Coming Soon, Web Ads Tailored To Your Zip+4 185
On the heels of Apple's intention to collect and sell detailed location data comes word that Juniper is putting together technology that will allow any ISP to present you to advertisers by your Zip+4. An anonymous reader sends this snip from Wired: "Your Internet service provider knows where you live, and soon, it will have a way to sell your zip code to advertisers so they can target ads by neighborhood. If your local pizza joint wants to find you, they will have a new way to do that. National advertisers will be able to market directly to neighborhoods with like characteristics across the whole country using demographic data they've been gathering for decades. ... Juniper Networks, which sells routers to ISPs, plans to start selling them add-on technology from digital marketer Feeva that affixes a tag inside the HTTP header, consisting of each user's 'zip+4' — a nine-digit zipcode that offers more accuracy than five-digit codes. Juniper hopes to sell the software to ISPs starting this summer, having announced a partnership with Feeva earlier this year."
Why not? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah!
I'm tired of getting those ads in the lower right hand corner of those girls that say, "I'm hot for you!" or "I'm ready to have sex." only to see that they're several towns over. I want the sluts in my local area!
Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why not? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
They will not stop pushing. They will not stop moving forward until we all start pushing back.
I push back as much as I can. Adblock+NoScript is only the beginning but a damned good start. But that's just what individuals can do and most will not. So in addition to that, people have to start complaining to law makers and government agencies about it. I mean sure, you can identify people responsible for the excessive advertising and place roadkill on their doorstep with a note about "stop flooding me wit
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
place road-kill on their doorstep with a note about "stop flooding me with advertising"
...and then place two the next day with a sign saying "SPECIAL TWO-FOR-ONE OFFER!"
Re:Why not? (Score:5, Insightful)
"Dear Business Owner,
I noticed that you have started to advertise through my ISPs Zip+4 locality based advertising system. Unfortunately, I believe that this system is intrusive and an infringement not only on my right to privacy and anonymity, but also encroaches on the data allowance I pay for which is already prohibitively capped by my ISP.
Thanks to the government allowing the ISP a monopoly of the "last mile" of the connection, I cannot switch my ISP to one not offering this intrusive advertising scheme. I can, however, refuse to offer my business to those who make use of it.
Sincerely,
A lost customer."
Re: (Score:2)
I will take a copy of your letter, however.
Re: (Score:2)
I will take a copy of your letter, however.
Here, I'll make that copy for you:
Re: (Score:2)
Wrong question. You don't have a say in this. The right question is :"Why should private companies give up the chance to make extra money for the benefit of your privacy?".
The only real answer is: "Regulation."
Re: (Score:2)
Why should we be giving up on privacy for the benefit of marketing companies?
This is what the market is all about. The exchange of items of value and each side trying to get the most for the least.
The final decision on if you do is made when you purchase their service. You just have to decide on what has more value to you.
Who is talking about 100% privacy? (Score:3, Insightful)
Nobody expects us to have total privacy -- no such society has ever existed. However, there are certainly people who would prefer the other extreme: no privacy at all. We are no longer talking about necessary sacrifices of privacy, we are talking about excessive and deliberate efforts to erode any privacy at all.
"Also, don't label all advertisers and marketers under one blanket label please.
Some companies are actually decent and jus
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Most of modern advertising is an attempt to control your behavior -- it's applied psychology, a weak form of mind control [io9.com] designed to get you to buy stuff you do not need or want, to keep feeding the unsustainable society of consumption [wikipedia.org].
And you'd like it to be more targeted and effective? Fsck that.
Re: (Score:2)
If people would just stop abusing others for their own personal gain we wouldn't have an issue with a profile shared ubiquitously for our own benefit. I guess it's mostly a moot issue since privacy is much more attainable than expecting to be treated wit
Re: (Score:2)
Why not?
Because, presumably, you'd not opt in? As far as I know, if any company want to send you electronic adverts, you have to have opted in first - possibly when you signed the contract - or you must certainly be presented with the chance to opt out. At least that is how it works in UK, where this sort of scheme will no doubt be introduced too.
Re: (Score:2)
Really? You're given an opt-in / opt-out on every webpage you visit? I think not...
Re:Why not? (Score:4, Insightful)
We are going to block ads no matter what, so why do we care how relevant they are?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because it should be opt-in. (Score:2)
And it's easy to do that already: Just install a browser with HTML5's geolocation support, and enable it, click "yes" when something wants to know where you are.
Contrast that with your ISP injecting a header into your HTTP traffic, which should be considered a violation of Net Neutrality.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. Injecting a header can have all sorts of negative consequences.
My feelings on networks is that if I present a packet with a valid IP address corresponding to a computer accepting packets:
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
That's true of nearly any PO Box. At the same time, narrowing it down to a single PO Box really does nothing to help them since your 'location' is wherever the post office is located, which they could have figured out from the regular 5 digit zip code.
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Per http://www.usps.com/ncsc/addressservices/moveupdate/ace.htm [usps.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Without it, they'd have a hard time billing you.
FTFY. A home address sure wouldn't be necessary for Internet access via dial-up or any type of wireless data network.
Re: (Score:2)
No, it's the only way you can get mail when they don't deliver to your house. Actually, they almost would if I put a mailbox on someone else's property half a block away.
We've long ago slipped down that slope (Score:3, Insightful)
Almost every web page I visit seems to know where I live down to the town or suburb. I think we slipped down this slope a long time ago.
IPv6 might wipe that database clean effectively, but it won't take long to repopulate.
This is worse (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I seem to have a big problem with telemarketers. A big problem, like 10-15 calls a day. I changed my phone number and relaxed in the week of silence. Then I had to update my Cox billing information, and they got the new number. Not even two hours later, the telemarketers started calling again.
My point is, your ISP has (probably) been selling you down the river since you signed up, as has pretty much everyone else you've given personal information to. Magazine subscriptions, any number of websites, your ban
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually "unacceptable"? I mean, I take it you are now in the process of cancelling this service...right?
Finally, some relevant ads (Score:5, Funny)
Too bad I use Adblock.
Awesome (Score:5, Funny)
So the fake hot lesbians who want to hump me are now directly on my block? BRB, ringing on random doors holding a printout of some adult friend finder banner....
Re: (Score:2)
- A black eye by the fourth house.
- A sense of severe disappointment regarding the aesthetics of your neighbours.
Dear Vendors, Stop breaking the Internet (Score:5, Insightful)
Seriously, guys. You already f'ed up DNS beyond recognition, now you want to break http, too? Someone at Juniper needs to kick the marketers out of the engineering department.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
HTTPS ... (Score:3, Interesting)
... FTW. Let's see them munge the headers with that.
SSL (Score:3, Insightful)
Even more reason to use SSL for every site. Not like I needed another.
Re:SSL (Score:5, Informative)
SSL won't help guard against this at all. If you visit a site that embeds an advertisement, the ad provider still obtains your IP address, and they can still query participating ISPs for the postal code of the user at that address.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
That's very different than getting that information, "for free", with every request for an ad image. Adding the latency to query the ISP for the information before returning the ad would make the image load too slowly, and adding the API traffic would be pretty expensive in terms of open socket connections.
Re: (Score:2)
And its not like you can use SSL with a site that doesn't support it. And the decisions to support SSL and whether make use of the tech to serve ads would both be made by the site.
Even sites that do use SSL might not for the ad content (at the risk of making those "some content not encrypted" warnings pop up constantly)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
- Encryption
- Verification
The second one is the 'added value' the CAs provide... I'm fairly sure you can see how you can do without for most normal sites (especially considering regular HTTP does neither).
As to your ISP intercepting idea, you could implement this with by 'knowing' which sites have CA-certs and which don't... the method for this can be with a list of known keys, or simply with a special DNS record indicating 'do not accept
No (Score:3, Insightful)
I do not want this. Go away with your ever more intrusive advertising. GO AWAY!
Re: (Score:2)
Better targeted != more intrusive.
In fact, better targeted may mean *less* intrusive, as you would theoretically see higher conversion rates, and so less need to blast people in the face in order to get their attention.
Re: (Score:2)
Better targeted != more intrusive.
In fact, better targeted may mean *less* intrusive, as you would theoretically see higher conversion rates, and so less need to blast people in the face in order to get their attention.
Or, in their ever-increasing need for more More MORE profits, they will keep increasing the amount of advertising that is piled on us until we revolt violently, or become quivering masses of apathy.
Seriously, what modern business thinks beyond increasing the next quarters profits? They will keep being increasingly mercenary until they implode under their own greed.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't really know, I'm speculating here. I can tell you this much, though: they won't get any worse because of this technology. And at least they'll be better targeted.
Incidentally, I have a whole other set of privacy concerns, here, but those are unrelated to the OPs original complaint.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you misunderstand how the market works. If you don't like the service which you are purchasing, then you are the one who can go away. Either find another ISP or move to a country with decent broadband coverage and find another one there.
Location isn't as useful as buying history (Score:2)
Aside from the fact that this is already being done (maybe not to zip+4 level). Ads for things where I live aren't as relevant to me as ads from my purchasing and surfing history. The restaurants around where I live suck, I have to drive a bit of a distance to get to the few local things I find useful. So in that regard, pure location info isn't going to be a particularly good hit for me. If advertisers knew my shopping patterns, they'd do a lot better job, and it's just a matter of time until they do.
S
Well, crap like that does not fly with me (Score:5, Interesting)
While I may or may not be able to block said targeted advertising, I can guaranty that I will explicitly boycott any companies that use such services like this to target me. I do the same thing with telemarketers and those people who leave door tags on my door. If I want something, I will go find it.
If you have to have advertising... (Score:2)
If you have to have advertising, why not have advertising that is relevant?
Re: (Score:2)
I tend to agree with you on this point. While I don't like the ISP narrowing down my location by zip+4 in particular, more relevant ads would actually be a good thing for several reasons.
1. Targeted ads cost more than broadcast ads, so less are needed to achieve $x income. This makes having a website more viable with less ads. If your favorite website is covered in too many ads, go to some other website instead.
2. Ads that are relevant might actually interest me. If my local Dominos is having a $9 Lar
Re: (Score:2)
...and location makes it relevant? I guess these people donot know me very well.
Re: (Score:2)
It goes a little beyond just targeting advertising, it is a slippery slope, what next, injecting not just your zip, but your entire address into every packet, and handing that info over to whomever wants to pay for it.
Well guess what, regardless of what info you are getting from me, they are using that info for a profit, and what am I getting out of it, you can bet they are not going to drop their prices in any way from the additional revenue they are generating by selling this data.
No, the data and informa
Re: (Score:2)
Why have advertising in the first place?
Because we don't live in a fantasy world, and understand that advertising will *always* exist, particularly if people continue to insist on free-to-access content.
Make no mistake. The internet as you see it today, with free sites like Slashdot, Freshmeat, Penny Arcade, and so forth, not to mention services like gmail, are possible only because advertising make it financially feasible to offer that content. The only alternative is to lock things up behind paywalls, a
Re: (Score:2)
That's why I don't block ads for sites like Slashdot. In general, I keep adblock up all the time, but turn it off for certain sites. And Slashdot is even giving me the option to turn off advertising (probably because I only troll half the time). I don't take that option, because well, I like free things and I know advertising helps keep it that way.
Other than their associated stores, I don't know how websites could keep themselves afloat. Bandwidth costs are still too high for most sites to exist on ha
I don't turn it off, either. (Score:2)
Advertising or paywalls? (Score:2)
Advertising or paywalls aren't the only alternatives for professional media. Publishers should be able to earn income directly from the help they give their users. Slashdot already does this though Amazon affiliate links.
But just more and more are finding advertising useless because it pushes agendas in an increasingly annoying way, affiliate links still push a single vendor. Slashdot should be able get paid for hosting a helpful review, no matter where the book was bought, or even if a bad review helped
The what? (Score:2)
>Slashdot already does this though Amazon affiliate links.
The what? Didn't know they had those. I see the ads every day though.
Easily blocked by techies? (Score:4, Interesting)
This should be easily handled with a browser plugin.
For those of you saying "browse more with SSL", this is primarily going to benefit site owners with more targeted ads, who will know it doesn't work with SSL.
For those of you saying "use Adblock", that won't stop site owners from using this information for other purposes. Some sites will already have this information, particularly if you do e-commerce with them. But others may not. Do you really want midgetporn.com to know where you live?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
This should be easily handled with a browser plugin.
Except not, if this is really handled at the ISP level, then anything done by the client is pointless, you are being MITM'd, and the party you are connecting to WANTS you to be, your screwed!
This is like if the mailman inspected every letter from your mailbox and 'helpfully' added return addresses to all your letters.
re: Just go away (Score:5, Insightful)
You can yell all you want for the advertisers to "just go away", but the problem is, the collective "we" that use the Internet DEMANDED that monster, with our insistence on free services everywhere.
I don't like the ad banners a bit, but I also realize I'm grown used to the idea of visiting my choice of tech or news sites without paying monthly subscription fees. I use several free email sites, and I've got a places that host my photo collections for free and keep backups of 2GB or so of my files for free. I've got some (again free) software on my iPad that lets me send and receive unlimited SMS messages over it, using a new local phone number they assigned me. Google is willing to assign me yet another free local phone number to handle voice mail services for me, au gratis. Need a quick translation of some text from one language to another, or maybe just a conversion between units of measure? Free sites out there give you those features too. Plenty of other message forums let you share info on your favorite hobby or cheat codes and walkthroughs for your favorite games. The list goes on and on. Do you REALLY think all these things should just be done out the kindess of people's hearts, despite the ongoing expense of hosting them?
That's the way it was. (Score:5, Insightful)
Then about 1988, the marketers showed up. It's been downhill ever since.
So can humans do things for each other just to be nice? Yes, as long as those humans don't include marketing assholes.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
To be fair, the guy is correct about how the net worked back around '84. But like you say, there were FAR fewer regular users back then, and most content was plain ASCII text, suitable for transfer via dial-up modem speeds.
As you scale everything up, costs increase.
Also, I'd argue that an awful lot of those "free" services you saw on the net back in the mid 80's were FAR from free. They were simply being funded by your tax dollars or by the tuition dollars of students, since much of it was built and hoste
xkcd says it came a long time ago (Score:2)
Adblock. (Score:3, Insightful)
So location specific ads that I still won't see because I have Adblock?
I wonder when the advertising industry will figure out the current amount of advertising has well exceeded the point of diminishing returns and is making consumers go out of there way to get rid of it.
It's a price for free sites I'm willing to pay (Score:4, Insightful)
Someone has to pay the bills for running a 'free' site and that is generally advertising.
If that advertising is localised and potentially more relevant for me then I don't mind 'paying' this price. This is why even though I have the option I don't disable advertising on Slashdot.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
By contrast, I not only disable advertising on Slashdot, I remove the sidebar. Otherwise it is basically unusuable on my EEE 701.
I am not patient enough to browse the web on my 701 without AdBlock.
Frankly I don't want everyone and their mom sniffing up my ass anyway. On Firefox I use CS Lite and on Chrome Dev there is now good cookie control. Some sites are sending you off to get cookie'd by about seven different people, facebook and geeks.com are the worst offenders I visit regularly. Ads are another way o
Re: (Score:2)
And yes, I can live without ad-supported sites. If they all vanished tomorrow, they would be replaced in short order. That includes Slashdot.
So would you pay for access via subscription?
Re: (Score:2)
So would you pay for access via subscription?
I would pay for Slashdot today, right now, if moderation were unfucked. I will never pay otherwise. As far as I can tell I am in no danger of having to put out any money.
Re: (Score:2)
Responding backward to your post because I think the more important point I wanted to speak to was made first in your post.
I agree, and I also have not disabled advertising on Slashdot. I don't mind advertising. I don't even mind things like Google ads and all the information they've collected about me being used to
Here we go (Score:3, Insightful)
STORE VOICE: Hello, Mr. Yakamoto! Welcome back to the Gap.
STORE VOICE: How'd those assorted tank tops work out for you?
STORE VOICE: Come on in and see how good you look in one of our new Winter sweaters.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean "STORE VOICE (that only you can hear [usatoday.com])".
Zip+4 uniquely identifies 1E+09 entities. (Score:2, Interesting)
Does the use of Zip+4 strike anyone as a little odd? After all, it allows for 1E+09 entities, and the population of the US is only around 3E+08. Sounds like a serial number to me.
Re: (Score:2)
Your calculations are off because there are only approximately 40,000 different zipcodes in the US and there areoften more than 10,000 people in a single zipcode (mine has 50,000). Zipcode+4 [wikipedia.org] generally refers to a rather small number of people, but it can't be used as a serial number for individual by any means.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Well, Zip+4 identifies buildings, or groups of buildings... not people. Your ZIP+4 might change over the course of your life - maybe even several times.
My Zip+4 corresponds to the 4 houses on my driveway... but the post office sees ##A, ##B, ##C and ##D on my street and decides that these are clearly apartments in an apartment building. So sites that collect and distribute "public information" about me tend to start off by being completely wrong about my living arrangements.
Business Model (Score:2)
I fail to see the business model behind this. They are selling a service to ISPs, which will do DPI, and add an HTTP header to traffic, most likely coming from the ISPs own database. (Only the ISP knows where its cables are terminated.) This is done for the benefit of third party advertisers, who, at least today, are not paying the ISP for the tracking info. I suppose that the info could be encrypted, with the key available to the ad providers who subscribe to a service, and the ISP get kickbacks, but o
That's stupid... (Score:4, Informative)
FTFA as an example of what it could be used for: "For instance, HBO could partner with an ISP to verify, at the network level, that a certain user subscribes to HBO, and so should be allowed to watch its programming for free on Hulu. Users might be annoyed that they can't use a username and password to watch the channel from a computer outside their homes, but content providers will appreciate the way this system can prevent users from sharing accounts."
It would be bullsh*t if they did that. I watch Hulu BECAUSE I can't afford to subscribe to HBO. I participate in the Hulu "ad tailoring" and don't mind the ads they play because, again, I CAN'T AFFORD to have a cable bill AND a high speed internet bill. I know a lot of people are in the same situation. If they did institute that I'd probably read a lot more, that's for sure.
no good (Score:2)
The vast majority of my zip are older than me, NRA members, die-hard Republicans, less computer-savvy than my 11yo daughter, and retired from factory work. They can blast ads for "Guns and Ammo" and the latest Ford F-150 all they want - I ain't buyin'.
Advertisers (Score:2)
Do not mess with my trousers!
My ISP is wrong (Score:2)
Service goes one place, billing goes another. Guess which one they use when they sell their subscriber list? Yep. Billing. Which doesn't even happen to be in the same state.
I don't think my ISP is competent enough to do targeted ads on the zip+4 for the service address when they've got a different address that gets them money.
Ads are not the worst part (Score:2)
Targeted ads are only the beginning. Soon, I expect ISP's will be selling your surfing habits as well. Here's where this person lives. Here are the websites they visit. Here are the terms they have searched this week. Here is what they have purchased online. Etc, etc.
Everyone worries about the government having this kind of information. Meanwhile, businesses are quietly gathering this data, and will sell it to whoever wants it. All completely legal, and we are paying them to do it as well.
Re: (Score:2)
I have about two dozen choices of ISP's where I live. Guess what happens when my current one even hints of doing this.
why exactly is this a bad thing for geeks? (Score:2)
My mail box (the one by the road, in meatspace) is full of local ads for things I throw away, sometimes the amount of actual paper spam to real mail is 10:1. It's ALREADY bad. All the local grocery stores that know my address by my little card I scan in for discounts, and every little shop in town gives me paper crap.
I drag a garbage can next to my mailbox and keep it there so I can sort faster.
If this catches on, advertisers will stop targetting people with the paper spam (they pay for) without first deter
Re: (Score:2)
I see this as DROPPING the amount of paper that winds up in the round file.
What, just like email was supposed to have us use less paper?
The advertisers use every opportunity they can to crap ads everywhere. I doubt this would help reduce any other type of spam. They might even combine tracking a zip area's usage online with adapting their physical spam for that area.
Let's see how it pans out but, (Score:2)
Personally I'd prefer to see ads like these more than just the generic banner ads for god-knows-what. I think this would be a way for small businesses to really gain some advantage in the advertising market over the larger companies with massive budgets.
I've got a FEEVA (Score:2, Informative)
And the only PRESCRIPTION, is more COWBELL
Neat! (Score:2)
I hate adverts. If I am going to be annoyed by adverts it is better to be annoyed by adverts from people within punching range.
Proxy (Score:2, Informative)
good idea, but the execution will fail. (Score:2)
If it were truly used the way it should be, zip+4 ads could be actually useful - I try as much as I can to spend my money at local independent businesses, and being told about, say, a pizza place close by with online ordering would be informative. It would be like those ValPak coupons I get every so often, but (hopefully) more relevant.
The problem is, it won't be used that way. It'll be used to try and convince me that there're local hotties hungry for my junk, just waiting for me to input my credit card nu
Re:Tor plus some similar tech. (Score:4, Insightful)
Really, I guess a technical way around this is to use Tor. And for everyone to have a Tor exit node. Screw the corporations and their fucking advertising!
I agree in principle, but when advertisers piss the technical public off so much that we actually hate kiddie porn less, only then you'll see the uptake of Tor and FreeNet.
Re: (Score:2)
Y'know what? We've reached the point where I believe that kiddie porn is actually the lesser blight on society, when compared to this relentless and incessant push to monetize everything.
To hell with the downsides. The more Freenet and TOR are used, the better.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think tor will help you much.
The packets have to pass through the ISP routers on the way to anywhere.
They will modify the header of all requests, even those through tor.
Maybe an updated tor node could strip that header info out, but that would depend on at least one tor node in your chain having the right update.
Re: (Score:2)
That would be most impressive since tor encrypts all of it's traffic right up to the exit node......
I think he's suggesting that the traffic from the exit nodes would get modified. So you'd still get ads, only now they'd be the wrong ads.
Re: (Score:2)