Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
China Censorship Government Your Rights Online

China Bans "Human Flesh Searching" 109

hackingbear writes The Supreme People's Court, China's top court, has outlined the liabilities of network service providers in a document on the handling of online personal rights violation cases. "Rights violators usually hide in the dark online. They post harmful information out of the blue, and victims just can't be certain whom they should accuse when they want to bring the case to court," said Yao Hui, a senior SPC judge specializing in civil cases. Those re-posting content that violates others' rights and interests will also answer for their actions, and their liability will be determined based on the consequences of their posts, the online influence of re-posters, and whether they make untruthful changes to content that mislead. This essentially tries to ban the so-called human flesh searching. Though this does not stop others from using the chance to highlight the country's censorship problems even though the rulings seem to focus on personal privacy protection.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

China Bans "Human Flesh Searching"

Comments Filter:
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Sunday October 12, 2014 @01:23AM (#48122729)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 12, 2014 @01:45AM (#48122773)

      A Chinese couple get married ... and she's a virgin.

      On the wedding night, she cowers naked under the bed sheets as her husband undresses. He climbs in next to her and tries to be reassuring: "My darling, I know this is your first time, and you are frightened. I assure you, I will give you anything you want, I will do anything you want. What do you want?"

      "I want number 69" she replies.

      "You want beef with broccoli?"

    • Re:s/Fresh/Flesh/ (Score:4, Interesting)

      by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) * on Sunday October 12, 2014 @03:55AM (#48122991) Homepage Journal

      Actually most Chinese people can make the L sound without any problems, it's the R sound that they have difficulty with. You see it a lot with Chinese people who speak Japanese, where the 'r' sound is closer to an English 'r' and than 'l'.

      It's not by any means a universal problem either. My Chinese girlfriend can make both sounds easily. In fact my name has an L in it but transliterated into Japanese it becomes an R, and since we speak to each other in Japanese she always says it with an R even though she can say it the English way too. I think I prefer the Japanese version anyway.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      I can't tell if it's a stupid accidental typo or a stupid intentional joke. :/

    • The only Chinese person I've heard pronouncing "r" as "l" was from South Park. How do I know? I'm Chinese.
    • What's racist about foreign people having accents? That's not even genetic, that's a cultural-linguistic issue.
    • No, "flesh" is NOT a racist typo! That is the direct translation of the actual Chinese phrase "ren rou sou suo" [chinasmack.com].

      ren rou: human flesh
      sou suo: search

      The idea is simply to leverage on the wide viewership of Internet communities (i.e.g forums and BBSes) to search or identify the actual "human flesh" responsible for the atrocities depicted in viral videos.
  • Google: Fresh Humans!

    Brains, brains! BRAAAAAIIINNNNSSSS!!!!

    They're just trying to stop the zombie apocalypse.

  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Sunday October 12, 2014 @02:35AM (#48122859)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) * on Sunday October 12, 2014 @04:03AM (#48122995) Homepage Journal

      What they are doing is not dissimilar to what some western countries are like. For example, (re)posting certain things on Twitter in the UK can land you in jail. Like China, there is no freedom of speech there. Aside from being bad for British citizens it makes it difficult for the UK to criticise China's actions because it is no better.

      Before someone says that China is much worse than the UK, it doesn't matter. The principal is the same. The government decides some things unacceptable to say and uses the law to punish people saying them. The fact that two governments have different ideas of what is unacceptable is irrelevant.

      • by Rich0 ( 548339 )

        Before someone says that China is much worse than the UK, it doesn't matter. The principal is the same. The government decides some things unacceptable to say and uses the law to punish people saying them. The fact that two governments have different ideas of what is unacceptable is irrelevant.

        No argument there, but you did manage to pick the western country with some of the worst free speech laws around.

        Granted, it seems like the US has been trying hard to be more like the UK in this regard, but things like libel laws are FAR weaker in the US. You can be punished for what you say in the US, but the burden of proof is on the person making the accusation to demonstrate that what you said was both untrue, and caused harm.

        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          by Anonymous Coward

          Before someone says that China is much worse than the UK, it doesn't matter. The principal is the same. The government decides some things unacceptable to say and uses the law to punish people saying them. The fact that two governments have different ideas of what is unacceptable is irrelevant.

          No argument there, but you did manage to pick the western country with some of the worst free speech laws around.

          Granted, it seems like the US has been trying hard to be more like the UK in this regard, but things like libel laws are FAR weaker in the US. You can be punished for what you say in the US, but the burden of proof is on the person making the accusation to demonstrate that what you said was both untrue, and caused harm.

          As a Greek that HAD free speech until last month (when the "anti-racist" law that forbits me to say that the dead Jews in WW2 was less than 6 millions, the Black people are not as smart as Chinese, the Muslims want to kill us, e.t.c., got voted) i must inform you that in most -if not all- of (Western) Europe there is no "free speech".
          Just a couple of months ago a Swedish politician convicted for "hate" speech just because he mentioned that (and nothing other than that) all the previous year's rapes in Swede

      • by khallow ( 566160 )

        Before someone says that China is much worse than the UK, it doesn't matter. The principal is the same.

        Hypocrisy is not the worst sin. It does matter that China is much worse than the UK in terms of suppression of free speech.

      • What they are doing is not dissimilar to what some western countries are like.

        s/some western/all/

        Before someone says that China is much worse than the UK, it doesn't matter.

        Really? Have you asked the Tienanmen Square protestors?

        The principal is the same.

        Been sent to his office again, have you?

  • by Anonymous Coward

    What is this drivel? I have no idea what this paragraph I just read was supposed to mean. Is this literally about cannibalism, or is "human flesh" some kind of metaphor, and if so, for what?

    What the hell are "personal rights violation cases?"
    Are we talking real personal rights, like the right to personal freedom of speech, or bullshit personal rights, like the right not have a personally-held patent infringed?

    • by __aaltlg1547 ( 2541114 ) on Sunday October 12, 2014 @08:15AM (#48123383)

      "Human flesh search" is a method of identifying what/who/what place is in a picture by posting it widely on the internet and encouraging people to tell you what/who/where it is.

      There's nothing wrong with that aspect of it and that's not what China is trying to ban. They're trying to ban the use of it to harm and harass people (including government officials). Notable instances of it include people who were driven to suicide because they could not stand the harassment.

  • Fix the title (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward

    Timothy: I don't often post comments but this is just racist. Fix the title now.

  • There are thousands of dialects and pidgins in the world. The problem is not mainly that we misunderstand one another, but that we assume that the use of these linguistic markers tell us more than where the people that use them come from; that somehow they are lazy or stupid for not "learning our language".

    Your language (no matter what it is) is not a special snowflake. It is not fixed. It is not "universal". I doubt we ever will have a universal language. Different people will always speak languages diffe

"Pok pok pok, P'kok!" -- Superchicken

Working...