D-Squared Can Resume Pop-Ups, For Now 67
linuxwrangler writes "According to this SF Gate article, U.S. District Judge Andre Davis said there was insufficient evidence for him to grant a preliminary injunction preventing D-Squared from using Microsoft's messenger service to send pop-up ads to Windows users. D-Squared used the Windows messenger service to pop-up ads as often as every 10 minutes. The ads promoted its product -- software to stop 'these unwanted and illegal pop-up messages forever with the click of a button' - a practice the FTC called 'high-tech extortion.'"
Is the Judge saying.... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Is the Judge saying.... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Is the Judge saying.... (Score:2)
Damned If You Do... (Score:5, Insightful)
OK. Let's all read this. Now this is either true or untrue. Let's take a look.
Option 1: the statement is true. That means that pop-ups are illegal, and hence the company is knowingly and willfuly violating the law. If this is the situation, they are in trouble.
Option 2: the statement is false. That means that pop-ups are NOT illegal. Hence the company is lying to extort money through practicing false advertising (along with probably being in violation of some of those new anti-spam laws).
Seems to me they have managed to write themselves into a corner. Now if we add to that some of the other charges that we might be able to make stick, they're in deeeeeeeeeeeeep trouble. Let's see what else we can come up with, shall we?
Of course, spamming the spammer (and their lawyer) with these pop-up messages might finally do it. Am I the only one who thinks that someone who's stupid enough to do this in the first place probably isn't using their own software?
Re:Damned If You Do... (Score:1)
Re:Damned If You Do... (Score:1)
Re:Damned If You Do... (Score:1, Funny)
No, ads infinitum are just what we don't want!
Re:Damned If You Do... (Score:4, Insightful)
He just said that he didn't have enough evidence to issue a preliminary injunction.
The only time these should be issued is if there is immediate, severe, and irrevocable harm being caused by an action, and the judge feels that the harm-causer is unlikely to win their court case.
I'd say this is pretty reasonable. The idea is to keep law from becoming someone's subjective opinion -- the court is where the real arguments will be heard. Preliminary injunctions are emergency actions, not to be taken in every case.
Re:Damned If You Do... (Score:1)
Basically, the judge is enforcing a bit of the
Re:Damned If You Do... (Score:1)
your not forcing the computer to display the message, since users can easily turn it of. now, i agree that its immoral because most users dont know how to turn them of, but if it would be illegal, could you not make the same argument for most IM? after all, if i contact somebody on ICQ, their computer will p
Penal code 502 (Score:2)
Re:Excluded middle... (Score:2)
If they make the assertion believing it to be false, then they're guilty of fraud even if by some odd chance the statement turns out to be true. For instance, some people who take a quack cancer cure will just happen to go into spontaneous remission, but that doesn't get the quack off the hook.
from the got-firebird dept? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:from the got-firebird dept? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:from the got-firebird dept? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:from the got-firebird dept? (Score:1, Offtopic)
I have an idea (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I have an idea (Score:1)
Stop that popup in 10 easy steps clicks for free. (Score:5, Informative)
2. Settings
3. Control Panel.
4. Administrative Tools.
5. Services.
6. Messenger
7. Change Startup Type to "Manual"
8. Stop.
9. Apply.
10. OK.
Re:Stop that popup in 10 easy steps clicks for fre (Score:1, Insightful)
"The snapin below, reference in this document has been restricted by policy. Contact your administrator for details. Services."
Any suggestions?
Re:Stop that popup in 10 easy steps clicks for fre (Score:3, Funny)
-
Re:Stop that popup in 10 easy steps clicks for fre (Score:1)
If the problem can be eliminated through a Control Panel setting, charging for software to stop it sounds like consumer fraud to me.
Of course, as a Unix person, just about everything associated with MS Windows seems like that to me. :)
Re:Stop that popup in 10 easy steps clicks for fre (Score:2)
Your instructions are correct, but I'd note that getting spam Messenger pop-ups is an indication that the recipient either doesn't have, or has incorectly configured, his firewall.
Since not having a firewall opens you to many other abuses than just Messenger popups, better advice to affected users might be to get the free Kerio Personal Firewall [kerio.com], or another firewall product.
Getting a firewall and not disabling the Messenger Service also allows the se
I disagree (Score:2)
Getting a firewall and not disabling the Messenger Service also allows the several other Windows services that use Messenger for reporting to the end-user to continue to make those reports.
I can't agree.
I've found the "personal firewall" to be one of the biggest disasters in recent memory. It has essentially
Re:I disagree (Score:2)
ZoneAlarm has a free version (for non-commercial use), as does Kerio (Personal Firewall).
Requiring a firewall is *always* a sign that you are either using broken software or you have misconfigured your software.
No, it's a sign that you are a realist. Whatever patches you download for windows, theres still the RPC ports open, and when know the trouble they've caused recently.
In addition to this, what if the user opens an attachment that just happens to be a trojan that captures the
Re:I disagree (Score:2)
No. Most Microsoft server software is broken WRT to security and should not be used. RPC should not be active. [www.hsc.fr]
In addition to this, what if the user opens an attachment that just happens to be a trojan that captures their every key-stroke (including their personal banking passwords and/or credit card no's), connects to the internet and se
Re:I disagree (Score:2)
No, it allows them to continue ignoring them in greater safety.
In a normal system, any servers you have running should (a) support authentication and (b) not allow remote attacks inward. I never use firewalls for my small networks, because it's entirely unnecessary. If I manage to mask a security problem by slapping up a firewall, all that means is that I now have a security vulnerability that can be exploited if someone ma
Re:I disagree (Score:2)
The whole piece of software isn't bug free. The only thing I'm concerned about is the auth system (generally a relatively small, simple piece of code) being bug free.
It's not an issue if your FTP server has an exploit based on LISTing files if it correctly ignores all input until a valid password is entered, and its handling of that password does not have bugs.
So a firewall is justifiable because knowledgable admins of a managed network "may not h
"Broken" (Score:1)
Requiring a firewall is *always* a sign that you are either using broken software or ...
Is there any non-broken operating system distribution? Windows is broken out of the box because it allows remote attacks inward. Linux distributions are also broken because SANE lacks a driver for Microtek Scanmaker 4850 scanners.
Re:"Broken" (Score:2)
Re:I disagree (Score:1)
Re:Stop that popup in 10 easy steps clicks for fre (Score:2)
Re:Stop that popup in 10 easy steps clicks for fre (Score:1)
Re:Stop that popup in 10 easy steps clicks for fre (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Stop that popup in 10 easy steps clicks for fre (Score:2)
How Sad (Score:1, Flamebait)
Why not? (Score:1)
Of course you would need to know what you are fighting for, hopefully its to free yourselves from the oppression of people who try to exploit, extort you physically, mentally and virtually like these spammers, junk mailers, Bush, big corps that have no morals, and lawyers that support
I'm WAY OT, but sick of this. (Score:1)
The US basically had a fake election ending up with a fake president. Its time the US citizens start making themselves the country they want, especially when your democratic process breaks down like it did back in your 2000 elections.
I call bullshit. Florida was so fscking close that statistically it could have gone either way. There were legal deadlines to meet, and SOMEBODY had to make a decisio
Re:Why not? (Score:1)
How long before viruses are corporate? (Score:3, Insightful)
D-Squared is basically sending a series of packets to a specific port on the user's machine that is causing code to be ran, right?
What about the latest list of RPC virii? Don't they do exactly the same thing? Sure, the code that D-Squared is causing to be executed was written by MS and the code that the virii run are written by their respective authors - but the two are essentially the same.
How long before the courts allow virus authors to write antivirii and advertise them in the virus itself?
Re:How long before viruses are corporate? (Score:2)
Why do people put up with it? (Score:3, Interesting)
D-Squared used the Windows messenger service to pop-up ads as often as every 10 minutes. The ads promoted its product -- software to stop 'these unwanted and illegal pop-up messages forever with the click of a button'
That's the funniest thing I've seen in a while.
Perhaps I don't get out enough.
Sometimes it amazes me what windows users will put up with to stay on the microsoft plantation. Messenger pop-ups ... Web popups ... Spyware ... Gator ... Browsers that you can't trust to accurately represent a URL ... Programs that crash at random (or even regular) intervals...
I'm sure there are lots of other everyday annoyances, since I don't have to deal with them anymore, they just don't come to mind.
I was speaking with a fellow at work today and he was complaing about having to reload his windows box yet again because of stability issues. Why do people continue to just suck it up and deal with this crap? I guess I just don't understand why even people who know about the alternatives and are completely capable of dealing with the change continue to be so willing to submit. My wife is one of those. I've told her flat out that google and her own wits are the only tech support she has anymore. Fortunately for her, she knows enough to be able to figure things out on her own and can navigate DOS better than most, but I just plain refuse to be an enabler with this annoying pile of warm cow patties that is windows.
Re:Why do people put up with it? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Why do people put up with it? (Score:1)
Re:Why do people put up with it? (Score:3, Funny)
Sometimes it amazes me what windows users will put up with to stay on the microsoft plantation...
Seriously, of all the "problems" you listed the only one that is vaguely Microsoft's fault is the messenger one. The rest can be avoided by a little common sense like actually reading what you're clicking 'yes' to. Using a browser like Mozilla or even one of hundreds of popup blockers. Installing regular
A morsel for the troll (Score:3, Interesting)
The financial stake (Score:1)
Not according to my nieces and nefews (ages 2-14)
They're not in high school or college yet. Once they get into high school, they will begin to be pressured into playing video games that their peers are playing and that are available for Windows but not for Linux. Haven't the 6 to 8 year olds begun to ask for Reader Rabbit and the like?
or it may reflect an idealogical, financial, or personal stake you have in Windows vs. other alternatives.
The financial stake is a big one. Home users often don't wa
Re:Why do people put up with it? (Score:1)
Re:Why do people put up with it? (Score:1)
Why some people still use Windows (Score:3, Informative)
* Familiarity. Just as most people aren't willing to learn a new (possibly significantly superior) control interface to their car, most people don't want to relearn an interface to their computer.
* Software availability. Lots of custom and vertical-market software and games are only available for Windows.
* Lock-in. Microsoft is actively making it unpleasant to switch from their software.
Re:Why do people put up with it? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Why do people put up with it? (Score:2, Insightful)
Maybe they like all their hardware to run out the box and not have to spend hours compiling software and configuring their PC? Maybe they like to have drivers at all for some of their hardware?
Maybe they like to play PC games without spending hours compiling software and configuring their PC?
Maybe they like to come home from work after programming/compiling and do some casual browsing and play a couple of games without having to spend ages at home what they have been
Re:Why do people put up with it? (Score:1)
Like Mozilla? You're right. That's why I use Opera.
Try this one in Mozilla:
http://www.mozilla.com%00@www.opera.com/index.h
(I can't href it, slash strips the bug bit out)
Re:URL Problem Doesn't Exist? (Score:1)
The URL encoded like this into tag should mask the portion after %00 so you are led to believe you're going to a differnt server. At least according to a CERT advisory I got a few days back. I don't have any Mozilla based browsers to test it out, though.
They don't even know enough to fix windows... (Score:2)
Do you really expect people to use an alternate OS or browser when half the XP problems you listed can be solved with a few minutes of effort and common sense, yet they don't do that?
The messanger service can be turned off with a few simple clicks. Most spyware and popups can be easily defeated with adaware or spybot. Most viruses can be reduced by common sense on what you open/click on and running an up to date virus scanner. Gator can be dealt with by not installing it.
I do helpdesk at a college, and
Re:They don't even know enough to fix windows... (Score:1)