Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
The Almighty Buck The Internet United States Your Rights Online

Sales Tax Refund For Tennessee Internet Access 37

Posted by timothy from the companies-stand-gain-the-most dept.
Scotty B. writes "The Tennessee Court of Appeals ruled that Internet access is not subject to sales tax. We Road Runner customers can check out the refund information page."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Sales Tax Refund For Tennessee Internet Access More

Sales Tax Refund For Tennessee Internet Access

Comments Filter:

  • Some useful forms. (Score:5, Informative)

    by bryanp ( 160522 ) on Wednesday June 02, 2004 @01:12PM (#9317235)
    The procedure to reclaim your refund per the Tennesee Dept. of Revenue [state.tn.us]

    The form on Comcast's web page to fill out and mail in. [comcast.com]

    Why yes, I do live in Nashville and have been a Comcast cable modem customer for for several years.

  • The refund does not include sales tax on equipment or installation - only access.

    Proof once again that politicians don't understand that hardware is needed if software is going to be worth anything. Boy I'm glad I live in a no-sales-tax state.
    • The refund does not include sales tax on equipment or installation - only access.

      Proof once again that politicians don't understand that hardware is needed if software is going to be worth anything. Boy I'm glad I live in a no-sales-tax state.

      We have a ridiculously high sales tax here, but no state income tax. I'd rather have the sales tax. As an aside, I do find it amusing that someone who calls himself a Marxist in his nick would gripe about taxes. (not flaming, just chuckling a bit)
      • I like PROGRESSIVE taxes. Sales tax by it's very nature is regressive. Plus- Marxism is only the start- the Hacker is much more descriptive. As in, I like to hack economic systems, come up with new and better ways to do resource distribution than the old profit motive so prevalent in both Capitalist and so-called Communist countries. It's clear to me that just as absolute power corrupts absolutely, wealth concentration creates absolute power, which corrupts absolutely. I've yet to see any country turn
        • I like PROGRESSIVE taxes. Sales tax by it's very nature is regressive.

          Understandable viewpoint. I happen to disagree with you. But that's the beauty of it - you can live in a state that chooses no sales tax and I choose to live in one of the few states without an income tax. Florida being one of the others I can name off the top of my head. They manage it by fleecing the tourists.
          • Yep- one of my other ideas is kind of like this. Free Enterprise Reservations and Charter Communes. If we had both legal in the U.S., businesses like Wal*Mart could have their Free Enterprise Reservations (No taxes, the corporation is the government, and the only requirement is that they take nothing from the outside world and process all possible waste on the reservation so that they don't pollute the outside world); and people like me would be free to form high tech communes where the only money is when
            • where all the money was kept in a barrel by the door- you take what you need to buy and you don't worry about accounting

              This works well, assuming everyone is honest. What happens when one lazy guy decides that he doesn't want to work for the commune to get his new whatever and is going to buy it outside of the commune with money from the food bucket?
              • Dishonesty should be severely punished anyway. At a minimum, exile from the commune seems fitting of the crime; but since we're talking about basically a free enterprise zone with different rules, it'd be whatever the commune charter calls for, up to and including the death penalty.

                This is pretty basic- the earliest commune rules, such as St. Benedict's Rule, all include massive punishments for dishonesty that affects the community. You didn't really think that communism started with Marx, did you?
                • The book of Acts in the Bible talks about the believers held everything in common. This is the earliest example I know of off the top of my head. Not saying there aren't earlier versions, just an example older than Marx that came to mind.

                  My issue with communes is that many are utopian societies based on the (flawed) idea that human beings are good by nature. The other extreme is being forced to be part of the commune which I also don't agree with. If people want to get together and share their things i
                  • Of course, you do realize that the Corporatist takeover of capitalism amd the formation of the WTO means that you're already a part of the largest forced commune ever attempted, right? The trappings of capitalism are just kept to keep you from noticing the fact that you've already been sold into slavery in the great corporatist takeover of the world.
                    • I would say this depends highly on the country you're in and what you have access to. There are many work from home businesses for those that have the motivation and just need the tools. Those that have the skills can invent things to sell. Ultimately, if I wanted, I could have my own substance farm with some animals for meat/dairy, use solar and wind power, dig a well, have my own septic system, etc. and live all on my own. I could also invent something or use a trade to make the cash for my "food room
                    • My experience with work at home businesses have been that the majority of them are scams of one sort or another (from multi-level marketing to schemes to sell the small businessman a bunch of software and computers he doesn't need, to outright fake companies that merely take your investment money and you never hear from them again). But you're right on skills and inventions- that's where it's at. IF you can get past the larger businesses that would rather you not horn in on their market share- and you can
                    • Yes, you're right, it will be a barebones living, at least when starting out, if you're trying to do things all on your own, but it's still a choice. I decided I like nice things like Air Conditioning, Electricity, close proximity to stores, etc. I also decided that I liked being able to actually buy things. As for getting paid what you're worth, that's based on a number of things and what you consider is worth pay. For example, I work for a small company and don't make what I'm worth in salary alone.
                    • I'd be happy to simply be compensated with the money I'd saved the companies I used to work for. Now, of course, thanks to corporatism I'm not allowed to work in private industry anymore; there are far more programmers in India who can do the same job for less compensation. I work in Government now- which I guess is a nice halfway point, but it sure would be nice if I was a permanent employee instead of a benefitless red badge contractor. Had to do that after 26 months of NOTHING and watching my hard-ear
                    • Well, here's the thing. Companies employ techies like us to save them money, otherwise they'd keep on doing the same thing. I think to ask for all the money you saved the company is asking too much. Asking for a piece is not. That piece is your salaray / contract amount. If you wanted more, that's what negotiations are for. Free market economy sets the prices though so you can't demand 1 million dollars for a simple perl script even if it does save the company 1 million dollars.
                    • Then that's where you and I differ- and that's where the basic premise of the free market falls down to me. To profit from another person's work to me is immoral to the point of being criminal; every cent of profit is a robbery from the people who do the actual work. That's why I have a problem with both corporatism and personal accumulation of wealth; to me all economic trasaction SHOULD be a zero sum game. Since it isn't, we need to provide incentives to make it so; that's what a truly progressive tax
                    • If there is no incentive of profit, where is the motivation? Let's take an example of a startup company. They need capital to get started so they come to me to invest. They take off and I make make money. They tank and I lose money. They've done all the work either way, but I've assumed risk. Let's take another example of a business. They're spending one million dollars to do a process. They find they can spend half that if they hire someone for $100,000. That person gets $100,000 and the company s
                    • If there is no incentive of profit, where is the motivation?

                      The motivation, to paraphrase Ben Franklin as he rejected the patent for his infamous stove, is to pay the world back for the great inventions by which we make our lives better. We should be honored to contribute back to the society.

                      Let's take an example of a startup company. They need capital to get started so they come to me to invest.

                      See, right there, you've made a mythical assumption- that one needs capital to create a startup company.
                    • See, right there, you've made a mythical assumption- that one needs capital to create a startup company. Money is mythical in and of itself- it has no real value besides that which the shared myth gives it.

                      Well, I agree. I work for bits of data that change numbers in my bank account so I can get this printed green stuff. Sometimes I just swipe a card and bits are transferred from my account to others. Still, most things have the value of the shared myth. Everyone needs food, water, and shelter. Those
                    • "Even during the 26 months that I was not allowed to work for private industry or government I achieved the following:"

                      You keep saying that.

                      Were you in prison for 26 months?
                    • Nope- just laid off and despite putting out 2,700 resumes during that time, jobless and forced to sell off assets to survive. It was at that point that I turned away from right wing rhetoric and gave up on the American Dream. It became quite clear to me that the only people allowed to live the American Dream are immigrants.
                    • Well, for me, I find that I like to spend my free time working with people and helping them out. This is just one of the reasons I work with a jr. high youth group. If I only had to put in 1 hour at my real job, I would have all that extra time to work with the jr. high as well as form other relationships that would be mutually beneficial.

                      It's more than just mutually beneficial- working with the kids is a net bonus for society at large, as we won't be forced to put up those kids in prison later on. To th
              • 2nd answer: communes and FEZs only work locally with a fairly homogeneous culture. We've seen what can happen in the business world with dishonest businessmen- people get taken for millions and the fines are a very small fraction of the actual ammount. Dishonesty is really no different under communism than capitalism, and in both cases justice must be swift and violent, or else the system breaks down. Your example is no different than Ken Lay raiding the pension fund of Enron. What happened there?
                • See my other response where I basically agree. My disagreement was that you were assuming the basic goodness of humankind.
                  • Which leads us back to a lack of evidence does not neccessarily imply a lack of existance. I didn't mean to make any such assumption. In fact- while I do believe in social engineering (there's the hacker portion coming back in); and providing incentives/disincentives, the whole idea is to give maximum freedom with a minimum of fuss and interferance from a centralized authority. OF COURSE some FEZs will fail, and some will succeed, and it's the ones that keep the best controls over the evil side of human
                    • Nope, it was merely a generalization of many that are pro-commune. You appear to have a well thought out idea. Keep it small and keep the evil in check
                    • In that case- I think, to paraphrase the pointy haired boss, we have consensus.

                      Yes, I think that is the key- Dorthy Day was right back when she formed the Catholic Workers that distributionism, not communism, is key. Decentralization is the logical end point- because local decisions affect friends, neighbors, and relatives rather than the faceless consumers and workers in corporatism, or the faceless workers and comrades in communism. Once the masses become faceless, you've gone beyond any reasonable siz
          • P.S. Nevada has no property tax- they fleece the tourists too through a gaming tax.
      • You do realize that communism (at least pre-Soviet) advocates the abolition of the State, correct?
      • I live in WA state, which is the same way.

        I would *rather* have an income tax and no sales tax, because state income tax is deductible from your federal income taxes, and sales tax isn't. This makes the overall tax burden for people in non-income tax states higher.

        Our Congress-critters keep proposing a bill that would allow people in states with no income tax to deduct a portion of their sales tax from their federal income tax, but it keeps going nowhere. (I believe it has bipartisan support, but only in

  • You gotta love Tennessee where the poor people have to pay most of the tax. tennesseans for fair taxation [yourtax.org] has lots of good information about how the tax code works there. here is a good example [yourtax.org].

    This relates to this post because internet access is not something that poor people can afford, i.e. this is a regressive tax cut.

    • So it is unfair that people pay around abouts the same in taxes? Sure the 100k income family has more to save than the 15k, just like their example says. And while 9.75% is getting into the higher ranges, but adding an income tax has a certain amount of stupidity. Honestly have you ever heard of a politician reducing a tax?

  • Link for BellSouth customers (Score:4, Informative)

    by Motherfucking Shit ( 636021 ) on Thursday June 03, 2004 @04:39AM (#9323690) Journal
    The link in the story points to a page at Time Warner's local (Memphis) site, twarner.com, which really only applies to RoadRunner refunds.

    If you use or have used BellSouth internet access (dialup or DSL), they have set up a site specifically to handle claims under this settlement. Go to http://blstntaxrefund.com [blstntaxrefund.com] to apply for the reimbursement.

    Does anyone know whether or not AOL is responsible for refunds, and/or how to request one?
  • info from the tennessee dept of revenue is available here [state.tn.us] but, can anyone find text of the ruling itself? that's what interests me, and google's not turning up much

Slashdot Top Deals

When the weight of the paperwork equals the weight of the plane, the plane will fly. -- Donald Douglas

Close