Amazon Botches Sales Tax, Overcharges NJ 179
Hodejo1 writes "On July 1 Amazon started to charge sales tax to NJ residents, which is 7% in the state. But something was not right when I attempted to buy a book for my daughter. Just as I was about to finalize the order I noticed the charges were way off. The book cost $8.09. The tax I was to be levied was $0.85. That's a 10.5% tax rate! Why am I being charged 10.5%? It turns out that Amazon is also charging me tax on the $3.99 cost of shipping and handling. That's a problem, because New Jersey does not tax shipping and handling as I confirmed on the state's web site. I then checked a purchase I made from Amazon on October 7th of this year. Guess what? I was taxed on the $13.50 shipping and handling charge for that order. Now it is very possible — probable most likely — that this is nothing more than a coding error on Amazon's site. But it's a whopper! Just consider the hundreds-of-millions of dollars in sales Amazon makes in New Jersey each year. These extra dimes add up very quickly. Has Amazon been overcharging NJ residents' sales tax since July? If so, why haven't they picked it up by now?"
State should just tax it. (Score:2, Insightful)
What do you think the "only pay for shippig&handling, nevermind its more than the product" scams are about? just another tax dodge in the land of tax dodgers.
Re: (Score:1)
Thank you.
I have an elderly relative who fell for one of those scams, but she's feisty and, being retired, had nothing better to do than sit on the phone over multiple calls to cancel the order and get her money back.
But it is a scam, just like banks charging you overdraft fees is core to their business model rather than a true penalty because it costs them money, and credit card companies hoping, yes hoping, you get into financial trouble so they can jack up the rates and get you permanently stuck barely m
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I think the problem is the way they get their money. Instead of charging service fees that reflect their cost of business, some fees are set exorbitantly over the cost of providing the service (like a $20 service fee anytime "overdraft protection" is used). And these fees are paid by those that can least afford them. The guy that keeps $10,000 in his account gets free checking, and never gets dinged by overdraft fees. But he's being used by the bank too, by getting 0% interest on his checking account so it becomes a free loan to the bank.
This is not a problem in a competitive environment. Unfortunately, in the US, the banking system is as competitive as the DSL/Cable ISP duopoly, mobile phone service or TV programming services.
Re: (Score:3)
I would suggest that many if not MOST markets in the U.S. are unhealthy (do not work as a market is supposed to work). That's why we see consumer electronics where the top of the line and the budget model differ only in firmware and soldered jumpers on the board and why a pair of shoes that costs $10 to make in Indonesia runs $200 in the store. It's why the only difference between so many brands is the name on the box.
Re: (Score:2)
Say it with me class: CRED-IT UN-ION
Re: (Score:2)
They're no better - snobish, poor customer service, and the local CUs in this area have savings accounts whose rates are no better than a bank's. I ended up switching to an employee-owned bank. I get pretty good service, and my only complaint is they don't run their own data system, so when I make a deposit it's not instantly credited to my account, I have to wait anywhere from 1-8 hours before any of it shows up on the account, as they batch everything from each branch only twice a day.
Re: (Score:3)
The guy who keeps $10k in his account is the guy the bank makes money from. They make their money by lending out the money of others and charging interest.
The guy who doesn't keep a lot of money in his account is nothing buy a cost to the bank, so they charge more fees.
I hate to break it to you, but banks are not charities.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Banks can easily lend out up to 80% of the deposits they hold.
Things get a bit hairy when they lend out 90%+ though, like what happened in Europe.
Most people put most of their money in a bank. The idea is large groups of people don't random pull all their money out of a bank.
This is backed up by the fact there is less than $1T USD in circulation, but over $10T held by banks. (and like, 14T held by other nations...)
When someone buys a house with a mortgage, where does the money they paid for the house go? In
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm simply stating the guy who keeps $10,000 in the account gets free services because the bank can profit off $8,000 of his money.
The guy who keeps going in to overdraft gets charged large fees because the bank doesn't like people borrowing their money without prior agreement.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think the problem is the way they get their money. Instead of charging service fees that reflect their cost of business, some fees are set exorbitantly over the cost of providing the service (like a $20 service fee anytime "overdraft protection" is used). And these fees are paid by those that can least afford them. The guy that keeps $10,000 in his account gets free checking, and never gets dinged by overdraft fees. But he's being used by the bank too, by getting 0% interest on his checking account so it becomes a free loan to the bank.
No, you need to go one step deeper all the way back to you the consumer. Banks provide a service. They could charge a person $20/month
for this service and probably be ok financially if they could get customers but you the consumer will go to the bank across the street that
gives free checking instead. You pay for free checking with overdraft fees and lost interest just like you pay for free broadcast tv with commercials.
They aren't being "used" by the bank. They are paying the bank to use their services
Re:State should just tax it. (Score:5, Informative)
NJ does tax S&H. Amazon is doing it correctly. The submitter is a moron. The reference provided in the summary to "prove" that NJ does not charge tax, actually says exactly the opposite: since 2006 they tax S&H.
Re:State should just tax it. (Score:5, Informative)
"As of October 1, 2006, the exemption for delivery charges imposed by the seller is repealed for taxable goods and services. For deliveries on and after October 1, 2006, if a shipment includes both taxable and exempt property, the seller should allocate the delivery charge based on either the total sales price or the total weight, and collect tax on the portion of the delivery charge allocated to the taxable goods. In such mixed transactions, if the seller does not allocate the delivery charge, the entire delivery charge is taxable."
I didn't actually read much of that page, until I saw your post. Then, I did a search for "shipping" on the page, and read everything that got highlighted. You're right - reading helps people to avoid making idiot posts!!
Re: (Score:3)
Stupid Slashdot. Why does this shitty site not have a way to mod down moronic submissions like this? This isn't the first time I've seen something this poorly-researched pop up on here.
Re: (Score:2)
Stupid Slashdot. Why does this shitty site not have a way to mod down moronic submissions like this?
It does. It's called the firehose, and you can set it up so that newly submitted stories are on the front page, with a handy + and - next to each story and a moderation for it (spam, stale, stupid, dupe, notthebest).
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but once it's on the main page, it's stuck.
On Reddit, there is no separate page you have to visit to moderate story submissions; all the submissions can be modded up or down at any time, so if something is stupid, it'll just get modded down to oblivion after enough people look at it and decide it's crap. Here, you're relying on people to take their time to check out the Firehose.
Or amazon prime (Score:2)
What about amazon primes shipping, or free shipping over $35. or all the books that sell for 1 cents plus $3.99 shipping. thar's commerce in that handling.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know about NJ, but in my state they do exactly that. Whatever you charge as sales tax above the actual sales tax, whether it is deliberate or by accident, you pay to the state anyways.
I think if it was an error on the part of a coder, then my guess is that this money is also pooled into taxes that they have to pay to NJ, so it is going to be paid to them whether they ask for it or not.
Re: (Score:3)
The "shipping costs more than the item scam" was really only a thing on ebay...
You don't watch too many late night infomercials, do you?
Are you sure ? (Score:5, Informative)
What about this nj law
As of October 1, 2006, the exemption for delivery charges imposed by the seller is repealed for taxable goods and services. For deliveries on and after October 1, 2006, if a shipment includes both taxable and exempt property, the seller should allocate the delivery charge based on either the total sales price or the total weight, and collect tax on the portion of the delivery charge allocated to the taxable goods. In such mixed transactions, if the seller does not allocate the delivery charge, the entire delivery charge is taxable.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Let's apply Occam's Razor. What's more likely: a company that's been the largest online store for years charging wrong taxes, going completely unnoticed since 2006? A company that's been intensely focused on interstate tax issues in the last few years, and have incredible incentive to ensure they tax accurately to avoid giving ammo to their many opponents?
Or some idiot (submitter or Timothy, you can take your choice) misread his own State's laws and decided to puke his unfounded outrage all over this site?
I
Tax rate too low? (Score:1)
Re:Tax rate too low? (Score:5, Interesting)
I am somewhat confused. I thought only filthy free market capitalists wanted to pay lower taxes.
As a fithy free market capitalist (FFMC), let me chime in. We FFMCs do indeed believe in lower taxes, but we also believe in sensible taxes. Taxes should be simple, fair, difficult to avoid, and should not inhibit economic growth and prosperity. So taxes on income and labor and the worst, taxes on revenue are better, taxes on property or consumption are better still, and taxes on things you want to discourage are the best of all. If you look at the things we tax in America, it would be difficult to design a dumber tax system. Most taxes are on production or profits (income tax and payroll tax), and we have some of the lowest consumption taxes in the developed world. So we end up with millions unemployed at the same time we run up trillions in deficits because we don't produce enough to satisfy our consumption levels. That is a symptom of a broken system. Unfortunately, sensible tax reform isn't even on the political horizon.
Re: (Score:3)
The problem with Checks and Balances, a diverse economy, and a population that really engages in politics is that all big changes are nigh-impossible to enact. If Obama proposed a tax reform that conservative intellectuals loved, for example replacing the income tax with a national VAT, conservative Congressman would be unable to vote for it unless it also cut revenue. The engaged people who vote in GOP primaries are universally convinced ALL taxes are evil, and all taxes are equally evil, therefore any "ta
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So taxes on income and labor and the worst, taxes on revenue are better
Eh? Taxes on revenue are terrible. Yeah, they're simple, but they penalize low-margin businesses, driving capital away from highly-efficient industries.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, I have to disagree with most of what you said vehemently. Sales/consumption taxes are regressive; the poor slob behind the grill at McDonald's lives paycheck to paycheck while the CEO spends only a small portion of what he "earns". Worse still is property tax; you're getting taxed over and over. I knew an elderly couple who lost their home, because it had been paid off twenty years earlier but housing prices had risen so much that the taxes were higher than what they'd been paying for the mortgage. T
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed, but by taxing income, you allow taxation to be avoided by deferring income, having income received outside the country, etc.
Only because the tax law allows it. Just take away all deductions, all deferrals, and tax all citizens no matter where the income comes from. After all, if you live in East St Louis and work in St Louis you're going to pay income tax in Illinois and Missouri both. Will I be taxed on income for sales of my book to Europeans? I think I should, it's income.
BTW, get rid of the capi
Re: (Score:2)
What's really bad is that the so-called "liberals" in this country are big fans of taxes that hurt poorer and working-class people the hardest. Sales taxes are the most regressive form of taxation, yet if you look at most of the "Blue" states, they have extremely high regressive tax schemes. The only Blue states that really walk the walk are Delaware, Oregon, and New Hampshire. There's also Alaska and Montana, which are strong Red states.
Rule 263 (Score:1)
Never allow doubt to tarnish your lust for wealth
Re: (Score:2)
Never allow doubt to tarnish your lust for wealth
Which rule of acquisition is that?
Re: (Score:2)
Never allow doubt to tarnish your lust for wealth
Which rule of acquisition is that?
Rule of Acquisition #263: Never allow doubt to tarnish your love of latinum. [memory-alpha.org]
S&H is taxable in NJ (Score:5, Informative)
It's because S&H is taxable in NJ.
From http://www.state.nj.us/treasury/taxation/emailfaqs.shtml
Are shipping and handling subject to sales tax?
Effective October 1, 2005, the law provides for a new definition of "delivery charges." For transactions occurring on or after October 1, 2005, handling charges are included within the definition of delivery charges, and are therefore exempt from tax whether or not they are separately stated to the purchaser.
Prior to October 1, 2005, a separately stated charge for the transportation (shipping) of tangible personal property from the vendor to the customer was not subject to New Jersey sales tax. Depending on the circumstances, a separately stated “handling” charge could be considered part of the taxable receipt (amount on which sales tax is due) because it occurs prior to actual shipment. However, when “shipping and handling” charges were billed together, both amounts were considered exempt transportation charges for New Jersey sales tax purposes.
As of October 1, 2006, the exemption for delivery charges imposed by the seller is repealed for taxable goods and services. For deliveries on and after October 1, 2006, if a shipment includes both taxable and exempt property, the seller should allocate the delivery charge based on either the total sales price or the total weight, and collect tax on the portion of the delivery charge allocated to the taxable goods. In such mixed transactions, if the seller does not allocate the delivery charge, the entire delivery charge is taxable.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I assume it's to stop the 0.99cents buy price + $9.99 s/h scheme of tax avoidance.
Re: (Score:2)
If you deliver with your own equipment, you will also have to collect sales tax.
Re: (Score:2)
Drive there with a big truck, fill it up with 0.99 cent items. NO SHIPPING because you're operating the truck yourself. Then you sell the underpriced stuff for $5 at incredible profit.
in the rare occasion they would sell the items for you in person they could and would still charge you for handling.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
S&H is taxable in NJ! (Score:1)
S&H is absolutely taxable in New Jersey, if the shipment contains taxable goods.
timothy strikes again (Score:5, Insightful)
from the insult-to-injury dept.
The insult is that I read another stupid post from timothy.
Re: (Score:1)
Who pays for shipping anyway? Although I noticed Amazon.com recently raised the minimum from $25 to $35 to get free shipping.
Well if it's true.. (Score:1)
If Amazon is overcharging on taxes for deliveries in NJ, who's getting the windfall? Amazon, NJ? All that money has to go somewhere.
Re: (Score:1)
it goes to NJ. If it doesn't, then the state's auditor will find out and the additional fines/penalty would be so severe as to not make it worth it.
Here is a tip to everyone, from someone inside the sales and use tax business: companies across America overcharge sales taxes on a regular basis. I'm talking specific sales taxes on specific TPP (tangible personal property) and services. If a rule is 'gray' and can be interpreted as either exempt or 1%, for example, then the vendor will often charge the 1%, col
Re: (Score:2)
Or, even better, use a tax service that remits all your payments for you and provides audit protection. If a problem should ever arise, you point to them and go back to work.
Whingedot.org (Score:2)
Personal whinging seems to be out of place here on slashdot.
We could fill a whole site with what Telstra Australia gets wrong :)
What's the problem? (Score:2)
Isn't the real problem that NJ state's tax code is so expansive that its own citizens don't even know what they should or should not pay taxes on?
Tax law is one item that Amazon is paying extremely close attention to as of late. They are actually leading the discussion for the national sales tax, because it forces their competition (eBay) to play by the same rules. Amazon is a distribution system masquerading as an online retail store. They have physical nexus and are being required to collect taxes on b
Amazon Prime (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Next, you'll tell us that part of that money goes to the state to cover shipping taxes, even though the customer paid nothing for shipping. Pshah.
Going to get worse before it gets better (Score:4, Interesting)
As several people have pointed out Amazon appears to be applying the correct sales tax. The fact that the resident of NJ doesn't understand his own sales tax demonstrates how complex sales tax can be. Every state, county, and city can have their own sales tax laws which have to all be correctly applied based upon arbitrary characteristics. A state can have a tax rate of 4% with an additional 3% for prepared foods and then a city in that state could have a 2% tax on sugary treats. What counts as a prepared food or sugary treat? That will vary just as much and may not even follow common sense, tomatoes have even been legally defined as vegetables for tax reasons.
A national sales tax could make a lot things a lot simpler but would force states to relinquish a lot of power as every business that could use the national sales tax instead of the local taxes would. States with high sales tax would see a large revenue drop while residents of states without a sales tax would be penalized. I could see brick and mortar stores jumping through hoops to selectively use the lower tax rate, if the local tax rate is higher then the national one they'd "order" the item for the customer and then "deliver" it from the backroom.
The best solution I can see is if the federal government runs a sales tax database that every retailer can query. The retailer submits the location, price, item, and some relevant descriptors: "luxury", "food", "service", "book" and the API spits back what the sales tax should be for the item. It's then beholden to the states to keep their relevant data updated. The states would be limited in how creative their sales taxes could be as the software would need to support it but the states wouldn't need to cede power to the federal government.
Re: (Score:2)
No way. The problem with your solution is that there's no way to remit the taxes to the ~10,000 different tax jurisdictions across the country, unless you're the size of Amazon. Some 1 or 2-person internet shop being run out of a basement might be able to handle getting their shopping cart set up to use the Federal API you propose (it'd just be built into all the major shopping cart programs after all), but remitting those taxes requires cutting checks to all the different authorities, and there's no way
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, if they all do that (it might need to be mandated Federally though), that would solve that problem. However, it still doesn't solve the other problem, which is: what do you do when the Federal site goes down? Again, the ObamaCare rollout disaster shows that the Federal government isn't exactly competent at setting up reliable web services.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually the residents of states without a sales tax are only partially penalized, since the sales tax collected would go back to those states and in theory benefit the buyer in some other way...
Or possibly if a state were really committed they could take money sent from Amazon for a national sales tax, and allow people to issue claims to recover sales tax. It would be a pretty good system for everyone because people that cared still wouldn't pay sales tax, while enough people wouldn't bother than the stat
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What I don't understand is that if you buy something while you're on vacation or while you're working in another state, you pay the local sales tax where you buy the product and your home state doesn't give a rat's ass about it. They would be hard pressed to prove where you bought it. But if you buy online over the "internet", your home state thinks they deserve to tax your purchase.
If you buy something outside your state and bring it back to your home state you are expected to declare the amount on your tax return and pay a use tax on it, minus a credit for the sales tax you paid to the other jurisdiction. Exactly the same as buying things online. I live in a border town and the neighboring sales tax is 1.5% lower. Once I bought a car out of state, when I went to register it they demanded proof of tax paid and made me pay the difference before they would register it.
Re: (Score:2)
What I don't understand is that if you buy something while you're on vacation or while you're working in another state, you pay the local sales tax where you buy the product and your home state doesn't give a rat's ass about it. They would be hard pressed to prove where you bought it. But if you buy online over the "internet", your home state thinks they deserve to tax your purchase.
Not so in Washington State. Purchasers are still liable for paying a 'use tax' on items not taxed at the point of sale. So if you bring an item back into the state, you had better fill out the proper state tax forms and sent them a check.
In reality, they aren't going to enforce this for minor purchases. But for major ones, they do. A friend of mine spent a couple of grand on a fancy camera in Oregon (no sales tax) about a decade ago. At the end of the tax year, the Wash State dept of revenue contacted her
User botches reading comprehension (Score:2)
News at 11. The included link says that yes it's taxable if the item shipped was also taxable.
Illigal (Score:2)
I bet that incorrectly labelling tax is a felony. You cannot just collect a tax, and then keep it for yourself because you charged more than the government required.
Re: (Score:2)
Also pretty sure that's not illegal, as every cell phone carrier and credit card company seems to do just that on a monthly basis.
Re: (Score:2)
From the linked site on NJ taxation (Score:2)
As of October 1, 2006, the exemption for delivery charges imposed by the seller is repealed for taxable goods and services. For deliveries on and after October 1, 2006, if a shipment includes both taxable and exempt property, the seller should allocate the delivery charge based on either the total sales price or the total weight, and collect tax on the portion of the delivery charge allocated to the taxable goods. In such mixed transactions, if the seller does not allocate the delivery charge, the entire de
A thorny problem (Score:2)
Each one of them charges different taxes on different categories of goods.
Each one of them can use a different categorization, each one can charge different taxes on different categories or items, and the tax rate can change at pretty much any time.
And none of them have an obligation to inform anyone about outside the State/County/City about the rate change.
Now go write me some code that works.
Re: (Score:2)
And you've personally verified that QuickBooks correctly calculates the sales tax for each and every product in each and every jurisdiction? Even all the bizarre rules like that fact in Pennsylvania that mounds are taxable because they're candy but Almond Joys aren't because the almonds make it food instead of candy? Or like the fact in New York that milk in a carton is non-taxable but milk in a cup is taxable?
Or is it more likely that there's all kinds of oversights or outright errors in the database and
This is STUPID (Score:2)
Regardless, this approach solves the issue of local sales tax disappearing, and allows localities/states to focus on infrastructure. And for companies that ship, a flat 10% makes it easy to avoid dealing with major software issues.
No, the state does tax S&H (Score:2)
And pretty much all states tax S&H.
I noticed the charges were way off. The book cost $8.09. The tax I was to be levied was $0.85. That's a 10.5% tax rate! Why am I being charged 10.5%? It turns out that Amazon is also charging me tax on the $3.99 cost of shipping and handling.
This is why the arguments for a national sales tax to "level the playing field" with B&M retailers are totally bogus.
They always want to tax shipping and handling.
Buyers from B&M retailers do not have to pay for d
Re: (Score:2)
if the retailers buys something for $10 and it costs them $1 to get is shipped to them, then at a minimum they charge $11. Thus, the shipping cost IS taxed, just not directly.
Those are distribution costs, not shipping costs.
Amazon has distribution costs as well --- they have to get products from their suppliers, to their warehouses and fulfillment centers.
However, these bulk distribution costs are likely on the order of $0.03 to $0.05 an item, not $1.
Whether they're a retailer or Amazon; they'r
People Warned This Was Going to Happen (Score:2)
Which is precisely the problem with taxing internet transactions. There are almost ten thousand different sales tax jurisdictions in the US. It's ridiculous to expect Amazon to keep track of minor variations in sales tax rules for all of them.
Re: (Score:2)
It's ridiculous to expect Amazon to keep track of minor variations in sales tax rules for all of them.
Oh, Amazon can easily do it. It's their smaller competitors who can't afford to do so and will go out of business, which is why big Internet companies have started saying 'hey, let's make everyone pay sales tax on internet sales, that's a great idea.'
The left whine and whine about the evils of Big Business, then do everything in their power to make them bigger.
Someone owes Amazon (+ us) an apology in this case (Score:5, Interesting)
So it seems that the submitter of this rant was entirely wrong, and sales tax does indeed apply to the delivery costs of taxable goods in NJ.
Will Hodejo1 or Timothy now hold their hands up, admit their mistake and promise to do better in future?
Re: (Score:2)
Will Hodejo1 or Timothy now hold their hands up, admit their mistake and promise to do better in future?
Maybe Hodejo1, but the suggestion that Timothy might deserves a +6 Funny.
Re: (Score:2)
If Amazon charged for the actual shipping cost, separate from handling or item price, the shipping would not be taxed.
How'd you work that out?
For transactions occurring on or after October 1, 2005, handling charges are included within the definition of delivery charges
For deliveries on and after October 1, 2006, if a shipment includes both taxable and exempt property, the seller should allocate the delivery charge based on either the total sales price or the total weight, and collect tax on the portion of the delivery charge allocated to the taxable goods. In such mixed transactions, if the seller does not allocate the delivery charge, the entire delivery charge is taxable.
Been there, done that (Score:2)
I'm a Washington state resident, I ordered something through Amazon many years ago;
at the check out I was told there's a chance that a tax may be required on this item
in the future, and if not they'd just keep the spare change (in a round about way).
Then placed a tax to the item price.
Yes Amazon is located in Washington state, and yes they tax in Washington but
they weren't required to at the time, and it wasn't retroactive when they were.
I haven't shopped Amazon since, NewEgg.com all the way, put many comp
Newegg.com (Score:2)
As a side note: every time someone mentions buying something they Mention newegg.com
very rarely Amazon.com I don't see why Amazon.com is always talked about and little about
Newegg.com. Other than Amazon pays for the press.
Chatting while playing games for many years, if someone says damn this sucks I need a new
video card (a common complaint), almost always someone mentions a deal on Newegg.com,
never has Amazon been mentioned. I don't know why, it's just the way it works.
Re: (Score:1)
Oh, we're trying to do it all here -- income taxes, sales taxes, high corporate taxes, capital gains taxes. And every few years they toy with a VAT to replace most, but not all, of that (in this way, they can slowly start jacking the other rates back up again.)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
You're lucky! Maryland taxes you on rain.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Amazon Makes? (Score:4, Interesting)
"But it's a whopper! Just consider the hundreds-of-millions of dollars in sales Amazon makes in New Jersey each year."
Wouldn't that be NJ making it?
How do you know they're aren't dutifully recording it all (Amazon) and handing it over to NJ?
In most (all?) states where sales tax is collected, any excess sales tax collected must be refunded to the customer or turned over to the state -- the company doesn't get to keep it.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Have you seen New Jersey? 20% may not be enough.
Re: Wait what, only 10 %? (Score:1)
NJ only gets back about 75 cents on the dollar for the federal taxes it pays. Start there.
Re:Wait what, only 10 %? (Score:4, Insightful)
No, sales taxes are the most regressive form of taxation, that is they hit the poor the hardest. Interesting then, that the northeast Blue states all have high sales taxes and other regressive forms of taxation (like all the toll roads and bridges with insanely-high tolls).
Also, NJ is famous for the highest property taxes in the US. The reason for this is racism: every little municipality (there's ~550 of them) has its own separate school district and property tax. They refuse to merge the school districts into county-wide districts like most other states, because no one wants their town's school to be in the same school district as some poorer (mostly black) township or city on the other side of the county. The phrase "home rule" is used a lot here as a euphamism for the real reason no one wants consolidation. Interesting that the northeast liberals are the most racist people in the country.
Re: (Score:2)
Anyways, insults aside, sales tax doesn't apply to essentials. If you're poor and buying non-essentials, well, there's the reason why you're poor.
n.b. I am poor.
Re: (Score:2)
Are you an idiot? What kind of conservative complains about regressive taxation?
Sales tax does apply to essentials, it depends on the state. Lots of states tax food, clothing, etc.
If you're poor and buying non-essentials, well, there's the reason why you're poor.
So are you a southwestern conservative prejudiced dick?
With an attitude like that, you sound like the conservative prejudiced dick.
Re: (Score:2)
Follow the money. In February of 2011, school superintendent salaries were capped (depending on district size) at $125k-$175k, because they were previously in excess of $200k in many instances. These "jobs" are quite awesome. The pay is great (especially compared against other gigs in education). The benefits are great (you get to keep rolling over sick days [because you work from home when you
Re: (Score:2)
Obviously, people in power will do things to keep themselves enriched and in power, but they have to justify it to the voters somehow. Telling them "we need more highly-paid superintendents" isn't going to go over very well. However, telling the people in richer towns that poor kids are going to be bused to their schools, and that their kids are going to be bused to schools in the ghetto town on the other side of the county, WILL cause them to vote against consolidation. It doesn't matter much what the p
Re: (Score:2)
No, they don't. Property taxes only go to fund the school in the district those property taxes come from. So rich neighborhoods, with high property tax revenues (because of the high house values there) keep all their money and pour it into their own schools, while poor neighborhoods in a poor district in the same county have to make-do with much lower funding since the property values in the ghetto are very low and consequently property tax revenues per capita are much lower.
Right, you'd think that, because it makes sense. But you'd be wrong [njspotlight.com]. While some wealthier areas do in fact spend more per pupil, you'll see that Newark spends 28% more per pupil than the average. In case you haven't been there, Newark isn't exactly a "rich neighborhood". If you look at that map, you'll notice that some of the highest per-pupil spending happens in the urban areas (where, as you might imagine, outcomes are below average).
The fact of the matter is that our worst-performing, poorest districts
Re: (Score:2)
Amazon is just counting on people to not notice it. They're stealing money and they know it.
This is a very common scam that almost nobody gets busted on, mostly because the IRS is too fucking lazy to do its goddamned job.
The IRS doesn't handle state sales tax issues. If you're going to complain, at least be accurate. Well, unless you're trying to become a talking head on cable news.
Re: (Score:2)
They're not paying taxes on extra 'income' from overcharging shipping.
Re: (Score:2)
No they're following the rules and the complainer is a moron who can't read.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a clear tax scam
Actually, it turns out the submitter is wrong, so not that clear at all.
Hopefully you won't be so quick to believe the next thing you read (especially if it's come via Timothy).
Re: (Score:2)
It is standard practice in pretty much any online retailer business to overcharge on shipping for extra income, taxes or not.
Mainly because the shipping carriers only add an ESTIMATE on plus tax using their automated systems. The actual billing cost to the company is typically lower.
There is still money being pocketed.
Re: (Score:2)
There is still money being pocketed.
It's called profit, not a tax scam. I hear they'll even charge you more for the products you order than what they actually paid for them, too! Scandalous!
All the costs are displayed, Amazon aren't charging any tax they shouldn't and pocketing it, and no-one's forcing anyone to click Submit.
not a scam (Score:2)
It's unlikely Amazon would be scamming using this method; the fines involved would be horrendous. It would only take one person noticing to trigger an investigation and audit by the state.
From most of the responders to this thread, this is unlikely to also be a mistake. But even if it were, Amazon wouldn't be keeping the money, but would be handing it over to the NJ tax authorities. (That would also probably result in a fine, but not a catastrophic one.)
Re: (Score:2)
I rather doubt you've actually confirmed this.
Re: (Score:2)
Listen, it's really not that difficult to charge sales tax online. It might take some time to organize and get working correctly, but it's not difficult.
There are plenty of tax service providers out there these days that all knew this day was coming. TaxCloud, Avalara, Taxware, etc.
While developing our business's new site, this was an area I was adamant about getting correct. Whether we charge sales tax to every state right now or only those we have nexus in, it should be a simple method to begin collecti
Re: (Score:2)
That IS the definition of difficult.
Re: (Score:2)
...and you haven't even touched on exemptions due to the type of product or service you're selling
First off, taxability codes are trivial to implement in Magento. The service I use allows a product to have a tax class assigned, so there are absolutely no worries there other than the data entry that's involved. Second, why would I bother to worry about possible taxability status for products or services I don't sell? I have the products in my own catalog tagged with tax codes, so when those line items are validated in the cart, their codes are compared to the state's list of codes that need to be taxabl
Re: (Score:2)
There is no overcharge, so no one does. The taxes are exactly spot on.