US Court Disconnects Canadian Domain Name Scammers 149
coondoggie writes "A US District Court today ordered a halt to the illegal practice of Canadian companies who the Federal Trade Commission said deceptively posed as domain name registrars and sent bogus bills to thousands of US small businesses and nonprofit organizations for their annual 'Website Address Listing.' The FTC said many of the businesses believed they would lose their Web site addresses unless they paid the bill, so they paid but in most cases the defendants did not provide domain registration services, did not provide the 'search optimization' services it claimed to provide, and bilked small businesses and nonprofits out of millions of dollars."
I get these all the time. (Score:1)
It would make me laugh though, they offered me their best deal of 4-6x what I am paying my current registrar.
Re: (Score:1)
Heck, most people can't even tell you who their site is hosted with. All they can tell you is who does the updates or show you what buttons they push to update their site.
This is why companies get bilk
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I can see how the uninformed masses could easily fall for it.
Re: (Score:2)
My domain is named for my DOG.
I even got a bill from a shipyard for fixing my yacht or my DOG's yacht, I dunno. I have never seen either of them.
My dog has had a couple of credit cards sent to him, in his name, pre-approved. Those are very cool novelty items.
If you have had a domain since 1995, then you have seen a lot of scammers and stupidity as well.
Frozen money! (Score:3, Interesting)
Lesson is? Don't store money in the US if you are (allegedly) committing crimes in the US.
I'm trying to get outraged but the US only affected US assets. Something within its Jurisdiction.
Re: (Score:2)
i've gotten those in the mail (Score:5, Insightful)
i really must be in the wrong business. i'm thinking about this whole "business plan" concept wrong. i'm thinking "what do people want and need and how can i give that to them better than the competition"
i should be thinking "how can i prey on stupidity and fear of authority"
Re:i've gotten those in the mail (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sad thing is, they don't even have to try as hard anymore as they used to. TV makes it too easy. Goebbels had some skills; Hannity et all are just a sworm of lowest-common-denominator shills. "Propagandist" is too good of a word for those hacks.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Law enforcement only has to get lucky once to put a criminal in prison. The criminal has to get lucky every single time to stay free. Sooner or later a serial criminal is almost certain to screw something up either through complacency or just plain bad luck.
Re:i've gotten those in the mail (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, given that a profitable amount of people believe they are communicating with Nigerian royalty
I don't know of any way of measuring the total value of Nigerian scams, but as noted in the quote, it seems that it is profitable; scammers keep playing the game, so it must be working for them to some extent.
Scambusters says $100 million to $200 million a year http://www.scambusters.org/nigerian-scams.html [scambusters.org] with no detail on the calculation.
Has anyone ever seen a serious attempt to monetarily quantify Internet-based Nigerian fraud type activity?
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
As for people falling for the "bulls***", despite what some people may think, there are still people out there who are new to the internets and the Google and can't quite wrap their brain around it all.
I know people who, despite numerous attempts to explain, can't figure out why they can access their we
Re: (Score:1)
Blame the Republicans, you accomplish both at once.
Re: (Score:2)
ordered a halt to the illegal practice (Score:2)
So basically the courts ordered someone to stop breaking the law? Yea, that's gonna change their whole attitude.
Summary is horrible. (Score:3, Informative)
Second nothings been disconnected, a US judge froze the companies US assets, a Canadian court needs to seize their Canadian assets.
This is not a case of the US trying to impose its laws on Canada again, the bogus domain name companies are committing fraud and thats illegal anywhere you go.
I don't know why this article is even on slashdot, its not news. Canadian and US authorities cooperated to catch a crook who tired to use the border to avoid getting caught. Happens all the time.
Re:Summary is horrible. (Score:4, Insightful)
So... (Score:1)
The stupidity tax really bites hard (Score:3, Insightful)
Stupidity tax rewards evil (Score:5, Insightful)
You can laugh at the people who fall for things like this and pat yourself on the back all you like, but it is wrong. It isn't helping society. It isn't weeding out the weak and stupid. It is rewarding evil.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I am suspicious that they take your money and then eat the bloated African children. Remember those licorice candies called "Nigger Babies"? Well they aren't really made from licorice!
Re:Stupidity tax rewards evil (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
What would you have me do? Y
Re: (Score:2)
Stupid people need to be responsible for their own choices, as do smart people who make stupid mistakes. However, allowing victimization to occur is a negative externality for everyone. It allows the most callous to accumulate financial power, which they may turn against our freedoms.
Therefore, it makes sense to spend resources to punish those who do it. It also makes sense to educate people in h
Try running a business (Score:5, Informative)
It's the reason large companies use purchase order systems. But for many small/medium businesses the extra overhead of purchase orders isn't worth it, and so they become vulnerable to this type of scam.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't pay mine - problem sol
NO CARRIER
Re: (Score:2)
Especially given that sending out bogus invoices is a very old scam. But apparently one which still gets enough money to make doing it worthwhile.
dollars (Score:2, Funny)
Why bother? It's probably Canadian just dollars...
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
When it happens, I am going to head down to Minneapolis, find some hookers and then pay them to fight some other hookers I picked up in Tijuana. Be able to do it all for about 12 CAD if I budget. Maybe more if the Tijuana hookers can't be revived (I had them in that freezer for quite some time and I'm not as experienced with Cryogenics as I would like - no I did not just use a deep-freeze; I know THAT doesn't
Re: (Score:2)
When it happens, I am going to head down to Minneapolis, find some hookers and then pay them to fight some other hookers I picked up in Tijuana.
Really? Look at this [international.gc.ca] then.
Over 80% of canadian exports go to the US.
How do you think canadian economy will be if US collapses?
Meanwhile <16% of what is exported from Brazil goes to the US, as you can see here [state.gov].
I guess it's more likely that brazilians would be
Re: (Score:2)
Network Solutions (Score:4, Insightful)
Great News! (Score:2, Interesting)
Canadian Companies (Score:3, Interesting)
illegal? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
An oldie but goodie (Score:3, Interesting)
Good scam. (Score:1)
Let's take a look at www.daxpub.com (Score:1, Informative)
Registrant:
namesbeyond.com
Private Private
4141 Yonge Street, Suite 204,Toronto, ON M2P
2A8
Toronto, Canada ON M2P 2A8
United States
Phone:+1.8773211356
This is some type of "Directory listing service". At my past job, they sent a bill for such things as "website hosting fees", etc.
How popular is this
Now only if they can be stopped in Canada (Score:2, Interesting)
The problem is enough people fall for this to make it profitable for them... basically like spam.
When I was working in webhosting, I don't know how different customers would call us asking about these "invoices" and if they should pay them or not... or asking why they have to pay us since they already paid them.... probably hundreds.
It always annoyed me how they could get away with it...
Same old scam (Score:2, Interesting)
Too busy for that... (Score:2, Funny)
This is yet another reason why I lie on whois (Score:2)
Yes, I know that I could pay extra to hide my domain info, but I refuse to do so. If ICANN requires me to post real information, they can fucking well require the registrar to hide that info for free. In the meanwhile, I'll keep lying, and if the feds really really care about tracking me down, they can do so with the credit card that I use to p
Bogus bills not isolated to internet stuff... (Score:4, Informative)
(Is it just me, or does "ordering a halt to an illegal practice" sound kinda stupid? Seizing US assets, extradition, and so forth, fine. Go for it. But "stop doing that illegal stuff!" doesn't sound that useful.
What about DROA Domain Registry of America (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
The biggest scam artist I've seen is the Domain Registry of America - they send out snail mail letters with impressive looking American flag logos on them with a bogus invoice-looking form to renew domains, but it's really the Internet version of slamming the domain and switching registrars. DROA needs to be shut down.
they seem to have a Canadian branch called DROC - Domain Registry of Canada - that pulls the same scam. i have seen clients receive these fake bills as far back as 2001.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:When will they ever learn? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Now, if the owners of said company ever decide to vacation in the good ole U.S. of A, then watch out...
Re:When will they ever learn? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:When will they ever learn? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:When will they ever learn? (Score:5, Interesting)
If the US asks for the Canadian gov to hand over the criminals and the Canadian gov agrees that they are in fact criminals, then they'll get shipped off and charged in the US for breaking US law.
The same can happen in reverse.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
If for whatever reason, they determine that preying on stupidity isn't a crime, then a disagreement may ensue.
I'm not stating that's what will happen, just putting it out there.
I know there have been disagreements before as to what constitutes a crime, depending on where you are at, where the action took place, and whether or not the action was physical or virtual.
If I place an advertisement in a magazine, and say "Send $5.00, and SASE to
Re: (Score:2)
If this happens then prosecution can go back to the US courts can go after the assets of the foreign entity that happen to exist in the US. So if this company happens to use Bank of America for their banking service then their BoA funds can be seized. If they used PayPal for collecting the extortion^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H payment
Re: (Score:2)
The defendants named in the FTC complaint are Data Business Solutions Inc., also doing business as Internet Listing Service Corp., ILS Corp., ILSCORP.NET, Domain Listing Service Corp., DLS Corp., and DLSCORP.NET, and its principals, Ari Balabanian, Isaac Benlolo and Kirk Mulveney.
The case listed 3 principals by name so they should be able to be held liable for the judgement in the scenarios I outlines above.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I was mentioning the fact that there could be a disagreement over whether or not a law had been broken, and whether or not the people behind it would be considered criminals by another government, and/or to what extent they would be.
By showing something of a lesser degree, yet morally/ethically corrupt form, my intent was to show that differences
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not really, it just means that most people don't care enough to show how stupid you really are.
Maybe if I decided to follow you around all day every day, as you appear to do for me, and mod you down - mark you troll for anything and everything, you'd show that way to...
All it means is you have no life, no brains and way too much time on your hands.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What happens to them after is up to you.
Re: (Score:2)
Just drop them over the falls; I'll catch them at the bottom.
Re: (Score:1)
(As a Canadian living in the U.S. I like to keep abreast of these matters in case I should ever snap and kill and bunch of people.)
Dan.
Raises a question. (Score:2)
Hmm... So in order to face a trial to determine whether they are guilty of the crime, under a system that presumes that they are innocent of the crime, they have to be declared guilty of the crime? How the blazes does that work? The court decides your guilt/non-guilt in your absen
Re: (Score:2)
It doesn't work that way. You see, they aren't determining guilt when determining to send you off to the other
Re: (Score:2)
Hint: That's the country where the courts have the final say.
Re: (Score:2)
Or sometimes then too [wikipedia.org]
Fucking fascists.
Re:When will they ever learn? (Score:5, Informative)
If they don't stop, they will be in contempt. Any assets that ever enter the US can be seized. And I suspect that Canada would be more than happy to enforce the contempt judgment.
Because the targets of the scam are in the US and the US mail is being used, the court has all the jurisdiction it needs. To check this, see the Supreme Court's decision in Asahi Metal Industries Co. (1987), holding that a foreign product manufacturer could be dragged into US court if it foresaw that its products would be used in the US. This case is even stronger -- the Canadian scammers intended their scam to reach the US.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, the US court really does have jurisdiction. Again, read Asahi Metals. The Supreme Court found that US courts had jurisdiction over a Japanese parts manufacturer. The parts manufacturer had never entered the US and had never even directly shipped to the US. It was enough that the parts manufacturer knew that another company was integrating its parts (tire valves) into products that were going to the US (tires).
The same goes for state-to-state conduct. If y
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think you should check the treaties and other international agreements between the countries involved. Often there is a system set up to to exchange cooperation in these matters. Japan in the case we the op was talking about most assuredly has one, so does Canada. It's how we were able to freeze drug assets and so one.
So no, it doesn't mean jack shit. It means what it means unless no agreements are in place which then it could mean jack shit. Remember the Australian guy who was extradited to America for b
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
...consists of the FTC, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Competition Bureau Canada, the Toronto Police Service - Fraud Squad, the Ontario Ministry of Government Services, the Ontario Provincial Police - Anti-Rackets, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and the United Kingdom's Office of Fair Trading.
A federal district court judge in Chicago, Robert M. Dow, Jr., ordered a halt to the deceptive claims and froze the defendants' assets held in the United States, pending trial.
The Commission files a complaint when it has "reason to believe" that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendant has actually violated the law. The case will be decided by the court.
Re: (Score:2)
Turns out the original ones were from canada too.. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/01/06/court_bars_canadian_domain_slammer/ [theregister.co.uk]
Re:When will they ever learn? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The amount of mail I receive from them for domains that have no connection with each other indicates that this is a very large scale operation.
~Dan
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
The Canadian courts need do nothing; by a runaway margin most slashdotters think the rulings of US courts should apply to everyone in the whole world.
Re:When will they ever learn? (Score:4, Interesting)
There is quite a bit wrong with Americans trying to impose their rulings on everyone. But that doesn't mean they're always wrong. Nor that every case where our two court systems do something like this is a an outrageous act of Americans trampling over our sovereignty.
Re: (Score:2)
While I agree with the sentiment - I do not agree with your logic. If I kill an American or steal from him in my country, it is only punishable under the laws of my country. The US courts have no jurisdiction here. Why should this be any different for the crime being committed by (presumably) Canadian subjects in Canada? What should happen is the information is passed to the Canadian law enforcement agencies and they take action if a crime has been committed under local laws.
I think that we both agree
Re: (Score:1)
See: Softwood Lumber
the US doesn't get to play Nafta victim when they've been screwing us and fighting it for years now. Either it applies to all of us or to none of us. You're not supposed to pick and choose what parts you like in a treaty and ignore the rest.
Re: (Score:2)
And if that doesn't work, we'll impound your hockey teams
dave
Re:Watch out for those Canadians! (Score:5, Funny)
That could start a war! Canada does have an army, though I think he's in Iraq at the moment.
Re: (Score:2)
dave