$5M In Torrented Files Presented As Art 243
ideonexus snips thus from Wired: "The Art 404 gallery is currently exhibiting a piece by Manuel Palou called '5 Million Dollars, 1 Terabyte' which is a 'sculpture' consisting of a 1 TB external hard drive containing $5,000,000 worth of illegally downloaded files. The hard drive is displayed on a pedestal at the gallery."
Adds ideonexus: "There is a PDF of the files stored on the device with links to the torrents." I'd like this to be an exhibit at every trial in which gigantic money damages are claimed for copyright infringement.
Two can play it that game (Score:2)
In today's news, the RIAA and MPAA have given a generous grant to performance artist "B1ank S1ate" to support his new installation "B1ank S1ate pisses on other artist's hard drive."
Re: (Score:2)
Nope, there's nothing on there from the RIAA/MPAA (that would be stupid...)
Re:Two can play it that game (Score:4, Interesting)
Interesting system, it's just like conjuring money out of thin air. In the olde daze a pirate was someone who had to work for his money, kill, rape, plunder. Now all he has to do is copy a file. Not even steal it, just make a copy
Avast ye swabbies!
Re: (Score:2)
In the olde daze a pirate was someone who had to work for his money, kill, rape, plunder. Now all he has to do is copy a file.
Hey, setting up rTorrent on a server is hard work!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Doubtful, it's clearly fair use, plus those were downloaded files.
Does this classify (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
From that Wikipedia link:
The liner notes feature a short story by Bowie, the Diary of Nathan Adler, which outlines a somewhat dystopian version of the year 1999 in which the government, through its arts commission, had created a new bureau to investigate the phenomenon of Art Crime. In this future, murder and mutilation of bodies had become a new underground art craze. The main character, Nathan Adler, was in the business of deciding what of this was legally acceptable as art and what was, in a word, trash.
Re:Does this classify (Score:5, Funny)
Didn't you read the summary? It's Art 404. 404 is "not found". Therefore it is not found art.
Re: (Score:2)
Two questions: (Score:2)
First, so the harddrive does not contain files, it contains one file with links to torrent files?
Second, THAT'S ART?!
Re: (Score:2)
One could conceivably argue the the content of the drive being worth $5 million is art in that it's an artistic statement.
Re:Two questions: (Score:5, Informative)
First, so the harddrive does not contain files, it contains one file with links to torrent files?
No, the hard-drive contains the actual files in question, the PDF is a separate listing of what files have been downloaded to the drive, and their value IIRC (I can't access the PDF file without my browser crashing as I'm at work and this computer only has Adobe Reader).
Second, THAT'S ART?!
Moreso than most things passing as art these days.
This exhibit actually aims to raise a valid point about piracy.
By highlighting how trivial it is to cause $5million of "damage" (by certain definitions of that word) and how little effect it actually has, it's supposed to get people questioning the way we deal with infringers.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, damn...
If I had mod points you'd get them. I actually disagree with you, but this is still the most pertinent, informative, and insightful comment I've seen on this story so far.
Re: (Score:2)
But is that art or is it just social commentary?
First Amendment? (Score:2)
If they were able to sue him, wouldn't that infringe on his guaranteed first amendment rights? Or is that still an issue these days.
Re: (Score:3)
First, so the harddrive does not contain files, it contains one file with links to torrent files?
Second, THAT'S ART?!
It provoked an emotional response in you and it caused you to talk about it with other people. I'd say that classifies it as art. Maybe not GOOD art, but art nonetheless.
Re: (Score:2)
By that definition, pretty much all shitty software is art..
Re: (Score:2)
Most acts of terrorism are therefore art.
If I bomb an orphanage many people will feel an emotional response and talk about it. Art!
Re: (Score:2)
Depends whom you ask. The Joker in the first Batman movie certainly took that stance.
But, in practical terms, you're being obtuse. This exhibit was done as art and is being displayed by a gallery.
Making art explode with colour (Score:2)
Hes right, Haedrian. Which is why you shouldn't blow up an orphanage. You should blow up an art gallery. THAT is art....
Re: (Score:2)
Very true. You can claim it was artful, except that you also have committed several murders and claiming artwork will not help you in court.
Art is in the eye of the observer. Lot of things can be art, but artistic claim never take you off consequences of your actions.
Re: (Score:2)
Since when is art about being lawful?
Much Graffiti is grwat art, but t wouldn't even BE graffiti if it was legal.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Is this supposed to tell me if I'm an art critic or a lesbian, Mr. Decker?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I just saw the cutest little kitten. It made me so happy, I just had to come on here to tell you about it. And now you're saying that kitten is art too? How wonderful!
Way to miss the point, AC. Art is a form of expression with the intention to create an emotional response. That could be a picture of a building, a family portrait my kid drew, or even an object used in a way that differs from its intended purpose, such as making a statement.
Re: (Score:2)
Second, THAT'S ART?!
No...being a snobby, pretentious prick with access to lots of skinny pants is art. Didn't you get the memo?
Re: (Score:2)
Second, THAT'S ART?!
If it is, then I've got my own masterpiece right here. I bet I have way more than $5 million on my drive.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but you never thought to call it art until just now. Manuel Palou thought to call it art, so that's why it's art.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Well, if that's the definition of art, I just created an art masterpiece in my bathroom. I named the piece "Where's the plunger?" It's a kind of performance art, actually.
Sure. But that's not a new idea [wikipedia.org].
Modern Art (Score:2)
Many people balk at the stuff that is passed as 'art' by contemporary 'artists'. They can fairly call their 'work' art, because the artists have realized that beauty is subjective, and that by definition, everything and nothing is art depending on who you ask. Therefore an 'artist' has the right to call anything they want 'art'.
A very nice side effect of this definition, in my opinion, is the more subtle point that anyone can also label said 'art' as 'worthless crap' with equal wei
Re: (Score:2)
It's "conceptual art". I've never really considered that to be visual art. I put conceptual art into the same category as plays and novels, which may be art but it's not visual art. Visual art should be able to be appreciated without first knowing the title or reading some commentary from the artist; that doesn't mean you'll necessarily like it but you can make the attempt to view it for what it is without a tour guide. A blank hard drive on a pedestal will look exactly like this piece of art until you
Re:Two questions: (Score:5, Insightful)
Apparently, anything can be called art now.
That tiny little box sitting on a pedestal is apparently worth $5,000,000. It think it's a poignant statement on copyright.
Re:Two questions: (Score:4, Insightful)
Exactly: We could take another hard drive and copy the first one over to it, then BAM! we've got ourselves 10M bucks. Then another and it's 15M. If we do a couple hundreds, we could actually end world poverty!!
The concept as I understand it is that the fact that just producing a copy of a disk can instatly create 5M dollars worth of anything is incredibly wrong. From there you can start deconstructing the whole business interpretation of copyright.
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently, anything can be called art now.
That's hardly new... People have been saying that about any art they don't like or appreciate... Someone probably said that about the first painting of a woman without eyebrows or something...
A PDF? (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't know which is stupider, the concept of the art project, or that they are distributing a list of links over the internet with a PDF file.
Re:A PDF? (Score:5, Funny)
The concept is fine. I'm working on a similar project right now. The stupid part is calling it art.
Re: (Score:2)
"What if the interlocutor actually knows about art ?"
"Digital art"
Re: (Score:2)
The stupid part is calling it art.
Probably why they've called it "art 404", no?
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know which is stupider, the concept of the art project, or that they are distributing a list of links over the internet with a PDF file.
Well, this is primarily something to be displayed in a gallery so I suppose it makes sense to make something printable that could be stuck on the wall next to it or included in the exhibit catalog, or whatever. And then why not throw it on the web site. This is a problem for you?
Re: (Score:2)
No, what he means is that the PDF file listing the pirated content contains working links to said pirated contact. It's like a tiny table that lists what it is, where you can get it (tinyurl links to megaupload), how much it's worth, et cetera.
It does seem a bit weird for them to show you where to pirate the content yourself.
So it has two songs on it? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Not art (Score:2)
So can I take a shit on a pedestal and call it 'Modern Hollywood' and call it art?
Re: (Score:2)
You can call it whatever you like.Whether it is "art" as such is really up to other people - but I'm sure you'll be able to find some people who think so.
Re: (Score:2)
Right after the big ugly art museum was opened in downtown Santa Cruz, or maybe it was just after the sign went up, someone smeared shit all over the sign. I remember seeing it and thinking it was a pretty cool political statement. That building really is a big piece of shit.
Re: (Score:2)
You could, if you were a hipster living in the right neighborhood and associated with the right people. The problem is that this crowd is unlikely to be sympathetic towards your criticism of Hollywood. Your dump would have to represent some other form of establishment the artsy hipster crowd despises.
Re: (Score:3)
“Your mother” is a large installation that turns food into feces [sic.]...
FTFY
Re: (Score:2)
People who use the phrase "this isn't art!" usually seem to be objecting to the idea that someone might be making money off the back of very little work.
No, people who use the phrase "this isn't art" object to the idea of calling green something that isn't.
And don't ask me to define what "art" is. Like many things around us, it escapes a concise definition, but I know it when I see it. More importantly, so does the majority of other people, and if you'd do a poll among general population, you'd get some remarkable agreement on what things aren't art that are claimed to be.
Uh... art?! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So you are saying the downloaded files don't include porn?
Re:Uh... art?! (Score:4, Insightful)
So something can be entirely subjective, and at the same time hold some universal truth? That's quite impressive.
But as for your main point, here's the definition of the concept of art, as quoted from Wikipedia:
"Art is the product or process of deliberately arranging items (often with symbolic significance) in a way that influences and affects one or more of the senses, emotions, and intellect."
I'd say; a coherent political statement that says something by means of symbolism, can easily be viewed as art.
The fact that people are getting quite heated in a discussion about this, I think lends credit to that viewpoint.
Re: (Score:2)
"Art is the product or process of deliberately arranging items (often with symbolic significance) in a way that influences and affects one or more of the senses, emotions, and intellect."
In my personal opinion, if an "artist" has to explain the meaning of his "art" to an audience to influence and affect their senses in the way he intended, that's not art.
Re: (Score:2)
I take it you're not a fan of Pop and Performance Art either. Or poetry for that matter.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"THIS ISN'T FUCKING ART!"
Shrug. If it's projected on a screen in a movie theater, it's a movie. If it happens on a stage in a theater, let's call it a play. That doesn't make it a good movie, or good theater. If it's stuck on a pedestal in an art gallery, let's call it art, OK? Why is that a problem?
And personally I think sticking it on a pedestal under a spotlight in an art gallery adds an extra dimension of hilarity to the whole idea. I like it.
Re: (Score:2)
So is Voltaire's Candide not art either then?
Music for $46k? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I agree, it will only be truly overpriced art once someone has actually tried to purchase, (in this case...use it in legal court) at said value of 5million dollars, vs. the 46,000$.....then it would be true art!
PDF File size (Score:3)
404 Art.... The file size is 40.4 KB in size.
Co-incidence? I think not!
This is art (Score:5, Insightful)
I know a lot of you are going to protest and complain that this isn't art, much like the protest over that sculpture made of raw meat... but in a sense this really is art because of the people downloading, the controversy over copyright, the flagrant copyright violation involved in the artist downloading these files and presenting them as an artistic work. I think it's commendable, and it definitely involves taking a risk and it does make you feel something, so it's art.
I didn't say it was good art, but it is art, and I think it's interesting.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
If I download the same works and put them on the same drive
Kids these days! Not even the slightest bit of originality, sheesh! When we stole copyrighted works, we stole them creatively!
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I wish people would stop calling "statements", "art".
Art is about aesthetics.
While some art makes a statement, not all art does (for example the mona-lisa), and not everything that makes a statement is art (for example PETA rallies).
A commodity hard drive containing files, is not art. It can (depending on how it's used) be a statement.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You raise the "principles of beauty" argument and you have made a good point, to some extent. How do you explain languished art, art of pain and darkness, art that paints sorrow? Beauty is what triggers a positive emotion so in my opinion, your statement that art is about aesthetics is lacking because it only expresses one of many rich emotions possible to be generated through art. Visual art, feeling art, art of noise; these are the contrasts of art and each has a place. To suggest
Why is that? (Score:3)
I'd like this to be an exhibit at every trial in which gigantic money damages are claimed for copyright infringement.
Why? What relation does the exhibit have to a civil regarding copyrights? Or do you think wasting the judge's time will work in favor of the defense?
I've seen crime scene photos displayed in a gallery as art. Do you think those should be exhibits at the trial? (Obviously the crime scene photos are evidence. I mean, the particular fact that the photos could be displayed as art, is that relevant to the trial?)
"See judge, the blood splatter is art. Therefor this killing was not a crime!"
Unless you're going the other way, and saying, if anyone should have to pay big money for copyright infringement, it should be the pretentious arsehole who tries to pass off a commodity hard drive as art.
In that, I'm with you 100%.
Re: (Score:2)
I think this jab was intended to point out the "unbelievable value" of what we regard as a simple object, as if to demonstrate the absurdity in a pile of sand being imbued with $5M worth of value... Sure, it's a normal object and sure, it was easy to (illegally, in the case of the hard drive) obtain. Does that stop it from having significant worth?
To counter I would say, where is the "art" exhibit containing a group of programmers who work 40 hours/week for a company for nothing in return due to the premi
pfft, small potatoes! (Score:2)
Then you could call it social commentary on the insanity of the ??AAs.
Fail to see the worthyness of this (Score:2)
We haven't been a society where the physical size of something, or even the workmanship of the product represents its financial value. Modern artists of all people should know that.
Oh for the days... (Score:2)
People are doing a disservice to real artists when they label stuff like this "art."
Re: (Score:2)
Which particular time are you thinking of?
Good art has always required both skill and luck. And even then much of the best art was not at first accepted by those who experienced it as art...and definitely not as good art.
So don't rush to judgment. I'm not sure I consider this art, but I'm also not sure that it isn't.
Remember, art is not craftsmanship. They are orthogonal concepts. This clearly isn't craftsmanship, but it might be art. It might even be good art. Another concept is involved her, design,
My next art project: (Score:2)
Cool... (Score:2)
Cool.
Can I hook up my laptop to it and copy the files? That way, the drive will be worth even more money because I'm duplicating the files.
If everybody does this, then the exhibit can be renamed '5 Trillion Dollars' (pinky on mouth).
I didn't think it was art either, at first... (Score:3)
This is a work of art.
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Art.. my ass (Score:2)
Lets have some differentiation. It may be a political statement but its not art.
How can this be put in the same category as a painting by a great master?
I long for a return to the time when great art and music means something produced by someone with a unique genius or at least a skill that took and decades to perfect, not something that is just all about an idea and not its execution. Where's the value in something that any of us could make in a few minutes?
More statement than art. (Score:2)
I like the message, and whilst I doubt it will serve as a reality check to the IP holders, I think it is a point well made.
Also I was wondering if I was the only one suddenly compelled to go and locate a torrent of the "$20,000" font pack.
Off with his head. (Score:2)
I'd like this to be an exhibit at every trial in which gigantic money damages are claimed for copyright infringement.
So would the attorneys for the plaintiff.
The geek casts himself as the hero in his own courtroom melodrama. In the real world, the jury is more likely to see him as a candidate a stout oak and thirty feet of hemp.
American juries are middle-aged, middle-class, small-C Conservative and firmly of the opinion that property rights matter, that there is no such thing as a free lunch.
The geek's sense of entitlement really pisses them off.
Call me Artie (Score:2)
Wishes are to be avoided. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For 1TB of downloads? Man, I wish I lived wherever it is that you do. Is it Freebroadbandland?
Re: (Score:2)
Look up the value of each of these on the market. Not the (RI/MP)AA market, but the real, "I would like to give you paper for goods" market.
For things like the ROM's, consider what each ROM costs, if you were to buy the game, and to play it, you need the console.
I can only assume it is the same logic that gets us to $5m. And if it were (RI/MP)AA market values... One hundred... billion...kajillion... flazillion... dollars.
Re: (Score:3)
I guess the MSRP value of what the software/digital media is being sold for at the time of creation? i.e. ebooks, songs, DVDs, blu-rays, etc.
So since the RIAA/MPAA/BSA like to ask for $150000 per infringement, I guess the lawsuit will be in the billions. That's one man certain to be a starving artist for the rest of his life....
Re: (Score:2)
Only if he actually uploaded the files himself.. which he didn't. They're safely stored away in a museum. You'd need to have tight leather pants and an aerosol can to break in and steal it.
Re: (Score:2)
The link to the PDF leads to a PDF file that is 40KB big ... that will hardly contain 40.000 files. And if you open it using Adobe it does crash Adobe PDF Viewer.
He might have a different version of Adobe Reader you can try if you'd like..
Re: (Score:2)
It would be kind of funny if it contains an Adobe Reader exploit.. this guy is obviously into his illegal activities in a big way..
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, almost every PDF I've opened in the last week has crashed Adobe Reader. Something is just not right with the latest update...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Every time you borrow my air, you are stealing from me. Please stop.
Re: (Score:2)
Ahh, photography... ... Weasel words for "kidnapping".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If my neighbor could steal my only lawnmower but I'd still have the same lawnmower after the theft occured, then copyright infringement would be analogous to theft. Since this is not the case, we need different terminology for different crimes.
FTFY
Sorry to be a logic nazi... I just got this irresistible urge to adjust it to fit scenarios of having multiple lawnmowers, or your neighbor stealing your lawnmower, and replacing it with another lawnmower...
Re: (Score:2)
Ahh, copyright infringement. Weasel word for government protectionism interfering in a free and consensual transaction between two individuals.
Re: (Score:2)
So what? It's still a criminal and illegal act, and even the staunchest defenders of copyright infringement admit that. (They instead focus on the justification of that act and why it is morally acceptable in their viewpoint.)
I wish we could get past all the semantics arguments and instead focus on the issues. It's illegal, and in my opinion it's also morally wrong. I know that's not a popular opinion here on Slashdot, but endless debate on the semantics of what you call it is - yes - weaselling out of the
Re: (Score:2)
What's the point?
The point is that a 1 TB harddrive is worth $100, but the same 1 TB harddrive - when loaded with certain bits - is said to be worth $5,000,100. The point is THAT IT'S NOT WORTH THAT MUCH. The "artist" doesn't accomplish anything in terms of getting the judge or a jury to agree that people who commit copyright infringement aren't hurting copyright owners. He only accomplishes the goal that the copyright holding megacorps are gigantic assholes.
Re: (Score:2)