in mind that sometimes the 1 star reviews are quite useless/fake. I was looking at a water heater on Amazon recently and there were a lot of one star reviews claiming the product broke and was terrible but most of the reviews were actually for a different and older version of the product which was no longer in production. I've also seen 1 star reviews that were clearly designed to astroturf the product.
Point is, presume any review has ulterior motives unless you have evidence to think oth
Re: (Score:3)
This is a logic I just don't get, but seems extremely common amongst /. readers. I use reviews on things like Amazon/Tripadvisor as a part of decision making process. I've made hundreds of purchases on-line over the years and am very satisfied with the results. If I'm looking to drop £10k on a car, or £500 on a TV then reviews site reviews are just a small art of my process, however if I'm buying a
Skeptical != Useless Reviews (Score:2)
This is a logic I just don't get, but seems extremely common amongst /. readers.
Why? Do you think that all reviews are honest, legitimate and well formed opinions about the services provided by people who would actually be in a position to provide such a review? If so then you are being rather naive/foolish and I doubt you actually are. You can get useful information even if some of the "reviews" are fake but you need to read them with some default skepticism.
Some things just aren't worth the time it would take to come to a good decision without using reviews, and using reviews (with a pinch of salt) has worked consistently.
Nobody (sane) is saying don't use the reviews. Just have the default assumption that they may not be honest unbiased opinion
Re: (Score:1)
On what basis would you discard that default assumption? Because if you can't think of one[1], it comes back to not using them.
[1] apart from if you actually know the person. In which case you could ask him anyway, which still isn't using the review.
Re: (Score:2)
The second xkcd is actually how you should judge review stars in reality. Anything below 4 stars is crap with inflated # of stars due to fake reviews.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, you cannot really trust any review or rating system without doing a lot of sanity checking and your own home work.
Look at the pattern in terms of reviews with similar language.
Distribution of stars. Amount of gushing reviews.
Competency of the reviewers. For this it helps to have some competency yourself.
And your own subject matter expertise. If a product is aimed at beginners of anything, they will tend to write overly positive or negative reviews.
Too positive, because they don't know how to assess th
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Next Amazon will be suing people for their fantastic reviews of The Mountain Three Wolf Moon Short Sleeve Tee [amazon.com].
Fortunately, the three wolf moon t-shirt's power also indemnifies the wearer of any culpability. Truly the most amazing shirt ever made by man.
Shill!
Abraham Lincoln's quote on internet truth (Score:5, Informative)
" every reviewer would state their skillset and experience with similar products"
That's often evident from the reviews. 2-4 star reviews tend to be the most helpful, and there are often good points made in them. Expecting all of them to be useful or applicable to your situation would be like expecting all the /. story comments to be insightful, or to have a MS or Apple thread without trolls and fanbois in the mix. It just ain't gonna happen.
Re: (Score:2)
I've always wondered why sites like Amazon and NewEgg haven't adopted some sort of "Adjusted Score", which discards the 1s and 5s and scores only on a three-star scale. This means that those who try to game the system will do 4s and 2s, but that's why you allow the user to decide which score to search/match on (or just show both.)
"Weighted" scores would also be nice, measuring from a rep system (based on visitor feedback of previous reviews for someone, plus the time they've been on the site, plus if they p
Re:I don't know about you (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
This means that a new GPU has no proper reviewers for an entire year, at which point it's already obsolete.
Unbiased and Honest (Score:5, Informative)
"We are not selling fake reviews. however we do provide Unbiased and Honest reviews on all the products"
Wow, that's priceless. Oh, wait, no, it does have a price. Want to know how this works? From the site itself:
A purchase of your product is not required for us to post a review. If you would like a verified purchase review however we can buy your product first. If the cost is $2.00 or less we will cover the price. If it is more than this you will need to make arrangements with us to reimburse the cost. We are only accepting very limited amounts of verified purchase reviews, please contact us before ordering if you are interested in these.
Price List:
3 Reviews $74.26!
5 Reviews (Reg: $124.50, w/ 20% $99.60!)
10 Reviews (Reg: $249.50, w/ 20% $199.60!)
.
.
.
200 Reviews (Reg: $4887.50, w/ 30% $3421.60)
I can see why Amazon wants to shut this down. It completely undermines the legitimacy of their user ratings system. Not a big surprise, of course, as just about any system will be gamed if at all possible when there's money involved.
Re:Unbiased and Honest (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
"Unbiased and Honest" sounds like "Fair and Balanced".
Seems legit (Score:4, Funny)
"Unbiased" and "Honest" are capitalized. That's cruise control for credible.
You can't explain that.
Re: (Score:2)
"Unbiased" and "Honest" are capitalized. That's cruise control for credible.
You can't explain that.
Maybe they have 2 internal classifications or titles of reviews: one called "Unbiased" and another called "Honest"-hence the capitalizations. Then they are not technically not misleading in their advertisements.
Re: (Score:3)
Looks like a lucrative business,
Maybe amazon should offer their own payola review service instead of shutting down these honest entrepreneurs.....
Re: (Score:3)
Why do you think they're shutting them down first?
Re: (Score:2)
No company would be stupid enough to destroy the integrity of their primary business for a little cash boost on the side.
Oh, snap. Lenovo was [pcworld.com].
Well, Amazon probably isn't quite that stupid.
Re:Easy fix (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Amazon already has a "verified purchase" tag for reviews (read the quoted part of my post again), and of course it's already only one review per product for each customer. The "verified purchase" tag isn't required, but people are much more likely to discount a review if it doesn't have that tag. I'm guessing it's also weighted much lower in aggregate scores as well.
Re: (Score:1)
You can buy 200 unbiased reviews? What, do they use Mechanical Turk for this?
Side note: It's unbiased if they don't know anything about the product!
Honestly (Score:5, Insightful)
If I were Amazon, I'd include a check box "I am not being paid or compensated for this review"... at least then they'd have reason to delete any from paid reviewers.
Re: (Score:3)
The paid reviewer mark would be an ideal checkbox. It allows them to declare, can make Amazon enforce purchase from that user, and can ban reviewers who violate the terms. They can even use that to weight the reviews differently vs paid and unpaid. I presume they already weight the Amazon vs non-Amazon verified purchasers. (And if the feedback is good, a paid reviewer isn't necessarily a bad thing).
Re:Honestly (Score:4, Interesting)
Realistically, there's nothing about a review, paid or otherwise, that should require a purchase from Amazon. I can buy something in Sears and still provide perfectly valid information about the device on Amazon - it's the same device, after all, no matter where I buy it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Disclose or violate terms of service (Score:4, Insightful)
Yes, I agree because no one that has ever clicked a check box anywhere has ever lied before.
Doesn't matter if they lie or not for it to be useful. Reason is that it forces them to either A) disclose that they have been paid or B) violate the terms of service.
The IRS uses this exact same tactic on your 1040 form. Look at line 21 of the current 1040 Form and you'll see "Other Income List Type and Amount". This applies whether or not the income is legally obtained. So this is where someone dealing in illegal drugs would be required to disclose their income. If they do not disclose their (illegal) income then they have committed tax fraud. This is how Al Capone was busted - not for the actual crimes but for tax evasion on those crimes.
Re: (Score:2)
I always look at the bad reviews (Score:5, Insightful)
The "this is super and excellent" reviews don't tell me much. I look at the bad reviews. Usually you can get an idea if a product is any good by the type of bad review. If there are many good reviews, but one or two saying "delivered late", "wrong product", or "damaged in transit", then I figure that this can happen occasionally but can be sorted out if it does. Some reviews will be bad because of different use-cases ... if most people give high rating for sound quality on a radio but one or two say "distorts at high volume" then you'll probably be OK if you listen at reasonable volumes. Someone once gave a washer/dryer a 2 start review because it took over three hours for a complete wash/dry cycle. For us that didn't matter - we run it a few times a week and just set it going until it ends. Someone might complain about "complicated controls" on an SLR camera or "lack of flexibility" on a point and shoot ... again it might not matter to you.
On the other hand if a lot of people complain about the general quality of an item, or lack of functionality that you would actually use then that's a good reason to stay away from one.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I always look at the bad reviews (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
2, 3, and 4 star reviews are where the meat of the "good" reviews are (i.e. the "Look, I'm not a pro, but still I consider myself better than average. Tried using features A,B,C,D that're listed as supported, and work flawlessly on [other brand of same thing], however those features do not work on this device." ). Obviously it's not a flawless system, but usually the reviewers giving it 2-4 stars ALSO incl
Fix-it boards (Score:2)
One thing I look at is fix-it boards. For example, I was recently looking for a washer-dryer. A certain company had a *LOT* of people asking on fix-it boards how to replace the element on the dryer, and noting that it died fairly early on or repeatedly.
Try googling
"[product] how to replace" or "[product] how to fix" and see what people are commonly asking about. Maybe it's a simple thing and even if it breaks now and then you don't care, but it gives you an idea of what commonly breaks down. Note that this
Re: (Score:1)
A BAD or a NEGATIVE review? Personally I don't have an issue with anyone (seller/buyer/competitor) who leaves a negative review provided it's accurate.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I do the same, but try to ignore the 1-stars. They're often as brain-dead as the 5-star ones, and I'm sure at least a few give bad reviews from service/quality that is the result of their own ignorance, rather than a problem with the product or maker.
whatever (Score:2)
Re:whatever (Score:4, Interesting)
I base my purchases on the RESPONSE to the reviews. Sellers have the ability to respond to any buyer's reviews, manufacturer's appear to have the ability to respond to product reviews (I have recently seen a particular product for solar panels where the producing company was responding to the FAQ and product reviews with corrections), and other product reviewers will often correct misconceptions about the product propagated by users (e.g. the reviews of the Samsung 850 SSD's etc.).
Nobody cares about a product, hotel, travel operator or whatever getting zero bad reviews - it just looks fake and suspicious, in fact. What we care about is how they responded to that.
The most enlightening responses I've seen are from companies with top customer service. And they even respond with comments like "Actually, we have no record of your stay whatsoever, reviewer. Would you care to give us a booking number so we can trace your problem?", etc. for the fake reviews. The responses are much more useful and indicative of good service than the occasional idiot that marks an Amazon product as "1-star" because some third-party seller sent it to the wrong address, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
The actual content of the reviews doesn't matter much. Whether intentionally or not, people filter out products with less than 4 stars, and Amazon ranks more popular items higher. It's a virtuous circle for the sellers that have higher-ranked reviews. Getting those initial good reviews can make all the difference between two similar or nearly identical products.
No more fake reviews? (Score:4, Funny)
Does that mean all 5000+ reviews for the Banana Slicer [amazon.com] will soon disappear?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you for that. I really needed a laugh this morning and this was totally unexpected.
Re: (Score:2)
Stop Fake Reviews by Treatening Chargebacks (Score:1)
Amazon can stop fake reviews by putting real fear into the minds of sellers. If a seller is caught in a fake review scam, Amazon should force the seller to accept returns. Until then, I give Amazon two stars in their efforts to control fake reviews. I'm looking forward to Amazon rolling over the perps and exposing their cheating clients. Fake reviews are against the law in some jurisdictions.
Re: (Score:2)
Amazon should force the seller to accept returns, regardless.
Post negative reviews? (Score:1)
I feel like the overall assumption is that people are buying good reviews about their own product.
I wonder how these companies feel about posting bad reviews for a competing product.
Typo in summary: suit, not site (Score:2)
The site also targets unidentified "John Does"
It's the suit which is also targetting unidentified John Does, not the site.
Re: (Score:2)
I've never reviewed a book before its release date, however, I have been able to obtain a review copy of a book before it's released to the general public.
It's certainly possible for someone like me who is outside the business to obtain those copies. My library occasionally has a few to give away. Goodreads is generally in the know about getting advanced copies.
I don't think there's anything particularly shady about this practice, though. I mean, why wouldn't a publisher want pre-release buzz?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Really? I write positively blistering reviews on occasion, and I've never had a review rejected. There must
Because it says so... (Score:2)
How can you prove that they are fake? Because the site says so in it's opening paragraph:
BTW, requiring verified purchase does not solve the problem. That s
Does slashdot support paypal ? (Score:4, Funny)
Send payment and if I have mod points I'll apply them to your posts (or to those on the other side of whatever flamewar you're in) in a totally unbiased way of course:
.
Buy 14, get one free !
Authenticate users (Score:1)
If you want to control this kind of thing, require that users turn over something that can be tied to their real-life identity, like a cell phone #. Then verify that what they give you is real.
Then make them swear that they have not received or been offered any compensation.
If you later discover that they probably lied, you can sue them.
As for people logging in from countries where suing the person individually is not an option, one thing you can do is limit the visibility of their comments, perhaps by lim
As a consumer Ive already decided (Score:2)
Amazon should do the right thing (Score:2)
They should only allow reviews from people who actually purchased that product. Their reviews are already a mess, with tons of one star reviews for products that are really meant for the seller.
They already have a mechanism for this too: http://www.amazon.com/gp/commu... [amazon.com]
They just need to purge all the other reviews. There's so many scams and agendas both for positive and negative reviews, that nowadays I only trust verified purchase reviews anyway.