Gun Rights Groups Say They Don't Oppose Smart Guns, Just Mandates 584
Lucas123 (935744) writes "When two gun stores attempted to sell the nation's first integrated smart gun, the iP1, gun advocacy groups were charged in media reports with organizing protests that lead to the stores pulling the guns from their shelves or reneging on their promise to sell them in the first place. But, the National Rifle Association and the National Shooting Sports Foundation say they do not oppose smart gun technology, which they call "authorized user recognition" firearms. "We do oppose any government mandate of this technology, however. The marketplace should decide," Mike Bazinet, a spokesman for the NSSF, wrote in an email reply to Computerworld. However, the argument for others goes that if stores begin selling smart guns, then legislators will draft laws requiring the technology."
Re:Yes! No more mandates! (Score:3, Funny)
You'll love this!
http://www.newyorker.com/onlin... [newyorker.com]
Don't show Penn Jillette, though; he might start shouting at you.
Re:Yes! No more mandates! (Score:0, Funny)
[gun owners] have little interest in killing random folks.
Citation please. Considering how many people those gun owners kill each year, you have been proven wrong. They are very violent people that murder everyone from toddlers to little old ladies. That is the way of their kind. They vote Republican and love violence.