Sex.com Hijacker Captured in Mexico 252
Revvy wrote to mention that Stephen Cohen has finally been brought to justice. From the article: "Cohen, a multiple felon and longtime con man, had been on the run since before 2001, when a judge ordered him to pay a San Francisco entrepreneur for hijacking the Internet address Sex.com. In 1995, Cohen forged a letter to Internet authorities to gain control of the address, which he transformed into a highly profitable site for pornography ads. Cohen, who had been living in a Tijuana mansion, was arrested on an immigration violation by Mexican authorities and turned over to agents of the U.S. Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Marshals Service, according to Deputy Marshal Tania Tyler."
Mr. Cohen (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Mr. Cohen (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Mr. Cohen (Score:2)
Re:Mr. Cohen (Score:3, Funny)
Hmm... if I could hijack this "prisionrape.com" I may be able to make a killing, and get that mansion in Tijuana the girlfriend has been asking about...
I mean, hell, I'll be in Mexico. I'll be safe from prosecution, right?
If he's so rich .... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe he did? If they turn him in, they get the money AND brownie points with the US.
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:4, Funny)
Haven't you ever done this before?
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:2)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:2)
Looks like there are some people in the mexican government who can't be bought. (Score:5, Funny)
Vewwy Vewwy interesting.
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:5, Funny)
I think you're painting a very unfair portrait of Mexican law enforcement, here. They are far, far more reasonable than that. Typically, $100 will do fine, and they're now taking PayPal if you have web access on your cell phone - but those Mexican roaming charges make prison a serious option.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:If he's so rich .... (Score:2)
It looks like even Mexico handles immigration violations better than the US does.
The wheels of justice turn slow. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. (Score:4, Insightful)
Pure guessing.
Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. (Score:2)
IANAL, but from what I've read there is extradition as long as the crime does not have a possibility for the death penalty (since Mexico does not have or support the death penalty).
Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. (Score:2)
Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. (Score:2)
Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. (Score:2)
Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The wheels of justice turn slow. (Score:2)
Off to Federal Pound-Me-In-A$$ Prison (Score:5, Funny)
Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) (Score:5, Insightful)
How is this different than someone stealing your identity and going to the bank and withdrawing your money and the bank says what? You don't have any money anymore because we gave it to someone else? Bullshit. It is the Banks responsibility to ensure they are dealing with who they think they are dealing with and ditto for Network Solutions. As I said before, Network Solutions could have fixed the problem with a simple DNS change and that only takes a few minutes. For Network solutions to hide behind their own error and refuse to correct things until a Judge orders them to is just bullshit.
IMHO Network solutions should be held liable because it was their error.
Re:Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm pretty sure that guy gets in trouble, too. They don't just pat him on the head and send the bank teller to prison.
Re:Blame the Internet Authorities (Verisign) (Score:2)
However; until it was proven that the change was indeed illegal (all they knew back then is that the somebody else said it wasn't to be transferred), they could not (and did not) do anything.
Time for revenge... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Time for revenge... (Score:2)
Do they really need 200 points to match up for a prison mate? I was thinking one point is sufficient: "are you in the same cell?"
I mean, for this kind of match up, it really doesn't matter what the "lady" is looking for in a relationship, does it?
So is it just me... (Score:5, Funny)
INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illegals (Score:3, Interesting)
Meanwhile, a New Hampshire Sherriff is charging illegal immigrants with trespassing. Why? Every time his department finds one (and he finds himself running into a LOT of them), he finds they're not here legally and calls the INS- the INS says "sorry, we don't have time to pick them up." So they're part of a revolving door.
That revolving door runs off tax dollars. Guess what? Illegal immigrants don't pay a dime in taxes (not eve
Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg (Score:4, Funny)
Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg (Score:2)
That said, don't expect any action on this anytime soon. Bush can't come down against illegals because a lot of his heavy supporters rely on illegal workers to reap profits off of low wages, but he can't come down in favor of letting them in either, because a good chunk of the rest of his supporters are opposed to having illegals in the country at all and want stricter i
Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg (Score:2)
Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg (Score:2)
Short term it probably does cost more. However word gets out, I wouldn't be surprised if less illegals showed up in that town in a few years because they know they will be fined.
I'm not sure if this is a good plan, but I could see how it could work.
Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg (Score:2)
Uh, how do they not pay sales tax? Do they whip out their illegal-immigrant card at the supermarket and say "I'm not a citizen, please remove the sales tax from this purchase" ? Get a clue.
Meanwhile, the INS, police, court-appointed lawyers and the various bureaucrats involved COST tax dollars.
Re:INS can't be bothered to pick up arrested illeg (Score:2)
NH doesn't have a sales tax, THAT'S WHY (Score:3, Informative)
New Hampshire has no salestax, Mr. Knowit A. Dipshit.
My point is that they're doing absolutely nothing to contribute to the NH public; they pay no property, wage, or sales tax...pretty much the only way the government gets any money from you. They're not even spending the money here, they wire it home to Mexico or wh
Re:NH doesn't have a sales tax, THAT'S WHY (Score:3, Insightful)
My point is that they're doing absolutely nothing to contribute to the NH public; they pay no property, wage, or sales tax...pretty much the only way the government gets any money from you.
My point is that you're ignoring the reality here. They contribute low/under minimum wage jobs, from restaurant staff to janitorial services, (traditionally), to keep your costs down. If restaurants had to pay minimum wage, or heaven forbid a livable
is it just ME? (Score:2)
Haven't you even seen the greatest movie of all time, Convoy ? The genius part is that they use the CB as a narrative device, but I digress, Long story short guy is being chased by smoky (thats what us CBers call Johnny Law, aka CHiPs, aka Oinkey the pig, the fuzz, the cops dammit) and had to make it across the border of.... you guessed it.... Mexico.
There is even a song about this subject, the mag
What's he going to do in prison? (Score:2)
It's not like he can't run a web site from behind bars. Every prison library has computers and Internet access nowadays. I'll be surprised if he is not still raking in dough from online ventures -- overseas if not domestically.
Re:What's he going to do in prison? (Score:2)
I don't know what parallel universe you're living in. I doubt any prison in the US has Internet access.
Re:What's he going to do in prison? (Score:3, Funny)
Of course you can get internet access in prison. You just have to be creative [imdb.com] enough. [faqs.org]
Re:What's he going to do in prison? (Score:2)
He was WHAT? (Score:3, Funny)
OK, so let me get this straight: he was deport from Mexico to the United States?
I think I need to go lie down now...
Re:He was WHAT? (Score:2)
Re:He was WHAT? (Score:2, Informative)
what was it? (Score:3, Funny)
Anything having to do with a breakdown or interruption at sex.com:
"...I felt a great disturbance
5 years??? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:5 years??? (Score:2)
In the Netherlands ... (Score:3, Insightful)
I really hope they take away all his money and he gets 30 years. It's about time these criminals get what they deserve.
WTF?!!?! (Score:5, Funny)
Have I fallen into some kind of alternate universe?
If so, is it the one where Spock has a goatee, or do I get treated to Nana Visitor in tight leather pants?
Re:WTF?!!?! (Score:2)
Major slimeball story (Score:5, Interesting)
The "state of the art" in streaming video that we had in 1995-96 was basically a tiny postagestamp-sized jpeg multipart/x-mixed-replace slideshow -- which the dominant netscape browser supported perfectly, but IE no longer does -- pushed out by our "exclusive" sun sparc video server boxes.
This was hot tech and this guy Steve Cohen approached us about getting our stuff setup in Mexico for sex.com. I'm not exactly sure about all the details, but we ended up with some sort of deal where we would provide a dozen video servers + installation & support in exchange for rights to the video feeds he was going to operate with the talent in Mexico. We also paid a bundle to setup a microwave link across the US/Mexico border.
So then he turns slimy: Mr. Cohen failed to provide the promised feeds (guess he wanted to be exclusive). And he never payed for our expensive equipment either. My boss flew down there to talk things out and apparently back then Mr. Cohen was cozy with the federalis and had him thrown in jail for a few days before he could fly back out. I then get a call from El Slimeball wherein he tries to BRIBE me into a) not remotely disabling the servers since I was the admin, and b) coming to work for him in sunny Mexico (enticing me with pathetic stories of how the blowjobs flow freely from his slutty girls.)
I guess he didn't know that his techs had already locked me out, or maybe he thought I had some backdoors, but I couldn't stop him remotely; all I remember finding was some useless hostbased rlogin accounts. I also wasn't about move to mexico, and I was (*gasp*) loyal, so I declined the hefty bribe (by not giving my account info for the wire transfer).
Anyway - that's my little anecdote of the famous Steve Cohen asshole. Hope there'll be a live jailcam video feed. :)
Re:Major slimeball story (Score:2, Funny)
Hmmmm.... (Score:2)
Tiajuana mansion? (Score:2, Funny)
Good ol' Days... (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes, I know those were the 90s wild west days of the Internet, but come on? Company letterhead as a security device? I am shocked that domain highjacking wasn't far more of a problem than it was!
Re:And? (Score:5, Insightful)
The real perpetrator in this case is NSI for essentially violating their agreement with the original owner to keep his domain in his control, but you can't deny that the original owner wasn't a victim.
-Neil
Sure he was a victim. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Maybe it's time.. (Score:2)
Re:Maybe it's time.. (Score:2)
Wasn't Bender built in America's heartland - Mexico?
Re:Maybe it's time.. (Score:5, Funny)
Other benefits:
1) Access to all Mexican oil/natural resources, eliminating dependence on imported oil/resources
2) Illegal immigration from Mexico stopped
3) No more terrorist entry into Mexico
4) Increased tax base
5) Increase military - absorb existing and recruiting more - we could finally become the imperialist nation everyone accuses us of being...starting with Canada, then Central America. Cuba? Gone.
The beneifts seem limitless. I am sure there are some drawbacks, but I think they would be outweighed.
Re:Maybe it's time.. (Score:2)
Re:Maybe it's time.. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Maybe it's time.. (Score:4, Insightful)
First off, there's 31 states in Mexico, not counting the Distrito Federal. Why are you arbitrarily cutting them down to 4?
Secondly, they hate us. A good deal of them are still screaming bloody murder about the last war we had with them 160 years ago and cheer what Pancho Villa did up here. We're mutually convenient neighbors but not necessarily friends.
"Easier extradition of criminals"
Perhaps, perhaps not. Besides, the only way you're going to stop people from fleeing south to avoid extradition is to extend the US down to Tierra del Fuego.
"Better environmental laws there would help get toxic cleanup started"
First off, guess which one of us signed Kyoto. Second, a lot of their problems with toxic waste are because we put it there.
"Consistent employer laws to better protect employees"
Ignoring details like whether they'd all be "right to work" states, what makes you think Mexican labor laws will be adjusted "up" instead of US labor laws being adjusted "down?"
"Great real estate opportunities!"
Yeah, that's what they said last time. Not much prime real estate in Arizona or New Mexico, though.
MOD PARENT UP (Score:2)
Re:Double standard? (Score:2)
Re:Double standard? (Score:3, Informative)
FWIW, the Mexician government doesn't like its citizens coming up to the US any more than the US governemnt does; they are losing potiential workforce and it just looks bad for them.
Re:Double standard? (Score:2, Informative)
Unfortunately that is not true, hell, their economy depends upon the money being sent home from workers in the US.
Add to that the fact that by having so many people leave the country, it actually benefits the government further by removing a large number of lower class persons who might just vote for the other guy in the next el
Re:Double standard? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Double standard? (Score:2)
http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=16664 0&cid=13896515 [slashdot.org]
Re:Double standard? (Score:3, Informative)
You're right on the first point (they get a whole lot of money sent home), but you're wrong about the elections.
Mexico changed its election laws this summer, so it now allows absentee ballots from the US [news-journalonline.com]
Re:Double standard? (Score:4, Informative)
From the parent:
"FWIW, the Mexician government doesn't like its citizens coming up to the US any more than the US governemnt does; they are losing potiential workforce and it just looks bad for them."
Really? [cfif.org]
Re:Double standard? (Score:5, Informative)
You can also find the same document, with an english translation, distributed by a joint US/Mexican Government Commission, borderhealth.org. Does this mean that the US government is promoting illegal Mexican immigration into the US? No, and the existence of the document doesn't mean that Mexico is either, they are simply trying to protect their citizens, just as the US is.
http://www.borderhealth.org/view_article.php?id=15 0 [borderhealth.org]
Mexico Jobs Program (Score:2)
Here is a link to an article that discusses the jobs program and some of the problems that towns in Mexico are having due to loosing workers to the US.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/ 2 005/10/27/MNGQFFEGB41.DTL [sfgate.com]
Why do you think the truth is sinister? Do you have any facts to show that the Mexican government encourages illegal immigration into the US?
To me it would seem like they would be loosing th
Re:Double standard? (Score:2)
The fact that PAN managed to snag the presidency astounded everybody. Look for the PRI to win back that seat in the next election.
Re:Double standard? (Score:2)
Re:Double standard? (Score:2)
Re:Double standard? (Score:2)
You can read my response in this posting:
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=166640&cid=13 8 96062 [slashdot.org]
And by the way, did you listen to that radio interview that you are linking to? It includes an interview with a high Mexican official who basically states what I surmised; that the pamphlet is an attempt to save some of the hundreds of lives that are lost each year when Mexicans try to cross the border into the US. It is not about encouraging illegal imm
Re:Double standard? (Score:5, Insightful)
As the inimitable Mr. Boortz would say, the rich are responsible for creating prosperity, not those dirty laborers creating cheap agricultural surpluses. You need only look at their relative pay and their value to society will be made plain. And so the first seats in the lifeboat should rightfully belong to the rich. You might go so far as to say that they are entitled to them. Don't you love that word "entitled"? It's so redolent of nobility (feudal nobility, not that sticky romantic kind). I also love the word "privelege": rich people have a privileged status in our society, because they are law unto themselves (privilege: form the latin prvus, single, alone + lx, lg-, law).
Bringing the wealthy under the same laws as the rest of us is of course the ultimate double standard, because it takes so much more effort. We should expend the same effort on everybody, no matter what their ability and resources to evade are. It's cost efficient. You get many more people into prison that way. And everybody knows that the higher the number of people behind bars is, the greater your objectively measurable progress against crime is. We should not ask governments to make extra effort to bring the wealthy to account, when the result could only be fewer people in prison per dollar spent. As we've been told repeatedly, the government has too much "hard work" on its plate already.
Excuse me, was I ranting?
Sarcasm and trolling are two different things (Score:3, Insightful)
Sittin' here watchin the wheels go round and round (Score:2)
It isn't easy to draw a clear line between sarcasm and trolling. I think though the thing about trolling is that it doesn't really make a point; it's just attention seeking. I'll leave it open to people to judge whether I really believed in the point I was making.
I don't make a practice of mocking all conservatives or conservative views, but bear in mind that both ends of the political spectrum
Amen to that. (Score:2)
Re:Amen to that. (Score:2)
Re:Double standard? (Score:3, Insightful)
So, yes, Mexico may have double standards, but you're not exactly in a position to look down on them for it.
Re:Double standard? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Double standard? (Score:2)
Re:Double standard? (Score:2)
Re:Mexico uses Immigration Laws?? WTF? (Score:2)
WTF is right. But don't start barking "Liberal scum!!!111" just because you want someone else to blame.
Re:Captured in Mexico (Score:2)