China Bans Financial Companies From Bitcoin Transactions 110
quantr writes with this excerpt from Bloomberg: "China's central bank barred financial institutions from handling Bitcoin transactions, moving to regulate the virtual currency after an 89-fold jump in its value sparked a surge of investor interest in the country. Bitcoin plunged more than 20 percent to below $1,000 on the BitStamp Internet exchange after the People's Bank of China said it isn't a currency with 'real meaning' and doesn't have the same legal status. The public is free to participate in Internet transactions provided they take on the risk themselves, it said. The ban reflects concern about the risk the digital currency may pose to China's capital controls and financial stability after a surge in trading this year made the country the world's biggest trader of Bitcoin, according to exchange operator BTC China. Bitcoin's price jumped more than ninefold in the past two months alone, prompting former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan to call it a 'bubble.' 'The concern is that it interferes with normal monetary policy operation,' said Hao Hong, head of China research at Bocom International Holdings Co. in Hong Kong. 'It represents an unofficial leakage to the current monetary system and trades globally. It is difficult to regulate and could be used for money laundering.'"
The public is free to participate in Internet tran (Score:5, Insightful)
"The public is free to participate in Internet transactions provided they take on the risk themselves,"
that should actually be a green sign.
any method that can be legally used to turn yuan into something else that can be turned into money - and can be moved electronically - is in big demand...
(no, I don't have any bc)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The PLA and PLAAF are sizable, formidable forces, and a land war with China would be a nightmare, but the PLAN is a joke, at least to the US. To the small navies of its neighbors,
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
LOL. One US Navy carrier group > entire Chinese navy.
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
First number is USA's count. Second number is China's count. Third number is world-wide total.
Aircraft Carriers: 10 [55.5%] / 1 [5.5%] / 18
Amphibious Assault Ship: 9 [39.1%] / 0 [0%] / 23
Landing Ship: 21 [43.8%] / 26 [54.2%] / 48
Cruiser: 22 [78.6%] / 0 [0%] / 28
Destroyer: 62 [36.3%] / 24 [14%] / 171
Frigate: 24 [6.1%] / 45 [10.9%] / 411
Corvette: 2 [0.7%] / 8 [2.7%] / 301
Patrol Boat: 209 [17.6%] / 236 [19.8%] / 1,190
Anti-Mine Ship: 14 [3.2%] / 107 [24.2%] / 443
Missile Sub: 14 [28.6%] / 5 [10.2%] / 49
Attack Su
Re: (Score:1)
Oh yeah, the Liaoning right?
China buys a crappy 22 year old Soviet bucket, pretending it's a floating casino, puts a new coat of paint on it and calls it a warship.
Suddenly everyone's hangmu this and hangmu that, it's picture (any generic aircraft carrier picture they can find) is stuck on ads for anything a patriotic man might like to buy.
The whole thing is quite bemusing.
Re: (Score:1)
The whole thing is quite bemusing.
. . . yeah, it's all fun and games until you invade the wrong country, sparking an ethnic conflict that kills and displaces 10s of millions, and the cost of the war throws the world's economy into a tailspin.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
How come we only see bitcoin stories on slashdot?
How come there's no stories about Litecoin, Namecoin, etc.? They both have "billion dollar" values, too.
Re: (Score:2)
How come we only see bitcoin stories on slashdot?
How come there's no stories about Litecoin, Namecoin, etc.? They both have "billion dollar" values, too.
Yeah, but Bitcoin is the new Honey Badger. I saw the sign along the Lawrence Expressway in Sunnyvale, California, so it must be true!
Re:The public is free to participate in Internet t (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
You realize Namecoin isn't a currency, right? It's a replacement of DNS...
Went down, then came back. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: Went down, then came back. (Score:4, Insightful)
Exactly. But that's true of any transaction-token regardless of expression; money, stocks, bitcoins, camels. (The last has other uses too.) Money is a technology.
You're failing to see what bitcoin is changing money-technology _into_.
Re: (Score:1)
You still don't understand that money can't be majicked out of thin air and be worth something?
The only thing keeping it afloat is other people believing the same fairy story.
As opposed to any other fiat currency? Like, oh I don't know, the US dollar?
Re: (Score:2)
Dollars have been around long enough to earn their trust.
Re: (Score:3)
The exact same thing could be said of any number of tech stocks that skyrocketed then crashed into nothingness about 10 years ago.
Some people got lucky, many many others got burned.
Or tulip bulbs...
Re: (Score:2)
Dollars have been around long enough to earn their trust.
LOL
Re: (Score:1)
The stupid "majicked out of thin air" comment wasn't talking about earning trust, though. It was just a meaningless indictment of all forms of currency, in a context that carried a ridiculous implication that bitcoin was somehow exceptional in that regard.
If other words, someone was talking out of their ass.
A rational person can distrust Bitcoin for rational reasons. But most people who talk shit about Bitcoin, are not doing it for rational reasons and don't ever offer any serious explanations for their
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The government collects taxes in USD. If you want to stay out of jail, you need USD.
Maybe YOUR government does... I'm pretty sure most governments don't.
And many multinational corporations use means other than USD to "pay" their taxes, and never see jail.
I think there's a lot of room for a global fiat quantum currency; for numerous international trade situations, it beats USD (and the yuan, which is pegged to USD).
Re:Went down, then came back. (Score:4, Insightful)
The US dollar is backed by the full faith and credit of the US government. Bitcoin is backed by absolutely no one.
Re:Went down, then came back. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
The US dollar is backed by the full faith and credit of the US government . Bitcoin is backed by absolutely no one .
I'll give you one guess as to which of those two I put my trust in. /Frohike
Re: (Score:3)
The US dollar is backed by the full faith and credit of the US government.
Cool story, bro~!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
The US dollar is backed by the full faith and credit of the US government. Bitcoin is backed by absolutely no one.
Bitcoin is backed by the full faith and credit of those who mine it, trade it and use it. I have more faith in computer cycles than I do in the US govt. We are afloat because of we hold the world's reserve currency. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/reservecurrency.asp [investopedia.com]
Reserve currency: A foreign currency held by central banks and other major financial institutions as a means to pay off international debt obligations, or to influence their domestic exchange rate. A large percentage of commodities, such as gold and oil, are usually priced in the reserve currency, causing other countries to hold this currency to pay for these goods. Holding currency reserves, therefore, minimizes exchange rate risk, as the purchasing nation will not have to exchange their currency for the current reserve currency in order to make the purchase.
Investopedia explains 'Reserve Currency' In 2011, the U.S. dollar was the primary reserve currency used by other countries. As a result, foreign nations closely monitored the monetary policy of the United States in order to ensure that the value of their reserves is not adversely affected by inflation.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
The only thing keeping it afloat is other people believing the same fairy story.
But with "real" money, that fairy story is the credibility of the issuer - which rises and falls, but is damped by the inertia of the sheer volume of currency being transacted. Bitcoin has no issuer and therefore its only value is the confidence that its holders have that they will be able to exchange it at a reasonable rate. However there aren't billions of Bitcoin being traded and there's neither openness nor transparency regarding the future supply (i.e. Bitcoin inflation) so whatever "value" it trades a
Re:Went down, then came back. (Score:5, Interesting)
No, Bitcoin isn't "pegged" to any and all currencies, it's free-floating. Rather too free floating and volatile as the case may be.
The problem with Bitcoin isn't the absence of a central issuer, but right now the problem with Bitcoin is its extreme volatility. At the moment it's almost useless as a currency and it's being used as an instrument of speculation. It's far too volatile for any merchant (perhaps except the black market) to take seriously since it's value relative to all other currencies swings so wildly and so quickly and you have to convert BTC into your local currency to be able to use any funds transferred to you for the mundane things in life like buying food, electricity, housing etc. If I want to sell a thing worth about US$1200 in BTC, if I sold it at 9am today for 1BTC and waited a whole 15 minutes to convert this to USD, in the intervening 15 minutes I would have lost around $300 because of a wild swing in its value that happened over a period of just a couple of minutes.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Handy that you can sell directly to a coinbase wallet and cash out immediately to your bank account, eh?
In that case why not just trade in dollars?
A currency who's use case is: convert from another currency -> execute transition -> convert back to original currency is of limited utility.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Went down, then came back. (Score:4, Insightful)
The power of Bitcoin is often what people point to as its weakness - the fact that it isnt backed by any ~one~ conventional govt/issuer.
No, it's a weakness.
Any number of entities (governments, Columbian drug cartels, Russian Mafia, etc.) could have been quietly buying up bitcoins for the last six months and sitting on them. Lack of liquidity creates a seller's market so bitcoin prices skyrocket as a result. When the time is right they can dump all their coins on the market for a massive profit. The price of bitcoin will crash and they can buy back their stock at a fraction of the price just in case it ever recovers.
This trick only works if you can do it in secret (so people mistake the lack of liquidity for market confidence - nobody wants to sell!!)
Bitcoin is a perfect target for it.
Re: (Score:1)
Is the liquidity of Bitcoin vs the Dollar reflected in Bitcoin vs the Yuan or Bitcoin vs the Yen or Bitcoin vs the Real?
Bitcoin's potential value is its unique position as a meta-currency. Bitcoin lacking liquidity against any one currency doesnt mean it lacks liquidity vs ~all~ currencies that you can trade it for.
In other words, the more currencies that you can trade Bitcoin for, the more stable and attractive Bitcoin becomes. Its a hugely valuable potential shelter from unstable regional currencies/finan
Re: (Score:1)
Is the liquidity of Bitcoin vs the Dollar reflected in Bitcoin vs the Yuan or Bitcoin vs the Yen or Bitcoin vs the Real?
Bitcoin's potential value is its unique position as a meta-currency. Bitcoin lacking liquidity against any one currency doesnt mean it lacks liquidity vs ~all~ currencies that you can trade it for.
In other words, the more currencies that you can trade Bitcoin for, the more stable and attractive Bitcoin becomes. Its a hugely valuable potential shelter from unstable regional currencies/financial policies.
It makes me wonder if Bitcoin is a useful hedge for the Bolivar, for example....
Re: (Score:1)
the credibility of the issuer ... Bitcoin has no issuer ... there's neither openness nor transparency regarding the future supply (i.e. Bitcoin inflation)
It's issued by a decentralized network of miners, but how much they can issue is limited by the protocol. The supply is fixed at 21 million; half issued in the first 2 years, and half of the remainder every 2 years thereafter.
IMHO math is more credible than any appointed human.
Re: (Score:2)
Suppose I mine gold and hold it in a vault. I "magic" a piece of paper out of thin air that promises that gold to the holder on presentation of the paper.
That paper is worth something or not worth something depending on whether or not there is faith in the fairy story that the gold will actually be provided when the paper is presented.
It is after all just a piece of paper. How does anyone know they'll actually get
Re: (Score:1)
You still don't understand that money can't be majicked out of thin air and be worth something?
The only thing keeping it afloat is other people believing the same fairy story.
And you still don't understand that money being pulled from thin air has been montary policy since the start of the 20th century.
Wikipedia: Fiat money has been defined variously as: any money declared by a government to be legal tender.[1] state-issued money which is neither convertible by law to any other thing, nor fixed in value in terms of any objective standard.[2] money without intrinsic value.[3][4] The term derives from the Latin fiat ("let it be done", "it shall be").[5] While gold- or silver-backed representative money entails the legal requirement that the bank of issue redeem it in fixed weights of gold or silver, fiat money's value is unrelated to the value of any physical quantity. Even a coin containing valuable metal may be considered fiat currency if its face value is higher than its market value as metal. The Nixon Shock of 1971 ended the direct convertibility of the United States dollar to gold. Since then, all reserve currencies have been fiat currencies, including the U.S. dollar and the Euro.
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fiatmoney.asp [investopedia.com]
Definition of 'Fiat Money': Currency that a government has declared to be legal tender, but is not backed by a physical commodity. The value of fiat money is derived from the relationship between supply and demand rather than the value of the material that the money is made of. Historically, most currencies were based on physical commodities such as gold or silver, but fiat money is based solely on faith. Fiat is the Latin word for "it shall be".
And so you aren't thinking my post is redundant, here is a an article from Forbes explaining how fiat currencies work, and why money is fiat and the only different is if its backed by something or not. http://www.forbes.com/sites/pascalemmanuelgobry/2013/01/08/all-money-is-fiat-mone [forbes.com] So yes, you CAN pull money from nothing.
Regulated like a commodity rather than currency (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
translation (Score:1)
It is difficult to regulate and could be used for money laundering.
translation
we can't tax it, and that is bad
Re: (Score:1)
Bitcoin should be easy to regulate, since it does have a money trail. Even though the trail has public keys only, at some point someone will need to exchange/pay for goods with the private key. This means that the feds could place a watch, and see where the money is moving to for taxs/criminal activity purposes (something they can not do with cash). Check out this story on how $100 million in bitcoins were stolen, but the thieves have hard time spending it since the whole Internet community is watching wher
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This might be a weakness of BitCoin eventually. As blockchains get longer and longer, it gets more unwieldy to keep everything updated.
The closest thing is having to calculate every transaction (vending machine, gas station, bank, etc.) a Loonie [1] coin has been through since it was struck at the mint. Even though big-O is a linear function, after a while, the cryptographic calculations required for each transaction can add up over time, and when a BitCoin is broken into subunits, each subunit down to th
Re:Does it mean, (Score:4, Interesting)
It means it's attracted the attention of the big players so they'll be the only ones making big profits from now on.
Anybody with enough capital can manipulate the bitcoin market (just like any other stock/share) - creating artificial shortages to drive the price up, dumping it into the hands of greedy individuals when it peaks, buying back when it crashes down. Rinse, repeat.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
that current Bitcoin rally is over?
I for one wonder if this'll be the last big rally.
I've been absolutely terrible at predicting when this train will end. An unstable currency that is not suitable for the vast majority of merchants and individuals is doomed to fail eventually, but since I've been beating this horse Bitcoin has risen by 5000%. Rally #1 was the American public, rally #2 was from Greeks and other troubled European nations and now this rally is from the Chinese.
I wonder if anything significant is left? Regardless, it's way too
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree with you completely.
Let's put it this way... if you were about to start a long term contract for a big project, would you rather get paid in dollars (which will likely be worth at least 95% of what they are now at the end of the contract), or in Bitcoin (which may be worth anywhere from $10 to $10,000 each a year from now, depending on who you talk to)?
Bitcoin might work for buying a bag of weed or some cookies, but you would never use it to do real business until the currency stabilizes.
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
While you were beating your anti-BtC drum, how's that 401k doing for you? How's your market stability? Returns over ti
Re: (Score:1)
If you think bitcoin will reach 100,000,000 would you cash any out for a vacation?
Re: (Score:1)
or what they think is their control?
More importantly: (Score:2, Funny)
Did they also ban financial companies from tulip transactions?
Re: (Score:3)
No. Most of the trade was in tulip futures rather than actual tulip bulbs.
A Responsible Economy (Score:1)
We all know the US is now run by crook like Wienerstein et. al. & they legalised shitcoin so it can be pilfered and pillaged in the customary rape-minded fashion as we saw in Denmark.
That China is banning their use for serious transitions, and is the most responsibly run economy on the planet right now, speaks volumes.
I don't think it has anything to so with control as attack minions/apologists will claim. China does nothing much to stop illegal pirating of movies, OS's etc.
They just don't want their ec
Re: (Score:2)
BWAaaaaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Oh wait, you're serious?
Do you have any idea what the debt load is of the provincial governments? Do you even know that provinces and other lower levels of the Chinese government are taxing their constituents months, sometimes years in advance to try to maintain solvency?
Do you know that the statistics on things like the expansion of electrical power usage do not line up in any even remotely sane way with the CCP's clai
Re: (Score:2)
So what?
Re: (Score:2)
GDP should contain movie production costs. Do you even know what GDP is? What makes you think making a movie and selling it is ultim
Re: (Score:2)
> Yeah, you really understand and care about what's happening in China. Hell, you'd fit right into the Chengguan, which you probably don't even know anything about without looking it up.
> GDP should contain movie production costs.
> What point is there on zooming in on x or y industry? Sure there are growth sectors in any country, but we're talking about aggregates.
The majority of this post is not on the point we were discussing. As I understand it, the topic was the relative fiscal responsibility o
Re: (Score:2)
You dismissed out of hand real conditions in China, which I addressed, because they're like, you know, the fucking topic.
YOU brought up the topic of movie production being included in GDP. I addressed it because YOU brought it up, asshole.
I brought up specifics vs. aggregates because YOU started talking about the steel industry for no reason.
I addressed YOUR points, which often were off the original topic, and you fault ME for addressing YOU?
Then you foe me. Wow. That's special. Consider it mutua
using BTC to buy yuan can drive yuan up... (Score:3, Interesting)
Somebody inform China and the rest of the world.. (Score:2)
All money is nothing more than an abstract representation of value. It was created to ease trade (to overcome limitations of barter). And the only value in this abstraction we call money is the agreed upon use of it. Problem is, all of this abstract value representation has been abused so badly that it no longer is a genuine honest representation of the real values its supposed to represent. The proof is obvious, once its realized that with all the bankruptcies there is not a single person that can show me
The price of BTC drops in response to this... (Score:1)
Sounds like a GOOD thing for Bitcoin (Score:4, Interesting)
Bitcoin exists because many people don't trust a) the major world governments or b) the major banking institutions.
So it is a *good* thing for some of those banking institutions from being prohibited from using Bitcoins. And really, banks do not need to be dealing with Bitcoins - do you really want a bank to be taking your money and "investing" it in Bitcoin?
Classifying it as a commodity, like gold or silver, for regulatory purposes makes sense, and much like there are few regulations on gold and silver themselves, these are regulations on the banks, not on Bitcoins.
Now, the anti-money-laundering stuff may be a cumbersome burden on Bitcoin exchanges, and tries to defeat the entire purpose of Bitcoin's pseudonymity, but the US already has similar restrictions, and they're not restrictions that are completely unreasonable. In fact, wouldn't regulations on converting Bitcoins to and from other currencies make people more inclined to use Bitcoin as an actual currency, instead of just a carrier system for other currency (the buyer buying BTC to immediately spend, and the seller immediately converting it back to a "usable" currency)? Even their attempts to undermine it seem likely to strengthen it.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Bitcoin exists because many people don't trust a) the major world governments or b) the major banking institutions.
oh wait your serious...
Bitcoin is pure speculation at its finest. When it crashes (and it will). You may want to change your tune.
Gov controlled money was created to stop fluctuation in price (it works to a degree). Price along the lines of I dont know if I can buy a loaf a bread today or a Ferrari. Everyone pretty much demanded the Gov do *something* anything. They lucked into the particu
Re: (Score:1)
You forgot c) to profit from the scam.
Re: (Score:2)
Bitcoin exists because people can mine by themselves.
Have massive spare computing power? Make essentially free money!
Very few people want to put down $1000 to by that virtual thing that can crash any second now. But a lot will play if they don't have to put money down.
Re: (Score:2)
That's part of it, but there's another reason: Bitcoin is simply the fastest, most convenient and secure way to send and receive payments over the Internet. No need to submit your credit card information, no waiting for wire transfers to complete, no worries about PayPal suddenly deciding they don't like your business and freezing your funds.
Bitcoin has an ecological niche in the Internet age
Nootropic sales (Score:2)
Re:COMMIES AT HEART !! (Score:4, Insightful)
Fear the unknown !!
The reality is Bitcoin is stateless so China can't exert influence on it. Scares them, it does. Yes.
Re: (Score:2)
I think China is more worried about people circumventing RMB exchange controls than who owns Bitcoin. They don't seem to particularly care whether people use Bitcoin. All they care is that Chinese financial institutions don't allow RMB to be converted via this route.
Re: (Score:1)
The reality is Bitcoin is stateless so China can't exert influence on it. Scares them, it does. Yes.
LOL!
China could buy up 90% of all bitcoins, creating an artificial scarcity. It would be a seller's market without anybody knowing why. Prices would soar. Idiots would be going crazy to buy them.
When it reaches $10,000 (or whatever) they could dump their coins on the market, making a handsome profit for themselves and ruining everybody else's day. Bitcoin would probably collapse as a result, allowing them to buy back their 90% stake at firesale prices. Rinse, repeat.
It's not just governments who could do th
Re: (Score:2)
Since you're a market expert you should quantify this prediction, short bitcoin, and make a boatload of money in 10 years or so.
There's people out there who'll let me short Bitcoin over a ten year period...?
PS: It dropped 40% since you wrote that.