"New Statesman" Pirates Its Own Magazine 117
WebMink writes "Knowing that its explosive special edition on China this week will be blocked by censorship, UK political magazine 'New Statesmen' has taken the unusual step of posting its own torrents of the PDF of the Mandarin edition on the magazine. Looking at the content of the issue they are probably right to expect censorship — there's an article from the former newspaper editor Cheng Yizhong about media censorship, and Ai Weiwei interviews a member of the '50 cent party' — a commenter paid half a dollar every time he derails an online debate in China. 'Essentially, these people are paid internet trolls; their job is to stop any meaningful discussion online about the government.'" Specifically, the magazine has made available this issue as a PDF and also as a torrent (magnet link).
Torrents != pirating (Score:5, Insightful)
Who on earth came up with that headline?
Re:Torrents != pirating (Score:4, Funny)
Jack Valenti
Re: (Score:3)
My God, I knew that the RIAA was evil but now they are using the Undead [wikipedia.org]!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The retirees in Florida vote mostly democrat so I'd say no...
Re: (Score:1)
They switch to voting R after they die.
Re: (Score:1)
Were that to be the case the Ds would protest much less when Rs attempt to make sure that real live voters are the only ones that can vote. Apparently the undead are a minority that Ds must protect from disenfranchisement.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Torrents != pirating (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Pardon, nitpick.
Chinese is something you read.
Mandarin is something you speak.
(Multiple spoken dialects that map to the same unified writing.)
Re: (Score:1)
> Mandarin is something you speak.
Technically, that's an oversimplification.
It's a *good* oversimplification, because it's almost entirely correct. But reality is somewhat more complicated.
More precisely, Mandarin is a very popular dialect of Chinese (perhaps the most popular, although measuring popularity is inherently a bit subjective), and the differences between the major dialects of Chinese are significantly more pronounced in speech than in writing.
Re: (Score:2)
maybe you should say that to my chinese professor that calls it mandarin, oh and she is a native speaker of the language
Re: (Score:1)
Me, I wish people would stop referring to the different Chinese languages as "dialects".
Mandarin, Cantonese, Shanghainese, etc., etc., are not mutually intelligible.
Calling them the same language is essentially CCP propaganda.
Re: (Score:1)
Honestly, the word "dialects" really just means "directly related languages". Some dialects are mutually intelligible and some are not. The various Chinese languages are generally mutually intelligible in written form, not so much when spoken.
What I find odd is that the Romance languages (Spanish, French, Portuguese, Italian, etc.) are almost never called dialects. They're so closely related and so similar (apart
Re: (Score:2)
Here is the problem though. Torrent does not equal pirating methods. And even if it did, the fact that the copyright owner gave permission to copy and download or distribute the copy, removes any and all aspects of pirating unless they open the issue with a feature story on pirates in the south pacific.
let "pirating" = "the free version" (Score:2)
Shhhh. Anything that dilutes the meaning of the word "pirating" is a good thing.
Re:Torrents != pirating (Score:5, Funny)
Thank god this was derailed quickly. Just imagine how horrible it would have been if people actually discussed something meaningful. After all, its obviously much more important to dissect a headline, of an aggregation site notorious for useless and incorrect headlines, than it is to actually discuss the content on which the article reports.
Here's a clue. This is not the time for THAT discussion.
You must be a blast at parties.
Re: (Score:2)
You really must be new here.
Re: (Score:2)
So basically you let them win?!?!
Pardon my French, but Man, what a pussy.
Either a) ignore the trolls & idiots, b) tell them to piss of, or c) shame them by writing a rebuttal that makes them looks like complete and total idiots.
You DO have choices. Giving up seems counter to everything /. was originally about -- having an intelligent and insightful commentary & debate. /me *shrugs* At least the place hasn't degenerated into Reddit ... yet
Re: (Score:1)
> people actually discussed something meaningful.
This is Slashdot. The question of what does or does not constitute piracy is considered highly meaningful by a significant percentage of the people here. The site runs a lot of stories devoted entirely to that topic, in fact. (Granted, I don't know that this was necessarily intended to be one of them; censorship is _also_ a fairly major topic here, so the submitter may well have intended the story to b
Re: (Score:2)
What are you, a cop?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This should have been modded flamebait.
The relentless perpetration of massive lies is far more important than the content of the ridiculously headlined post in this case especially since the actual article is not even titled that way.
For such misinformation to be allowed to perpetrate without calling it on a forum where people know a hell of a lot better is ludicrous.
Re: (Score:2)
Pay ME China! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Who on earth came up with that headline?
I don't know but they should go home (by TWOCing their own car), burgle their own house, then sexually molest themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Broken PDF link? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Also remember the cost of living and average wage are lower in China, so without checking any actual numbers, it may be more akin to several dollars per derailment in the US. Still not a lot, but it'd be a nice little side gig and as the other poster mentioned, they may just enjoy doing it.
Re: (Score:3)
Kind of like posting on slashdot, at work, for money.
Man, that'd be nice.
Re:Broken PDF link? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Broken PDF link? (Score:4, Funny)
Can't seem to access the PDF link to read more into it
Perhaps you should pirate it from somewhere
Re: (Score:2)
Can't seem to access the PDF link to read more into it. Interesting that the (sometimes) hours of effort involved in derailing a message thread or debate only pays 50 cents - one might argue that you'd be looking at 50-100 threads at once, but surely that's still not enough to justify the hours of work that must go into it each day?
Just look at the people here who do the same thing for free though!
Re: (Score:1)
> in derailing a message thread or debate only pays 50 cents
I don't know exactly how the article determined the "fifty cents" figure, but if that's half a US dollar's worth of the People's Currency as determined by exchange rates, it would have rather more than fifty cents' worth of purchasing power in China. (The Chinese government deliberately keeps the value of their currency somewhat low in terms of purchasing power parity compared to oth
Chinese Edition (Score:5, Informative)
It should be "Chinese Edition" since it refers to the written language. Mandarin is a spoken dialect of Chinese, roughly equivalent to what "Received Pronunciation" is to English. Chinese can generally understand all Mandarin, though few outside of Beijing can speak it perfectly.
Modern written Chinese borrows heavily from Mandarin grammar and vocabulary, while retaining some conventions from Classical Chinese, the older written form that was pretty much impossible to understand when read aloud.
While it is possible to write in Chinese characters using Cantonese, Minnan or Wu grammar, it's quite rare and considered strange or wrong, even in regions where those dialects are spoken.
Re: (Score:1)
A useless (and homophobic) response to an informative comment. Well done.
Re: (Score:2)
A useless (and homophobic) response to an informative comment. Well done.
I assure you I'm not afraid of homosexuals... What I do fear is that humans may be well on their way to Idiocracy. [imdb.com]
My fears were justified by the GGP's informative comment, which is remarkably similar to certain scenes in that movie...
I'd "woosh" you, and the down-modder, but I was rather tactless, I can see how the reference would be easily missed (it wasn't a very good one) -- I blame my inability to give a damn about being P.C. or my slashdot comments. Also note: Just because someone says Fag, doesn
Re: (Score:2)
Just because someone says Fag, doesn't mean they're a homophobic. It's similar to how I can say "Nigger" without being racist.
Using fag or gay as an insult is either (1) homophobic or (2) childishly ignorant. And unless you're black using the word "nigger" will pretty much always be seen as racist.
Political correctness doesn't come into it. You might think you're being bold and outspoken, but if your language offends people unnecessarily, then you can't complain that people treat you as offensive. You have the right to be as much of an arsehole as you want, just don't whine when people react as though you're an arsehole.
Re: (Score:2)
Mandarin is a spoken dialect of Chinese, roughly equivalent to what "Received Pronunciation" is to English.
This is factually incorrect. “Chinese” used colloquially in English refers only to Mandarin Chinese. Mandarin is not a dialect of a larger language, it is a language in and of itself. Speakers of other Chinese languages, e.g. Min or Yue or Hakka, can’t understand Mandarin hardly at all without formal education. The analogy is more like English versus Dutch or German. Dutch and German speakers are often fluent in English, but this is only because they have extensive schooling in English. Th
Re: (Score:1)
While it is possible to write in Chinese characters using Cantonese, Minnan or Wu grammar, it's quite rare and considered strange or wrong, even in regions where those dialects are spoken.
Not really, while modern mainland books and magazines have standardized to Mandarin/Beijingese grammar, many publications worldwide and on the mainland, especially those still published in Traditional Chinese use Cantonese grammar as that is the dominate dialect that still holds onto the Traditional writing type.
Simplified Chinese, being the work of the PRC-CPC, is strictly written in Mandarin/Beijingese style grammar.
Re: (Score:2)
Traditional Chinese is most often used in Taiwan (pop 23 million), where the offical language is Mandarin. Hong Kong people taking notes for themselves often prefer writing English and when writing informally and Mandarin influenced Chinese (with Traditional characters) when writing novels and other great works (see Gu Long, Jin Yong, Liang Yusheng, etc.). The overwealming majority of Cantonese speakers live on the mainland though and only know how to write using Mandarin grammar.
Best to think of Simplified
Hard times, coming your way (Score:2)
From 1223-1240, Mongols (partial ancestors of today's Han Chinese and cultural contributors to all of Asia) invaded Europe, eventually being stopped at the borders of Western Europe.
From 1839 to 1860, the English and Chinese fought a series of wars. If it had not occurred before, resentment of the West was now part of the Chinese psyche.
In 1949, China became communist. It no longer had the pro-Western orientation of its nationalist party.
From 1950 to 1953, the US fought a proxy war with China in Korea.
From
Re: (Score:1)
North Vietnam was allied with the Soviet Union; they are not big fans of China for historical reasons.
The PRC and the USSR parted ways after Stalin died; they were in their own little mini-ColdWar for most of the 50s-90s.
You might want to pay more attention to history.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Hard times, coming your way (Score:4, Funny)
No. With global warming, the land bridge to Asia is closed for repairs.
Re: (Score:1)
> China or her allies in Russia and Eastern Europe.
China and Russia have not been allies since... well, technically they were allies for part of World War II, but it was a pretty uneasy alliance even then. Also, that was the Nationalist government of China (which is now de facto the government of Taiwan), before they were driven out.
Yes, I know, the current Chinese government has its roots in Communism, which came out of Russia. That's true. It does n
Re: (Score:2)
The war in Korea was a US "proxy war" against China? What nonsense. It was a war started by the (Communist) North Koreans. It's a lot easier to make the argument that the Korean war was a Chinese proxy war against the United States than vice-versa. (Or are you aiming to make the US the bad guy?) The USSR was also a big backer of the North Koreans (so why don't you call the Korea war a proxy war against the USSR?) Afterall, the North Ko
Re: (Score:2)
The Vietnam war was about stopping the spread of communism into South Vietnam (see the Domino Theory)
The entirely discredited Domino Theory was an absurd piece of justification for military/economic intervention. Here's a clue: if a country wants to be "communist" [*] it's not the job of the US to stop them.
[*] This was used to describe any vaguely left wing or democratic movement that did not pander to the US military-industrial complex.
I wonder if the same thing happens here (Score:2)
I wonder how many microsofties on here have similar arrangements.
Its what you do when you study english.
Re: (Score:2)
I bet there are certainly a few, though with a pay rate higher than 50 cents. I'd believe $5 per thread. $10 if they are getting a luxury payout for being good.
Re: (Score:2)
I bet there are certainly a few, though with a pay rate higher than 50 cents. I'd believe $5 per thread. $10 if they are getting a luxury payout for being good.
I can confirm that the figure is in fact $108.50 (less withholding tax) per thread. If you have accounts with all the major players (Microsoft, Apple, Google, Twitter, Facebook) and accounts on slashdot, reddit, digg, twitter, faceboook and a few others and you post on a few threads on each every day, you can pretty soon get yourself a nice 7 figure annual salary for a couple of hours work a day. You won't get rich like Bill Gates, but you'll be comfortable.
However, these gigs are appointment only. If
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Assuming english forums, it's probably good practice for speaking/writing english.
And they get paid for it.
It's a two-fer.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Cerberus, the dogs of mass effect 3 (Score:2)
I bet the US govt keeps a set of similar professionals, that have as a goal to keep people as stupid as possible.
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds Familiar (Score:1, Flamebait)
So they are the Chinese equivalent of Fox News. I'm not just trying to make a joke, that is absolutely one of the effects of Fox News. They troll every story with a partisan angle and push their base ridiculously far to the right. Then everyone in the left and center responds by ridiculing them and offering counterpoints to their ridiculous arguments. But that doesn't matter because the effect of Fox News making their ridiculous
Re: (Score:1)
Funny thing - last year a professor (UCLA?) used standard statistical measures on various news outlets to measure overall bias. I don't recall the details of the methodology, but it is one that has been used for a long time for this sort of thing. He found that most of the mainstream news media were far to the left (over 70%), and Fox News was only slightly to the left (IIRC 52%, within experimental error).
It's also worth noting that in DC something over 90% of all news professionals are registered to lef
Re: (Score:2)
There's an implicit view in your post that the center, neutral ground, is where media should be. This is debateab
Re: (Score:2)
No argument there, though I would argue that the media can not rightly assert that they are neutral when their own demographic is so highly skewed from the population. Rather than a highly skewed reporting entity 'trying to be unbiased', I would prefer if their institutions weren't essentially echo chambers for their own biases - I would like to see two news reporters who actually disagree once in a while - in private, not to mention in public.
Of course, that's about as likely as a reporter who actually kn
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Funny thing - last year a professor (UCLA?) used standard statistical measures on various news outlets to measure overall bias. I don't recall the details of the methodology, but it is one that has been used for a long time for this sort of thing. He found that most of the mainstream news media were far to the left (over 70%), and Fox News was only slightly to the left (IIRC 52%, within experimental error).
That is the funniest thing I have read all week.
It's also worth noting that in DC something over 90% of all news professionals are registered to left or extreme left parties - IIRC last survey showed over 12/13. Among the reporters and editors the ratio is more extreme. I just read a quote from the editor or publisher or something at NY Times, who said (as I recall) that everyone in the news room and editorial staff is so far left that they don't even know how to cover a story from any other angle.
If you are a college grad, realize that at most colleges over 95% of instructors are left or far left - so your education started out from a very left perspective. Chances are, based on the available inputs to most of us, your idea of 'center' is probably somewhere to the left of where it really is. Of course I don't know you, I'm generalizing.
IMHO any news organization that presumes to be nonpartisan should have approximately equal numbers of personnel of all common persuasions. AFAIK the only 'mainstream' news TV outlet with _any_ regular non-leftist onscreen personalities is Fox - I don't have cable and rarely see TV, so I could be mistaken on that by now. (plus also maybe Bloomberg and some other financial channels?) I think the experience of Juan Williams (is he still on Fox?) is a useful example.
Oh, you were being serious. I'd get some urgent professional help if I were you, whatever drugs you're on aren't helping.
subject (Score:2)
They'll PAY YOU to troll? I'm quitting my job and moving to china!
Reply to: subject (Score:2)
New Slashdot meme?
"In Communist China, government..."
Pirating (Score:4, Insightful)
You keep using that word. I do no think that word means what you think it means...
Personally, you welcome your new overlords (Score:1)
Discern your political leaning:
1. Oh my god, how corrupt!
2. Eh, companies astroturf, why not governments?
3. 50 cents? That's not a living wage!
Did anyone else add Ai Weiwei (Score:1)
Pirating? (Score:1)
They own it, and all the rights to it, so unless they have refused to give themselves permission to distribute their magazine, a concept that makes no sence, they have the right to distribute it any way they want.
Translation: They can't pirate their own stuff.
50 Cent Party? (Score:1)
Pirate (Score:2)
You keep using that word. I do not think you know what it means.
"giving" it away (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Why in hell should a british newspaper be censored -in Britain?!?- 'cause it reports on China? Doesn'r make sense.
Censored in China? Yes. Censored in UK? No.
They are putting it on torrents so that people in China can read it! ...... Oh wait ... are you being paid 50c to divert the conversation to UK censorship?
Re: (Score:2)
Remove all the street cameras in UK as a first step before talking about bad things in other countries.
Here's a tap with the clue stick to all you paranoid fuckwits out there: if you're going to watch child porn, deal drugs or whatever it is you're worried about being caught doingdon't do it in a public place where you might be seen by witnesses. And CCTV cameras are in public places.