Arrest Made In Webcam Highjacking Extortion Case 311
Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "CNN reports that Jared James Abrahams, a 19-year-old computer science student, has been arrested for allegedly hijacking the webcams of young women — among them reigning Miss Teen USA Cassidy Wolf — taking nude images, then blackmailing his victims to send him more explicit material or else be exposed. Abrahams admitted he had 30 to 40 'slave computers' — or other people's electronic devices he controlled — and has had as many as 150 total. His arrest came six months after a teenager identified in court documents as C.W. alerted authorities. She has since publicly identified herself as Cassidy Wolf, the recently crowned Miss Teen USA. Wolf received messages featuring pictures of her at her Riverside County address and others apparently taken months earlier when she lived in Orange County, says the criminal complaint (PDF). The message explained 'what's going to happen' if Wolf didn't send pictures or videos or 'do what I tell you to do' in a five-minute Skype videoconference, according to the criminal complaint. 'Either you do one of the things listed below or I upload these pics and a lot more (I have a LOT more and those are better quality) on all your accounts for everybody to see and your dream of being a model will be transformed into a pornstar (sic),' wrote Abrahams. FBI agents raided Abrahams' Temecula home in June and seized computers and hardware, cellphones and hacking software, court records show. Outside the court, Abrahams' lawyer, Alan Eisner, said that his client's family feels 'profound regret and remorse' over what happened. Eisner told CNN affiliate KTLA that Abrahams is autistic. 'The family wants to apologize for the consequences of his behavior to the families who were affected.'"
Autistic huh? (Score:5, Insightful)
The current excuse of the day when some nerdy low-life gets caught up to no good. Here is a hint, just because you have problems coping, it does not mean "I am autistic" is an excuse for being an arsehole.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Autistic huh? (Score:5, Insightful)
I sure hope he likes a having a tiny living area and orange jumpsuits.
I agree, too many people are using pretty weak excuses for antisocial and illegal activities.
Re:Autistic huh? (Score:5, Interesting)
If he is officially diagnosed, what would you say then?
I'd say that there's a significant difference between autism and sociopathy. An autistic person frequently doesn't understand how to interact with someone else, but they have enough empathy to know some basics of how *not* to interact.
Re:Autistic huh? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Autistic huh? (Score:4, Funny)
Lies... All lies... Everybody knows there aren't any Girls on Slashdot (let alone the internet)... :P
Re: (Score:3)
The problem is not autism or Asperger's. The problem is using autism or Asperger's as an excuse to behave badly.
Because you know what happens? The public starts to believe in it.
If you want a more innocent example - take video games and violence. The t
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
If he is officially diagnosed, what would you say then?
I'd say that there's a significant difference between autism and sociopathy. An autistic person frequently doesn't understand how to interact with someone else, but they have enough empathy to know some basics of how *not* to interact.
He seems to have been highly organized and quite practiced at what he did. I'm a skeptic of his claims.
Re: (Score:2)
Diagnosed or not, it's still a crime and no excuse undoes the damage.
Re: (Score:2)
First and foremost, autism is diagnosed through behavior only. There is no medical test for it. It's observational data only.
Secondly, autism is a spectrum disorder so it could literally be a reason for being an asshole. It could also be a reason for worse or more bizarre behavior. But for some, it's not a good excuse for the behavior.
*I* am on the autistic spectrum and *I* would not do this to anyone. Then again, I'm asking my 2013 self if I would do that... I guess I would be better off asking a much
Re: (Score:3)
What has whether he is on the spectrum (yes, I know people who are) got to do with whether he is a criminal low-life.
Because it may change how you end up dealing with the situation. For example, if your intent is to fix the problem, instead of just sending such people away and forgetting about them.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Autistic huh? (Score:5, Interesting)
As a father of a child on the autism spectrum who also has ADHD, I can tell you that those kids are out there. I can also tell you that you have NO IDEA how much work my wife and I have put in over his lifetime to get him to the point where he can be in a mainstream classroom, and generally come off as just "mildly aloof and a bit forgetful, but friendly" as opposed to "way out there, completely disorganized, and won't make eye contact." He has to work much harder to make friends and get his schoolwork done, but because of all the training, therapy, and professional help that we have gone through (and it takes all of us to do this), you might not be able to tell in a short interaction with him. (It's still the case that in any lengthy interaction with him, if you know what to look for you'll pick some of it up.)
So don't assume that ASD + ADHD = lazy parent. We also have a typical child, and you can tell the difference in parenting effort between the two easily, but only because we have put that effort in on the atypical one. Parenting is hard for anyone, and even harder for parents of kids with either ASD or ADHD, let alone both. Many parents in one boat or the other get plenty of sideways glances from people with the attitude you wrote above, and I feel it is very disrespectful to the massive amount of time, effort, and money we have spent on our children.
That said, I agree, it is completely irrelevant whether the blackmailer in this story was autistic or not, because the behavior is not something related to the behaviors autistic people generally express as part of that diagnosis. If his family (IF) is using that as an excuse, shame on them.
Re: (Score:3)
Also as a father of an autistic son, I have to agree with the AC. What I will add is that the autism should be taken into consideration when/if accused of wrong doing. My son has enough communication difficulties that if the police showed up and accused him of anything, he'd probably come across as guilty, lack of eye contact and verbal responses would probably trigger a cops guilt sense. Same with court, it would be important for Judge and jury to understand he has communication problems and lack of eye co
Re: (Score:2)
The only thing a diagnosis of a mental ailment should do in a criminal trial is change from 10-20 in the penitentiary into 10-20 in a high security hospital.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you not observe the dual nature of understanding we have of behavior? On one hand, we want to blame the individual for his behavior. "I wouldn't do it. I don't think it's right. He must be an asshole." I get that way too sometimes. It's a "relative" measure though. On the other hand, we recognize that chemical and other external forces on people can have extreme and wildly varied behavioral consequences. We all seem to know and accept it when a drug does something to a person. We all accept it w
Re:Autistic huh? (Score:4, Interesting)
I think you have it slightly wrong - Do you not observe the dual nature of understanding we have of behavior? On one hand, we want to blame the individual for his behavior. "I wouldn't do it. I don't think it's right. He must be an asshole."
that's not the case, its "WE decided it shouldn't be done, we don't think its right. He must be not part of our society". Its a standard herd instinct to have a mostly-conforming community to protect ourselves from predatory factors. So this guy, if he's not behaving how we as a society think is acceptable, then he must be a danger to us. Which, when you consider what he's done, is entirely true.
So punishment is less about him and more about what kind of society we want (or need) to have. We don't accept when drugs etc influence people - the crazed killer still gets locked up for everyone's good, even if he was under the influence at the time. This also shows why drunk driving is treated less harshly - because its something 'ordinary' (ie normal members of our herd) people might do, and not the anti-societal external 'predators'.
Re: (Score:2)
Look in the mirror and witness the spread of neoconservative ideology. Thought idiology might be more apt.
Re: (Score:3)
Want to greatly reduce abortions? Make contraception & sex ed easy to get. (Oh wait, Republicaans would never do that. But conservatives would.)
Want fewer people on welfare? Make a realistic job training program. (Oh wait, Republicaans would never do that. But conservatives would.)
This (along with a love of running up ridiculous deficits) is why, as a conservative, I can never, ever
Re: (Score:3)
she invited him in (Score:2, Funny)
since she didn't secure her computer enough
Poe's Law (Score:2, Redundant)
she invited him in ... since she didn't secure her computer enough
I really can't tell if you're making a tasteless joke parodying blaming rape victims, expressing a sincere belief in support of that train of thought, or being bitterly sarcastic about it, since any of those are believable on Slashdot.
Re: (Score:3)
You think you are being sarcastic, but that view is widely held here judging from past discussions.
That's incredibly creepy (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:That's incredibly creepy (Score:5, Insightful)
What we learn from this:
If a student spies on someone its a crime but if government does the same it's not.
How does the saying go, do as I say but don't do what I do ?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So what the kid should have done, is get a job with the government.
Re: (Score:2)
Please cite a case of a government agent hacking into someone's laptop, acquiring naked pictures of them, and then blackmailing the person using the naked pictures.
It boggles my mind that multiple people found this comment "insightful".
Re: (Score:2)
Re:That's incredibly creepy (Score:5, Funny)
Young Jared James Abrahams, I hereby sentence you to 20 years of coding for the NSA. Our country needs young innovators with such talents to preserve our eternal safety from those who would do us harm. As your reward, you can have access to all the nude webcam photos you want, we have the worlds largest data center chock full of the bestest stuff.
Re:That's incredibly creepy (Score:5, Insightful)
And blackmail into sexual activities is rape, even if it doesn't meet the legal definition. Seems like it would violate a person in all the same ways.
No, it's not. It may be a "violation," but if it doesn't meet the definition of rape, it's not rape.
If you expand the definition of rape to include anything you don't like, it will end up being a word with no real meaning at all.
Re:That's incredibly creepy (Score:4, Funny)
>> If you expand the definition of rape to include anything you don't like, it will end up being a word with no real meaning at all.
Oh, quit yer raping.
Re: (Score:2)
Like, say, statutory rape?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
If we're throwing away definitions, why not call it mass genocide, detonating WMDs, or even worse, patent troll?
Re:That's incredibly creepy (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Not all rape has any of those, and in fact most rapes don't. Rape doesn't have to be violent to be terribly degrading.
Re: (Score:2)
Relationships don't have to be violent to be terribly degrading...
Seventh grade doesn't have to be violent to be terribly degrading....
Work doesn't have to be violent to be terribly degrading...
If "terribly degrading" is your definition of rape, it's a crime far more prevalent than ever before thought.
Re: (Score:2)
You idiot, my definition of rape is quite clear, from the top of the thread "non-consensual sexual activity". I'm sorry you've bought into the myth that rapes are mostly perpetuated by homeless people hiding in the bushes or whatever kind of story is in your head, but that's not how reality is.
Re: (Score:2)
If "terribly degrading" is your definition of rape, it's a crime far more prevalent than ever before thought.
Nowhere did he say that was his definition of the term; i kan reed was ascribing a particular aspect of rape, and in that is not particularly incorrect.
Re:That's incredibly creepy (Score:5, Informative)
OTOH, a terribly degrading thing doesn't have to be called rape.
Re: (Score:2)
Lots of stuff is degrading, but come on now, rape requires force, in the mechanical sense.
This is a thing a lot of rapists say. "Oh, sure, she said no, but she didn't fight back."
Re: (Score:2)
Mechanical force isn't necessrary. Threat of violence or threat of other reprocussions are enough.
I'm with you, though... ...blackmail isn't rape, even if you blackmail people for more nudes.
Re: (Score:2)
Only in the manner that "force, in the mechanical sense" is necessary for all movement. (Including cyber-sex; masturbation is movement and involved mechanical force.)
Only a minority of rapes involve force in the sense of violence or the threat thereof. Most involve alcohol or other drugs. (Mostly alcohol. "Date rape drugs" are about 90% myth. [washingtoncitypaper.com]) This is because the people doing most of the raping are repeat offenders who carefully plan their acti [wordpress.com]
Re: (Score:2)
He's guilty. We all know it.
I'm sorry, is Due Process inconvenient for you? We'll just get rid of it and replace it with "If he was charged, then he must by guilty and if he's guilty then he has no rights so let's go all wild west on his ass."
Oh, and by the way, there's an armed mob outside who would like to talk with you about some unpaid parking tickets.
Re: (Score:2)
You people from the 20th century are so cute with your silly archaic ideas.
Feeling "profound regret"... (Score:5, Funny)
Funny how being caught does that to people.
Re:Feeling "profound regret"... (Score:5, Insightful)
That makes sense. Until you are caught, you typically have only your perspective on what you're doing. There's no one else out there telling you that you've made a mistake. A lot of people change their minds about their activities once they realize that other people don't approve.
Re:Feeling "profound regret"... (Score:4, Insightful)
That makes sense. Until you are caught, you typically have only your perspective on what you're doing. There's no one else out there telling you that you've made a mistake. A lot of people change their minds about their activities once they realize that other people don't approve.
Ah, bullshit - I stole a pair of JNCO jeans once when I was a pre-teen, and believe me, I didn't need anyone else to tell me that I was in the wrong for doing it.
Re:Feeling "profound regret"... (Score:4, Interesting)
Wow, just the other day, a woman mugged an elderly lady in a restaurant, and when caught insisted the mugging was justified because "the lady was rich. She was eating at a restaurant". It's amazing what mental gyrations people will go through to justify actions that the rest of us are pretty sure are wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed; I fear that cognitive dissonance has infected the herd mind, and is quickly becoming pandemic.
The worst part is, I'm not sure there's anything any of us can do to stop it.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. Get out of the way, don't call attention to one's self, take steps to protect one's family, and wait it out. I think that's about it.
Re:Feeling "profound regret"... (Score:5, Insightful)
Thing is, extortion isn't something you do alone. There's always the victim you're extorting. And the fact that you're extorting them means you fully understand what you're doing is against their wishes.
Maybe he didn't fully comprehend the full extent of the emotional distress he was causing in his vicitms. But he damn well knew that "their perspective" of it was that they didn't want it to happen. Otherwise he would've just sent them an email asking them to pose nude, no extortion attempt.
Re: (Score:2)
That makes sense. Until you are caught, you typically have only your perspective on what you're doing. There's no one else out there telling you that you've made a mistake. A lot of people change their minds about their activities once they realize that other people don't approve.
No, it only makes a sociopath sorry they were caught. Someone actually capable of feeling empathy would have thought about it after the first crime, not continue to do it 40 more times.
Re: (Score:2)
Until you are caught, you typically have only your perspective on what you're doing. There's no one else out there telling you that you've made a mistake. A lot of people change their minds about their activities once they realize that other people don't approve.
Most people learn that lesson by time they're five or six.
Re: (Score:2)
By trying to hide his activities, he already know that others don't approve. By threatening the victim with pain in order to get them to do what he wants, he shows he understand human motivations and behavior.
This indicates a normal, or perhaps even above-normal understanding of human behavior. Very far from autistic.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
It's his family that is expressing regret, not him.
Re: (Score:2)
In fairness, I think it was his family that was expressing regret. As well they might.
I've never heard of autism causing extortion (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
I have Asperger's Syndrome an Autism spectrum disorder. Autism is a spectrum meaning that almost everyone has it to some degree. The difference between a quirk and a disorder is that a disorder gets in the way of every day life. Sure every geek is awkward at times but autism is a different thing. For example, most people keep eye contact pretty well. I have to think about it because my natural tendency is to watch someone's mouth when they speak because that is where the information is coming from. I get li
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Worse than a bully (Score:5, Insightful)
This is worse than bullying, it's sexual harassment and extortion.
And I agree, Ms. Wolf did a courageous thing to stand up and present evidence so this lowlife could be stopped.
Re: (Score:3)
It may even be worse than that. He had lots of photos of underage girls, and that he told one of his victims that he didn't care how old his victims were.
The Feds may pile on some child pornography charges once they examine all the evidence on his computers.
Re:Worse than a bully (Score:5, Insightful)
may even make the sex offender list as well. (Score:2)
and that can be wore then doing jail time.
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
"This is what bullying is, taking unfair advantage over someone else."
That's also called "the free market". (Which is one reason why free markets are bad.)
NSA material (Score:5, Funny)
He should join the NSA once he's out of jail. He has a bright future there.
Pfffft (Score:2, Interesting)
Another criminal genius bites the dust!
Actually what I think is the court should take into account is the fact that this person's brain is not developed yet which might lead him to do... that.. and think 1) it's a fine thing to do and 2) he'd get away with it.
They do this in Europe- take the age and developmental stage of the defendant into account as it interacts with the defendants s crime.
We live in a world of humans. Some young humans spontaneously think up criminal acts to engage in. This is always a
Re:Pfffft (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually what I think is the court should take into account is the fact that this person's brain is not developed yet which might lead him to do... that.. and think 1) it's a fine thing to do and 2) he'd get away with it.
He's 19. He is legally an adult and should have more than a well-enough developed brain to realize that sexually blackmailing women is wrong. Most people would easily grasp the concept years before.
That knocks out #1, which is really the only relevant point because you don't deserve any leeway for thinking that it's okay to do something wrong so long as you don't get caught for it. Poor impulse control and an inattention to the consequences of one's actions at that age is the opposite of a mitigating factor.
Everyone involved really ought to consider that before they put him in the no-rehab hell-on-earth called American prisons for 20 years and turn him into a REAL criminal.
This isn't just some little ha-ha prank or delinquency. He broke into a person's computer, commandeered it for his own amusement, and then threatened the future life and career of a woman if she refused to degrade herself for his sick sexual entertainment. The first half? Maybe your argument holds water. The second? That IS being a real criminal. This was sexual assault in all but contact -- that same sort sexual self-gratification through the control and degradation of an unwilling party.
I won't disagree that 20 years in the current system will do next to nothing to reform him or prepare him for better integration into society, but let's not pretend that he deserves to get special, kids-gloves attention just because the system is broken. What he did was flat out evil and deserves to be punished -- harshly -- by whatever standards we have as a society set for sexual predators and blackmailers. Because that is what he is.
Re: (Score:3)
Actually what I think is the court should take into account is the fact that this person's brain is not developed yet which might lead him to do... that.. and think 1) it's a fine thing to do and 2) he'd get away with it.
He's 19. He is legally an adult and should have more than a well-enough developed brain to realize that sexually blackmailing women is wrong. Most people would easily grasp the concept years before.
That knocks out #1, which is really the only relevant point because you don't deserve any leeway for thinking that it's okay to do something wrong so long as you don't get caught for it. Poor impulse control and an inattention to the consequences of one's actions at that age is the opposite of a mitigating factor.
Agreed.
What scares me a little was the article earlier this week where the government wants to consider people juveniles up to age 25. Different context, but I wonder when this thought process will spill into the criminal justice realm.
Re: (Score:3)
Your liberal heart is ignoring the cynic that must be present as well. There's a high probability that this is NOT an autistic individual, merely a person who was diagnosed as autistic at the parents' wishes. This is a HUGE problem in America and one of the reasons that parents of truly autistic children have a hard time with the systems in place.
My anecdotal evidence for my view point is the fact that the lady who lived at the end of the block I grew up on had a son. That son was not diagnosed by their
Re: (Score:3)
So you're telling me that when 2 out of 3 doctors do not diagnose autism, it means the 3rd must be right? You, as someone presumably scientifically oriented in nature, should look at that factor and start questioning whether that's true. Furthermore, the fact that the child has been told he's socially awkward, raised as though he is autistic, sheltered from the rest of the world, and there is 0 interaction with his age group whatsoever, the likelihood, in my book, is that his traits come from an overbeari
No worries (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The perp will be out in 30 days so he can make the rounds on TV talk shows...
If so, I'd be tempted to follow him around and heckle from the audience. On second thought, I almost certainly would have to wait in a long line to do this.
If his initials were NSA (Score:3)
If his initials were NSA, would you really be surprised by this?
I can't be the only person who tapes over the camera in my laptop and disables it. Apparently my tin foil hat isn't tight enough, as I haven't unplugged the wires internally yet.
RAT Breeders (Score:4, Interesting)
The article is slightly sensationalist, but interesting
Perhaps law enforcement has opened a can of worms... or monkeys... autistic monkeys.
It seems like more is wrong than autism (Score:3)
This calls for creative sentencing. (Score:4, Funny)
When an attractive young girl accidently shows more of herself than she wants to, you need to be conscientious and respectful and look away.
When I show accidentally more of myself than I want to, you do not need to be respectful to look away. You will look away for your own sake, or what you see will be its own punishment.
I think y'all know what I'm getting at. You've seen Clockwork Orange.
Re: (Score:3)
(And my low Slasdhdot UID should be proof enough that I am not speaking idly.)
just an observation (Score:3)
I agree with others that the autism excuse is a little too convenient. But what I wanted to mention is that anyone who says "I have a LOT more of these that are better quality" whether the goal is political, bragging at a share site, or the vilest of extortion, they're always lying. If they had better quality photos, they'd have shown them to you. If the creep is trying to extort based on one or two blurry low light screenshots, chances approach certainty that it's all he has.
Excuse of the day (Score:2, Insightful)
Austic my arse. Just another excuse. Darryl Hannah now claims to be autistic. A way into the limelight. This punk did wrong, period. But, if he IS autistic you can bet that he will probably get a short probation and fine.
Just so we're clear... (Score:5, Insightful)
This was *not* about seeing naked girls. As we all know, there is more highly detailed porn on the internet than one person could experience in a lifetime. (Probably. I haven't, like, taken an inventory. But evidence indicates this is the case.)
This was about control. It was very specifically about the feeling of control experienced when forcing someone to do an act they find disgusting.
He wasn't trying to see his victims naked. He could have seen tens of thousands of girls naked for free on the internet. He was very specifically attempting to gain control over his victims, to make them do something that revolted them.
I wonder how his lawyer is going to try to spin this.
"Kiddie porn"? (Score:2)
He took pictures of a 17 year old.
I'd expect that there are child pornography charges involved too, no?
I don't believe any of this story (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think it's a reasonable legal requirement to presume that every lens in your household must covered at all times. I also don't think it's reasonable to expect me to lock my closet doors, just because hey maybe someone snuck into my house while I was away and is in my closet. Do you sweep your house for bugs twice a day? Do you test your milk for poison before you eat a bowl of cereal, just in case someone put cyanide in it?
In my opinion it would be much better just to prosecute the perverts who ille
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Autism (Score:5, Interesting)
His lawyer is already bringing it up, as a possible mitigating factor. So slam him and his lawyer for bringing it up, not for Slashdot for providing details you find unfavorable.
Re:Autism (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Autism (Score:5, Insightful)
I agree with the article in Salon. Autism spectrum disorder is an overused diagnosis.
HOWEVER that does not mean it's not a real phenomena. I have a son who was diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome. There are several clear differences between him and my other children (who are bright geeky types) including a near eidetic memory and slowness processing spoken language. You might not notice it in a casual context, but it becomes pretty apparent over time.
I am still pissed off at Slashdot publishing this summary in this manner. This shit of a lawyer is still engaging in adverse profiling and contributing to a body of ideas that has no justification.
Re: (Score:3)
I think the essential thing to understand is that people have different abilities and needs. No category is quite adequate. I have trouble with speech, but unlike your son, apparently, I have almost no "mind's eye" at all, and a terrible memory for anything that I can't logically relate to other facts or feel in a musical way. I don't think that necessarily means that he's more or less genuinely Asperger's than I am. One of my three children has trouble with speech also, and is overly affectionate with
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty sure the kitchen crew at his prison will be "hiring."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I like looking at naked women, I will admit.
So do I, but man, there's a whole lot of much easier and cheaper ways to look at digital images of naked women, even in real time.
Hell, redirect that kind of effort, and who knows, he might have even been able to get laid by a flesh and blood woman.
Stories like this certainly seem to confirm the notion that sex crimes are more about power than about sex.
Re: (Score:2)
So, how many girls did he extort before he made the mistake of targeting somebody with influence? If you are going to cheat, steal, blackmail, etc., you don't do it to the people the police actually protect.
You think Miss Teen USA gets any sort of special treatment by the government? You obviously haven't ever known any; I went to high school with a former winner, and believe me, being Miss Teen USA did not prevent her from being stopped, regularly, for DWB.
Re: (Score:2)
DWB?? Driving While Black? That's a very serious condition in many parts of America that tends to outweigh any other characteristic or accomplishment.
Here's an old joke that's still relevant:
Q: What do you call a black millionaire heart surgeon who's been pulled over in his Porsche?
A: A nigger
Re: (Score:2)
DWB?? Driving While Black? That's a very serious condition in many parts of America that tends to outweigh any other characteristic or accomplishment.
Indeed; ironically, being pretty (at least, pretty enough to win a MTUSA competition) probably didn't help her case, but rather made it worse.
Here's an old joke that's still relevant:
Q: What do you call a black millionaire heart surgeon who's been pulled over in his Porsche?
A: A nigger
Sorry, but as a "white" guy I'm pretty sure I'm not allowed to think those kind of jokes are funny. At least, not publicly (more irony, the tragic kind this time).
Re: (Score:2)
I was reading earlier this week that "child" goes up to age 25 now.