Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy The Internet News

Worldwide Aaron Swartz Day Memorial Hackathons This Weekend 76

New submitter sterlingcrispin writes: There are hackathons taking place all over the world in memory of Aaron Swartz this weekend, November 8th and 9th. The goal is to "bring together the varied communities that Aaron touched to figure out how the important problems of the world connect, and to share the load of working on those problems." If you are interested in open access, privacy, free speech, transparency, citizen activism, human rights, and information ethics please attend, promote this event, and contribute to its growth.

I'm organizing the Los Angeles meet up and would love to see you there! Here are the other cities hosting one.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Worldwide Aaron Swartz Day Memorial Hackathons This Weekend

Comments Filter:
  • Ideally (Score:4, Insightful)

    by rmdingler ( 1955220 ) on Friday November 07, 2014 @05:28PM (#48337537) Journal
    Some group would make public the government's abuse of surveillance

    and the public outcry would break the decibel record set at a college football game.

    Dream big, right?

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      by BitZtream ( 692029 )

      And that has exactly dick to do with Aarpm Swartz.

      He didn't expose you to some massive cover up. He was a common criminal who couldn't handle the fact that he got caught. Any 'good' he did was by dumb luck and coincidental, not intentional.

      He was not a hero. Stop pretending he was or bullshitting about what he did, you just cheapen the actions of those who have done heroic deeds.

      Do you even know what he did and why he got in trouble? I don't think you do.

      • This.

        He could have spent 6 months in jail in a low security prison.

        He wasn't Robin Hood, just immature. Instead of spending 6 months in a low-security prison, he killed himself.

        Fair or not fair, he didn't accept the consequences of his actions.

        All-in-all, a pretty poor reason to commit suicide.

        And this guy was fortunate enough to go to HARVARD. This guy got to live a dream and had wealthy parents.
        • Re:Ideally (Score:4, Insightful)

          by SuricouRaven ( 1897204 ) on Saturday November 08, 2014 @03:02PM (#48341685)

          The accusation levied is that the prosecutors overdid the intimidation in their efforts to get to to accept a not-very-good plea bargain. It's a standard procedure: Inform someone that they could go to jail for decades, their life effectively owner, unemployable when they do get out, financially ruined, reputation in shreds. Throw in some scary talk about how dangerous prison is to leave them wondering how they'll survive in a place filled with violent criminals. If all goes to plan the subject will be so terrified they'll accept any plea offered. Prosecutor gets a good politically-advantageous outcome and the taxpayer is saved the cost of a drawn-out and expensive trial. There are downsides though - innocent people may be pressured into pleading guilty this way, and occasionally someone just can't take the pressure and has a breakdown, which is what happened here.

          • He put himself in the situation. And he got caught. It wasn't the first time he did it either. Prosecutors are always big-time jerks --- it is part of the job description.

            If anything, the problem is hackers are usually caught up in a very juvenile culture where they decide right and wrong are decided by their social circle and social approval.

            Self-pity in adults is the first sign of evil. And the opposite of being an adult. Adults make their own choices.

            Self-pity is the concept that you don't create
            • Your entire premise is that the government went after him for enabling JSTOR privacy , but the feds actually went after him on principle and used JSTOR as an excuse. The feds has raided his apartment over a year earlier for his correspondence with wikileaks.

              But you shills are just here to trash his character, anyway.
          • And thank you for the interesting conversation.
          • The point is that he was never actually going to face fifty years in jail.

            Someone (like his lawyer) should have explained this to him.

        • Funny how all these emotional arguments for JSTOR appear whenever there's an Aaron Schwartz thread, as if anyone on slashdot really feels that strongly about piracy.
          • I don't have any opinion at all about the specifics.

            I dislike cowards. Especially suicide over trivial circumstances.

            My heroes are ones that overcome adversity. Not ones that cry over themselves and then take their own lives, for no legitimate reason because they engaged in a legally frowned-on behavior one time too many.
            • by Rujiel ( 1632063 )
              "He was a common criminal who couldn't handle the fact that he got caught."
              Your deception lies in the word "caught". Aaron wasn't caught, he was specifically targeted by the government. It wasn't MIT pursuing charges against him--it was the FBI.
              • Where did I say he was a common criminal?

                Your need to fabricate what I said is weak. If you have something worth saying that is both a valid point and stands on its own, you wouldn't need to fabricate a quote.
      • I doubt you're so naiive as to think that the fed prosecuted him purely over JSTOR when both JSTOR and MIT didn't care to continue with the charges. He was targeted by the government as an activist. That's how he was martyred, not over JSTOR.
  • "And may the Swartz be with you."
  • Suicide awareness (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward

    INSERT SNIDE COMMENT HERE

    He is not my hero. He shouldn't be yours either.

  • expect your pic to be posted. forever.
  • > yum update

  • by sterlingcrispin ( 1805040 ) on Friday November 07, 2014 @07:37PM (#48338231)
    FACT: Downloading JSTOR articles was one minor footnote among the many amazing projects Aaron was working on at the time. From the fall of 2010 until his death in 2013, Aaronâ(TM)s projects included, but were not limited to: SecureDrop, the leak-protecting technology for journalists now implemented by outlets ranging from The New Yorker to Forbes to The Guardian; the SOPA/PIPA fight, The Flaming Sword of Justice (now The Good Fight), a podcast about activism which went on to reach the top of the iTunes charts; VictoryKit, an online campaigning toolset still mobilizing activists around the world; and co-founding Demand Progress. FACT: Aaron implemented a piece of software that downloaded articles from the JSTOR website faster than JSTOR originally intended. Aaronâ(TM)s software downloaded articles from the JSTOR website to Aaronâ(TM)s laptop, just like a live person would have downloaded them, but without his having to sit there and click through each of the steps manually. Source: Alex Stamos, http://unhandled.com/2013/01/1... [unhandled.com] FACT: Aaron did not hack into any of MITâ(TM)s computers. The CFAA requires that a person gain access to a computer that they werenâ(TM)t authorized to access. Aaron was obviously authorized to access his own laptop. FACT: Aaron did not hack into MITâ(TM)s network. Aaron connected his laptop to MITâ(TM)s open network by walking into an open computer closet on MITs open campus and simply plugging into an unused ethernet port. Source: Alex Stamos, http://unhandled.com/2013/01/1... [unhandled.com] FACT: Aaron was a âoeFellowâ at the Harvard University Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at the time. Aaron was exactly the type of academic researcher that MIT meant to have downloading articles from the JSTOR database over its open network. Aaronâ(TM)s past research in this regard was the basis of a Stanford Law Review Article where he found troubling connections between corporations and their funding of legal research. Source: Stanford Law Review http://www.stanfordlawreview.o... [stanfordlawreview.org] FACT: Aaron wasnâ(TM)t even violating JSTORâ(TM)s Terms of Service at the time. JSTOR and MIT had contractual agreements allowing unlimited downloads to any computers on MITs network. Source: Alex Stamos, http://unhandled.com/2013/01/1... [unhandled.com]
    • by Anonymous Coward

      FACT: Downloading JSTOR articles was one minor footnote among the many amazing projects Aaron was working on at the time. From the fall of 2010 until his death in 2013, Aaronâ(TM)s projects included, but were not limited to: SecureDrop, the leak-protecting technology for journalists now implemented by outlets ranging from The New Yorker to Forbes to The Guardian; the SOPA/PIPA fight, The Flaming Sword of Justice (now The Good Fight), a podcast about activism which went on to reach the top of the iTunes

    • by GNious ( 953874 )

      Only thing I got from this was that there is some girl called Aaronâ(TM) doing stuff.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    ... open access, privacy, free speech, transparency, citizen activism, human rights, and information ethics ...

    So far, no-one on this thread is addressing these issues. For those who don't know, which is most of you, Aaron got Google Inc. involved in the "Stop SOPA" campaign. So don't bitch about the one thing he did wrong, we owe him.

  • Some agency is very afraid of Aaron becoming a martyr, and their paid trolls are here to throw out talking points someone else wrote for the purpose of trashing Aaron's character.

    They don't even try to hide it. Giant paragraphs of garbage, shitposting, you name it. The fact of trolls indicates the truth: Aaron was ultimately victimized by his government, not MIT or JSTOR.

Let's organize this thing and take all the fun out of it.

Working...