US Set to Use Spy Satellites on US Citizens 513
duerra writes "A plan to use U.S. spy satellites for domestic security and law-enforcement missions is moving forward after being delayed for months because of privacy and civil liberties concerns. The plan is in the final stage of completion, according to a department official who requested anonymity because the official was not authorized to speak publicly about it. While some internal agencies have had access to spy satellite imagery for purposes such as assisting after a natural disaster, this would be the first time law-enforcement would be able to obtain a warrant and request access to satellite imagery."
Re:Plain view? (Score:4, Informative)
The article only mentions it briefly, but it seems to be subject to the same plain-view laws as helicopters and airplanes.
Re:Oblig. 1984 in the UK (Score:5, Informative)
Every major city & town is already 90% covered by CCTV. You can't walk from one side of the street to the other without appearing on a CCTV system.
We're already covered.. Say cheese
Re:They've won. (Score:1, Informative)
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" This statement was used as a motto on the title page of the book "An Historical Review of the Constitution and Government of Pennsylvania" (1759) of which Richard Jackson is believed to be the primary author. It was very likely Franklin, who in the Poor Richard's Almanack of 1738 wrote a similar proverb: "Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power."
Details: http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Benjamin_Franklin [wikiquote.org]
Misquoting Ben Franklin... (Score:5, Informative)
Here it is: [franklinpapers.org]
Franklin is referring to bearing arms as an essential liberty. And he says that those who give up that essential liberty has only himself to blame for getting victimized by raiding parties.
Re:Starting now? (Score:1, Informative)
The current system has a lot of hoops to clear to do a CONUS tasking even for legitimate research purposes. So, in a sense, yes, they have been doing this, but you'd better have a damn good reason for doing so.
On the other hand, I question exactly how much utility this will provide. Given the orbits you can realistically only get data on a specific spot once or maybe twice a day, and only a few shots at that. It'll give you an idea of long-term activity that's happening out in the open, but for most time-sensitive law enforcement tasks it'll be far simpler to do traditional surveillance.
There's a reason why spysat photos are classified (Score:3, Informative)
Now what is going to happen if we start handing out eyespies to every deputy with a warrant? Poof, there goes the secret.
First Use - Field of Marijuana (Score:3, Informative)
Re:W00t. 1st post (Score:2, Informative)
Well, I am a Clinton hater. but she is out in the open; no one, especially not a gun owner, would trust her for a flat second on any 2nd amendment issues. Obama doesn't seem to be popping up in the radar on this issue.
Besides, your argument that the president doesn't have that sort of power is specious; Bush has proven over the last 7 years that the presidency is able to get away with anything without worrying about congress.