Court Says Parents Can Block PA "Sexting" Prosecutions 383
mikesd81 writes "In the first federal appeals court opinion dealing with 'sexting,' a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled Wednesday that parents could block the prosecution of their children on child pornography charges for appearing in photographs found on some classmates' cellphones. Miller vs. Mitchell (PDF) began in 2008 when school officials in Tunkhannock, Pa., discovered seminude and nude photographs of some female students on other student's phones. George Skumanick Jr., the DA at the time, said the students and their parents could be prosecuted if they did not participate in an after-school 'education program.'
The unanimous ruling of the judges, Thomas L. Ambro, Michael A. Chagares and Walter K. Stapleton, criticized the district attorney's reliance on the girls' presence in the photographs as a basis for the potential charges. 'Appearing in a photograph provides no evidence as to whether that person possessed or transmitted the photo,' said the opinion, by Judge Ambro."
Re:IANAL, but (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Insanity (Score:4, Informative)
(* liberal meaning "free", not "leftie" though for some those two meanings are the same).
Re:Insanity (Score:3, Informative)
By "interfere" you mean "buy them condoms", right?
Re:Insanity (Score:5, Informative)
Underage sex photos should be restricted (because someone was raped)
Not all under age sex is rape. Even if you accept the legal fiction that people under a certain age are incapable of consent, the age of consent differs from the age of majority in many places. In fact, people have been prosecuted for child pornography after taking pictures of perfectly legal sex acts. Hell, in my state a few years ago a man was sent to prison for having sex with his wife who he legally married in another state.
And yet, they tell us to be fruitful and multiply. (Score:3, Informative)
That's Jewish though Christians say it too. However they add you can only multiply when granted a church license called marriage. Muslims along with some Christian sects also allow males to have more than one spouse, but females can only have one. Which is called polygyny [onelook.com] not polygamy [onelook.com]. Now if they allowed females to have more than one spouse as well as males then it would be polygamy.
Falcon
Re:a free and open attitude towards sex (Score:3, Informative)
A healthy understanding of sex includes an understanding of the risks, and the necessary precautions. What it does not involve, in any way whatsoever, is guilt. That's what you seem to be arguing for though. Correct me if I'm misunderstanding you.
Voluntary? (Score:5, Informative)
Except in OrwellWorld(TM), "obey or be prosecuted" is not "voluntary".
Not noted in the article was that Judge Ambro specifically credited Captain Obvious, Esq. for his amicus brief on this subject.
Re:Insanity (Score:5, Informative)
You presume that you will always make better choices than your children will?
Spoken like a true teenager [pbs.org].
How old are you? In almost all cases, an adult WILL make better choices than a teenager will.
I've been a teenager, and I'm the father of two former teenagers. I think I know what I'm talking about here.
That's what the judges said (Score:3, Informative)
The judges are asserting that there is a likelihood that the prosecutor was retaliating by threatening to prosecute because the Does were seeking to exercise their rights under the law. Isn't this barratry?