Microsoft's Bulk Deal With New Zealand Collapses 166
vik writes "The latest 3-year, pan-government deal that Microsoft has been establishing with the New Zealand government since 2000 has collapsed, opening the doors to the wider use of open source software in government. The NZ State Services Commission (already a prize-winning user of open source) says in a statement that it '...became apparent during discussions that a formal agreement with Microsoft is no longer appropriate.' Having lost their discount, individual government departments will now have to put their IT requirements out to tender individually."
RIP (Score:2, Insightful)
Another nail in MSs coffin?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Maybe not a nail:
SSC spokesperson Marian Mortensen says government looks for three things in its negotiations: value for money, fitness for purpose and strategic benefit.
Mortensen says open source will be "part fo [sic] the mix, definitely". However, she adds, such choices will be made by individual agencies.
There's something, anyway, but it might not be much. It's up to the individual agencies.
Re: (Score:2)
There's something, anyway, but it might not be much. It's up to the individual agencies.
You are right, however Government agencies quickly develop a sixth sense with regard to which way government policy is blowing. It is a "courageous" IT department that insists on continuing with the same spending when that department's budget is reduced and while nothing has been said about cost cutting you can be positive that the NZ Government is going to reduce all Government spending. like it or not Departments are going to have to make do with less money and when this happens you are going to see Open
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It's likely a positioning move to get steeper discounts.
What would put another nail in MS's coffin would be them calling the bluff and forcing NZ to take on quite a bit of Open source software. Once past the "OMG it's different then what we have always used" stage, it might be more then enough to the government agencies and lead to more OSS adoption.
Re: (Score:2)
What would put another nail in MS's coffin would be them calling the bluff and forcing NZ to take on quite a bit of Open source software. Once past the "OMG it's different then what we have always used" stage, it might be more then enough to the government agencies and lead to more OSS adoption.
I think that's exactly what has already happened! That seems to me to be exactly the reason why the State Services Commission has taken the position they have.
As the summary points out, the SSC has won one award already [nzosa.org.nz] from the NZ Open Source Awards; in addition, they've been using SUSE [computerworld.co.nz] (both server and desktop) since at least 2005, and in 2006 they published a guide [e.govt.nz] on using open source software in government departments. (An early version of the guide, prepared for them by a legal firm that also worked f
Re: (Score:2)
Even if it's planting a seed that will grow into a tree that will eventually become the MS coffin -- it's still a good thing.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Maybe microsoft should work on making windows more user friendly so you don't have to spend hours in the dos cli configuring irq numbers and io addresses, dealing with constant crashes and manually installing networking support just so they can get a workable graphic interface to check their mail with..
Oh wait, it's not 1993 anymore...
Linux these days is generally much easier to install than windows, and proprietary unix was always much easier than windows (because like macos, it came bundled with hardware
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
and proprietary unix was always much easier than windows
Nope. UNIX was/is much easier to maintain when setup half decent. Keeping 10 workstations running was peanuts compared to Windows. To install it you needed to know your stuff. No deceptive comfy pillow was supplied. Ever installed SunOS 4? Ever added a 3rd party SCSI disk?
Re: (Score:2)
SunOS 4 was pretty easy providing you had a sun branded cdrom to install it from, it actually used to check the vendor string of the cd and wouldn't kick other brands (i had a toshiba) into 512 byte blocksize mode... But i know what you mean about third party disks, having to manually input the cylinder information etc.
Ultrix was trivially easy, boot from cd, say yes a couple of times...
IRIX was easy, click on the "install from cd" option in the bootup gui.
All simple because they have known hardware they're
Really? (Score:2)
I booted Sun4 machines from Apple CD readers.
SCSI is SCSI after all, so you were more likely to succeed than not.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Put the Lexmark down and step away from 1998. Your 4 paragraphs detailing one area where Windows is better than Linux (and only due to market considerations, not technical considerations) is amusing but overall pointless. I've personally set up about 50 desktop linux installations for friends and family who want to use me as their "computer guy". You have a (very small) point in that you can't just pick up ANY hardware and have it work in Linux, only about 90% of it works immediately. You're completely
Re: (Score:3)
I'm in the computer repair business (sole proprietor). I'm looking into starting a company along the same lines with three colleagues, one of which is a big fan of Linux and OpenOffice, and another of which is a fan of Vista and Microsoft Office.
We have had a massive bitch of a time convincing Vista dude why we'd prefer OO for in-house use (main selling point: it's compatible with office dox and its free). We literally had to sit down for a half hour and run him through it.
Ultimately, the end user likes thi
tar.gz files? What about zip? (Score:2)
If Windows users can deal with zip files (all done by an graphic decompresser) are they really that monumentally stupid that they would not grasp that a tgz file (with the same compressed file icon) is just another kind of compressed file? (Linux will open them in the same way you open a zip file in Windows, unless you chose to use the CLI).
I think many people out there seriously underestimate the intelligence of people that are not computer specialists.
RIP M$ more shilling aand nonsense (Score:2)
out of the box bought at Staples and MediaMarkt.
The reason some stuff dosnt work is it is carp or a one-week remaindered junk line WallMart bought up.
What about asking "will it work with linux" and getting an undertaking to take it back if it dosnt.
I cant speak too highly of Brother support, and their MFC's dont cost more than a tomer cartridge. Dont use
the wrong refill inks, they need dye inks with 10%
Re:RIP (Score:4, Insightful)
Now try buying an all in one printer, a USB TV Tuner, and a Wifi USB stick. Remember-NO RESEARCH. Now go to distro foo and see if device barr you just got at Walmart works.
Having bought an overpriced prebuilt many years ago, I've been through all that and more. I still remember the five hour delay while Windows Update downloaded a 30MB bloated, shitty sound card driver over dialup because the OEM install CD didn't bother to include one. It worked on Knoppix "out of the box". Guess windows just isn't ready for the desktop.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So for windows you have to write 5 drivers to cater to every possible version someone might be using...
On Linux you can write one driver and submit it to the kernel maintainers, and providing your driver is up to snuff it will get rolled in and the kernel developers will help maintain it.
What's better, an old driver that works on a new os because that os provides tons of backwards compatibility kludges, or a driver that's been updated along with the new os?
Also, if you release your driver this way you will
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh wait, it's not 1993 anymore...
SCO now rests in the place it deserves to be. Had they done it the right way, they could have where microsoft is today! But at >$1500 a seat, they were just to greedy!
Re: (Score:2)
What if you have an unattended install, how hard is windows to install then?
About as hard as a custom spin of a Linux dostro on known compatible hardware.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
How does nLite ease the installation of Windows?
The act of using nLite to create your custom unattended install is more complex than just doing an attended install in the first place.
Unless you have someone else create your nLited disk for you, but then, you could have somebody else do the Windows install, too.
So your point is moot....
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
It depends on who's doing the slipstream.
I was able to get a fully updated, SP3 XP unattended install with DriverPacks for everything in less than an hour my first time ever working with the programs.
Doing an attended install means no million restarts due to the install disk I have only being up to SP1, not having to mess around with drivers, and not having to mess with the activation key.
If I wanted to go even further I could have set it up to autoinstall Firefox, Foxit Reader, and OpenOffice by doing a br
Re: (Score:2)
You can do pretty much the same with Linux, only there is less reason to because it already ships with a decent set of autoinstalled software and the update process isn't going to make you reboot more than once.
Doing an unattended install just means that you only have to mess with drivers and the activation key once...
But unless you're planning on installing several machines in one go, is it really worth all the extra effort? Most of the advantages you get from a slipstream install are already provided by l
Re: (Score:2)
But unless you're planning on installing several machines in one go, is it really worth all the extra effort?
This is Windows we're talking about. The amount of re-formats/re-installs for a single machine alone makes it worthwhile. :P
To be fair though, Windows doesn't have that problem to nearly the same degree that it once did. I only ever re-install XP if I'm moving to a new MB.
Re:RIP (Score:5, Interesting)
In my experience it's not so difficult to teach a person with low Windows knowledge to do the same fundamental actions in another OS, Ubuntu being my preferred alternative for these. The tasks these people do are virtually the same. What is difficult is to teach the thick headed thinks-he-knows-his-computer guy, that has learned some semi advanced tweaking and configuring in Windows, to start "all over". To me it's clear, these people push it away not because they can't, but because they thought they could and when they realise that Windows has tought them very little (since little hacking is necessary) about general OS structure and configuration. I'm saying this because the first time I really forced myself to give Linux a chance I started off, on recommendation from friends using Linux, with Slackware. As a thick headed thought-I-knew-my-computer I'd tell you one thing: I was fucking lost. This failed, that failed -- and I can tell you that from a Windows users perspective the word "sound server" was very confusing. But as I moved further and further away from the Windows concept (what I thought was how an OS was built) I began learning how OSs function in reality. Of course the hardware resources of your soundcard may only be accessable by one application, which is why you need a sound server to distribute/gather/tunnel the stream, but Windows never even hinted this very fundamental fact about hardware/software interaction. Also I have to add that this was many years ago and long before Mark Shuttleworth first spoke the word Ubuntu, nowadays the sound server example might be nullified by Ubuntu as well. But it wouldn't matter, my point is that you find it difficult because you find it difficult, not because it is difficult, if you understand what I mean. So you see there are 3 types of users, the one that knows, the one that doesn't know and last and worst the one that thinks he knows, don't be the latter, nobody likes this guy.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not only laziness. I've tried installing Linux on various PCs over the years, and out of 8-9 tries, got to the desktop only ONCE. Last try, ubuntu 8.10, gives me "snow " when it's time to launch the gnome desktop. On all those machines, XP runs perfectly.
I'm changing PCs soon, and will try once again. I'm growing afraid that, if the basic OS install gives me so many problems, I'll never get to install apps, though. I don't know if it's my skill level (I've fairly used to installin gXP, and a newbie in
Re: (Score:2)
Just out of curiosity, what type of computers do you buy?
I've installed Linux on everything from standard name-brand systems, to the most mongrel, hacked together pieces of random crap you could imagine.
I virtually _always_ get to the desktop. The only time I can remember that I didn't was when I installed Debian for the second time, after not having done it for a while, and forgot to install the package that includes the "startx" command. (I hate GUI login screens on Linux, so I didn't use any ?dm)
But tha
Re: (Score:2)
latest try was on an MSI pizza-box style PC, with an i815 IGP chipset, an oldish CPU (Celeron or via), and no extension card whatsoever: some RAM, 1 HD, 1CD drive, and that's it.
Re: (Score:2)
And this was the Ubuntu 8.10 attempt?
I've got a machine that's very similar hardware-wise to that. I'm going to try installing on it and see what happens.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You're saying that you're about to change PC equipment. Before you decide what you want google around for those pieces of hardware and make sure there are stable Linux drivers that support them.
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, most computer users don't install an OS, and end up paying for Microsoft's OS because they never knew they had a choice. That is going to be one of the last greatest walls to tumble is more Linux pre-installed on computers. I was somewhat surprised to see an EEE PC with Linux at Bes
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I can never really identify with people who say this. Enough people say it that I guess it must be true, but I still can't reconcile myself to it.
I've installed Linux a bunch of times on a bunch of different machines, exactly NONE of which were bought with Linux in mind. All of these were off the shelf, relatively random, relative mix of budget and performance hardware, some branded and some not.
Off the top of my head, I've installed any of Ubuntu, Debian, or Puppy on a 1998 Dell box (originally Win98), two
Re: (Score:2)
It is sort of laziness, but in some ways it isn't. Most people hate computers, and just want to get their work done. They learn the bear minimum, usually exact keystrokes and button pushes. They have no idea what they are doing, they just now press this button, then press return, then copy the text.
Learning a whole new system is not a small task for these people, and they have real work to do as well.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Mind you, I have to help out my Windows-using friends as well :(
You didn't hear? The best IT friend excuse was formed, it goes by: "I'm sorry man, I never learned Vista so I can't help you. :(". Seriously though it's the best excuse I've found for bailing out of those people-taking-advantage-of-your-juicy-brain situations.
Back to the topic though. I understand your argument about scattered and misleading information, but this is a self solving problem caused by the small magnitude of Linux. As Linux grows, so will this problem shrink. However there are still many detai
Re:RIP (Score:5, Insightful)
It is a lie. Repeat after me. "A Computer is NOT an appliance".
Some things are not inherently simple. A blender is simple, a toaster is simple. A telecsope is NOT simple. You have to adjust where you are pointing it and the focus, know about lenses.
Things are moving along. Compare an SLR camera from 20 years ago to a push and click digital camera of today. There are still things to learn but the simple "point and click" "appliance" camera of today is a very powerful camera.
Microsoft has done everyone a diservice by saying that a computer IS an appliance. Take any group of hardware and add $200 of Microsoft products and you will have a working system. Easy to use and secure.
Everyeone wants to do word processing, but they don't want to lean how their OS stores files...so they can't find what they saved an hour from now. Everyone wants to send email, but they don't know how to read an error message that tells them why their email could not be delivered.
Short of running a kiosk, we are not anywhere near the "appliance" stage of PC computing. Anyone saying otherwise should be swiftly kicked in the balls. Even if he is a geek with funny haircut and wears glasses.
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft has done everyone a diservice by saying that a computer IS an appliance. Take any group of hardware and add $200 of Microsoft products and you will have a working system. Easy to use and secure.
Everyeone wants to do word processing, but they don't want to lean how their OS stores files...so they can't find what they saved an hour from now. Everyone wants to send email, but they don't know how to read an error message that tells them why their email could not be delivered.
You can lament all you want, but if people want to treat their computer as an appliance, and use it as such, then they'll go to those providers that offer something at least resembling that to them. See: OS X, Windows. Most "user-friendly" Linux distros are definitely heading there, too.
Re: (Score:2)
I can treat my car the same way. Never worry about putting air in the tire or changing the oil. I will have to buy a new car every year. What matters though is I get to treat it like an appliance. Those are the same windows users that either buy a new computer every 6 to 12 months or live with 10 minute boot up t
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
From this perspective, the Asus Eee is an interesting machine. It comes bundled with a system (modified Xandros)that you can very much treat as an appliance.
In fact, "appliance computing", as we may as well call it, is the intended target market for the Eee. You use the Eee as an appliance for surfing, word processing etc. Some people may call this limited, but lets' face it, it's all a Joe Sixpack needs in a small, convenient package.
Re: (Score:2)
But Linux is great to reduce software procurement costs as a bargaining tool.
Currently there is a similar debate in Spain.
Re: (Score:2)
Linux (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Linux (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
True enough, but the global Linux community is considerably larger than Microsoft so the particular placement of that slingshot is open for debate.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure... Remember Microsoft against IBM (Goliath ended up with the sligshot soved up its ass twice), Google against Digital...
Just to name a few...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
How can people make stuff up, like this? I mean, really, HOW?
Supposing that they go with BSD. It is ALREADY standards compliant, and secure. The government need only decide which programs are necessary for their uses, and MAYBE have them tailored and tweaked for thier purposes. Nothing more than what is necessary for any MS system.
Every single step required to put that BSD system to work for the government, would be required for an "equivalent" MS system. Or, Solaris, or Linux, or whatever. You seem t
Re: (Score:2)
Training is the single expense that will probably be higher with an open source system - but that is a ONE TIME expense, which is more than offset by the money saved (ie, not sent to Redmond)
Most clerical people use a word processor, email client and web browser. They may also use a spreadsheet or presentation software. Open Source software does this now and you don't have to use a Linux distribution to run them.
Using a Linux distribution a user will use one of three graphical session managers, these being gnome, KDE and possibly Xfce although this is debatable. There are others but most distributions have an option of installing the first two by default. Once you pick a session manager you
Open Formats (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I agree that should be the number one short-term goal for governments of the world. The only problem is, what do you do about issues like OOXML, which is a standard, and which MS supports in name, but which isn't actually supported by anyone? Gaming the standards system has become too easy and corrupting standards has no penalty.
What ever happened to the good ol' days when you put up an RFC and a reference implementation and everyone tried to make sure new stuff worked with the old stuff? If there had been
Re:Open Formats (Score:4, Informative)
I agree that should be the number one short-term goal for governments of the world. The only problem is, what do you do about issues like OOXML, which is a standard, and which MS supports in name, but which isn't actually supported by anyone? Gaming the standards system has become too easy and corrupting standards has no penalty.
I know I have posted something similar like this before. However I believe it bears repeating.
The Norwegian Government, in a moment of clarity, decided to embrace open standards. From January 1 2009 all departments, institutions, schools and public sites; should deliver and accept all documents that are ODF, PDF or HTML (which ever is appropriate for the information in question). This doesn't bare those sites and institutions from putting up, or accepting, Microsoft document formats; but at everything have to be there in Open Standards first and foremost.
Re: (Score:2)
The Norwegian Government, in a moment of clarity, decided to embrace open standards. From January 1 2009 all departments, institutions, schools and public sites; should deliver and accept all documents that are ODF, PDF or HTML (which ever is appropriate for the information in question). This doesn't bare those sites and institutions from putting up, or accepting, Microsoft document formats; but at everything have to be there in Open Standards first and foremost.
You'll forgive my cynicism, I trust, but does that actually happen or is it on the statute books but neither followed nor enforced? I'd be particularly interested to know if they make a lot of things available in ODF format.
Re: (Score:2)
ODF (ISO/IEC 26300) is to be used to publish documents to which the user should be able to make changes after downloading, e.g. public forms to be filled out by the user. This format is also made obligatory.
The government's web site in English is at http://www.regjeringen.no/en.html?id=4 [regjeringen.no]
I didn't dig much, but all I could find was either html or pdf. There's a hearing document out mandating open standard formats for communication between local governments as well. And more
Re: (Score:2)
If the purchaser is actually serious about open standards, then it will reject OOXML for three reasons: (a) it is not an open standard; (b) there is no conforming implementation, even by Microsoft; (c) in spite of the bizarre stance taken by ISO, it isn't a standard of any sort since no complete specification exists, much less has been voted on by ISO. Microsoft may well be able to trot out OOXML for organizations that want to go with Microsoft and just need an excuse, but this won't work with any organiza
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting.
a) it is an open standard
b) there can be no conforming implementation because the standard has not been finalised. You can bitch about this once the standard has been released, but until then there is no way to conform
c) by the same token we should also reject ODF, since the specification is both vague and incomplete (formulas anyone?)
Re: (Score:2)
Why should I be force to fork out for MS products to work with the government?
We'll see.... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Well, just so you know, not very far from home (for me at least) there is this semi-Utopian place [wordpress.com] where people say "Windows? What's that?".
But everyone is still going to fuss because it is communist... and Linux is now being seen as a communist thing... and only Obama can change things... yes I know. It is still a ray of hope in a world of darkness. It should be worth mentioning, though, that this state elects a communist government every five years, and have the option not to and had the world's first elec
A small win, but MS has lobbyists (Score:5, Interesting)
Before you all rejoice in hallelujah glory please remember that:
1) MS is a powerful marketing organisation with a single control center. It has millions to spend on lobbying. Instead of one central purchasing order they will go after each state/county and government organisation parallely and independently.
2) To take advantage of this situation the FOSS/Open Source has NO marketing budget or marketing plan except for some backdoor geeks.
3) Lobbyists that MS hires far outmatch the abilities of what FOSS can bring up....
Let's face facts ok?
We have been a good, in fact excellent opening in a battle. The enemy has taken a big kick in its balls and is down for a few moments.
But, we lack the control center and resources of taking advantage of it.
If i were Red Hat or Ubuntu (in a corporate sense), i would be in NZ now talking to the main permanent secretaries and other pukes down there to hammer down an initial PoC for Linux/Open office.
And yes i would offer a central help center staffed by real people who can train the department's IT staff and/or assist them in installing, fixing bugs, training staff, etc all the things Microsoft will do.
And yes, i would sign a one-year contract with them offering them a FREE software with paid support.
But, as FOSS supporter do i have a centralized marketing budget, people, resources to make it happen?
NOOOO.
Its likea Sniper going against an entire armoured division. Yeah it sounds gung-ho, but that does not win a war gentlemen. We need the three C's of marketing. Command, Control and a Corporate willing to take risks and Money.
Once we have that in form of Red Hat or corporate Ubuntu we can talk about a Master Plan on taking down MS...
Until then shut up the vodka bottles. Its too early to celebrate.
Re: (Score:2)
And they'll say "Whoa, you're thinking of using what filthy hippy app? You know that it's AIR-QUOTE compatible with Office, right? All the cool counties are going to go Office - do you want to talk to them or not?"
I think all that's up for discussion is whether they actually make air-quotes, or just say it out loud.
open for business (Score:3, Informative)
And they'll say "Whoa, you're thinking of using what filthy hippy app? ...
The 1990's called, they want their talking points back. Notice that after all these years, the best MSFTers can do to counter RMS is to call him names? Can't handle any of the ideas or technologies, can they?
We've known for decades that FOSS is about making money. Some discussions which might make the point that FOSS concepts dovetail with that:
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's the problem.
That's EXACTLY the problem.
Open Source is owned by none giving it NO respect in corporate sense.
IT departments have been saying this for many years.
To be considered for real, open source must be "adopted" by a corporate entity which has the financial muscle acumen and the willingness to take risks.
This is exactly what our Company Law allows us to do: taking risks without risking our pensions!
Why hasn't anyone created a for-profit corporation which can "adopt" open source and whose charter
Re: (Score:2)
Pure FUD. There are a number of companies which will offer you support on your Open Source software, including redhate. The availability of the support contract was enough to fill your requirements. The problem now is vendor lock-in.
Re: (Score:2)
...yet none of them are on the bid in NZ. Surprising isn't it?
Visibility my friend, is the first lesson in marketing.
You gotta be out there selling yourself. You can't wait here and expect NZ to find and come to you.
I bought Diskeeper instead of the better/free/competitor products when it came to defragging my drives. Why? Marketing.
Which is why i think an iPhone is better than a Nokia E95. Even you maybe.
Why?
Re:A small win, but MS has lobbyists (Score:4, Insightful)
...yet none of them are on the bid in NZ. Surprising isn't it?
No, but not for the reasons you describe. It's called simple bribery and collusion, and it has to do with Microsoft, and big bags of money. If the corporations didn't come along with complete programs for these government pinheads to look like they were doing their jobs, they might actually have to do them.
Re: (Score:2)
That is what i was referring to by money!
MS has a unified source of income and is able to spend it on caviar and Limos for the pukes.
OSS cannot.
Oh please, you are not expecting a civil servant to put public good over his career???
Re: (Score:2)
Re:A small win, but MS has lobbyists (Score:5, Informative)
1) MS is a powerful marketing organisation with a single control center. It has millions to spend on lobbying. Instead of one central purchasing order they will go after each state/county and government organisation parallely and independently
I agree to a point: I personally don't think that Microsoft has the domain knowledge to after individual provinces or localities in New Zealand, but then I may be underestimating Microsoft's presence in NZ.
2) To take advantage of this situation the FOSS/Open Source has NO marketing budget or marketing plan except for some backdoor geeks.
Red Hat, Novell, Canonical, Mandriva, Sun, IBM, etc. all have marketing budgets. With the sole exception of IBM, none have as large a marketing budget as Microsoft, at least not by themselves.
3) Lobbyists that MS hires far outmatch the abilities of what FOSS can bring up....
There is no "open source lobbying" organization. ("FOSS" and "FLOSS" are ugly terms, IMHO). But certainly there are individual groups that, together, are extremely power, each from different angles. From the "online freedom" aspect, you have the EFF. From the "Linux is good" dept., we have The Linux Foundation. There are several organizations pushing open standards. IBM pushes open standards and open source. And there are tons of other examples. Together, these organizations outweigh Microsoft's lobbying efforts.
And there is no "we": Open source represents a bunch of diverse elements with diverse agendas. That's why open source is winning (yes, I said it: we are winning!). Many individuals and organizations with many agendas easily outweigh the one agenda and one organization, no matter how big or how much money said agenda and organization are.
Re: (Score:2)
Think about guerilla warfare. They cannot win this as long as there are enough attacks which require wasteful counter-action resources. Microsoft can't win all the time but has to. Otherwise open source gets a bridgehead. Fighting open source makes open source stronger.
Re: (Score:2)
You are basing your opinion on emotions. Facts state otherwise.
Guerilla warfare has never, ever won a regular army on regular terms.
Its a mosquito that bites a fly. Yes it can annoy the lion, but the lion eventually develops a thicker skin.
Please don't start by saying partisan warfare in Russia drew the Nazis out. Because they did't. And neither did the french. All they did was to betray jews.
Historically, regular armies have won with massive resurces.
Partisan warfare can annoy but can't compete with a r
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft fights in regular battlefields. Exclusively.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
In fact, barely anybody else that I know is familiar with linux; everybody assumes it's Microsoft as far as the eye can see - how can there be possibly something better out there if everybody still uses MS?
There was one person I tried to introduce to linux, and to my
Re: (Score:2)
There was one person I tried to introduce to linux, and to my distress the result wasn't exactly glamorous - after spending half a day figuratively breaking through brick walls with my forehead to configure PulseAudio with his 5.1 surround system
People working in government offices (or most businesses for that matter) don't have any need for technologies like these. What may present issues for consumers have little relevance to professional usage situations. Millions of people are sitting in front of vani
Re: (Score:2)
I agree to a point: I personally don't think that Microsoft has the domain knowledge to after individual provinces or localities in New Zealand, but then I may be underestimating Microsoft's presence in NZ.
Microsoft NZ is pretty strong, and knows which side its bread is buttered. They're not going away anytime soon. I presume they'll be moving their attention to the next big target: the government of the new "super-city" of Auckland, as there's a big synoecism of separate boroughs going on right now. Small by international standards, but the new city will have about a third of the country's population, so it will most certainly matter to Microsoft NZ.
Red Hat, Novell, Canonical, Mandriva, Sun, IBM, etc. all have marketing budgets. With the sole exception of IBM, none have as large a marketing budget as Microsoft, at least not by themselves.
I suspect the main reason that Red Hat, Mandriva, etc. are
Re: (Score:2)
Lets also realize that Open Source isn't the only alternative to Microsoft.
You got IBM. Yea Yea IBM is a big supporter of Open Source Software (Enough to influence the FSF to add verbiage in GPL 3 to add the commercial use exception, to its anti-TiVoization clause), However not all their products are Open Source and they may not push the open source projects for the need that New Zealand needs. Perhaps a Nice AIX, Lotus, Informix combination. Or how about Oracle solution Solaris, Oracle and Star Office (Th
Re: (Score:2)
IBM is strong on servers / mainframes. That's their bread and butter. Unfortunately, Websphere Studio Application Developer and Rational Software Architect can't be used to write the daily memos and do mathematical worksheets.
Star Office is closed. Shut down. So forget it.
Re: (Score:2)
Ever heard of partisan and guerilla warfare?
Re: (Score:2)
Ever heard of partisan warfare defeating a regular army in a regular battlefield?
Re: (Score:2)
Ever heard of partisan warfare defeating a regular army in a regular battlefield?
No but I have heard that partisan warfare rarely if ever fights on a regular battle field but they can cause so much disruption that the enemy eventually is forced to admit defeat.
Re: (Score:2)
If i were Red Hat or Ubuntu (in a corporate sense), i would be in NZ now talking to the main permanent secretaries and other pukes down there to hammer down an initial PoC for Linux/Open office.
And who's saying they're not?
If I were Red Hat, Canonical, et al, I'd do exactly the same as you suggest- go and talk to the potential customers. In fact, if I were any vendor of any software (FOSS or otherwise), I'd be down their trying to sell my wares to them, because that's what software vendors do.
Neither Linux nor OpenOffice are developed by just hobbyists and startup companies. They're both backed by a number of very large businesses, with vested interests in selling their products. They'll be sendin
We have the power of reason. (Score:2)
That eventually will beat any group of lobbyists, no matter how big.
More diverse or just trickier? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is New Zealand any where near Vancouver? (Score:2)
Re:Is New Zealand any where near Vancouver? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
They fly direct! [scoop.co.nz]
(For fourteen straight hours)
They want better deal (Score:5, Interesting)
Nothing will change though (Score:5, Insightful)
Another chance for FreeBSD (Score:2)
Everyone here only ever talks about Linux in business, but this is as much a chance for any of the BSDs to gain in government, as well. FreeBSD [freebsd.org] can be used anywhere Linux can, and also has some advantages:-
1. Potentially much simpler per-host configuration. The three files in question are /etc/rc.conf, /etc/sysctl.conf, and /boot/loader.conf. Sysvinit isn't used, and custom kernel recompilation is a lot easier than with Linux as well.
2. The ability to fully emulate the Ubuntu "user friendly," desktop;
National Radio segment about this (Score:2)
There was a bit on our National Radio programme about this today, downloadable here: http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/ntn/ntn-20090527-0908-Government_reliance_on_Microsoft.ogg [radionz.co.nz] (Vorbis, 13Mb)
It starts with an interview with the head of the NZ Open Source Society, and follows with an interview with a local Microsoft guy.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait ... hammer's don't go "bang" ... and they don't get pounded in either! Something's fishy about this post. I think we need Inspector General Taco to come take a look at this; we may need to bring in the NSA to crack this one.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait ... hammer's don't go "bang" ...
Maxwell's silver one does.
Re: (Score:2)
I pull up this story about Microsoft vs Linux and Slashdot is showing me an advert about OpenSuse from Novell. Epic Sigh
The ad is OpenSolaris for me. I win!