How the RIAA Targets Campus Copyright Violators 280
jyosim writes "The Chronicle of Higher Ed got a briefing at RIAA headquarters on how the group catches pirates. They just use LimeWire and other software that pirates use, except that they've set up scripts to search for songs, grab IP numbers, and send out notices to college officials. They claim they don't target specific colleges, though many feel that they do."
Not exactly targeting... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:How (Score:3, Insightful)
RIAA "making available" (Score:5, Insightful)
Hate Emails (Score:5, Insightful)
If you risk getting hate mail simply because you work at a certain company, perhaps it's time to look for a different job?
On the other hand, if this guy actually stuck his neck out and shared how the RIAA really finds their suckers, he'd probably get thank you letters rather than hate mail.
In either case, he probably needs to do some deep self-examination to see why he stays at this job.
IP is not an identity (Score:5, Insightful)
no capability of targeting any school? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Change LimeWire EULA now! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:IP is not an identity (Score:3, Insightful)
They will stand on the side of Hollywood, not the side of the citizens. Just like they always have.
If you P2P then use protection. (Score:1, Insightful)
Use it or dont whine about getting nailed by the RIAA,MPAA,BSA,NAACP,etc....
Re:Hate Emails (Score:1, Insightful)
In either case, he probably needs to do some deep self-examination to see why he stays at this job.
Re:Hate Emails (Score:3, Insightful)
"You're fired"
Re:If you P2P then use protection. (Score:2, Insightful)
I agree with the statement "A false sense of security is worse than no security at all."
Check this thread
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies-archive.cfm/488917.html
Bunch of disingenuousness (Score:1, Insightful)
There is some other reason they are targetting universities with this automated business. Maybe because they know students don't want to get in trouble with the administration, or because the universities are more risk-averse and less likely to fight than the commercial ISPs, which would lose business if they tried to stop piracy.
"We have no capability of targeting any school at all," said the RIAA representative, who argued that there is a large "misperception" among university administrators that individual colleges are being picked on. "Technically we can't do it. We find what we find with this process, and that's what we send to schools."
Re:Time to do a counter-sting (Score:3, Insightful)
Hint: neither file name nor first few seconds being the same will do it.
Re:If you P2P then use protection. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:If you P2P then use protection. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Maybe capitalism really does promote darwanism (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Maybe capitalism really does promote darwanism (Score:4, Insightful)
But by the same token, the larger the group, the more idiots will be in that group, and the higher the likelyhood that some of them will be exceptionally stupid.
That also follows for competence.
The larger the group, the greater the need for organization. Above a certain critical limit, the bureaucracy bogs the effectiveness down.
But I don't see how this applies to evolution.
Re:RIAA "making available" (Score:3, Insightful)
In which case, if you download the music from them (the RIAA), then it would seem (IANAL, etc.) that they couldn't possibly charge you with copyright infringement since they, the copyright holder, offered the MP3 for download. Or am I missing something?
Re:Hate Emails (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Maybe capitalism really does promote darwanism (Score:2, Insightful)
The RIAA has it good. Judges love them and rubber-stamp their motions in courts, they have the ear of the politicians, and every dime coming in is tax free, heading to their legal team's Maybach fund.
Re:Hate Emails (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:How (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:A humorous solution (Score:5, Insightful)
You are correct that the easiest way to defeat the methods they deploy is to flood them with garbage, but how is the casual user supposed to filter out the garbage without The Man doing the same?
The closest analogue I can think of would be currency. The Treasury Department changes the design every few years because it takes a while for counterfeiters to, reverse engineer, develop copy techniques, and perfect methods for mass production. By the time that's complete a new bill is in circulation.
I'm glad I don't need to worry about the RIAA... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Hate Emails (Score:3, Insightful)
I often question why people would work at companies that have questionable business practices. I assume that it is similar to the reason why I work at a company that doesn't. (a) They gave me an job offer, and (b) they consistently provide me with a paycheck.
Sadly, there are not enough jobs to go around within companies who have strong morals and upstanding business practices. It is Supply/Demand... and when the demand for employees is highest in immoral organizations, it is no wonder why people end up there.
A ray of hope is that it might be possible to teach enough young people values so that when they grow up and turn around these businesses.
Until then... we just need to keep track of people on an individual basis who have a history of making immoral decisions, and (sadly) we are doing a crappy job. I would love to see a Who's Who of corporate America that lists the cretins and jerks who lie and abuse the power they've been entrusted with.
Re:Hate Emails (Score:1, Insightful)
To answer your question- YES they should. Anybody in such a position should ask themselves every day if they are morally correct to support the law, and when the answer is no then they should stop.
Hiding behind the phrase 'just doing my job' won't remove the blame for nefarious actions- the Nazis tried those excuses at Nuremberg.
Re:Harvard anyone? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Harvard anyone? (Score:3, Insightful)
if you are going to harvard shouldn't you be smart enough not to have a family you can't afford to support? or conversely have a solid plan on how you will (where harvard is a key part of it).
if you have to hope that your future earnings are enough (as opposed to know) then maybe you shouldnt be there eh? I would have thought that anyone who is deemed worthy of going there would be intelligent enough to understand
and since i'll likely hear a retort about a comedic exageration; look at the bright side.. diploma's can double as extremely expensive toilet paper.