CND Government Demands Widespread Tap Access 223
north_of_49 wrote to mention a Globe and Mail article stating that the Canadian government is seeking the ability to conduct surveillance on the communications of its citizenry. From the article: "The major boost in interception capacity is in proposals the government has put forward in confidential negotiations with the telecom industry as it prepares new legislation on high-tech wiretapping scheduled to be introduced next month. Government officials insist their proposals will bring Canada's laws on wiretaps -- drafted when people still attached alligator clips to telephone lines to listen in -- up to speed with new technologies. But privacy advocates fear an erosion of safeguards, and telecom companies worry the government wants them to build in a costly interception system."
Shortform of Canada (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Shortform of Canada (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Shortform of Canada (Score:2)
American "CND" == Canadian "CDN"... American "MM/DD/YY" == Canadian "DD/MM/YY"... Seems like par for the course!
EricSee your HTTP headers here [ericgiguere.com]
Re:Shortform of Canada (Score:2, Insightful)
CND? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:CND? (Score:2)
Re:CND? (Score:2)
Hurrah, Socaialism! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Hurrah, Socaialism! (Score:4, Funny)
Thank god I live in the US, where our government would never interfere with our privacy (or other) rights.
Re:Hurrah, Socaialism! (Score:2)
this: (Score:2)
utilitarianism (Score:3, Informative)
That's not socialism, it's Utilitarianism. [wikipedia.org] That which creates the most happiness.
Socialism (from Wiki):
Socialism is an ideology with the core belief that a society should exist in which popular collectives control the means of power, and therefore the means of production.
There is more defining both, but it is ess
clarification? (Score:2)
Isn't a "popular collective" just another name for a government? And so isn't a core belief that a "popular collective" should control the means of power just a basic belief that there should exist a government at all?
In which case, what distinguishes socialism from any other form of government? I certainly thought it was an enhanced attention to the good of society as a whole, and hence a decreased attention to individual rights (since the two are
Re:this: (Score:3, Interesting)
No. Not at all.
... not starving to death, healthcare, education.
Socialism says that society should try its best not to simply abandon people and let them fend for themselves. You know
You're both badly misquoting Spock, and mischaracterizing all forms of socialism as inherently individual-destroying, impersonal machines
Still puzzled... (Score:2)
Ah, I see. Thanks for the clarification. I never studied this political stuff at school -- too busy with math and science. But these goals sound very nice! May I ask, however, where "society" gets the massive resources needed for this noble mission? I mean, where does "society" get the buckets of money and labor it needs to feed everybody, see to their healthcare needs, and educate them? I take it we're assuming large numbe
Should be a fun charter challenge (Score:5, Informative)
Fortunately laws like this are only good for 5 years until a new government has to pass another exception to the charter (charter exceptions are only good for 5 years, no more, and must be passed repeatedly by all new successive governments for the law to stay on the books).
Specifically, this violates section 8 of the charter [justice.gc.ca]:
Re:Should be a fun charter challenge (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Should be a fun charter challenge (Score:2)
Re:Should be a fun charter challenge (Score:4, Informative)
Therefore, people are not being searched unreasonably, meaning this won't be challenged. Having the capacity to do something and actually doing it are two different things.
Re:Should be a fun charter challenge (Score:2, Flamebait)
Notwithstanding [universal human rights and all other laws of the country]...
We were better protected before the compromised charter was written.
Re:Should be a fun charter challenge (Score:2)
Re:Should be a fun charter challenge (Score:2)
Re:Should be a fun charter challenge (Score:2)
Re:Should be a fun charter challenge (Score:2)
Re:Should be a fun charter challenge (Score:2)
Re:Reasonable search (Score:4, Interesting)
The question is what constitutes a 'reasonable' search? That alone begs the question, "If i'm not an identified suspect as a party to a criminal act, does the government have reasonable grounds to observe me in ANY fashion?" I believe that the US courts have held that with respect to law enforcement, there must be a legitimate reason for any government entity to entangle itself within activities of a citizen's day-to-day life. Legitimate reason arises when one is a suspect of a criminal act that has been committed, or one's actions are a very clear indication that a crime is about to be committed. Downloading a file, talking on a telephone, walking in a public park, or onto a public transit system do not qualify in any sense. Therefore, any effort to observe the citizenry at large to determine if they *might* be doing something illegal, is completely unreasonable.
the real agenda (Score:3, Insightful)
The real purpose is to give the Recording Industry access to people who trade music files.
Correct.
That's civil law... (Score:2)
Privacy, Schmivacy (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Privacy, Schmivacy (Score:5, Informative)
I have one word for you: (Score:2)
Great... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Great... (Score:2)
Re:Great... (Score:2)
Re:Great... (Score:2)
Further south, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina?
Re:On a more serious note... (Score:2)
That's it (Score:5, Funny)
Re:That's it (Score:2)
*ahem...puts on movie commercial voice*
"There's nowhere to run. There's nowhere to hide. Coming to a government near you, Widespread Tap Access! In lawbooks winter 2005."
Who's going to bomb Canada anyway? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Who's going to bomb Canada anyway? (Score:2)
Thoughtcrime will be punished.
Re:Who's going to bomb Canada anyway? (Score:2)
Thoughtcrime will be punished.
WHAT?!?! You're thinking of children? You dirty paedophile! You should be put away for thinking such thoughts.
Someone give me a +5 Awesome!
Re:Who's going to bomb Canada anyway? (Score:4, Insightful)
More than likely this is the result of American pressure. Many laws up here are at least brought to the table as a direct result of American government or industry.
Canada definitely has less enemies of state than the U.S. but that doesn't make us much less at risk. Particularly because between Epcor, Hydro Québec and Hydro One, Canada supplies a *huge* amount of power to the United States, disruption of which causes a lot of panic and economic souring - token objectives of terrorists.
Re:Who's going to bomb Canada anyway? (Score:2)
Re:Who's going to bomb Canada anyway? (Score:2)
Man you actually had a cogent point working there...
Most oil isn't used to produce electrical power. Our reliance on oil stems from the need for fuel, and the byproducts of petroleum which are in, well, just about everything.
The options you are suggesting we invest in are great, but do nothing to solve the car prob
Re:Who's going to bomb Canada anyway? (Score:2)
Umm... How does Canada meddle in the affairs of oil-producing countries?
Re:Who's going to bomb Canada anyway? (Score:2)
Canada tends to meddle in the affairs of oil producing countries a) as a peace-keeper, after someone else has gone in and upheaved the local politi
Re:Who's going to bomb Canada anyway? (Score:2)
I wouldn't call the population of Saudi Arabia "impoverished".
Not at all (Score:3, Informative)
Very few others have been allowed to speak before the committee.
Re:Who's going to bomb Canada anyway? (Score:2)
Was wondering how long it would take to blame this on the U.S. As if companies and individuals in other countries could never come up with something like this on their own and would never even consider it if the U.S. wasn't pressuring them.
Re:Who's going to bomb Canada anyway? (Score:2)
This isn't about terrorism, although it is about a criminal organization: the MPAA and RIAA.
So it is American pressure bringing this law down, but it's snuck into a Copyright Act bill, C-60 I think.
The real reason isn't to fight terrorism, it's to give corporations information about private citizens so that they can sue them in
Wake up call. (Score:2)
Re:Wake up call. (Score:3, Insightful)
Bullshit. Anyone with the right information (which is freely available) and access to a university Biology lab can verify it. THOUSANDS of people.
Stop lying, you're embarassing yourself.
Re:Wake up call. (Score:2)
Thousands?
First off, in a typical MicroBio dept, there are loads of set-up for Bacteria. That is simply setting up a plate.
Growing a virus is a different matter. You need to have cell lines in which to grow it in. Worse, you need the correct cell lines as well as the info for growing them. My guess is that there are probably about 1000 in the entire world who k
Re:Wake up call. (Score:2)
You made a patently false claim abot a subject of which you're clearly ignorant
The procedure for identifying avian flu has been around for nearly 50 years.
Do you understand that?
"In America, there are probably less than 100 who have direct experience with it"
Do you understand that anyone who makes it past intro level Bio c
Re:Wake up call. (Score:2)
Re:Wake up call. (Score:2)
Let's recap stats 101:
25,000 / 250,000,00 = 0.0001, i.e. 0.01%
Sure looks like a small percentage to me.
Re:Wake up call. (Score:2)
Re:Where to now? (Score:2)
Awww, how cute. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Awww, how cute. (Score:2)
Re:Awww, how cute. (Score:2)
The Second Comment (Score:5, Insightful)
"Criminals and terrorists can easily bypass these measures using
encryption, stegonography, etc. The real purpose is to give the
Recording Industry access to people who trade music files. Anne
McLellan has been working with them on this for a couple of years. For
the sake of the greed of a few huge music corporations they're taking
up the tools of the Police State. Political surveillance is a heartbeat
away from this.You are the target. "
Nice.
Re:The Second Comment (Score:2)
Lots of police practices can be circumvented in some way (eg. wearing gloves when you kill someone, saying "no, you can't enter my house without a warrant, officer", not using the phone when setting up murder-for-hire, encyrpting their hard drive and not writing the password under the mousepad, etc etc), but some (large) percentage of the population is stupid and make it easy for cops to solve crimes (eg. see any cops TV show). What's the problem with this?
I
Re:The Second Comment (Score:2)
Double-edged sword. If they're that stupid, why does law enforcement need these new measures to begin with?
Re:The Second Comment (Score:2)
(again, I'm saying that merely arguing that something will be circumvented <50% of the time is silly... but that arguing that something is easily abused by police is good)
For instance, analog scramblers [wikipedia.org] have existed for a while, but their existance doesn't negate the usefulness of being able
Re:The Second Comment (Score:2)
Yes, some large percentage of the population is stupid, but this law is advertised as a tool to fight foreign terrorism. Foreign terrorists, by definition, are smart enough to organize themselves enough to get into another country. They do not flip open their cell-phones and say "Hey Joe, let's blow something up this weekend." Any e-mail will be either encrypted or innocuous.
As you point out, this law is obviously designed to catch the stupid or the average.
Re:The Second Comment (Score:2)
I can get any music I want through our fair-use laws. Borrow the original CD from someone (friend, relative, library) and rip it for personal use. Nobody can touch me then.
I might not be able to share the copies, but I do share my originals.
Chinese connection? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Chinese connection? (Score:2)
The nation that has the most spies in Canada is France.
WIRETAPS IN CANADA??? (Score:5, Funny)
Exactly what kind of crime do they have to deal with in Canada?
Maple Syrup Trafficing?
Re:WIRETAPS IN CANADA??? (Score:5, Funny)
Watch out. That stuff is addictive. And expensive...
Re:WIRETAPS IN CANADA??? (Score:2)
Re:WIRETAPS IN CANADA??? (Score:2, Insightful)
Have fun!
Re:WIRETAPS IN CANADA??? (Score:2)
Why not let free market decide? As in, give me the choice of watching the CBC, or FOX. Let's see what I *choose* to watch, and let the lesser watched channel die a horrible death.
But no, our government decides for us that we will watch canadian content and we will like it. Obviously it is crap since we are *Forced* to watch it, they won't let us decide what we want to watc
Re:WIRETAPS IN CANADA??? (Score:2)
Re:WIRETAPS IN CANADA??? (Score:2)
Hey, we take our maple syrup seriously, see Table 2 in Ticketable Offences Under the Farm Products Grades and Sales Act [gov.on.ca].
EricShould you truncate your feeds? [memwg.com]
Re:WIRETAPS IN CANADA??? (Score:2)
Re:WIRETAPS IN CANADA??? (Score:2)
Straining at gnats (Score:3, Informative)
For the anti-terror ops, knowing who talks to whom is important, and can lead to fairly detailed knowledge of the workings of an organization. The contents of the conversations are in many ways less important, since it takes a real idiot to spill details over the phone. They are also labor-intensive, since you have to wait a long time between calls and then work hard to decipher exactly what's said.
A wiretap could reveal that two guys are "ready to go for the big trip this weekend", leading jackbooted thugs to sweep in and prevent the crime. Later the perps claim those rifles, hip waders and fishing rods in the trunk are there because they were going camping.
Wiretaps are for old people.
There are some bigger holes in the protection of the Canadian people:
Canada has gillions of miles of uncontrolled coastline.
Canada has thousands of miles of open border with the US. And we're armed!
There is this little fad called the Internet (and encrypted communications) that reached Canada a few years back. Like in 1975.
Sir Humphrey Appleby! You're Alive! (Score:2)
Sir Humphreys! Beautiful! Who's the lucky minister to have you writing for them now??
Blockwars [blockwars.com]: free, multiplayer, head to head game.
What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander (Score:3, Interesting)
In this most democratic form of the 'Big Brother show', we would be able to hold our elected officials directly accountable. We would see what lobbyists are met, how long a lunch break they take, how ethically they shop, if they are really recycling and so on.
Re:What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gan (Score:2)
Mod up! SEE your tax dollars at work!
Watching leaders 24/7, I only have to say 1 name (Score:2)
Re:What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gan (Score:2)
WooHoo! Britney Spears vs. Pamela Anderson for president!
Canada? (Score:2)
Is that they country that officially sanctioned a talking dog puppet? Because the talking dog puppet said something that hurt their feelings?
Related Link [wikipedia.org]
I tease. :)
But seriously, I support any Draconian law that makes countries (other than the USA) even more fascist because it's, like, really funny. :D Sorry, but I *am* a misanthrope.
Or were you talking about the guy from Akira? No, that was Kaneda. Never mind.
Ed the Sock (Score:2)
Ed the Sock has been one of the funniest characters on TV for years.
As for Canadian insulting public figures it happens quite a bit. It is a regular occurance for politicians to end up on comedy shows with self mocking skits.
Is that new in Canada? (Score:5, Insightful)
Every company providing public communication has to be able to tap all traffic on demand. This not only includes fixed telephone lines, but also mobile (including location of the mobile set), Internet, etc.
The number of active taps per capita here is amongst the highest in the world. And the consumer is paying for all this, as the cost compensation given to the companies is not nearly covering the real cost of making these taps.
Furthermore, tapping is addictive. Now that the secret service has so many taps running, they start to see that it would be even better when everything is tapped and kept, so that after-the-crime analysis of data can be done as well.
Current law proposals are moving in this direction. Call records, mobile position data, Internet logs etc have to be kept longer and be made available on request.
This is of course only an intermediate step. Once this is implemented, it is found that even more information could be gained from the actual traffic, and the next requirement is to record all phone conversations and keep them for half a year. And to capture all Internet data sent to and from customers.
Worst of all is that we are part of the EU. Politicians abuse the EU for a kind of ping-pong game where they first draft up some idiotic idea, then discuss it (behind closed doors) with fellow politicians in other EU countries, a few countries implement the same idea, and then they report back in their own country that the new laws have to be passed for harmonisation within the EU.
In the first phase, any protest is waved away with "it is too early to discuss it, too early to protest, we are still drafting it and negotiating with EU partners" and then after some time (and a behind-closed-doors decision in the EU), the stance is changed to "we cannot turn this back, we are mandated by the EU to implement these laws, no need to protest because we are not making the decision".
This nearly went wrong with software patents, and now the same risk occurs with extended tapping of all telephone and internet traffic.
What amazes me most is that todays politicians are so easily being abused by terrorists.
Terrorism is achieving its goals using threat, and politicians easily play their game of threat amplification. Without having to actually perform any attacks, they move the entire free world to break down their free societies and destroy all the values they were so proud of a decade ago.
That seems like a bigger victory than blowing up some building.
The question you have to ask... (Score:4, Insightful)
The question you have to ask, is:
Why are our governments (Canadian, US, others) so terribly afraid of their citizens?
Or maybe *this* is the question you should ask... (Score:3, Insightful)
I shouldn't, but sometimes I think wistfully of the time when a political leader who treated the people with disdain ran the risk not just of early retirement, but of being hanged to the nearest tree. I wonder whether the personal risks associated with being too arrogant in an earlier era might have wonderfully cleared the p
OK lemme get this straight... (Score:2)
Wow.
Damn Republicans (Score:3, Funny)
oh wait - did you say Canada?
Yeah well (Score:3, Insightful)
Require a warrant first (Score:2)
This isn't much different from what's there now-- it's just forcing ISPs to make implementing the court order easier.
And it doesn't mean that the RCMP can just randomly wiretap your internet communications whenever they feel like it-- they still have to go see a judge first, just like if they wanted to wiretap your phone.
feudalism is not dead, then. (Score:3)
Oh goody. A judge, eh? Like how, in the old days, the bailiff would have to go see the the lord of the manor first, before he could confiscate my crop and sell my barefoot children into slavery.
This should come as no surprise.. (Score:2)
I find it insightful to consider the American motto... "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" (Which should be assumed rights everwhere and go without saying)...
Canadian "Peace, Order, and Good Government".
It's right there on our Clown coloured money! GOOD GOVERNMENT!
I will bet $1000,000 that Canadian government s
Re:Data is worthless -- How you use it is key (Score:3, Interesting)
By and large I agree with what you're saying. However, this example is somewhat lacking. You can ask neighbours all you want. They will tell you "those guys are part of a gang for sure...." but the cops already know that. Generally it's easy for the cops to figure out that guys are "up t
Re:Data is worthless -- How you use it is key (Score:2)
I guess you didn't get the memo [iastate.edu]...
Re:Time to call your MP! (Score:2)
If it'll help me keep track of the TV remote, you're damn right I do!
Re:snail mail...? (Score:2)
ETHGS NKLWE QJCCT EPVNJ WINDA
KVWNQ PIUHV UIAFM EWANV IUTRO
IUHSQ OIUWQ
Re:not that this will stop snotty American brats.. (Score:3, Informative)