Take Part In The Internet Commons Congress, Mar. 24-25 19
"This means conveying some 'technical' facts about the boot process for home computers, and also some 'technical' facts about copyright law in the United States of America, and much more.
In the next few days, descriptions of various projects we need help with will go up on the ICC web sites. Right now, we need places for people to stay near the ICC site, which is in Shady Grove, Maryland. We also need at least one person who can show us a free operating system running on the Xbox, and we'd like to see a St. Ignucious-certifiable OS running on Apple hardware. We need some adepts to help with the gavel-to-gavel audio coverage. We are going to need folks to write to their Representatives and Senators, and more, visit with them and talk with them. If you want to help, write to jays@panix.com, and include the string 'ICC Volunteer' in the subject line." Here's NYFU's page on the gathering.
Are we confusing politics and commerce? (Score:5, Interesting)
Looking at this Call to General Assembly, I find myself pondering exactly what NYFU is trying to be. Is it based upon a political view of overreaching and naive governmental officials, and if so, is this limited to Internet issues? Are they espousing a belief in the technical superiority of open source over closed source software and, if so, what relevance is the "Bio-Medical Cartel" and similar hyperbolic language? Are they objecting to the substance of SCO's IP claims, with some broader conspiracy theory involving Microsoft? If their answer is "all of the above," I think they are being counterproductive. Each of these views is certainly worth discussing, but they seem to have little relationship among them beyond the fact that some technology professionals hold them as true.
For myself, as an attorney and law professor [tourolaw.edu] interested in issues of technology rights and risks, I am turned off by the exaggeration and mix of issues presented in this Call. I also believe that NYFU is doing both itself and its cause(s) a profound disservice by presenting its ideas as a conspiratorialist rant filled with references to "tyrannical governments", "barratry and red-baiting" and cartels and oligopolies.
What do the rest of you think? {Professor Jonathan}
Re:Are we confusing politics and commerce? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Are we confusing politics and commerce? (Score:5, Insightful)
Saying that they should be dealt with as separate subjects is like saying that the founding fathers should have held separate conferences for each of the amendments in the Bill of Rights:
"Well, I can see how a well regulated militia might be necessary, but we shouldn't muddy that with the issue of the soveriegn quartering soldiers in our houses".
Re:Are we confusing politics and commerce? (Score:1)
Since the public
Re:Are we confusing politics and commerce? (Score:1)
We would love to have you come down to Shady Grove next week on the 24th and the 25th to talk with us about your doubts as to the strict accuracy of all our claims. Today you and I can boot a free OS on a computer we paid money to take out of CompUSA. No one one will say us nay, not by law, and not by electronics, and not by any interaction of law and electronics. Admittedly, we both know Aproned Masters who would help us, else perhaps we'd not succeed in this paradigm of private ownership
Re:Are we confusing politics and commerce? (Score:1)
Re:Are we confusing politics and commerce? (Score:2)
Regarding the rhetoric, all of these groups tread a little bit on the side of radicalism - they overstate their side in order to make a point. I chalk this up to the maxim "openers aren't closers."
Unfortunately I have a number of other things to be doing on those two days, or else I would go.
-
And this is impressive how? (Score:2)
Legislators and public opinion aren't swayed by such.
Re:And this is impressive how? (Score:1)
I invite you to really take a look at the list of folks that have signed on for panels and then decide if this is really a flash event. See the press release at http://www.nyfairuse.org/icc/media1.xhtml [nyfairuse.org]
FYI- we are already in planning for next year and congress 2005.
-Brett Wynkoop [wynn.com]
Working member of NYFU [nyfairuse.org]
At least two problems in the announcement alone... (Score:1)
#2 What's a 'technical' fact? Are these facts or not? A 'technical' fact sounds like something Comic Book Guy would pop in to point out. "Well technically Spider-man is a mutant, but not the same as the X-Men." WTF?
C
Woah I live like 5 minutes away (Score:3, Informative)
We should have a geek get together. I have lived 5 minutes away for most of my life and not one thing has ever happened there cause its just a small satelite campus with a handful of majors.
Easy directions: points North West I70 to I270, get off at Shady Grove heading South and continue 3 miles till you see a sign for the campus after crossing Darnestown Rd.
points South, North-East, I95 to I495 to I270 get off at Shady Grove heading South and continue 3 miles till you see a sign for the campus after crossing Darnestown Rd.
Re:Woah I live like 5 minutes away (Score:2)
Historical off air recordings (Score:1)
fair use
Historical off air recordings
for...
March
at
http://listserv.loc.gov/listarch/arsclist.html [loc.gov]
http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/byform/mailing-lis
ICC Icecast info (Score:1)
Check this page [nyfairuse.org] on conference day for a list of icecast servers. In the mean time you can test your player on one of the below streams.